Facts:
U cannot COMMIT the murder and then go from the scene of the crime, 2 Oj's house, take a shower, go 2 the airport and board a plane in L.A. in an hour unless your name is Clark Kent.

Based on the crime scene alone, there was so much much blood and brute force that the time frame given 4 the killing in no way matches what was presented 2 the court.

There was strong evidence of a Columbian Necktie as the M.O. 4 the murder.

They NEVER called the male date that was with Nicole and her kids that night 2 the stand. Ever wonder why?

They did not present a single motive 4 OJ killing the woman. They had been divorced 4 years. What was the motive?

There was other hair samples in the cap that they found. Caucasian

Nicole and her friend (FR)owed a crap load of money 2 people who are not friendly 2 people whom owe them money. (alleged)

2 weeks after the crime scene O.J. blood show up on a fence that had been cleaned. That same blood had traces of DHT which was used 2 analyze his blood alleged 2 be found in his bronco. The same amount found on the fense was missing from the vile of his blood that they took from OJ as evidence.

The D.A. at the time had it in 4 any and all celebs.....and almost NEVER won a case against any of them.

The judge allowed testimony into the case that had NOTHING 2 do with the murder.

.....I could go on and on about the funny business in this case.

Did I mention the detectives? Mark Furman, that fool that lived with OJ, the LAPD, ....etc.
[Edited 5/22/09 12:06pm]
[Edited 5/22/09 12:28pm]

MuthaFunka said:

U killing me.

MuthaFunka said:

I totally agree. It doesn't really matter if I believe OJ did it (and I was definitely shocked at the decision), the more important thing to me in retrospect was that those jurors had a lot of doubt and Cochran was well aware of it. It shone a spotlight on that particular issue.

Keep in mind that this was only a couple years after Rodney King. People in LA had no faith in cops--and for very good reason!

What I learned is that I had to accept the possibility that he did not do it because despite DNA evidence, there is another type of evidence, like corruption in the system, misplaced faith in science, jumping to conclusions, racism, and on and on, if that makes sense

My God, don't tell me you one those who really believes he didn't do it.

NDRU said:

Exactly. OJ put a LOT of extras on it when he was trying on that glove .

weused2luvhim said:

Can't say I'm convinced. Like I said, I don't recall the details from back then all that well, so when I am re-examining the facts TODAY... the "evidence" sounds weak.

Graycap23 said:

Dude. In the 80s/90s, they were. What more do you want?

Cinnie, I was never into the case enough to come to a hard-and-fast conclusion of where I stand. But a private investigator named William Dear, who at one time was convinced of O.J.'s guilt, wrote a book called O.J. is Guilty, but Not of Murder where he comes to the conclusion the culprit was quite possibly O.J.'s son Jason. O.J., he says, knew, but took the heat for him.

His theory might explain everything from the shoe footprint ... to the matching blood evidence ... to the glove not quite fitting ... to the unreconcilable timeline ... to that odd fist fight no one talks about that Jason and O.J. had at the end of O.J.'s "running away" in the Bronco. Jason also allegedly had a pretty widely known history of violence, which police never talked about. And notice that while everyone else around the trial, including O.J.'s daughter Arnell, capitalized on their fleeting notoriety for a bit, no one has seen hide nor hair of Jason since.
[Edited 5/22/09 11:27am]

Graycap23 said:

Dude. In the 80s/90s, they were. What more do you want?

But why OJ? Why hang a murder wrap on him? For what? He wasn't important or relevant then. So why HIM?

They had been divorced 4 years. What was the motive?

- The murder crimeline isn't etched in stone.
- Columbian necktie is when they slit the neck and then pull the tongue through - that wasn't what happened to Ron.
- What was her date that night gonna testify to?
- They did present motive: Their tumultuous history and his jealousy.
- Where did it say they found other hairs in the cap?
- The "owed money" claim is just a claim.
- When did this DHT incident come from?

But why OJ? Why hang a murder wrap on him? For what? He wasn't important or relevant then. So why HIM?

MuthaFunka said:

It reminded me of those commercials for some new product and the person is acting all annoyed with the old product.

"Tired of traditional gloves? They don't repel blood, and they shrink on you. OUCH!! THAT doesn't fit! With the new Isotoner gloves you get..."

MuthaFunka said:

Simply not true bro.....

What the hell is up with all these fruit loop replies?

I look at it this way; I have a relatively small mouth.
But if the cock don’t quit, must you really acquit? Hell nah.
But if the cock don’t fit and the handling of the
sperm by the pros later was sloppy, and done by a open homophobe
from the Republican party with a history of only sucking
cocks in dingy public bathrooms in Minneapolis airports.
Then you got enough evidence to say, “You know what,
we can’t prove beyond reasonable doubt that he’s a cocksucker.”
Even though you know damned well, I probably sucked that
cock.

That’s the way I look at it.

MuthaFunka said:

They were like $500 shoes back then.

What the hell is up with all these fruit loop replies?

Graycap23 said:

Dawg, they were. The ones OJ had were around $160-$180 bucks. Now, what KILLER goes around in $170 shoes killin' muh'fuckas?

Graycap23 said:

Dawg, they were. The ones OJ had were around $160-$180 bucks. Now, what KILLER goes around in $170 shoes killin' muh'fuckas?

SCNDLS said:

They are subtopics.. easier than quoting.

Graycap23 said:

Dawg, they were. The ones OJ had were around $160-$180 bucks. Now, what KILLER goes around in $170 shoes killin' muh'fuckas?

angel345 said:

a-ha!

What the hell is up with all these fruit loop replies?

MuthaFunka said:

There is absolutely no logic in that!

Imago said:

we thank U 4 Ur support
[Edited 5/22/09 13:07pm]

MuthaFunka said:

Timeline: he needed about 4 more hours so u are correct.
Ron: hummm.....
So the last man 2 see her alive would have nothing 2 add?
Weak as s*** 4 murder
See what happens when u don't do your homework?
Blood.....see above^

MuthaFunka said: