mcmeekle said:

oh...that i didn't know. i hope that'll happen for her too.

BSK3478 said:

I know there's the whole argument about beauty/looks/blah-blah-blah, but I'm heartened to see her looking well.

Blasphemy. They had to go and whore her out too.

and those Bratz Dolls have always made me all vomity.

She actually looks older all painted up.

sneezes said:

pancake make-up on older skin always does that I think she had a lovely english rose complexion before. A bit of a haircut wouldn't have gone astray, but apart from that and some light make-up with a new outfit, would have been enough.

Looks like she has hit the tanning salon.

She looks the same.

JustErin said:

Well the same, plus a tan, make-up, lighter hair and a more tailored look.

She has a face made 4 radio.

Genesia said:

...or Benny Hill.

uPtoWnNY said:

I totally see the Benny Hill in her.

heybaby said:

I agree! I don't see what everyone is being so sensitive about?

People wear make-up and get nice hair-do's all the time to enhance their looks...It doesn't me she looked bad before, but she looks nice after

Her dress is cute on her

PaisleyPark5083 said:

It still makes her look exactly the same.

She looks like a politician's wife now.

She was fine before. If that "before" shot was her authentic self.

uPtoWnNY said:

You mf's are ridiculous She looks better & you know it, quit frontin' Why would you wish the librarian/school teacher look on anyone? I bet NONE of you look like that yourselves (& none of you men look @ women like that). So PLEASE, she looks like she hasn't totally given up. It's a definite improvement. Quit'cho lyin'

CalhounSq said:

So she is a spice girl now?

What I dont get is why cos she is wearing make up and has her hair done, she looks "acceptable"?

It SHOULD be all about her voice, and like Amanda Holden said, they shouldnt prissy her all up.

Anyway, it has been said that Susans 15 minutes are nearly up..

REDFEATHERS said:

Good point. Sadly Britney Spears has had much longer than 15 mins and the bitch cannot sing.

MrsMdiver said:

CalhounSq said:

Not true.

CalhounSq said:

Some people are just happy being themselves.. now I bet she will feel she cannot leave her house without wearing all that slap on her face.

She isnt a diva, just blessed to have a wonderful voice, so I do not believe she should have to be dolled up and pushed and poked to "fit in"

She looks well, I agree, but I wonder is she comfortable with her new image???

CalhounSq said:

I agree. I think people are just turning against it b/c they feel like the media or whoever made her over b/c of society's obsession with an unobtainable beauty and they resent that. It doesn't mean she doesn't look very nice and fresh faced. She does not look totally different she looks HER best. All they did was put her in some clothes that complimented her body and give her a haircut that compliments her face. Maybe they could've toned down the makeup but this isn't some evil deed.

PurpleRighteous1 said:

I agree with this completely!
It's just a little make-up and a new outfit people! Not like she sold her soul to the industry or something

Besides, everybody gets 'fixed up' for public appearances...the first pic is obviously a candid shot

I honestly don't see the difference. sorry.

MrsMdiver said:

ThreadBare said:

LIYAH!

REDFEATHERS said:

So people who wear makeup & bother to comb their hair aren't happy w/ themselves? Are trying to be divas? Won't leave the house w/o a face full?

Goofy shit, she was doing an interview & people are upset b/c she got in the makeup chair for a change. Makes no sense

PurpleRighteous1 said:

Thank you