KidaDynamite said:

japanrocks ; calling them 'lower back tatoos'

Dewrede said:

That's what they are.

^i prefer the word tramp stamp , it's funny , even though it might be somewhat degrading

Dewrede said:

oh

Well, I would really love to hear the inventor's reasoning and logic behind givin it the term "tramp stamp".

^ self explanatory i'd think (spelling?)

*gets trout slaps some people round*

japanrocks said:

all of your motherfucking posts annoy me.

Not crazy about them. Some women can pull it off. I really don't like them on the top of the feet or on the breast though

But anyway on topic, I think it can be sexy yeah, not too many but there are some sexy ones.

I do enjoy laughing at tramp stamps, yes.

That is so NOT going to look good in 10 or 15 years, you idiots.

What a sexist question.

[img][/img]

I think it is sexy by woman tho, only in a beautiful term not that someone got her body all over with tatoos.

To each their own. Who cares what others think, as long as the person with the tattoos is happy and feels sexy it doesn't matter!

BTW Pantagirl the Angelina picture you posted...she's sporting fake tattoos for her role in Wanted. It still looks hot though!

wow.....

I love both of mine, they hold a lot of meaning to me. Might get one more for a special reason.
Fuck anyone that does not like them or where they are located. Though in saying that, not too many ppl can see mine, that is just the way I like it.

[Edited 6/11/09 7:56am]

johnart said:

Mary J always looks a hot mess when she's dressed beautifully, dripping in diamonds and her big ass tats are visible. Same with Angelina IMO.

Theo Kogan is my favorite!

CarrieLee said:

I really never cared for them until I saw yours. Tastefully done, put in places that make you want to see more.

The quality of the tat is really what it's all about. My cousin looks like someone took a sharpy to his arms and it looks like shit.

PanthaGirl said:

I have many tattoos. They all mean something and I dont consider myself following a fad, or having to cover them up for any reason. I work in a professional office and the ones on my arms do show. But, I was hired for my job skills, not what's on my skin. If I wear a long sleeved blouse and my hair down, you would never know I'm tattooed from the back of my ear to the tip of my toes.

If a man does not like what he sees then he can keep on walkin'....

whistle said:

I understand you here. I feel this way about the body generally. A tat's gotta be one helluva tat to warrant its existence, I think.

I don't like tattoes. Don't care about the gender. I'm bi-hate-tattoo-ful

But I like yours

I said tattoes

CarrieLee said:

Which ones? I know the ones on her left shoulder/back and the tiger are real!


[Edited 6/11/09 9:31am]

PANDURITO said:

Do you judge people by their tattoos?

Oh yeah. I love tats on the ladies. It is something sexy about seeing a tat on a lady, it just drives me crazy. I will admit, I don't really care for the really big tats that a lot of folks are getting.You know the ones with all of their back covered with whatever tat, that turns me off. I like the little tats; a heart on the butt, a butterfly tat on the ankle...that is sexy.

It depends where they are and how big they are.

I prefer small, feminine tats on women. I have a very small blue bird om my hip that represents freedom and it's almost always covered. I would never get anything on my arms, legs, back, neck or face. Something on the ankle is nice or the wrist, but other than that, I don't care for them. The lower back tat is especially tacky IMO.

amorbella said:

Of course not

Do you judge them by their hairdoes?
Guess not. Yet I'd bet you're not keen on combovers

if this is the attitude most of you have, I can only imagine how much worse it must be in the real world. I've always wanted a tattoo but I'm nervous about the pain and don't want people to be afraid of me or judge me based on that. I used to want it in a spot where it's not visible but then there's no point.