Graycap23 said: Ifsixwuz9 said: I don't think so for the simple fact that she is trying to renegotiate the pre-nup. So I don't think she's entitled to half based on that. And it doesn't look like there was a fidelity clause in the pre-nup. The mere FACT that she wants 2 change the prenup tells me what her TRUE motives are 4 getting married in the 1st place. hmmm... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Ifsixwuz9 said: SCNDLS said: It ain't no MORE than what is coming to you in most of these cases. The LAW entitles her to half of the marital assets. That's what is coming to her. It would be the same if he wasn't a billionaire. And if there's a fidelity clause she's gonna get more. If you don't like the law change it or stay single, but that's what she's rightfully entitled to. I don't think so for the simple fact that she is trying to renegotiate the pre-nup. So I don't think she's entitled to half based on that. And it doesn't look like there was a fidelity clause in the pre-nup. All of that is speculation. We don't KNOW she's trying to do that or if HE is offering to, if that's even happening. But we can somewhat estimate what she's entitled to by law. She'd get a truckload of money for bouncing right now, prenup or not, according to the law. For instance, they recently built a $39 million home. Guess what, that's half for her. And that's just ONE asset. She gon' get paid regardless. He stupid. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
The press conference is cancelled due to unforseen circumstances. Been gone for a minute, now I'm back with the jump off | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Graycap23 said: Ifsixwuz9 said: I don't think so for the simple fact that she is trying to renegotiate the pre-nup. So I don't think she's entitled to half based on that. And it doesn't look like there was a fidelity clause in the pre-nup. The mere FACT that she wants 2 change the prenup tells me what her TRUE motives are 4 getting married in the 1st place. That is not a FACT. You don't know SHE is trying to change the prenup. That sounds like an offer from HIM to keep from unassing half his shit. Besides, I don't think you can alter a prenup anyway. You have to create a POST-nuptial agreement which replaces the prenup. [Edited 12/3/09 10:22am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JackieBlue said: Ifsixwuz9 said: See that's my thing. If you are so borken-harted and blah, blah, blah just walk don't look back, don't ask for shit. Get an allowance for the kids work out a visitation schedule and be out. You reveal yourself to be a gold digger when you start demanding more than what is coming to you. I agree but when people are angry they do things to hurt their spouses and this is usually the only way. Burning his clothes isn't enough. Maybe over time she would feel differently. A one night stand, maybe. A single mistress who knows her place and stays in the shadows? Perhaps. But multiple chicks... a hostess, a reality show wannabe contestant? 31 months? She bore him two kids and may have have been loyal through whatever else is going on in their marriage unrelatd to these events. People are going to label her a gold digger regardless so might as well get extra for the pain and suffering. I think the "angry" was used up when she tried to putt his head down their driveway. If the guy hadn't ducked or ran she could be looking at an attempted murder or manslaughter charge. Yes, 31 months is a long time. But then again like I said if you are so hurt, walk, give him your ass to kiss and let him sort out his publicity issues alone. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I'll play it first and tell you what it is later. -Miles Davis- | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SCNDLS said: Graycap23 said: The mere FACT that she wants 2 change the prenup tells me what her TRUE motives are 4 getting married in the 1st place. That is not a FACT. You don't know SHE is trying to change the prenup. That sounds like an offer from HIM to keep from unassing half his shit. Besides, I don't think you can alter a prenup anyway. You have to create a POST-nuptial agreement which replaces the prenup. [Edited 12/3/09 10:22am] This is a fact: if she was all that, he would not have this drama 2day. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Graycap23 said: Ifsixwuz9 said: I don't think so for the simple fact that she is trying to renegotiate the pre-nup. So I don't think she's entitled to half based on that. And it doesn't look like there was a fidelity clause in the pre-nup. The mere FACT that she wants 2 change the prenup tells me what her TRUE motives are 4 getting married in the 1st place. Ding-ding-ding. Exactly. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I'll play it first and tell you what it is later. -Miles Davis- | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Graycap23 said: SCNDLS said: That is not a FACT. You don't know SHE is trying to change the prenup. That sounds like an offer from HIM to keep from unassing half his shit. Besides, I don't think you can alter a prenup anyway. You have to create a POST-nuptial agreement which replaces the prenup. [Edited 12/3/09 10:22am] This is a fact: if she was all that, he would not have this drama 2day. Huh? How is him cheating dependent on her being "all that?" All what? Good in bed? Explain that one. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SCNDLS said: Graycap23 said: This is a fact: if she was all that, he would not have this drama 2day. Huh? How is him cheating dependent on her being "all that?" All what? Good in bed? Explain that one. that's what I'm wondering. And even if I take his side as a sleazy man, she could be all that, but he's Tiger Woods and he could be with a different woman who's all that about every ten minutes if he wanted to. My Legacy
http://prince.org/msg/8/192731 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Ifsixwuz9 said: JackieBlue said: I agree but when people are angry they do things to hurt their spouses and this is usually the only way. Burning his clothes isn't enough. Maybe over time she would feel differently. A one night stand, maybe. A single mistress who knows her place and stays in the shadows? Perhaps. But multiple chicks... a hostess, a reality show wannabe contestant? 31 months? She bore him two kids and may have have been loyal through whatever else is going on in their marriage unrelatd to these events. People are going to label her a gold digger regardless so might as well get extra for the pain and suffering. I think the "angry" was used up when she tried to putt his head down their driveway. If the guy hadn't ducked or ran she could be looking at an attempted murder or manslaughter charge. Yes, 31 months is a long time. But then again like I said if you are so hurt, walk, give him your ass to kiss and let him sort out his publicity issues alone. The anger of betrayal isn't something that just gets used up or that one gets over easily. And who knows, more stuff could have been uncovered since then. We really don't know what's been going on between them aside from what's spilled out. He made his decisions, she's making hers. Been gone for a minute, now I'm back with the jump off | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SCNDLS said: Graycap23 said: This is a fact: if she was all that, he would not have this drama 2day. Huh? How is him cheating dependent on her being "all that?" All what? Good in bed? Explain that one. I think this refers to Tiger telling one of the hoes he wasn't happy in the marriage. Now a lot of people use this as an excuse to step out on their significant others, but Tiger has no game, no rap... at all. So I think the guy was just not as into Elin as he started out when he idiotically married her gold diggin' ass. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I'll play it first and tell you what it is later. -Miles Davis- | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Has anyone ever read the supposedly controversial article on him from 1997? The author thinks he could see this day coming.
http://www.esquire.com/fe...story-1997 Been gone for a minute, now I'm back with the jump off | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Ifsixwuz9 said: SCNDLS said: Huh? How is him cheating dependent on her being "all that?" All what? Good in bed? Explain that one. I think this refers to Tiger telling one of the hoes he wasn't happy in the marriage. Now a lot of people use this as an excuse to step out on their significant others, but Tiger has no game, no rap... at all. So I think the guy was just not as into Elin as he started out when he idiotically married her gold diggin' ass. I ain't saying the heffa didn't have sand under her nails and a shovel in her shoe, but really, ANY woman that married him or any other rich celeb/athlete is called a gold digger. She was a nanny but apparently she met his requirements for wifey. So whose fault is that? IMO there's no reason for anyone that rich and famous to get married in their 20s. It's just not conducive for fidelity. Makes no sense. And if you're not happy, leave. Easy peasy. [Edited 12/3/09 10:39am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Identity said: I see Tiger's marital headaches as a temporary setback. In a strange way, perhaps the tabloid sensationalism surrounding his marriage has humanized him by revealing that he's a talented person and a serial womanizer.
Elin is going to stay with him, and the myriad of hos are going to fade into the background. Most will be almost be forgotten once he returns in 2010, warts and all. [Edited 12/3/09 9:51am] No it will not. Today's information technology definitely makes it impossible for people to forget about celebrity scandals. If they can remember Michael Jackson, OJ Simpson, President Bill Clinton, & Rev. John Hagee, they will remember Tiger Woods and his sins. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SCNDLS said: Ifsixwuz9 said: I think this refers to Tiger telling one of the hoes he wasn't happy in the marriage. Now a lot of people use this as an excuse to step out on their significant others, but Tiger has no game, no rap... at all. So I think the guy was just not as into Elin as he started out when he idiotically married her gold diggin' ass. I ain't saying the heffa didn't have sand under her nails and a shovel in her shoe, but really, ANY woman that married him or any other rich celeb/athlete is called a gold digger. She was a nanny but apparently she met his requirements for wifey. So whose fault is that? IMO there's no reason for anyone that rich and famous to get married in their 20s. It's just not conducive for fidelity. Makes no sense. And if you're not happy, leave. Easy peasy. [Edited 12/3/09 10:39am] Especially a man. Didn't his good friend Charles tell him that? Been gone for a minute, now I'm back with the jump off | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Graycap23 said: SCNDLS said: That is not a FACT. You don't know SHE is trying to change the prenup. That sounds like an offer from HIM to keep from unassing half his shit. Besides, I don't think you can alter a prenup anyway. You have to create a POST-nuptial agreement which replaces the prenup. [Edited 12/3/09 10:22am] This is a fact: if she was all that, he would not have this drama 2day. You don't know that. You can't blame a woman for her husband going out and cheating. If a woman isn't satisfying her man, and he wants to go outside the marriage, he needs to put that on the table. Any man with guts would. But men who go sneaking around and cheating are pieces of shit and totally gutless. No exceptions. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JackieBlue said: SCNDLS said: I ain't saying the heffa didn't have sand under her nails and a shovel in her shoe, but really, ANY woman that married him or any other rich celeb/athlete is called a gold digger. She was a nanny but apparently she met his requirements for wifey. So whose fault is that? IMO there's no reason for anyone that rich and famous to get married in their 20s. It's just not conducive for fidelity. Makes no sense. And if you're not happy, leave. Easy peasy. [Edited 12/3/09 10:39am] Especially a man. Didn't his good friend Charles tell him that? And he oughta know. He hasn't lived in the same state with his wife for over 10 years. Perfect example of a wife that shoulda left years ago. Instead she stays married to his ignant ass and has to deal with him being arrested for a DUI with a hoe in his car and telling the officer she gives the best blowjobs, last year. [Edited 12/3/09 11:09am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SCNDLS said: JackieBlue said: Especially a man. Didn't his good friend Charles tell him that? And he oughta know. He hasn't lived in the same state with his wife for over 10 years. Perfect example of a wife that shoulda left years ago. Instead she stays married to his ignant ass and has to deal with him being arrested for a DUI with a hoe in his car and telling the officer she gives the best blowjobs. You mean to tell me Charles is still married??? Been gone for a minute, now I'm back with the jump off | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
TonyVanDam said: Identity said: I see Tiger's marital headaches as a temporary setback. In a strange way, perhaps the tabloid sensationalism surrounding his marriage has humanized him by revealing that he's a talented person and a serial womanizer.
