PinkOrchid said:

Um, nooooo lol...I was already seeing Pantha's "words" on numerous sites from when I was doing my own research for my response. And I only posted those links NOT because she disagreed with me (for fuck's sake, please lol...)...but because I found it hysterically hypocritcal of her to ridicule me for copying and pasting text from sites instead of using my own words when she was obviously doing the same damn thing. Not too hard to figure out, really...




And some people won't accept logical and factual explanations to their conspiracy theories, instead preferring to hang onto them as if they were life preservers

And I can post links, too ...

http://www.badastronomy.c...pollo.html

One of the more relevant parts of that site:

hokie said:

Is there no 'leave an orger a message' thread for you to post that on?

I thought the mods didn't like passive aggressive behavior

Byron said:

What evidence do the Fake Moon Landing Conspiracy Theorists have?
The evidence and ideas put forward by the Fake Moon Landing Conspiracy Theorists include the following:

No Plans for return trips

Images show that Stars were missing from the black lunar sky

Absence of engine noise in official NASA footage - how was it possible to clearly hear the voices of the Astronauts?

No Blast Crater under the LEM after the powerful engines had been fired

Astronauts Footprints - How was it possible for footprints to be left undisturbed and without dust

American Flag was waving - how is this possible when there is no air on the moon

Pictures of the ascent of the LEM - images appear to show that the LEM was jerked up, as if by a cable, there was no evidence of an exhaust plume

Grainy, Unclear images although technology at the time could have produced much clearer images - Did NASA intentionally make the images hard to see?

Still Photographs - Cameras were fitted to the Astronauts chest - there was no view finder and photographs could only be taken by movement of the body but 1000's of flawless photographs were taken

Crosshairs on Still Photographs - The crosshairs on the photographs could only be on the top of images but pictures of the Astronauts and the Flag clearly show that the crosshairs were partially obscured, beneath the images

Shadows - The only source of light on the moon was the Sun but shadows were cast in multiple directions

Lighting - Images of Astronauts were brightly lighted although their positions would have clearly been in shadow. Some images indicate that the Astronauts appeared to be in spotlight

Backgrounds - the backdrops or the moonscape of some images appear to be identical although NASA stated that the images were taken at different times and locations which were over 2 miles apart

The Van Allen Radiation Belt - Could the Astronauts survive travelling through the deadly radiation belt which is situated 500 miles above the earth and is 1000's of miles thick with only the protection from their space suits and the thin covering of the space ship when it is estimated that 6 feet of lead would be necessary would have been needed. None of the Astronauts have since showed any signs of radiation poisoning

No other manned mission has gone through the Belt

Silencing - It seems unreasonable that information would not have been leaked about any such hoax - theorists therefore believe that key witnesses, including members of the Astronaut Corps, were deliberately silenced. Between 1964 and 1967 10 astronauts died in accidents - 15% of the corps.

Fact stranger than Fiction? Facts and Info
In 1978 the movie Capricorn One was released about a fake manned Mission To Mars. The movie was made for a budget of $4 Million and comparisons have been drawn between the movie and the Fake Moon Landing Hoax - the Conspiracy Theory. Area 51 is also considered in these comparisons. The Nevada Desert Terrain, where Area 51 is located has amazing similarities to the moon terrain, including craters. Satellite pictures of Area 51 indicate large hangars which are similar to Movie Sets. The secrecy surrounding area 51 adds fuel to the fire of the Fake Moon Landing Hoax Conspiracy Theorists




..I didn't copy and paste all that, I swear!

Imago's Ocean mega penis pic?????

^^^ Go back to the site I just linked to, and you'll see explanations for pretty much damn near all of that stuff lol :yes:...then you can explain why their explanations should not be given any validity. That second part is what's sorely missing from this thread: actual responses to the explanations given that claim to debunk the "moon landing hoax" theory. Explain why they don't debunk any of the theory...don't just re-post the theory.

Amaxx said:

...Yeah, I've had my doubts about that one as well ...

Byron said:[quote]

PanthaGirl said:

OMG...I think I love you

Even tho you're a dude...and you drink coke

Nikademus said:

Why do women keep saying that to me?

Byron said:

I just believe that is a hell of a lot of evidence to back up it was a hoax, it's not just a few little things and the explanations from NASA which I have read don't ring true

Byron said:

It has the same kinda stench as tha alien autopsy to it. Doesn't it?

PinkOrchid said:

Fair enough

Amaxx said:

I don't think "stench" is the word you wanna use in connection to that image...

Byron said:

Dammit, I'll love you AND drink coke with you all damn day
if you'll WATCH THE VIDEO I LINKED! AND I like guys. so...



Sorry, but Trenita rawks.

RobynC said:

What video? lol

Byron said:

Byron said:

You were so busy debating ya skipped right over it!
Ya gotta go back a page on this thread...

This posting is hard work, dang.

Byron said:

What, the "you're a dude" part or the you drink vile nastyness" part?

hokie said:

Hush, you lol...

RobynC said:

Ok, that video was hilarious lol ...

Nikademus said:

Both lol

Byron said:

It's official then... I love you.

RobynC said:

Byron said:

Okay then Byron as long as the entire org agrees with U then I'm sure we can all move on from this.

I posted words and thoughts that I read in books based on other authors opinions on the moon landing and the works of Darwins theories and not the internet as it is a very unreliable source. You shouldn't lie either because the peeps your lying to may know the truth, as I know the truth of where my sources originated from.

Byron! Did you lie to me?!

PinkOrchid said:

Exactly but it seems favoritism runs thick in this place. If she had an decency at all she would have orgnoted me and kept it clean rather then attempt to discredit me.

PanthaGirl said:

I'm not trying to discredit you. I'm just saying that I think your arrogance is not a nice trait to have. It shows on this thread. Your "better than you" attitude is all over. Sorry if you don't like what I have to say.

PinkOrchid said:

June7 said:

OK. You're right. I apologize.

Funkmistress being a lesbian...Jersey put an end to all that nonsense.