Yo face?

that poor duck...

roodboi said:

it's getting molested too!

What a waste of duct tape

I don't know.....lemme think about it.

JerseyKRS said:

Mmm yeah, that's hillarious. Gaffer taping a baby to a wall for laughs? Moronic.

Omg, I had that exact duck when I was a child... How dare they!
[Edited 4/9/09 11:11am]

3121 said:

PANDURITO said:

I assume you haven't got a child? Can't you see that the baby is still clinging to its teddy? What does that tell you? I have as much a sense of humour as anybody but this 'stunt' is nothing short of pathetic. Do you realise how quickly that child could hit the floor and the damage that it would cause it? Doesn't matter that the child was put in danger and obvious discomfort just so a bunch of assholes get a 'hillarious' email its ok. And i'm the one with the problem? Where is the parents mind at to concoct such an idea? Ironic that they blacked out the childs face to 'protect it'. This world has lost its fuckin' mind.
[Edited 4/9/09 11:30am]

3121 said:

When I first saw this, I thought maybe the baby is on the floor and they just made it look like its on wall. Not that thats any better but maybe less discomfort for the child. But you pointing out that it's clinging to it's teddy shows how scared the child is and I just don't see what's so funny

JerseyKRS said:

hahahahahaha!

veronikka said:

wow, the org is HYPER sensitive lately. It's okay guys, I'm sure the baby wasn't hurt or damaged.

JerseyKRS said:

Full Moon today

Slim SHAAAADY! Jerz iz da new Slim Shady! Matter of fact, I'm Royce Da 5'9. Together we're the new Joe Jackson & Ike!

























.....














No wait, let me rephrase that.....

Mysterioso said:

Bad Meets Evil is the name of this dynamic duo, fool!

JerseyKRS said:

Are you? No, you're not, how can you be? It's nothing to do with hyper sensitivity either, just common sense. Sadly common sense isn't that common on the org today. The child is obviously uncomfortable - It's hanging to a wall by gaffer tape clinging to it's toy. Does that sound comfortable? I'm sure your intentions were not bad in posting this but that entire 'stunt' is just twisted.
[Edited 4/9/09 12:41pm]

3121 said:

I've never found the humor in this picture myself. Everything isn't funny.

3121 said:

This is true. However, how can you be sure it was? She may have thought it was fun and laughed. None of us know.

JerseyKRS said:

The image itself shows the child isn't comfortable. How comfortable does being taped to a wall sound to you? Now consider that you cant talk on communicate that you are scared or in discomfort. Sound fun? The child may have not suffered any injury but they have clearly been put at totally unceccesary risk. As a parent you have one job - Look after your child. This is abuse to my eyes, the more i see it the more horrendous the image becomes.
[Edited 4/9/09 12:45pm]

yo! what if these people didn't have the money for a babychair or a park (how do you say that in English?) and they have angry dogs. That shit is serious. Maybe this was the only way they could save their baby during a flooding.

All in all, not considering personal situations etc ... etc ... I can manage a smile.

Jersey would never seriously condone abuse of a child. I know that. He's just a big, goofy guy with a bit of a wrecked sense of humor. It was meant to be a joke. Not everything on the internet is meant to be taken literally.

I looked at it like something from a movie. Typical trailer park trash game quirk or something of that abominated nature. Truth be told, shit like this is tame. I mean, I don't HAVE a kid. But I'd assume that if I HAD one that the kid would be accustomed to living under the upbringing of a quirky parental unit. Now, if he/she was uncomfortable with something a bit "OUT THERE" as this, then I 'spose that I should know my boundaries and not cross them. But really, there's tomfoolery like this and there's snuff films (Boy, I bet this post is going to get snipped). I'm not trying to desensitize The ORG. I get what some of you guys are saying. However, we're kind of tugging on the level of what is accepted and what is consider perverse.
[Edited 4/9/09 12:51pm]

3121 said:

Okay, even though you are clearly LOCKED into your view on this, I'll give my opinion.

That child can communicate fear and discomfort, it's not 5 days old. How do we know if someone was or was not directly under the baby, out of view in the photo? We have done some silly things with our kids also, that they enjoyed and laughed at. That's my two cents, but feel free to have your opinion also.

hokie said:

That's what I'm saying. If the fucking baby was up there for 4 hours, that's abuse. 5 minutes to take a funny photo? Totally okay in my book. Unless it was crying or hurt of course. The child looks indifferent in this photo.

JerseyKRS said:

Looks like the kid is lying on the floor 2 me.....