independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > General Discussion > Spike Lee Puts Tyler Perry On Blast!
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 4 of 7 <1234567>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #90 posted 05/29/09 10:09am

DesireeNevermi
nd

Nobody should look to TV to make them feel good about themselves. Feeling good starts with your family, friends and community. I'm jus sayin'
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #91 posted 05/29/09 10:11am

MuthaFunka

avatar

DesireeNevermind said:

Nobody should look to TV to make them feel good about themselves. Feeling good starts with your family, friends and community. I'm jus sayin'


Yeah, but images are powerful. And when those images constantly depict your people in a negative light, it's hard to combat those images.
nWo: bboy87 - Timmy84 - LittleBlueCorvette - MuthaFunka - phunkdaddy - Christopher

MuthaFunka - Black...by popular demand
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #92 posted 05/29/09 10:12am

coolcat

Anxiety said:

coolcat said:



I loved the Cosby show. I remember seeing a documentary about African Americans in television where the Cosby show was criticized for showing a black family that white people were comfortable with, rather than something more representative... shrug


yeah. it's like, i understand the argument, but i don't think it's exactly a scathing accusation. a typical sitcom family (in those days, anyway) was supposed to be financially comfortable. if the brady bunch could be well off, why couldn't the huxtables? shrug


Well, one of the criticisms I've heard is that the show pacifies white America into the false notion that the race issue has been resolved...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #93 posted 05/29/09 10:14am

JackieBlue

avatar

coolcat said:

Anxiety said:



yeah. it's like, i understand the argument, but i don't think it's exactly a scathing accusation. a typical sitcom family (in those days, anyway) was supposed to be financially comfortable. if the brady bunch could be well off, why couldn't the huxtables? shrug


Well, one of the criticisms I've heard is that the show pacifies white America into the false notion that the race issue has been resolved...


eek
Been gone for a minute, now I'm back with the jump off
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #94 posted 05/29/09 10:18am

daPrettyman

avatar

SCNDLS said:

Anxiety said:

here's my question to those offended by the tyler perry tv show (which i have no argument for or against):

other than the cosby show, what do you think have been some honorable/realistic black characters on television?

it's interesting about the cosby show, i remember back in the 80s when it was on, some people were grumbly about how they were upper-middle class and how that wasn't realistic to the average black family in america. does anyone agree with that? (i don't, though i can kinda see the point, flawed though it may be.)

I disagree because the Cosby's were actually VERY representative of the average black families I knew growing up. Most of the middle class black folks I grew up with had college educated parents with white-collar jobs and all or at least most of their kids also went to college. All black people don't live in the ghetto in perpetual crisis. The media and some folks outside of the black community for some reason have a problem realizing that. confused


Thanks for saying that. Growing up in the country, I didn't know ONE black person that lived in a "ghetto". I knew a lot of white people that lived in trailers, though. Not saying trailers are bad, but it's a stereotype that is not true.
**--••--**--••**--••--**--••**--••--**--••**--••-
U 'gon make me shake my doo loose!
http://www.twitter.com/nivlekbrad
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #95 posted 05/29/09 10:21am

Harlepolis

JackieBlue said:

coolcat said:



Well, one of the criticisms I've heard is that the show pacifies white America into the false notion that the race issue has been resolved...


eek


Oh it gets BETTER lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #96 posted 05/29/09 10:26am

daPrettyman

avatar

Anxiety said:

SCNDLS said:


Funny but more black folks in crisis. I expected a lot more from Norman Lear, but I guess his antidote to Good Times was the Jeffersons. shrug


to be fair, good times was a spin-off from maude, wasn't it? and that was a spin-off from all in the family, which could be called a 'white folks in crisis' show (same could be said for maude, really). i think his whole concept with those shows was to create a "universe" of socially-aware sitcoms. how successful he was at that, i can't say, especially when you take into account shows like "archie bunker's place", "gloria" and, yeah, "the jeffersons", but at least in the beginning, i think it was a noble intent.

