SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:

Then you haven't been following MY words.

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:

Addressed.

CarrieMpls said:

He's now gonna turn around and tell us we don't understand logic!

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:

I made the decision to let her come by - THAT'S ON ME. What else is there after that? Nothing. That rest is ON HER.

MuthaFunka said:

So you're saying you're responsible for the false claims.

CarrieMpls said:

IG-FUCKING-ZACKLY! - When did I omit MIKE'S responsibility? NEVER. Again, YOU GUYS READ WHAT YOU WANTED TO READ! Again - NOT MY PROBLEM.

But Carrie...you're avoiding my question - Do you have daughters?

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:

C'mon, Soop! You're WAY faster than this, playa! I'm responsible for letting the ho in! Now, what part of that are you gonna STILL misconstrue?

JustErin said:

Wanna answer this, MuthaFunka?

MuthaFunka said:

You're use of the word "responsible" is totally missused and confused. You need to phrase your beliefs differently because you're words indicate you think a woman is responsible for her own rape just because she chose to go with a man to his place.

MuthaFunka said:

Uh, why she gotta be a ho, Mutha??? Is it cuz she shook her fast ass in Mike's face all day, then went to his room to "talk" at 3 am????

MuthaFunka said:

You seriously do not think you're responsible at all for putting yourself in a position with a stanger at 3am, who then can falsely accuse you of rape?

JustErin said:

Already did - page 4, #106.

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:

Bullshit. "Responsible" is the ONLY word that's needed. YOU misconstrued my comments from jump. That's not my problem...or better yet...not my responsibility - THAT'S YOURS!

MuthaFunka said:

Ok, went back and re-read it. So what does that have to do with rape?

SCNDLS said:

Naw, Soop is talking about the hypothetical situation he put myself in...and in that hypothetical - she was a ho!

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:

Ya'll tripping cuz you know good and gatdamn well that if you saw a story on the news about 2 unknown people and the woman was raped or even killed in the hotel room of a dude she met earlier that day. The FIRST thing that would come to mind is, "What the hell was she doing in a stranger's hotel room at 3 am?" Does it make what he did right? No. But he wouldn't have been able to do it if SHE didn't put herself in harm's way.

That's how I view this whole Craigslist murder. No reputable masseuse is going to advertise in that joint when EVERYBODY knows what Craigslist is really used for. Did she deserve to die? Hell, no, but I wasn't surprised either.

MuthaFunka said:

and by your own logic you are responsible for false rape claims because you invited her ho ass over at 3 AM

MuthaFunka said:

Oh, I see.

JustErin said:

Hell fuckin' yeah I'm responsible for putting myself in that situation. EVERY SINGLE MAN ON THIS PLANET THAT HAS SEX IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SITUATIONS THAT MAY ARISE FROM THAT DECISION. Period. This shit could happen to ANYBODY.

JustErin said:

Had she not gone. NO RAPE/FALSE CLAIM OF RAPE. Can you dispute that?

SCNDLS said:

Oh c;mon, SC! LOGIC/COMMON SENSE doesn't come into play! This is about "Going back to a stranger's room" simply because "I do it all the time!"

MuthaFunka said:

That includes you hooker

SCNDLS said:

Wrong.

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:

Naw, I've NEVER done THAT shit! Not even my black ass is THAT much of a pussy-hound!

MuthaFunka said:

I see, your post came off as you saying you were not responsible at all for being accused or rape as you said it was all on HER.

But now I see you say you are partly responsible.

Ok.

MuthaFunka said:

This is scary logic to me. Yikes.

MuthaFunka said:

But you're saying that you wouldn't be responsible. So are you, or aren't you?

I do not have daughters, but I have two lovely nieces. And I would absolultely advise them NOT to show up at a strange man's hotel room at 3am.

But if they did and something happened I would never in a million years say they were responsible for what happaned to them.

SCNDLS said:

Nobody is saying that people shouldn't use good/better/wise judgement. Funka's whole premise is that she is responsible for her rape because she chose to be with a man afterhours at his place. We can all agree that certain situations can be dangerous and all that but this is just classic blame the victim.

regardless of whether or not good judgement was used a woman always has the right to say no and not to be raped. I know you're not disputing this but Mutha needs serious lessons on how to get his point accross because that is the logical conclusion of his stance. I'm not the only one who sees that.

MuthaFunka said:

Who said they "do it all the time"?

What was said was that this kind of thing happens all the time. Even you admit to doing it.