Graycap23 said:

MuthaFunka said:

Oh really? Go 2 Nordstroms or the Beverly Center.

Cinnie said:

Cinnie said:

Have you seen him try on the glove? Maybe it didn't fit, but he put on this ridiculous show of not being able to fit it on his hand Of course, I would have done the same thing. There's not a chance in hell that glove woul fit my hand!

NDRU said:

They had a show on NBC a few years back on how the prosecuters blew this case. They showed the video of him trying on the glove and you could see on a close up that he was sticking his thumb out so it wouldn't go on. Also the prosecuting attorney never brought up the whole Bronco chase and threatening suicide during the trial.

weused2luvhim said:

I still don't see how suicide infers guilt. He was just in hell for being suspect.

Cinnie said:

I could go either way with that. Either he ran & threatened suicide because he was guilty OR because he felt there was no way a guy in his position could be acquitted in America.

Facts:
U cannot COMMIT the murder and then go from the scene of the crime, 2 Oj's house, take a shower, go 2 the airport and board a plane in L.A. in an hour unless your name is Clark Kent.

Based on the crime scene alone, there was so much much blood and brute force that the time frame given 4 the killing in no way matches what was presented 2 the court.

There was strong evidence of a Columbian Necktie as the M.O. 4 the murder.

They NEVER called the male date that was with Nicole and her kids that night 2 the stand. Ever wonder why?

They did not present a single motive 4 OJ killing the woman. They had been divorced 4 years. What was the motive?

There was other hair samples in the cap that they found. Caucasian

Nicole and her friend (FR)owed a crap load of money 2 people who are not friendly 2 people whom owe them money. (alleged)

2 weeks after the crime scene O.J. blood show up on a fence that had been cleaned. That same blood had traces of DHT which was used 2 analyze his blood alleged 2 be found in his bronco. The same amount found on the fense was missing from the vile of his blood that they took from OJ as evidence.

The D.A. at the time had it in 4 any and all celebs.....and almost NEVER won a case against any of them.

The judge allowed testimony into the case that had NOTHING 2 do with the murder.

.....I could go on and on about the funny business in this case.

Did I mention the detectives? Mark Furman, that fool that lived with OJ, the LAPD, ....etc.
[Edited 5/22/09 12:06pm]
[Edited 5/22/09 12:28pm]

Cinnie said:

The dude was running from the cops putting a gun to his head for 1 reason. He didn't like the fact that his ex was fucking this younger guy, he couldn't take and he killed them. He was in hell because he thought he was going to get the gas chamber.

weused2luvhim said:

The prosecution totally blew the case. They were as bad as the defense, for completely different reasons.

IN fact, I believe I hate everyone involved in the entire case, from the judge to the victims to the key players. The whole thing represents the worst of LA & Hollywood. The fact that it was a TV spectacle only magnified the sliminess of it all.

It'll be awesome when the dude finally confesses on his death bed or something....but I bet some people will probably still call him innocent.

JustErin said:

There was one quote I read from him where he said that since the trial he has no trouble getting dates, saying "it must be the whole bad boy thing." Not a confession exactly, but strange nonetheless

If OJ didn't do it, he knows who did. Plus there was a write up, though I cannot say its solid proof, that Ron Goldman was pushing dope for the underworld. Could they have killed him and Nicole and framed OJ? Possible.
[Edited 5/22/09 12:14pm]

angel345 said:

O.J had cuts on his hands, I guess they could have held him down and made wounds on his hands like those people get when they stab someone to death.

Cinnie said:

They found the shoe print of those particular shoes at the crime scene. As for him changing clothes, the timeline isn't exactly etched in stone.

Graycap23 said:

Or eating at Macdonald's with Kato and then hopping in a limo an hour later.

Especially when there was some sort of "torture" marks found on both victims. The killer had TIIIIIME.

JustErin said:

weused2luvhim said:

But no cuts on the glove. However, if that's what they did, I wouldn't put it pass them.
[Edited 5/22/09 12:24pm]

NDRU said:

weused2luvhim said:

I don't understand how that is proof.

I got a cut on my hand and am wearing Maglis right now.

angel345 said:

a-ha!

Cinnie said:

1 thing is not proof. My God, don't tell me you one those who really believes he didn't do it.

Lammastide said:

I haven't peeped the book, but from you've presented, I can't support that theory. Why would Jason be wearing Bruno Maglis? Why would he be THAT pissed at someone he's not tomantically linked to? That was a crime of passion not of "just vilent behavior". As for that spat with his pops after the chase - there was A LOT of emotions going on at that particular time, so him getting into it with his pops isn't strange at all. As for those that cashed in on their fame - the only 2 people that tried to cash in were Furhman and Cato. Everyone else had their 15 minutes but that was because of the magnitude of the case.

Graycap23 said:

Naw, the evidence was pretty overwhelming, but all JC & Co. had to do was to present reasonable doubt. And people snap. We ask that same question of a lot of people who just "suddenly kill". Why did the Craigslist dude kill?

MuthaFunka said:

See reply #37.

NDRU said:

That's ALL Cochran and crew had to do - present reasonable doubt - and they did it successfully. Hell, even Kardashian was shocked at the acquittal!

Graycap23 said:

Back then, they were.

MuthaFunka said:

U killing me.

NDRU said:

Exactly. OJ put a LOT of extras on it when he was trying on that glove .

MuthaFunka said:

I totally agree. It doesn't really matter if I believe OJ did it (and I was definitely shocked at the decision), the more important thing to me in retrospect was that those jurors had a lot of doubt and Cochran was well aware of it. It shone a spotlight on that particular issue.

Keep in mind that this was only a couple years after Rodney King. People in LA had no faith in cops--and for very good reason!

What I learned is that I had to accept the possibility that he did not do it because despite DNA evidence, there is another type of evidence, like corruption in the system, misplaced faith in science, jumping to conclusions, racism, and on and on, if that makes sense