So true. I don't really care to watch Good Times only because they never took the characters to another level. It didn't bother me that they were in the ghetto. The problem for me was that they didn't peruse options to improve thier situation. Michael was the "militant midget" and that was about the only "socially-aware" part of the sitcom that I got. Sure, James may have worked at a car wash, but in the 70s, there were grants galore that could have helped him acquire either a degree or some formal training to get a better job.

Also, why was Walona a HO in the beginning? By the time she got Penny, she became holier than thou.

As for the Jeffersons, I love that show. Now, how realistic was it? Not very. Who ever heard of a dry cleaner becoming a NY socialite?
**--••--**--••**--••--**--••**--••--**--••**--••-
U 'gon make me shake my doo loose!
http://www.twitter.com/nivlekbrad
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #97 posted 05/29/09 10:29am

Harlepolis

daPrettyman said:

As for the Jeffersons, I love that show. Now, how realistic was it? Not very. Who ever heard of a dry cleaner becoming a NY socialite?


I loved the 1st 5 seasons, its the 6th season when it started to get "white washed".
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #98 posted 05/29/09 10:32am

Anxiety

daPrettyman said:

Anxiety said:



to be fair, good times was a spin-off from maude, wasn't it? and that was a spin-off from all in the family, which could be called a 'white folks in crisis' show (same could be said for maude, really). i think his whole concept with those shows was to create a "universe" of socially-aware sitcoms. how successful he was at that, i can't say, especially when you take into account shows like "archie bunker's place", "gloria" and, yeah, "the jeffersons", but at least in the beginning, i think it was a noble intent.

So true. I don't really care to watch Good Times only because they never took the characters to another level. It didn't bother me that they were in the ghetto. The problem for me was that they didn't peruse options to improve thier situation. Michael was the "militant midget" and that was about the only "socially-aware" part of the sitcom that I got. Sure, James may have worked at a car wash, but in the 70s, there were grants galore that could have helped him acquire either a degree or some formal training to get a better job.

Also, why was Walona a HO in the beginning? By the time she got Penny, she became holier than thou.

As for the Jeffersons, I love that show. Now, how realistic was it? Not very. Who ever heard of a dry cleaner becoming a NY socialite?


well, i think they DID try to improve their situation on 'good times' - j.j. was working to become a professional artist, thelma was always very serious about her studies, and like you said, michael had that whole 'militant midget' thing going on, lol...and didn't willona own a boutique or something like that? so there was some aspiration among the characters, which i guess could be seen as positive. the thing i hated about good times was, whenever something truly positive happened on that show, you knew that by the end of the episode, thelma would come running in screaming 'I WAS RAPED AND/OR MUGGED!!!' and then everyone would get all quiet and awkward and then after that you knew it was REALLY bad when they did the closing credits without any music. lol

it's like, the fact that they could never catch a break was part of the formula of the show, it wasn't really a reflection of how people's lives ALWAYS were. that bugged me even when i was younger and watching that show.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #99 posted 05/29/09 10:34am

MuthaFunka

avatar

daPrettyman said:

Anxiety said:



to be fair, good times was a spin-off from maude, wasn't it? and that was a spin-off from all in the family, which could be called a 'white folks in crisis' show (same could be said for maude, really). i think his whole concept with those shows was to create a "universe" of socially-aware sitcoms. how successful he was at that, i can't say, especially when you take into account shows like "archie bunker's place", "gloria" and, yeah, "the jeffersons", but at least in the beginning, i think it was a noble intent.

So true. I don't really care to watch Good Times only because they never took the characters to another level. It didn't bother me that they were in the ghetto. The problem for me was that they didn't peruse options to improve thier situation. Michael was the "militant midget" and that was about the only "socially-aware" part of the sitcom that I got. Sure, James may have worked at a car wash, but in the 70s, there were grants galore that could have helped him acquire either a degree or some formal training to get a better job.

Also, why was Walona a HO in the beginning? By the time she got Penny, she became holier than thou.

As for the Jeffersons, I love that show. Now, how realistic was it? Not very. Who ever heard of a dry cleaner becoming a NY socialite?


That's not true. James would always try to improve his status, either by asking for a raise, a promotion, or getting a new job. JJ was trying to better their situation through his art. Michael had his eyes set on college. The whole premise of the show was based off "Raisin' in the Sun" - a dream deferred, and in the Evans' case - DREAMS deferred: something would always go wrong and they'd never get that promotion, raise, new job, or whatever.
nWo: bboy87 - Timmy84 - LittleBlueCorvette - MuthaFunka - phunkdaddy - Christopher

MuthaFunka - Black...by popular demand
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #100 posted 05/29/09 10:37am

JackieBlue

avatar

Anxiety said:

daPrettyman said:


So true. I don't really care to watch Good Times only because they never took the characters to another level. It didn't bother me that they were in the ghetto. The problem for me was that they didn't peruse options to improve thier situation. Michael was the "militant midget" and that was about the only "socially-aware" part of the sitcom that I got. Sure, James may have worked at a car wash, but in the 70s, there were grants galore that could have helped him acquire either a degree or some formal training to get a better job.

Also, why was Walona a HO in the beginning? By the time she got Penny, she became holier than thou.

As for the Jeffersons, I love that show. Now, how realistic was it? Not very. Who ever heard of a dry cleaner becoming a NY socialite?


well, i think they DID try to improve their situation on 'good times' - j.j. was working to become a professional artist, thelma was always very serious about her studies, and like you said, michael had that whole 'militant midget' thing going on, lol...and didn't willona own a boutique or something like that? so there was some aspiration among the characters, which i guess could be seen as positive. the thing i hated about good times was, whenever something truly positive happened on that show, you knew that by the end of the episode, thelma would come running in screaming 'I WAS RAPED AND/OR MUGGED!!!' and then everyone would get all quiet and awkward and then after that you knew it was REALLY bad when they did the closing credits without any music. lol

it's like, the fact that they could never catch a break was part of the formula of the show, it wasn't really a reflection of how people's lives ALWAYS were. that bugged me even when i was younger and watching that show.


falloff

So true.
Been gone for a minute, now I'm back with the jump off
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #101 posted 05/29/09 11:16am

daPrettyman

avatar

Anxiety said:

daPrettyman said:


So true. I don't really care to watch Good Times only because they never took the characters to another level. It didn't bother me that they were in the ghetto. The problem for me was that they didn't peruse options to improve thier situation. Michael was the "militant midget" and that was about the only "socially-aware" part of the sitcom that I got. Sure, James may have worked at a car wash, but in the 70s, there were grants galore that could have helped him acquire either a degree or some formal training to get a better job.

Also, why was Walona a HO in the beginning? By the time she got Penny, she became holier than thou.

As for the Jeffersons, I love that show. Now, how realistic was it? Not very. Who ever heard of a dry cleaner becoming a NY socialite?


well, i think they DID try to improve their situation on 'good times' - j.j. was working to become a professional artist, thelma was always very serious about her studies, and like you said, michael had that whole 'militant midget' thing going on, lol...and didn't willona own a boutique or something like that? so there was some aspiration among the characters, which i guess could be seen as positive. the thing i hated about good times was, whenever something truly positive happened on that show, you knew that by the end of the episode, thelma would come running in screaming 'I WAS RAPED AND/OR MUGGED!!!' and then everyone would get all quiet and awkward and then after that you knew it was REALLY bad when they did the closing credits without any music. lol

it's like, the fact that they could never catch a break was part of the formula of the show, it wasn't really a reflection of how people's lives ALWAYS were. that bugged me even when i was younger and watching that show.

You are right, but think about it. Wilona only got the boutique after Frank, her rich ex-husband, bought it for her. After that, she dropped his ass. lol

Why did Thelma never get a job? She never graduated from high school, but ended up going to some college. Not to mention, she did nothing for a while, then she met Keith and married him. The meal ticket that never was.
**--••--**--••**--••--**--••**--••--**--••**--••-
U 'gon make me shake my doo loose!
http://www.twitter.com/nivlekbrad
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #102 posted 05/29/09 11:18am

daPrettyman

avatar

MuthaFunka said:

daPrettyman said:


So true. I don't really care to watch Good Times only because they never took the characters to another level. It didn't bother me that they were in the ghetto. The problem for me was that they didn't peruse options to improve thier situation. Michael was the "militant midget" and that was about the only "socially-aware" part of the sitcom that I got. Sure, James may have worked at a car wash, but in the 70s, there were grants galore that could have helped him acquire either a degree or some formal training to get a better job.

Also, why was Walona a HO in the beginning? By the time she got Penny, she became holier than thou.

As for the Jeffersons, I love that show. Now, how realistic was it? Not very. Who ever heard of a dry cleaner becoming a NY socialite?


That's not true. James would always try to improve his status, either by asking for a raise, a promotion, or getting a new job. JJ was trying to better their situation through his art. Michael had his eyes set on college. The whole premise of the show was based off "Raisin' in the Sun" - a dream deferred, and in the Evans' case - DREAMS deferred: something would always go wrong and they'd never get that promotion, raise, new job, or whatever.


Yeah, James did try as a father. That was the whole point of him taking the job in Mississippi where he ultimately died. I never understood how someone as buffed as James was worked at a car wash. Wasn't there some other industry that he could have worked in? Welding maybe? That's why I say they didn't do anything to improve their situation. He kept getting low paying jobs.
**--••--**--••**--••--**--••**--••--**--••**--••-
U 'gon make me shake my doo loose!
http://www.twitter.com/nivlekbrad
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #103 posted 05/29/09 11:20am

Graycap23

daPrettyman said:

MuthaFunka said:



That's not true. James would always try to improve his status, either by asking for a raise, a promotion, or getting a new job. JJ was trying to better their situation through his art. Michael had his eyes set on college. The whole premise of the show was based off "Raisin' in the Sun" - a dream deferred, and in the Evans' case - DREAMS deferred: something would always go wrong and they'd never get that promotion, raise, new job, or whatever.


Yeah, James did try as a father. That was the whole point of him taking the job in Mississippi where he ultimately died. I never understood how someone as buffed as James was worked at a car wash. Wasn't there some other industry that he could have worked in? Welding maybe? That's why I say they didn't do anything to improve their situation. He kept getting low paying jobs.

U were supposed 2 feel good about your lower class status.
Good Times my arse....
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #104 posted 05/29/09 11:21am

MuthaFunka

avatar

daPrettyman said:

MuthaFunka said:



That's not true. James would always try to improve his status, either by asking for a raise, a promotion, or getting a new job. JJ was trying to better their situation through his art. Michael had his eyes set on college. The whole premise of the show was based off "Raisin' in the Sun" - a dream deferred, and in the Evans' case - DREAMS deferred: something would always go wrong and they'd never get that promotion, raise, new job, or whatever.


Yeah, James did try as a father. That was the whole point of him taking the job in Mississippi where he ultimately died. I never understood how someone as buffed as James was worked at a car wash. Wasn't there some other industry that he could have worked in? Welding maybe? That's why I say they didn't do anything to improve their situation. He kept getting low paying jobs.


I thought he worked at other spots, too?
nWo: bboy87 - Timmy84 - LittleBlueCorvette - MuthaFunka - phunkdaddy - Christopher

MuthaFunka - Black...by popular demand
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #105 posted 05/29/09 11:25am

daPrettyman

avatar

MuthaFunka said:

daPrettyman said:



Yeah, James did try as a father. That was the whole point of him taking the job in Mississippi where he ultimately died. I never understood how someone as buffed as James was worked at a car wash. Wasn't there some other industry that he could have worked in? Welding maybe? That's why I say they didn't do anything to improve their situation. He kept getting low paying jobs.


I thought he worked at other spots, too?

I don't remember him doing anything but the car wash. Remember he did gamble a few times and won some money, but the car wash was his main occupation. He did get a construction job later (before he got canned) and went to Mississippi to work.
**--••--**--••**--••--**--••**--••--**--••**--••-
U 'gon make me shake my doo loose!
http://www.twitter.com/nivlekbrad
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #106 posted 05/29/09 11:48am

DesireeNevermi
nd

We went from Spike Lee to Tyler Perry Coonery to Good Times. rolleyes


Ima throw a wrench in this bitch!


Uptown Saturday Night and Soul Food (the series)!!!! brick
take that you Black Film and TV Buffs!!!
lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #107 posted 05/29/09 12:13pm

Anxiety

daPrettyman said:

Anxiety said:



well, i think they DID try to improve their situation on 'good times' - j.j. was working to become a professional artist, thelma was always very serious about her studies, and like you said, michael had that whole 'militant midget' thing going on, lol...and didn't willona own a boutique or something like that? so there was some aspiration among the characters, which i guess could be seen as positive. the thing i hated about good times was, whenever something truly positive happened on that show, you knew that by the end of the episode, thelma would come running in screaming 'I WAS RAPED AND/OR MUGGED!!!' and then everyone would get all quiet and awkward and then after that you knew it was REALLY bad when they did the closing credits without any music. lol

it's like, the fact that they could never catch a break was part of the formula of the show, it wasn't really a reflection of how people's lives ALWAYS were. that bugged me even when i was younger and watching that show.

You are right, but think about it. Wilona only got the boutique after Frank, her rich ex-husband, bought it for her. After that, she dropped his ass. lol

Why did Thelma never get a job? She never graduated from high school, but ended up going to some college. Not to mention, she did nothing for a while, then she met Keith and married him. The meal ticket that never was.



bad writing? lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #108 posted 05/29/09 12:38pm

MuthaFunka

avatar

daPrettyman said:

MuthaFunka said:



I thought he worked at other spots, too?

I don't remember him doing anything but the car wash. Remember he did gamble a few times and won some money, but the car wash was his main occupation. He did get a construction job later (before he got canned) and went to Mississippi to work.


I remember an episode when he had to get a physical for his job? Was that his car wash gig? Damn, they made 'em take physicals for car washin'? lol
nWo: bboy87 - Timmy84 - LittleBlueCorvette - MuthaFunka - phunkdaddy - Christopher

MuthaFunka - Black...by popular demand
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #109 posted 05/29/09 12:38pm

MuthaFunka

avatar

DesireeNevermind said:

We went from Spike Lee to Tyler Perry Coonery to Good Times. rolleyes


Ima throw a wrench in this bitch!


Uptown Saturday Night and Soul Food (the series)!!!! brick
take that you Black Film and TV Buffs!!!
lol

lol
nWo: bboy87 - Timmy84 - LittleBlueCorvette - MuthaFunka - phunkdaddy - Christopher

MuthaFunka - Black...by popular demand
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #110 posted 05/29/09 12:55pm

2elijah

daPrettyman said:

johnart said:

I've never seen a Tyler Perry movie, just the ads. I remember his plays being very successful (at least I thought they were).

Why is it coonery? (serious question) Is that just based on the fact that it uses stereotypes?

Similar debate (portrayal of community) is present among gays also. GlAAD is always blasting any movie/show that might have a "stereotypical" gay in it. And I kinda get that, we have butch cops and businessmen and such, but we also have a lot of sissy hairdressers. lol

I don't think Spike is referring to Tyler's movies as Coonery, but he is referring to his shows as that. I feel the same way as Spike. The shows that Tyler has on TBS are reminiscent of the Amos and Andy days when blacks were stereotyped as loud and over the top characters. To me, a character like "Brown" or "Curtis" on the 2 sitcoms on TBS are embarassing to the black race.

I say that because those characters are nothing like real people. The same can be said of Tyler's Madea character. She is a gun-toting, cigarette smoking, bat swinging grandmother that will curse someone out. Though most black americans know someone like that, it is still too over the top, therefore can be categorized as Coonery also.


I agree. Tyler makes good movies. I would love to see him do a soap opera type series with African-Americans. There's so much more he could do now. He needs to drop the Madea character and move on. Somehow I think he keeps the Madea character for the fans that have been following him since his early days in the theatre business. Those are the fans that have been with him from the very beginning of his career, who used to buy his plays on VHS tapes now DVDs. I believe that is why he is hanging on to that character, to not lose his dedicated fan base. But there comes a time when we have to let go and move on in order to grow and I think that is what Tyler needs to do. I despise that "Meet the Browns" character. The main male character is too "baffoonerish" and his character is too much of a "simp", like an "idiot", if you know what I mean. Other than that I have a lot of respect for Tyler, but he needs to let go of his Amos and Andy characters.
[Edited 5/29/09 12:58pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #111 posted 05/29/09 1:00pm

Harlepolis

Thats right, 2elijah.

He said it many times that he wanted to kill "Madea" but he kept her alive for the audience.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #112 posted 05/29/09 1:01pm

daPrettyman

avatar

MuthaFunka said:

daPrettyman said:


I don't remember him doing anything but the car wash. Remember he did gamble a few times and won some money, but the car wash was his main occupation. He did get a construction job later (before he got canned) and went to Mississippi to work.


I remember an episode when he had to get a physical for his job? Was that his car wash gig? Damn, they made 'em take physicals for car washin'? lol

I'll have to dust off my dvds and find out. I can't recall.

I vaguely remember him getting a physical, but I thought it was because he was complaining about something hurting. Then militant midget went on to discuss how black men die of heart attacks and strokes.
**--••--**--••**--••--**--••**--••--**--••**--••-
U 'gon make me shake my doo loose!
http://www.twitter.com/nivlekbrad
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #113 posted 05/29/09 1:02pm

kpowers

avatar

Ever since Spike Lee was going to sue Spike TV I really don't care what Spike Lee thinks. He can dish it out but can't take it.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #114 posted 05/29/09 1:16pm

2elijah

daPrettyman said:

MuthaFunka said:



That's not true. James would always try to improve his status, either by asking for a raise, a promotion, or getting a new job. JJ was trying to better their situation through his art. Michael had his eyes set on college. The whole premise of the show was based off "Raisin' in the Sun" - a dream deferred, and in the Evans' case - DREAMS deferred: something would always go wrong and they'd never get that promotion, raise, new job, or whatever.


Yeah, James did try as a father. That was the whole point of him taking the job in Mississippi where he ultimately died. I never understood how someone as buffed as James was worked at a car wash. Wasn't there some other industry that he could have worked in? Welding maybe? That's why I say they didn't do anything to improve their situation. He kept getting low paying jobs.


Good point, but I think that was the writers fault and no one stepping up to the plate to make the characters a family that "moved out" of their situation, yet they did have the "drive" to want to do better. They made the character son "Michael" the main intelligent one in the family, while it seemed they made "Thelma" the daughter character seem like she was waiting for her "knight in shining armour" to rescue her from her situation. Then again, maybe some of the actors in the show tried to speak with the writers about making improvements in the script and it didn't work out. It did seem like James' character kept hitting "a brick road", like the writers wanted to keep him a "weak provider" for his family, as though as a Black male it was hopeless for him to move up in society.

I think the James, the father character left because wasn't that around the time "Roots" was starting to be filmed?
[Edited 5/29/09 13:17pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #115 posted 05/29/09 1:19pm

kpowers

avatar

2elijah said:

daPrettyman said:



Yeah, James did try as a father. That was the whole point of him taking the job in Mississippi where he ultimately died. I never understood how someone as buffed as James was worked at a car wash. Wasn't there some other industry that he could have worked in? Welding maybe? That's why I say they didn't do anything to improve their situation. He kept getting low paying jobs.


Good point, but I think that was the writers fault and no one stepping up to the plate to make the characters a family that "moved out" of their situation, yet they did have the "drive" to want to do better. They made the character son "Michael" the main intelligent one in the family, while it seemed they made "Thelma" the daughter character seem like she was waiting for her "knight in shining armour" to rescue her from her situation. Then again, maybe some of the actors in the show tried to speak with the writers about making improvements in the script and it didn't work out. It did seem like James' character kept hitting "a brick road", like the writers wanted to keep him a "weak provider" for his family, as though as a Black male it was hopeless for him to move up in society.

I think the James, the father character left because wasn't that around the time "Roots" was starting to be filmed?
[Edited 5/29/09 13:17pm]




I thought both parents left the show because they were mad that Jimmy Walker was the star.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #116 posted 05/29/09 1:21pm

2elijah

Harlepolis said:

Thats right, 2elijah.

He said it many times that he wanted to kill "Madea" but he kept her alive for the audience.


I kind of figured that. Tyler is a very, humbled person and doesn't let his success take over his ego. I know once he lets that character go he is aware of the emails he'll get from those fans. He keeps in contact with his fans, so when he does let go of Madea, or should I say his "Linus Blanket" so-to-speak, I'm sure he will humbly explain it to those fans. At this point they respect him so much I think they will understand why it one day will be time to let Madea go.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #117 posted 05/29/09 1:21pm

daPrettyman

avatar

kpowers said:

2elijah said:



Good point, but I think that was the writers fault and no one stepping up to the plate to make the characters a family that "moved out" of their situation, yet they did have the "drive" to want to do better. They made the character son "Michael" the main intelligent one in the family, while it seemed they made "Thelma" the daughter character seem like she was waiting for her "knight in shining armour" to rescue her from her situation. Then again, maybe some of the actors in the show tried to speak with the writers about making improvements in the script and it didn't work out. It did seem like James' character kept hitting "a brick road", like the writers wanted to keep him a "weak provider" for his family, as though as a Black male it was hopeless for him to move up in society.

I think the James, the father character left because wasn't that around the time "Roots" was starting to be filmed?
[Edited 5/29/09 13:17pm]




I thought both parents left the show because they were mad that Jimmy Walker was the star.


No, John Amos got fired because of contractual issues.

Ester Rolle later left because she didn't like the direction the show was going. She was asked to return for the last season to close the show.

From what I understand, Ester was upset that JJ was the star. This show was supposed to be about her. She was the STAR. Especially since it was a spinoff of her character on Maude.
**--••--**--••**--••--**--••**--••--**--••**--••-
U 'gon make me shake my doo loose!
http://www.twitter.com/nivlekbrad
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #118 posted 05/29/09 1:23pm

2elijah

kpowers said:

2elijah said:



Good point, but I think that was the writers fault and no one stepping up to the plate to make the characters a family that "moved out" of their situation, yet they did have the "drive" to want to do better. They made the character son "Michael" the main intelligent one in the family, while it seemed they made "Thelma" the daughter character seem like she was waiting for her "knight in shining armour" to rescue her from her situation. Then again, maybe some of the actors in the show tried to speak with the writers about making improvements in the script and it didn't work out. It did seem like James' character kept hitting "a brick road", like the writers wanted to keep him a "weak provider" for his family, as though as a Black male it was hopeless for him to move up in society.

I think the James, the father character left because wasn't that around the time "Roots" was starting to be filmed?
[Edited 5/29/09 13:17pm]




I thought both parents left the show because they were mad that Jimmy Walker was the star.


Is that true? I didn't hear about that.hmmm Interesting.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #119 posted 05/29/09 1:24pm

2elijah

daPrettyman said:

kpowers said:





I thought both parents left the show because they were mad that Jimmy Walker was the star.


No, John Amos got fired because of contractual issues.

Ester Rolle later left because she didn't like the direction the show was going. She was asked to return for the last season to close the show.

From what I understand, Ester was upset that JJ was the star. This show was supposed to be about her. She was the STAR. Especially since it was a spinoff of her character on Maude.



Oh that's right. I forgot she was on that show. Wow, the things you learn about these shows years later. Well, since that show ended, sadly after that it seems it did nothing for Jimmy's future career to be honest with you.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 4 of 7 <1234567>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > General Discussion > Spike Lee Puts Tyler Perry On Blast!