Elin is going to stay with him, and the myriad of hos are going to fade into the background. Most will be almost be forgotten once he returns in 2010, warts and all. [Edited 12/3/09 9:51am] No it will not. Today's information technology definitely makes it impossible for people to forget about celebrity scandals. If they can remember Michael Jackson, OJ Simpson, President Bill Clinton, & Rev. John Hagee, they will remember Tiger Woods and his sins. MJ, OJ were accused of serious crimes, but the public gets over cheating (even if they don't forget). People love Bill Clinton--if they loved him before, that is! Morgan Freeman's incident seems to have completely blown over. People aren't talking about Letterman anymore either. My Legacy
http://prince.org/msg/8/192731 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JackieBlue said: SCNDLS said: And he oughta know. He hasn't lived in the same state with his wife for over 10 years. Perfect example of a wife that shoulda left years ago. Instead she stays married to his ignant ass and has to deal with him being arrested for a DUI with a hoe in his car and telling the officer she gives the best blowjobs. You mean to tell me Charles is still married??? YES, for 20 years! She and his daughter have lived in Houston since he played for the Rockets. But he moved to Phoenix years ago. He's married to a Viking bitch too. [Edited 12/3/09 11:20am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
NDRU said: TonyVanDam said: No it will not. Today's information technology definitely makes it impossible for people to forget about celebrity scandals. If they can remember Michael Jackson, OJ Simpson, President Bill Clinton, & Rev. John Hagee, they will remember Tiger Woods and his sins. MJ, OJ were accused of serious crimes, but the public gets over cheating (even if they don't forget). People love Bill Clinton--if they loved him before, that is! Morgan Freeman's incident seems to have completely blown over. People aren't talking about Letterman anymore either. But there is still sites like YouTube & Dailymotion where people can research the past as often as possible. This is what I meant. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SCNDLS said: Graycap23 said: This is a fact: if she was all that, he would not have this drama 2day. Huh? How is him cheating dependent on her being "all that?" All what? Good in bed? Explain that one. Cause for some reason it always comes back to blaming the woman. The Most Important Thing In Life Is Sincerity....Once You Can Fake That, You Can Fake Anything. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SCNDLS said: JackieBlue said: You mean to tell me Charles is still married??? YES, for 20 years! She and his daughter have lived in Houston since he played for the Rockets. But he moved to Phoenix years ago. [Edited 12/3/09 11:18am] Charles cheated on his wife many times. He even dated Madonna once behind his wife's back! And after all of that, she is still marry to him. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
TonyVanDam said: NDRU said: MJ, OJ were accused of serious crimes, but the public gets over cheating (even if they don't forget). People love Bill Clinton--if they loved him before, that is! Morgan Freeman's incident seems to have completely blown over. People aren't talking about Letterman anymore either. But there is still sites like YouTube & Dailymotion where people can research the past as often as possible. This is what I meant. you are right, the scandals won't ever really be forgotten, but I think these people get past them partly because there's safety in numbers. Seems like everyone has some kind of scandal associated with them! My Legacy
http://prince.org/msg/8/192731 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JackieBlue said: Has anyone ever read the supposedly controversial article on him from 1997? The author thinks he could see this day coming.
http://www.esquire.com/fe...story-1997 Tigger is realy stoopid and socially retarded. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SCNDLS said: JackieBlue said: You mean to tell me Charles is still married??? YES, for 20 years! She and his daughter have lived in Houston since he played for the Rockets. But he moved to Phoenix years ago. He's married to a Viking bitch too. I thought they finally got divorced. More power to her for putting up with his shenanigans. I always felt sorry for his daughter tho. Been gone for a minute, now I'm back with the jump off | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
RodeoSchro said: Graycap23 said: This is a fact: if she was all that, he would not have this drama 2day. You don't know that. You can't blame a woman for her husband going out and cheating. If a woman isn't satisfying her man, and he wants to go outside the marriage, he needs to put that on the table. Any man with guts would. But men who go sneaking around and cheating are pieces of shit and totally gutless. No exceptions. Frankly.....Tiger deserves what he gets. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SCNDLS said: Graycap23 said: This is a fact: if she was all that, he would not have this drama 2day. Huh? How is him cheating dependent on her being "all that?" All what? Good in bed? Explain that one. Don't need 2. The golf club explains it ALL! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
take the kids, take the money and bounce!
dear dumbass sugar daddy, I iz waiting for you! luv, silly (yet opportunistic) ho | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
"we make our heroes in America only to destroy them" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |