New topic
PrintablereneGade20 said: JerseyKRS said: listen, if some girl that was positive, and knowingly infected me, it'd be pretty tough to convince me not to shoot her. That's the god honest truth.  Y'all need some got-damned anger management classes or somthin'.....  Not at all. Shit, I haven't fought a dude since high school. And we ended up "hooking" up ten years later even though I whupped his ass. I've stated two specific instances where my initial response would be to most certainly, without a doubt, fuck a nucca's ass up. I'm cool as long as neither of those situations arise, otherwise. . . that's ya ass.  | |
- E-mail - orgNote -  Report post to moderator |
Lammastide said: DesireeNevermind said: I feel awful for her.
 What a scumbucket lying sack of gumshoe whore mongering piece of shit. In this day and age you would think, especially someone of his stature, would protect themselves at all cost. Especially if they have kids. Of course it only takes one time but dayum, is it that hard for dudes to slip on a rubber? Who the hell was he fucking? Midnight crack trannies?  I hear ya, BUT...
Remember, if he was screwing around to the degree that some suggest, it very well likely began years before he was with this woman and her children. Nonetheless, yes, unprotected sex is stupid... and it certainly is no less precarious with an ostensibly healthy, heterosexual blond suburban co-ed or professional than, say, a "midnight crack tranny." The assumption otherwise is, in fact, what probably makes folk like professional athletes and celebs think they can safely screw 1000 such groupies -- in one night -- unprotected.
Aids or no aids, he broke his vows and endangered her life. You do what you want with your life but when you start fucking around with someone elses you have crossed the line and you deserve whatever they choose to do or sue. I hope she gets every dime and let that be a lesson to the other fucktards doing the same thing.
I don't think they were ever married. But, yeah, I'd say he had some expectation to be upfront about his health. Unfortunately (and this is one very prevalent factor in HIV transmission), many HIV+ folk honestly don't know they have the virus... and either may actually be afraid to get tested out of fear of having their poz status confirmed or they deny their risk because they imagine they've been with relatively "safe" people (i.e., not fags, druggies... or "midnight crack trannies.") That sort of problematic thinking probably puts TONS of people in the grave. The solution? He shouldn't have been screwing around, of course -- ever! And when he did, he should have worn condoms. But only Alomar could've controlled that, eh? Which brings us to Dall: While she may or may not share significant ethical culpability in exposing herself, there was inarguably a practical culpability. Barring rape (which hasn't been alleged), she simply would not have arrived in this situation unless she willingly engaged in unprotected sex with Alomar -- and athletes are sketchy sexual partners... especially ones with persistent coughs, chronic fatigue, shingles, thrombocytopenia purpura, thrush, a vague recollection of rape at the hands of two Mexican guys and a refusal to be transparently tested for HIV. 
[Edited 2/12/09 7:47am] you make good points but the issue still remains that if ur committed to someone and they say they are to you and you are living together as man and wife (vows apply to common law marriage too) then you would not expect that you have to wear a condom each and every time. what if they wanted to have children together? if a relationship is so clinical then it is not a relationship at all. if you can't trust the one your'e with then there are no bonds left in society. He must have been giving her quite the shine on for her not ever suspect he was endarngering their lives. That's why it appears deliberate on his part IMHO. Those kind of folks need to be locked up or put out of all our misery. I firmly believe there are folks purposely spreading the HIV. In san fran where I use to live, they have "gift giving" parties among the gays. I don't have to tell you what that means. And with the hetero teens who think they are invincible ....its just sad that what should be done in love and sincerity is reduced to a quick means of satisfaction and perhaps killing someone.   | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
meow85 said: CalhounSq said: This thread is fucking BIZARRE
& I'll be damned if I fuck my HUSBAND w/ a condom. Hell, if I ever do get married it'll be the first unprotected sex I've EVER HAD - gimme a break w/ this condom/husband shit! No offense to anyone here who chooses to do that, but don't act like people are ridiculous to EXPECT some level of commitment from a SPOUSE No one's saying it's ridiculous, just that it's really naive to think all spouses will be faithful, and that only the nasty ones are cheaters. Understood, but I think most people go into marriage hoping it'll last & that their spouse WILL be faithful. Marriage in itself is a risk, so why take ANY of that risk w/ someone you don't trust from the start? I dunno - I see your point, but DAMN that shit is dismal...   I never met you, but I LOVE you & I will forever!! Thank you for being YOU - my little Princey, the best to EVER do it | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CalhounSq said: meow85 said: No one's saying it's ridiculous, just that it's really naive to think all spouses will be faithful, and that only the nasty ones are cheaters. Understood, but I think most people go into marriage hoping it'll last & that their spouse WILL be faithful. Marriage in itself is a risk, so why take ANY of that risk w/ someone you don't trust from the start? I dunno - I see your point, but DAMN that shit is dismal... And if you want to conceive a child, you have to use artificial insemination. Your spouse is not gonna become more faithful just because you wanna have kids. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
You're all DOOMED!!!   | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |