2freaky4church1 said: Britney sells more records than Prince, so that means Britney is better? Hey, I'm using your logic.
A lot of artists sold more records than Prince. And Lady Gaga's debut sold more than Prince's debut! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
TonyVanDam said: SCNDLS said: Huh??? You DID say "Tyler Perry is successfully reaching out to people that Spike Lee & Dr. Bill Cosby has overlooked and/or disregarded for the last 30+ years." So, my question, since you OBVIOUSLY missed it, is: Do you REALLY believe that NEITHER Cosby or Spike reached all of those people you listed? And are you saying in your other post that the only way to reach those people is by making a "hood" film? My, my, how white of you. What exactly is a hood film? And what about those movies from the 70s some of which we discussed in this thread that Bill was involved in? Who do you think went to see Uptown Saturday Night? If that ain't a hood movie I obviously don't know what is. You can't be serious. 1. Since you didn't get the memo, I'm a very single black man. 2. Uptown Saturday Night was directed by actor/film maker Sidney Poitier. I know you're black, that was tongue in cheek. Because that's the typical attitude of white film execs, "Just give 'em 'hood films' cuz that's all they'll go see anyways." Bill was still in it. You're the one who brought Bill up in the first place regarding his work. So why are you now pointing out he's not a director? Then why'd you bring him up??? And what about the rest of my post: So, my question, since you OBVIOUSLY missed it, is: Do you REALLY believe that NEITHER Cosby or Spike reached all of those people you listed? And are you saying in your other post that the only way to reach those people is by making a "hood" film? My, my, how white of you. What exactly is a hood film? You're not a linear thinker are you. [Edited 10/28/09 16:17pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
2elijah said: missfee said: I hardly call Spike receiving money from celebrities to finance one of the best movies in history as "begging". Even Spike felt sympathtic towards the ones who did give money by shedding some tears about it on the "In the Actor's Studio" show on Bravo when he was being interviewed by James Lipton. I think you are being way too harsh. If it wasn't for the celebrities chipping in with the money (and why not?) we wouldn't have even seen the movie on the big screen. Just comes to show what type of movies Hollywood really wants its audience to see. Duh. [Edited 10/28/09 4:02am] You don't have to agree with me, misfee, and that is okay, but I stand by my statement. I am sure Spike was grateful for the funds he received for his previous films, and I appreciate that he was able to complete them. Let's not forget, Spike is pretty harsh when criticizing other directors/filmmakers, and although I appreciate and respect Spike and his creativity and success of a few of his films, I don't have to always agree with his criticism of other filmmakers/directors. Point is, all the ones he criticized, were the same ones that backed up his films. However, I do agree with Spike when he makes his point about Hollywood moguls who don't invest in certain types of films by Black filmmakers/directors, especially when he feels that Hollywooe would back a film with a quickness, that displays negative Black stereotypes, i.e, Blacks in roles as drug addicts, drug dealers, criminals, prostitutes, housekeepers, illiterate characters, etc., before they back a film which has Blacks in positive roles. My point about Spike with a begging cup, was not to be taken literally, it was only to make the point that if you want to have total control of your own sh*t, then build yourself that empire where you can control your own sh*t, and don't have to always look for investors to push your product. It's fine if he does not like the type of characters Tyler has in his film, but early in Tyler's career, he was playing to a specific audience that could relate to those characters. Now he is on top of his game, and although I don't like some of Tyler's characters in his tv shows or films, mainly because it reminds me of roles that Blacks were only allowed to play back in the day, but I've seen about two of Tyler's films that I was impressed with, and I have this feeling that after watching the two films that I actually liked, I have the feeling tat Tyler will go further into making movies, past the "chitlin" circuit. Maybe in the beginning of a filmmaker's career, I can understand where you may need financial help, but Spike's been in this business for a long time now. Tyler just got here, and Tyler own's his own studio, movie set and controls his own sh*t, not to mention can give financial backing to other filmmakers. . okay can we just agree to disagree then??? I will forever love and miss you...my sweet Prince. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
missfee said: 2elijah said: You don't have to agree with me, misfee, and that is okay, but I stand by my statement. I am sure Spike was grateful for the funds he received for his previous films, and I appreciate that he was able to complete them. Let's not forget, Spike is pretty harsh when criticizing other directors/filmmakers, and although I appreciate and respect Spike and his creativity and success of a few of his films, I don't have to always agree with his criticism of other filmmakers/directors. Point is, all the ones he criticized, were the same ones that backed up his films. However, I do agree with Spike when he makes his point about Hollywood moguls who don't invest in certain types of films by Black filmmakers/directors, especially when he feels that Hollywooe would back a film with a quickness, that displays negative Black stereotypes, i.e, Blacks in roles as drug addicts, drug dealers, criminals, prostitutes, housekeepers, illiterate characters, etc., before they back a film which has Blacks in positive roles. My point about Spike with a begging cup, was not to be taken literally, it was only to make the point that if you want to have total control of your own sh*t, then build yourself that empire where you can control your own sh*t, and don't have to always look for investors to push your product. It's fine if he does not like the type of characters Tyler has in his film, but early in Tyler's career, he was playing to a specific audience that could relate to those characters. Now he is on top of his game, and although I don't like some of Tyler's characters in his tv shows or films, mainly because it reminds me of roles that Blacks were only allowed to play back in the day, but I've seen about two of Tyler's films that I was impressed with, and I have this feeling that after watching the two films that I actually liked, I have the feeling tat Tyler will go further into making movies, past the "chitlin" circuit. Maybe in the beginning of a filmmaker's career, I can understand where you may need financial help, but Spike's been in this business for a long time now. Tyler just got here, and Tyler own's his own studio, movie set and controls his own sh*t, not to mention can give financial backing to other filmmakers. . okay can we just agree to disagree then??? Absolutely, no problem, and by the way... I love your signature line. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SCNDLS said: TonyVanDam said: 1. Since you didn't get the memo, I'm a very single black man. 2. Uptown Saturday Night was directed by actor/film maker Sidney Poitier. I know you're black, that was tongue in cheek. Because that's the typical attitude of white film execs, "Just give 'em 'hood films' cuz that's all they'll go see anyways." Bill was still in it. You're the one who brought Bill up in the first place regarding his work. So why are you now pointing out he's not a director? Then why'd you bring him up??? And what about the rest of my post: So, my question, since you OBVIOUSLY missed it, is: Do you REALLY believe that NEITHER Cosby or Spike reached all of those people you listed? And are you saying in your other post that the only way to reach those people is by making a "hood" film? My, my, how white of you. What exactly is a hood film? You're not a linear thinker are you. [Edited 10/28/09 16:17pm] Cosby? Hardly. Yes, I missed The Cosby Show as much as the next person (especially the first 3 seasons). But lets be dead honest, a real-life family like THAT TV sitcom family neither existed in the hood. See where I'm getting at?!? Spike? Here and there. Yes, he did with Clockers & He Got Game. But that's it. Both were serious dramas, NOT comedies. But at least He Got Game was very entertaining. Clockers wasn't entertaining. And also, Spike made Clockers was more in the case of talk at black folks than to black folks (a mistake that Tyler Perry would never had done with any of his films). | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
2elijah said: missfee said: okay can we just agree to disagree then??? Absolutely, no problem, and by the way... I love your signature line. Thanks I will forever love and miss you...my sweet Prince. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
TonyVanDam said: SCNDLS said: I know you're black, that was tongue in cheek. Because that's the typical attitude of white film execs, "Just give 'em 'hood films' cuz that's all they'll go see anyways." Bill was still in it. You're the one who brought Bill up in the first place regarding his work. So why are you now pointing out he's not a director? Then why'd you bring him up??? And what about the rest of my post: So, my question, since you OBVIOUSLY missed it, is: Do you REALLY believe that NEITHER Cosby or Spike reached all of those people you listed? And are you saying in your other post that the only way to reach those people is by making a "hood" film? My, my, how white of you. What exactly is a hood film? You're not a linear thinker are you. [Edited 10/28/09 16:17pm] Cosby? Hardly. Yes, I missed The Cosby Show as much as the next person (especially the first 3 seasons). But lets be dead honest, a real-life family like THAT TV sitcom family neither existed in the hood. See where I'm getting at?!? Spike? Here and there. Yes, he did with Clockers & He Got Game. But that's it. Both were serious dramas, NOT comedies. But at least He Got Game was very entertaining. Clockers wasn't entertaining. And also, Spike made Clockers was more in the case of talk at black folks than to black folks (a mistake that Tyler Perry would never had done with any of his films). I loved Clockers!!! Hated the "25th Hour" too long and too boring. [Edited 10/28/09 18:34pm] I will forever love and miss you...my sweet Prince. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SCNDLS said: TonyVanDam said: 1. Since you didn't get the memo, I'm a very single black man. 2. Uptown Saturday Night was directed by actor/film maker Sidney Poitier. I know you're black, that was tongue in cheek. Because that's the typical attitude of white film execs, "Just give 'em 'hood films' cuz that's all they'll go see anyways." Bill was still in it. You're the one who brought Bill up in the first place regarding his work. So why are you now pointing out he's not a director? Then why'd you bring him up??? And what about the rest of my post: So, my question, since you OBVIOUSLY missed it, is: Do you REALLY believe that NEITHER Cosby or Spike reached all of those people you listed? And are you saying in your other post that the only way to reach those people is by making a "hood" film? My, my, how white of you. What exactly is a hood film? You're not a linear thinker are you. [Edited 10/28/09 16:17pm] A "hood film" is a type of film/movies that tell (fiction OR non-fiction) stories to people from the urban neighborhoods about characters from the urban neighborhoods. In most case, it's working class, NOT upper middle class like the suburbans areas. Also, some of the characters can also have a persona that is mostly identify as "hood" (EXAMPLES: Madea, Doughboy, almost every character in the Friday trilogy). | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
missfee said: TonyVanDam said: Cosby? Hardly. Yes, I missed The Cosby Show as much as the next person (especially the first 3 seasons). But lets be dead honest, a real-life family like THAT TV sitcom family neither existed in the hood. See where I'm getting at?!? Spike? Here and there. Yes, he did with Clockers & He Got Game. But that's it. Both were serious dramas, NOT comedies. But at least He Got Game was very entertaining. Clockers wasn't entertaining. And also, Spike made Clockers was more in the case of talk at black folks than to black folks (a mistake that Tyler Perry would never had done with any of his films). I loved Clockers!!! Hated the "25th Hour" too long and too boring. [Edited 10/28/09 18:34pm] Clockers was interesting. But just wasn't entertaining, IMO. And I was disappointed with the film's ending. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
TonyVanDam said: missfee said: I loved Clockers!!! Hated the "25th Hour" too long and too boring. [Edited 10/28/09 18:34pm] Clockers was interesting. But just wasn't entertaining, IMO. And I was disappointed with the film's ending. What else would you had Mekhi Phifer's character do? He had to leave town. I will forever love and miss you...my sweet Prince. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
TonyVanDam said: SCNDLS said: I know you're black, that was tongue in cheek. Because that's the typical attitude of white film execs, "Just give 'em 'hood films' cuz that's all they'll go see anyways." Bill was still in it. You're the one who brought Bill up in the first place regarding his work. So why are you now pointing out he's not a director? Then why'd you bring him up??? And what about the rest of my post: So, my question, since you OBVIOUSLY missed it, is: Do you REALLY believe that NEITHER Cosby or Spike reached all of those people you listed? And are you saying in your other post that the only way to reach those people is by making a "hood" film? My, my, how white of you. What exactly is a hood film? You're not a linear thinker are you. [Edited 10/28/09 16:17pm] Cosby? Hardly. Yes, I missed The Cosby Show as much as the next person (especially the first 3 seasons). But lets be dead honest, a real-life family like THAT TV sitcom family neither existed in the hood. See where I'm getting at?!? Spike? Here and there. Yes, he did with Clockers & He Got Game. But that's it. Both were serious dramas, NOT comedies. But at least He Got Game was very entertaining. Clockers wasn't entertaining. And also, Spike made Clockers was more in the case of talk at black folks than to black folks (a mistake that Tyler Perry would never had done with any of his films). You used the word "reached" in your original post which to me means, well, reached or exposed to. You didn't say that the criteria was that for people in the hood to watch it meant that the Cosby show had to be set in the hood. Which don't make a lick o' sense. My point is that the Cosby Show reached people IN the hood (whatever that means) regardless and offered a different view that it was in fact possible to go beyond the hood. Sorry, but it's assinine to believe that people in the hood only want to see that condition depicted in the movies they see and that because of their socioeconomic status they are incapable of comprehending or wanting anything else, both in their entertainment and in real life. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SCNDLS said: TonyVanDam said: Cosby? Hardly. Yes, I missed The Cosby Show as much as the next person (especially the first 3 seasons). But lets be dead honest, a real-life family like THAT TV sitcom family neither existed in the hood. See where I'm getting at?!? Spike? Here and there. Yes, he did with Clockers & He Got Game. But that's it. Both were serious dramas, NOT comedies. But at least He Got Game was very entertaining. Clockers wasn't entertaining. And also, Spike made Clockers was more in the case of talk at black folks than to black folks (a mistake that Tyler Perry would never had done with any of his films). You used the word "reached" in your original post which to me means, well, reached or exposed to. You didn't say that the criteria was that for people in the hood to watch it meant that the Cosby show had to be set in the hood. Which don't make a lick o' sense. My point is that the Cosby Show reached people IN the hood (whatever that means) regardless and offered a different view that it was in fact possible to go beyond the hood. Sorry, but it's assinine to believe that people in the hood only want to see that condition depicted in the movies they see and that because of their socioeconomic status they are incapable of comprehending or wanting anything else, both in their entertainment and in real life. The Cosby Show resonated with people "in the hood" because it showed what COULD be...not what WAS! The reality of what WAS...was far removed from what COULD be... because they neglected to address what IS. That is why it was the success that it WAS! After the success of the Cosby show and it's spinoff A Different World...Hollywood became disinterested in portraying what could be with education, hard work and dedication but began deliberately focusing on what MIGHT be, with shortcuts and forgetting where we came from! Tyler's work focuses on...where we've been...where we are...and where we can go...when honestly dealing with the realities of what IS! I knew from the start that I loved you with all my heart. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
missfee said: TonyVanDam said: Clockers was interesting. But just wasn't entertaining, IMO. And I was disappointed with the film's ending. What else would you had Mekhi Phifer's character do? He had to leave town. If I remember that character correctly, he was one of the villains. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
HatrinaHaterwitz said: SCNDLS said: You used the word "reached" in your original post which to me means, well, reached or exposed to. You didn't say that the criteria was that for people in the hood to watch it meant that the Cosby show had to be set in the hood. Which don't make a lick o' sense. My point is that the Cosby Show reached people IN the hood (whatever that means) regardless and offered a different view that it was in fact possible to go beyond the hood. Sorry, but it's assinine to believe that people in the hood only want to see that condition depicted in the movies they see and that because of their socioeconomic status they are incapable of comprehending or wanting anything else, both in their entertainment and in real life. The Cosby Show resonated with people "in the hood" because it showed what COULD be...not what WAS! The reality of what WAS...was far removed from what COULD be... because they neglected to address what IS. That is why it was the success that it WAS! After the success of the Cosby show and it's spinoff A Different World...Hollywood became disinterested in portraying what could be with education, hard work and dedication but began deliberately focusing on what MIGHT be, with shortcuts and forgetting where we came from! Tyler's work focuses on...where we've been...where we are...and where we can go...when honestly dealing with the realities of what IS! Exactly. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
HatrinaHaterwitz said: SCNDLS said: You used the word "reached" in your original post which to me means, well, reached or exposed to. You didn't say that the criteria was that for people in the hood to watch it meant that the Cosby show had to be set in the hood. Which don't make a lick o' sense. My point is that the Cosby Show reached people IN the hood (whatever that means) regardless and offered a different view that it was in fact possible to go beyond the hood. Sorry, but it's assinine to believe that people in the hood only want to see that condition depicted in the movies they see and that because of their socioeconomic status they are incapable of comprehending or wanting anything else, both in their entertainment and in real life. The Cosby Show resonated with people "in the hood" because it showed what COULD be...not what WAS! The reality of what WAS...was far removed from what COULD be... because they neglected to address what IS. That is why it was the success that it WAS! After the success of the Cosby show and it's spinoff A Different World...Hollywood became disinterested in portraying what could be with education, hard work and dedication but began deliberately focusing on what MIGHT be, with shortcuts and forgetting where we came from! Tyler's work focuses on...where we've been...where we are...and where we can go...when honestly dealing with the realities of what IS! That's your opinion and I don't agree because the Cosby show WAS and IS a reality for a lot of blacks. Besides, that still doesn't mean that it didn't reach people in the hood which is what Tony was saying in his post. And Tyler's work DEFINITELY doesn't represent me or most of the people I know so you might wanna just speak for yourself if that's YOUR reality instead of using "we" as if that's the de facto black experience cuz it isn't. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SCNDLS said: That's your opinion and I don't agree because the Cosby show WAS and IS a reality for a lot of blacks. . Lol.....seems like most folks I went 2 undergrad with WERE the Cosby family right down 2 the doctor/lawyer combo. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SCNDLS said: HatrinaHaterwitz said: The Cosby Show resonated with people "in the hood" because it showed what COULD be...not what WAS! The reality of what WAS...was far removed from what COULD be... because they neglected to address what IS. That is why it was the success that it WAS! After the success of the Cosby show and it's spinoff A Different World...Hollywood became disinterested in portraying what could be with education, hard work and dedication but began deliberately focusing on what MIGHT be, with shortcuts and forgetting where we came from! Tyler's work focuses on...where we've been...where we are...and where we can go...when honestly dealing with the realities of what IS! That's your opinion and I don't agree because the Cosby show WAS and IS a reality for a lot of blacks. Besides, that still doesn't mean that it didn't reach people in the hood which is what Tony was saying in his post. And Tyler's work DEFINITELY doesn't represent me or most of the people I know so you might wanna just speak for yourself if that's YOUR reality instead of using "we" as if that's the de facto black experience cuz it isn't. I really don't get the "all people from the hood should ONLY watches movies about the hood" either Thats like saying, all people from the hood should ONLY eat the damn government cheese instead of the regular cheese Thats the type of condescending attitude some people seem to be content with. I'm from the hood myself,,,,,but guess what, I don't see REALITY from Tyler's movies, I know the women and the men I grew up with and they're faaaaar more complex, intersting, radiant and proud than those Amos & Andy throwbacks in his movies. And yes I identify with the Cosby show, so it must be a reality after all even though I wasn't part of the "Jack & Jill" crowd At the least, the Cosby show paid my intelligence with a HIGH regard,,,,,Something Tyler wasn't thinking about doing even if he tried. [Edited 10/29/09 9:58am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
TonyVanDam said: missfee said: What else would you had Mekhi Phifer's character do? He had to leave town. If I remember that character correctly, he was one of the villains. INCORRECT. He was PERCEIVED to be a villian, but turned out he wasn't. I will forever love and miss you...my sweet Prince. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Spike Lee is Right! Tyler Purrry is a minstrel show. His had dozens of plays and movies and they are all the same. Most of his movies would be decent if they just lose the sterotypical characters. Tyler needs to get with the times. It's 2009 not the early 1970's when black exploitation movies were all we had for black entertainment. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
jaimestarr79 said: Spike Lee is Right! Tyler Purrry is a minstrel show. His had dozens of plays and movies and they are all the same. Most of his movies would be decent if they just lose the sterotypical characters. Tyler needs to get with the times. It's 2009 not the early 1970's when black exploitation movies were all we had for black entertainment.
I'd say the 70s was a MUCH better time when it comes to black entertainment though,,,,it was balanced somewhat, unlike now. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SCNDLS said: HatrinaHaterwitz said: The Cosby Show resonated with people "in the hood" because it showed what COULD be...not what WAS! The reality of what WAS...was far removed from what COULD be... because they neglected to address what IS. That is why it was the success that it WAS! After the success of the Cosby show and it's spinoff A Different World...Hollywood became disinterested in portraying what could be with education, hard work and dedication but began deliberately focusing on what MIGHT be, with shortcuts and forgetting where we came from! Tyler's work focuses on...where we've been...where we are...and where we can go...when honestly dealing with the realities of what IS! That's your opinion and I don't agree because the Cosby show WAS and IS a reality for a lot of blacks. Besides, that still doesn't mean that it didn't reach people in the hood which is what Tony was saying in his post. And Tyler's work DEFINITELY doesn't represent me or most of the people I know so you might wanna just speak for yourself if that's YOUR reality instead of using "we" as if that's the de facto black experience cuz it isn't. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
The question I get from a lot of my fellow artists (who are black and college-educated and have some connection to the entertainment biz) is:
What if Tyler Perry just can't write any better? I mean, the real gripe might not be with his refusal to do better. It might be that Tyler can't imagine or craft anything better than the formulaic mess he puts out. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ThreadBare said: The question I get from a lot of my fellow artists (who are black and college-educated and have some connection to the entertainment biz) is:
What if Tyler Perry just can't write any better? I mean, the real gripe might not be with his refusal to do better. It might be that Tyler can't imagine or craft anything better than the formulaic mess he puts out. I said that several pages ago. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Vendetta1 said: SCNDLS said: That's your opinion and I don't agree because the Cosby show WAS and IS a reality for a lot of blacks. Besides, that still doesn't mean that it didn't reach people in the hood which is what Tony was saying in his post. And Tyler's work DEFINITELY doesn't represent me or most of the people I know so you might wanna just speak for yourself if that's YOUR reality instead of using "we" as if that's the de facto black experience cuz it isn't. I liked that movie too. Sanaa has really been in a lot of good, well-rounded "black" movies, the exception being TP's The Family that Preys, can't believe Kathy Bates and Alfre Woodard were in that mess. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SCNDLS said: Vendetta1 said: I agree with every word of this. Did you see Something Else, SCNDLS? I loved Sanai Lathan character in that movie. I want to see more of that.
I liked that movie too. Sanaa has really been in a lot of good, well-rounded "black" movies, the exception being TP's The Family that Preys, can't believe Kathy Bates and Alfre Woodard were in that mess. If Kathy, Alfre and Angela Bassett(who was a prominent actress at some point) acted in his movies, you know the agency didn't knock on their doors for a looooong time. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Harlepolis said: SCNDLS said: I liked that movie too. Sanaa has really been in a lot of good, well-rounded "black" movies, the exception being TP's The Family that Preys, can't believe Kathy Bates and Alfre Woodard were in that mess. If Kathy, Alfre and Angela Bassett(who was a prominent actress at some point) acted in his movies, you know the agency didn't knock on their doors for a looooong time. No doubt. It's hard out there for older actresses and black ones in particular. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I agree with some of what Spike said and I agree with Tyler's response!
But as black people we have to be able to take the positive with the negative Some of us grew up and know family's or and have family memebers like the Cosby's, Lincoln Heights family,Evans family, Klumps,Amos & Andy and yes the Medea types as well. It's all believe it or not an accurate depiction depending on how, where and the types you grew up around. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I'm glad I don't see Angela Basset's ass in movies anymore. No disrespecting' the sistah but I was gettin' tired of seeing her play every famous black momma there ever was. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I am not a fan of any works by Tyler Perry, I'm simply not in that demographic. I'd be lying to say that I don't know people who are, but it isn't me or my family.
So, I guess that the only problem that I have with Tyler Perry, isn't really with him at all, it's the industry. I'd just like to see shows and projects that represent us fully, not just one side...one totally unflattering side. Why doesn't Spike Lee do movies anymore?...no scratch that. Why isn't Bill Cosby or Sidney Poitier working behind the scenes creating clever, witty and intelligent black movies? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |