goodlookingmofo said: PanthaGirl said: No it isn't. Anyone that has done their research on the subject will already know that peeps develop AIDS because HIV has damaged their natural defences against disease. What makes HIV dangerous and not a SCAM is that it attacks the immune system (CD4 lymphocyte) which is the very thing that would normally get rid of a virus. HIV is known to be tricky cause it helps evade the body's defences, which includes very rapid and extreme mutation. Once HIV has taken hold, the immune system cannot get rid of it. [Snip - luv4u] I'm a qualified Natural Therapist and Behavioural Scientist so I can confidently say I have done YEARS of research on such subjects. Do not underestimate the knowledge of others that have the proof and facts first hand to prove you wrong. Case closed.. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
NastradumasKid said: goodlookingmofo said: [Snip - luv4u] Where in Buddha's name did you here that??? HIV is what leads to AIDS I think YOU need to do your reseacrh sweetie. [Snip - luv4u] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
goodlookingmofo said: NastradumasKid said: Where in Buddha's name did you here that??? HIV is what leads to AIDS I think YOU need to do your reseacrh sweetie. [Snip - luv4u]. HIV destroys the immune system and not the body I'm aware of that it's the diseases the virus allow to let in the body. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
NastradumasKid said: goodlookingmofo said: [Snip - luv4u]. HIV destroys the immune system and not the body I'm aware of that it's the diseases the virus allow to let in the body. Exactly babe! Pretty much a damaged immune system is not only vulnerable to HIV but also being attacked by other infections. The immune system will not always have strength to fight off illness that wouldn't have bothered it before. With time a person who has been infected with HIV will likely become sick more often until they become sick with one of a number of severe illnesses. It's at these stages of HIV that the person is said to have AIDS. When they first become seriously ill, or when the number of immune system cells left in the body drops below a certain point. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
PanthaGirl said: NastradumasKid said: HIV destroys the immune system and not the body I'm aware of that it's the diseases the virus allow to let in the body. Exactly babe! Pretty much a damaged immune system is not only vulnerable to HIV but also being attacked by other infections. The immune system will not always have strength to fight off illness that wouldn't have bothered it before. With time a person who has been infected with HIV will likely become sick more often until they become sick with one of a number of severe illnesses. It's at these stages of HIV that the person is said to have AIDS. When they first become seriously ill, or when the number of immune system cells left in the body drops below a certain point. Thank you!!!! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
myfavorite said: we hula-hoop the same shyt eeryweek people!
you aint got no jobs! what the fuck else should you do??? aids is an occupational hazard. deal wit it. a bit crass but hey, I can dig it. all them human juices in and out here and there twos and threes. somebody was gonna catch sumpthin!!!!! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Moderator moderator |
goodlookingmofo said: [Snip - luv4u]
Ohh purple joy oh purple bliss oh purple rapture! REAL MUSIC by REAL MUSICIANS - Prince "I kind of wish there was a reason for Prince to make the site crash more" ~~ Ben |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
goodlookingmofo said: CarrieLee said: It just seems ridiculous to me and well, if you're having unprotected sex with ANYONE then you are at risk for ANYTHING.
Good luck with your herpes, hep C, genital warts and whatever else is out there. Yuck. whatever we have been at it raw dog for thousands of years don;t believe the hype Yeah but let's not be foolish here. The average joe don't screw as many partners as they do in porn. Some of these actors have done well over 100 movies and probably have been exposed to as many as 100 partners so if you're fucking all these partners raw dog you greatly increase your chances. Don't laugh at my funk
This funk is a serious joint | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
phunkdaddy said: goodlookingmofo said: whatever we have been at it raw dog for thousands of years don;t believe the hype Yeah but let's not be foolish here. The average joe don't screw as many partners as they do in porn. Some of these actors have done well over 100 movies and probably have been exposed to as many as 100 partners so if you're fucking all these partners raw dog you greatly increase your chances. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
He later found out that his mother learned about his diagnosis, and his porn career, on TV at her church.
OH MY LORD JEEEEBUS!!!!! I'm surprised she didn't have a heart attack right there in the pew!! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
The scariest part about HIVis that it has a 7 year incubation period Some has said it could be a 10 year incubation period,so you may test negative in the beginning but it may show up at a later time.Thatis why it is sooooo important to watch who u are sexually involved witand be careful.If that person is screwing alot of peeps than that is putting u in danger for getting HIV and if u are screwing alot of peeps than u are putting that person in danger of HIV. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
acjohns said: The scariest part about HIVis that it has a 7 year incubation period Some has said it could be a 10 year incubation period,so you may test negative in the beginning but it may show up at a later time.Thatis why it is sooooo important to watch who u are sexually involved witand be careful.If that person is screwing alot of peeps than that is putting u in danger for getting HIV and if u are screwing alot of peeps than u are putting that person in danger of HIV.
Abstaince is the best thing you can ever do for yourself. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
NastradumasKid said: acjohns said: The scariest part about HIVis that it has a 7 year incubation period Some has said it could be a 10 year incubation period,so you may test negative in the beginning but it may show up at a later time.Thatis why it is sooooo important to watch who u are sexually involved witand be careful.If that person is screwing alot of peeps than that is putting u in danger for getting HIV and if u are screwing alot of peeps than u are putting that person in danger of HIV.
Abstaince is the best thing you can ever do for yourself. A poem called Against Coupling I write in praise of the solitary act: of not feeling a trespassing tongue forced into one's mouth, one's breath smothered, nipples crushed against the rib-cage, and that metallic tingling in the chin set off by a certain odd nerve: unpleasure. Just to avoid those eyes would help- such eyes as a young girl draws life from, listening to the vegetal rustle within her, as his gaze stirs polypal fronds in the obscure sea-bed of her body, and her own eyes blur . There is much to be said for abandoning this no longer novel excercise- for now 'participating in a total experience'-when one feels like the lady in Leeds who had seen The Sound Of Music eighty-six times; or more, perhaps, like the school drama mistress producing A Midsummer Night's Dream for the seventh year running, with yet another cast from 5B. Pyramus and Thisbe are dead, but the hole in the wall can still be troublesome. I advise you, then, to embrace it without encumberance. No need to set the scene, dress up (or undress), make speeches. Five minutes of solitude are enough-in the bath, or to fill that gap between the Sunday papers and lunch What you don't remember never happened | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
phunkdaddy said: goodlookingmofo said:
CarrieLee said:
It just seems ridiculous to me and well, if you're having unprotected sex with ANYONE then you are at risk for ANYTHING.
Good luck with your herpes, hep C, genital warts and whatever else is out there. Yuck. whatever we have been at it raw dog for thousands of years don;t believe the hype Yeah but let's not be foolish here. The average joe don't screw as many partners as they do in porn. Some of these actors have done well over 100 movies and probably have been exposed to as many as 100 partners so if you're fucking all these partners raw dog you greatly increase your chances. Another part of the issue has to to with the infallibility of the AIDS and STD screening process itself. While all contract porn performers for the major studios have to go through monthly STD screenings, they only screen the talent within a certain studio. So if your average contract porn actor is fucking 100 different people, but they only fuck people within that particular studio in the San Fernando valley, and every actor in that studio comes up clean for STD's, then theoretically every actor in that particular studio should be safe. The problem comes when these same actors go overseas for porno shoots, where there may not be as rigorous (or any) STD screening. There have been a lot of pornos shot in the the Czech Republic and other parts of eastern Europe; in fact, sexual trafficking of impoverished women from the former Soviet republics has been rampant, much of it for porn and prostitution. There's also been a huge increase in porn shoots in Brazil ("Brazilian Booty Orgy") and Thailand ("Asian Anal Sluts"), and a lot of the female talent is taken off the streets without any screening. Couple that with some porn actors turning tricks on the side or getting involved with drug use (yep, a lot of porn stars are junkies and meth heads), and you have a scenario where AIDS or other STD's could break out. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CalhounSq said: He later found out that his mother learned about his diagnosis, and his porn career, on TV at her church.
OH MY LORD JEEEEBUS!!!!! I'm surprised she didn't have a heart attack right there in the pew!! Really...what a way to find out!!!!! It shouldn't have been publicized like that...or he should have had time to tell his family before they found out from tv...while in church | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CarrieLee said: CalhounSq said: OH MY LORD JEEEEBUS!!!!! I'm surprised she didn't have a heart attack right there in the pew!! Really...what a way to find out!!!!! It shouldn't have been publicized like that...or he should have had time to tell his family before they found out from tv...while in church I can't even imagine how heartbroken his mother must have been! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
PanthaGirl said: NastradumasKid said: HIV destroys the immune system and not the body I'm aware of that it's the diseases the virus allow to let in the body. Exactly babe! Pretty much a damaged immune system is not only vulnerable to HIV but also being attacked by other infections. The immune system will not always have strength to fight off illness that wouldn't have bothered it before. With time a person who has been infected with HIV will likely become sick more often until they become sick with one of a number of severe illnesses. It's at these stages of HIV that the person is said to have AIDS. When they first become seriously ill, or when the number of immune system cells left in the body drops below a certain point. not true at all | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
goodlookingmofo said: PanthaGirl said: Exactly babe! Pretty much a damaged immune system is not only vulnerable to HIV but also being attacked by other infections. The immune system will not always have strength to fight off illness that wouldn't have bothered it before. With time a person who has been infected with HIV will likely become sick more often until they become sick with one of a number of severe illnesses. It's at these stages of HIV that the person is said to have AIDS. When they first become seriously ill, or when the number of immune system cells left in the body drops below a certain point. not true at all Wha??? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
DesireeNevermind said: goodlookingmofo said: not true at all Wha??? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
goodlookingmofo said: PanthaGirl said: Exactly babe! Pretty much a damaged immune system is not only vulnerable to HIV but also being attacked by other infections. The immune system will not always have strength to fight off illness that wouldn't have bothered it before. With time a person who has been infected with HIV will likely become sick more often until they become sick with one of a number of severe illnesses. It's at these stages of HIV that the person is said to have AIDS. When they first become seriously ill, or when the number of immune system cells left in the body drops below a certain point. not true at all I'm not feeding clueless Trolls any longer! It is what it is mate you have no argument. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
what is going on here? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
DesireeNevermind said: what is going on here?
Dumbass thinks HIV is not harmful. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
NastradumasKid said: DesireeNevermind said: what is going on here?
Dumbass thinks HIV is not harmful. Of course it is. I mean unless you are Magic Johnson. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
goodlookingmofo said: PanthaGirl said: Exactly babe! Pretty much a damaged immune system is not only vulnerable to HIV but also being attacked by other infections. The immune system will not always have strength to fight off illness that wouldn't have bothered it before. With time a person who has been infected with HIV will likely become sick more often until they become sick with one of a number of severe illnesses. It's at these stages of HIV that the person is said to have AIDS. When they first become seriously ill, or when the number of immune system cells left in the body drops below a certain point. not true at all I don't know where you're goin with this man,your posting style is quite unique, given the subject at hand. But I will say that the only thing lacking from Pantha's post is that AIDS is not necessarily the FINAL stage (as its often viewed). I was diagnosed because I landed in the hospital near death with pcp pneumonia. My tcells were way down. Both, technically, requirements to an AIDS diagnosis. I was very fortunate and made it (it was a long ass recovery). That was 12 years ago. Here I am today. Strong and full of life! So AIDS is not always necessarily the final stage. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
johnart said: goodlookingmofo said: not true at all I don't know where you're goin with this man,your posting style is quite unique, given the subject at hand. But I will say that the only thing lacking from Pantha's post is that AIDS is not necessarily the FINAL stage (as its often viewed). I was diagnosed because I landed in the hospital near death with pcp pneumonia. My tcells were way down. Both, technically, requirements to an AIDS diagnosis. I was very fortunate and made it (it was a long ass recovery). That was 12 years ago. Here I am today. Strong and full of life! So AIDS is not always necessarily the final stage. How right you are mate and of course AIDS is by no means any final stage whatsover. You are legend babe.... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
PanthaGirl said: goodlookingmofo said: not true at all I'm not feeding clueless Trolls any longer! It is what it is mate you have no argument. I am not a troll. I am INFORMED and well researched. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
goodlookingmofo said: PanthaGirl said: I'm not feeding clueless Trolls any longer! It is what it is mate you have no argument. I am not a troll. I am INFORMED and well researched. you checked out www.virusmyth.com ? or whatchiu basni yuor info on ? did ? you read ? some of that dude from brelkley s shittt? HIV is real | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
RudyIsBackForGood said: goodlookingmofo said: I am not a troll. I am INFORMED and well researched. you checked out www.virusmyth.com ? or whatchiu basni yuor info on ? did ? you read ? some of that dude from brelkley s shittt? HIV is real yes a real harmeless virus that has NOTHING to do with aids. The rockefellers and co make BILLIONS off hiv/aids. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
goodlookingmofo said: RudyIsBackForGood said: you checked out www.virusmyth.com ? or whatchiu basni yuor info on ? did ? you read ? some of that dude from brelkley s shittt? HIV is real yes a real harmeless virus that has NOTHING to do with aids. The rockefellers and co make BILLIONS off hiv/aids. That is where your severely misinformed. HIV has everything to do with AIDS. As for the powers that be making BILLIONS off of it, well yes they do from the medicine and that goes for many other diseases as well like Parkinsons, MS or Cancer. Peeps are well aware that the money is in the medicine, and not producing a cure but that does not take away the FACTS of the diseases. They are all very real with available cures that will not be released for years to come. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
okay so lemme get this straight
HIV has nothing to do with Aids and his really harmless The Rockefellers have a cure for all diseases but are sitting on it so they can make money. Next y'all gonna tell me there is no spoon. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |