PurpleJedi said: This thread is going 2 B a classic! Anyone consider our next-best-thing to actual superheroes? WWE WRESTLERS OF COURSE!!!! The guys are getting to look just like hand-drawn superheroes; ...and the women too; Yes, they jump and slam and throw each other around the ring, BOOBS & ALL!!!!! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
almost everything that can be said about the sexist, degrading, insulting portrayal of women in comics (as characters and drawings) can also be said about the portrayal of men in comics. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I don't see anything disturbing Is there any place of refuge one can flee from this insanity | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
johnart said: meow85 said: People complain about and debate the lack of realism in comic books all the time. You never wondered why the acid origin stories for TwoFace and The Joker were missing from The Dark Knight? It's because people were bitching about the silliness of it. Like everyone else, you're missing the whole point. It's not just about the giant, usually exposed titties. (what if our hero, oh I dunno, GETS STABBED IN THE HEART, for fuck's sake?) It's also about the teeny, tiny waists, the pencil neck, and weak-looking spindly arms. I'm not saying they should be drawn like bodybuilders, but they should have a little muscle to them, at least. Even Supergirl's not gonna be able to throw down if she's emaciated. [Edited 1/31/09 17:05pm] I don't think we're really missing the point. I think we find the point to be...pointless. If one is willing to suspend their disbelief in order to accept a superhero has superpowers how can one then expect the superhero must to abide by rules of real-life human anatomy? You can't have it be fantasy and real. So how come the men aren't drawn like emaciated dolls then? After all, if it's fantasy shouldn't we be able to suspend our disbelief that a guy built like that could also throw down? Why isn't Superman a tinky lil thang? "A Watcher scoffs at gravity!" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
johnart said: PurpleJedi said: Yes, they jump and slam and throw each other around the ring, BOOBS & ALL!!!!! This woman never seems to complain she's being sexualized. Have you ever heard a pro wrestler of either gender form a coherent intelligent sentence about anything? I rest my case. "A Watcher scoffs at gravity!" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
errant said: almost everything that can be said about the sexist, degrading, insulting portrayal of women in comics (as characters and drawings) can also be said about the portrayal of men in comics.
You see a lot of male characters overtly portrayed as sex objects first, heroes second? You see a lot of gratuitous bulges and exposed flesh, do you? You see cute lil statuettes of ol' Spidey sticking his ass out as he does laundry for some guy? DAMN, you gotta let me know what comics you're reading if you are, cuz it looks like I've missed those ones. "A Watcher scoffs at gravity!" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
MarySharon said: I don't see anything disturbing Who said anything about disturbing? I said it was stupid and impractical. Nobody who's all tits and no muscle is going to stand a chance in a fight. "A Watcher scoffs at gravity!" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
meow85 said: johnart said: This woman never seems to complain she's being sexualized. Have you ever heard a pro wrestler of either gender form a coherent intelligent sentence about anything? I rest my case. WOOOW!!! Ever heard of Chris Jericho? Mick Foley? WOOOW!!! Well, of course not, son! Because you don't know the "INTRICACIES" of the biz. JEEZ!!! I'd expect that from someone else, man! Not you. You've got to be a little more observant. And Beth is another intelligent person in the biz. She's a hard-worker, too. This sig is just a fig of your imago-neigh-shun | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
meow85 said: errant said: almost everything that can be said about the sexist, degrading, insulting portrayal of women in comics (as characters and drawings) can also be said about the portrayal of men in comics.
You see a lot of male characters overtly portrayed as sex objects first, heroes second? You see a lot of gratuitous bulges and exposed flesh, do you? You see cute lil statuettes of ol' Spidey sticking his ass out as he does laundry for some guy? DAMN, you gotta let me know what comics you're reading if you are, cuz it looks like I've missed those ones. the entire superhero genre is about good looking men with bulging muscles running around in tight underwear. or hadn't you noticed? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I don't know if I'd say that men are being degraded, though. I mean, this world is practically male-dominated; that's most likely including the audience and creators of most comic books. How exactly can the male gender be degraded, though. I don't know. This sig is just a fig of your imago-neigh-shun | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
meow85 said: MarySharon said: I don't see anything disturbing Who said anything about disturbing? I said it was stupid and impractical. Nobody who's all tits and no muscle is going to stand a chance in a fight. what's having muscle anyway whithout suppleness, speed and some kung fu technique Is there any place of refuge one can flee from this insanity | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
errant said: meow85 said: You see a lot of male characters overtly portrayed as sex objects first, heroes second? You see a lot of gratuitous bulges and exposed flesh, do you? You see cute lil statuettes of ol' Spidey sticking his ass out as he does laundry for some guy? DAMN, you gotta let me know what comics you're reading if you are, cuz it looks like I've missed those ones. the entire superhero genre is about good looking men with bulging muscles running around in tight underwear. or hadn't you noticed? Yeah...tight underwear that apparently has nothing in it, given how flat those shorts are and how indirectly they're framed in a panel. And with few exceptions, it's very rare for a male superhero to be deliberately presented as a sex object. Some people do find superguys hot, but it's not because of any purposeful portrayals of them as such. It's just not comparable. When Batman and Wolverine start showing some junk in the front of their jockeys and panels close-up lovingly on their asses, that's when you'll have an argument. And you're another person who's missed the point of the thread. Are there any male superheros drawn in such a way you'd doubt their ability to even girlyslap someone away? The sexist portrayals of women is related, but it's not the point of my thread. [Edited 2/1/09 3:16am] "A Watcher scoffs at gravity!" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Mysterioso said: meow85 said: Have you ever heard a pro wrestler of either gender form a coherent intelligent sentence about anything? I rest my case. WOOOW!!! Ever heard of Chris Jericho? Mick Foley? WOOOW!!! Well, of course not, son! Because you don't know the "INTRICACIES" of the biz. JEEZ!!! I'd expect that from someone else, man! Not you. You've got to be a little more observant. And Beth is another intelligent person in the biz. She's a hard-worker, too. I have indeed heard of those clowns. And I've heard them speak, too. There's a reason they're employed as actors at play-fighting, and not as chemists. "A Watcher scoffs at gravity!" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
MarySharon said: meow85 said: Who said anything about disturbing? I said it was stupid and impractical. Nobody who's all tits and no muscle is going to stand a chance in a fight. what's having muscle anyway whithout suppleness, speed and some kung fu technique What's technique if our female heroes look too weak to flip their hair, let alone knock down a baddie? "A Watcher scoffs at gravity!" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
meow85 said: errant said: the entire superhero genre is about good looking men with bulging muscles running around in tight underwear. or hadn't you noticed? Yeah...tight underwear that apparently has nothing in it, given how flat those shorts are and how indirectly they're framed in a panel. And with few exceptions, it's very rare for a male superhero to be deliberately presented as a sex object. Some people do find superguys hot, but it's not because of any purposeful portrayals of them as such. It's just not comparable. When Batman and Wolverine start showing some junk in the front of their jockeys and panels close-up lovingly on their asses, that's when you'll have an argument. I have approximately 3000 comic books in my collection, and that's only what's left after having sold about half of them and having not bought any in almost 3 years. I can tell you that the drawings of musclebound men in skin-tight outfits that revealed every muscle, including those in the ass and the crotch, are part of what appealed to me when I was 12 year old gay male when I first started buying them. And you're another person who's missed the point of the thread. Are there any male superheros drawn in such a way you'd doubt their ability to even girlyslap someone away? The sexist portrayals of women is related, but it's not the point of my thread. [Edited 2/1/09 3:16am] MY point is that comic books, in general, rely on portraying all people in stereotypical imagery and characterization. That's really kind of the point of them as morality tales. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
meow85 said: Mysterioso said: WOOOW!!! Ever heard of Chris Jericho? Mick Foley? WOOOW!!! Well, of course not, son! Because you don't know the "INTRICACIES" of the biz. JEEZ!!! I'd expect that from someone else, man! Not you. You've got to be a little more observant. And Beth is another intelligent person in the biz. She's a hard-worker, too. I have indeed heard of those clowns. And I've heard them speak, too. There's a reason they're employed as actors at play-fighting, and not as chemists. Whatever you say, bro. Whatever you say. You're adamant and as diligent as they come. There's no inclining you to believe otherwise. This sig is just a fig of your imago-neigh-shun | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
errant said: I have approximately 3000 comic books in my collection, and that's only what's left after having sold about half of them and having not bought any in almost 3 years. I can tell you that the drawings of musclebound men in skin-tight outfits that revealed every muscle, including those in the ass and the crotch, are part of what appealed to me when I was 12 year old gay male when I first started buying them. Believe me, I'm not arguing that. I'm one of those people that thinks certain superheroes are hot as shit. How cool would sex while flying be? But these male superheroes are not deliberately being presented as sex objects the way female superheroes are. They're being perceived that way by certain readers alright, but I really doubt that's actually the intention. ESPECIALLY given how rare it is for those spandex tights to be showing off anything up front. Super-Dudes are usually hung like Ken dolls. MY point is that comic books, in general, rely on portraying all people in stereotypical imagery and characterization. That's really kind of the point of them as morality tales. The point of morality tales is to pretend women who, in real life would be useless and helpless if attacked, can use a train as nun-chuks? At least give the ladies a little muscle -make that strength believable. It's insane to think Superman would be built like a brick shithouse and Supergirl, having the same powers, would look like she has trouble picking up a newborn kitten. [Edited 2/1/09 3:55am] "A Watcher scoffs at gravity!" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Mysterioso said: meow85 said: I have indeed heard of those clowns. And I've heard them speak, too. There's a reason they're employed as actors at play-fighting, and not as chemists. Whatever you say, bro. Whatever you say. You're adamant and as diligent as they come. There's no inclining you to believe otherwise. Bro? looking down at my vag That's news to me. "A Watcher scoffs at gravity!" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
meow85 said: Mysterioso said: Whatever you say, bro. Whatever you say. You're adamant and as diligent as they come. There's no inclining you to believe otherwise. Bro? looking down at my vag That's news to me. I call everyone "bro" and "dude", pretty much. I'll just affectionately call you, "The Cat's Pajamas". Better? This sig is just a fig of your imago-neigh-shun | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
meow85 said: Mysterioso said: Whatever you say, bro. Whatever you say. You're adamant and as diligent as they come. There's no inclining you to believe otherwise. Bro? looking down at my vag That's news to me. Vag | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Honey, pick you battles. This one is not worth it. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Dayclear said: Honey, pick you battles. This one is not worth it.
So are chicks who dig comics just supposed to sit back and accept the blatant sexism and stupidity? "A Watcher scoffs at gravity!" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
meow85 said: johnart said: This woman never seems to complain she's being sexualized. Have you ever heard a pro wrestler of either gender form a coherent intelligent sentence about anything? I rest my case. Le prego di non toccare la macchina per favore! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
meow85 said: johnart said: I don't think we're really missing the point. I think we find the point to be...pointless. If one is willing to suspend their disbelief in order to accept a superhero has superpowers how can one then expect the superhero must to abide by rules of real-life human anatomy? You can't have it be fantasy and real. So how come the men aren't drawn like emaciated dolls then? After all, if it's fantasy shouldn't we be able to suspend our disbelief that a guy built like that could also throw down? Why isn't Superman a tinky lil thang? They're built unrealistically the other way for the most part. And because they're drawn to fit many women's ideal of male hotness. Women don't buy calendars with emaciated shirtless firemen on them, they buy calendars of overly-buffed "studs". | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
meow85 said: johnart said: This woman never seems to complain she's being sexualized. Have you ever heard a pro wrestler of either gender form a coherent intelligent sentence about anything? I rest my case. LMAO! Who's perpetuating stereotypes now? So not only can a woman not throw down or balance herself if she's got big titties and a small waist. She also cannot be intelligent. You know we shall never agree on this one. [Edited 2/1/09 7:18am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
You often can't sell fashion magazines with realistic women in them to WOMEN.
What makes anyone think that the concept would work in an industry aimed mostly at young males. [Edited 2/1/09 8:13am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Fuck me! Is there not a delete post button up in here???
I keep quoting myself when I want to just edit/add something. Sorry folks...still getting used to the button layout on this site. [Edited 2/1/09 7:18am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
errant said: almost everything that can be said about the sexist, degrading, insulting portrayal of women in comics (as characters and drawings) can also be said about the portrayal of men in comics. Um, no. Practically every male superhero is fully dressed. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Efan said: sextonseven said: I'd like to know to which comic books you are referring specifically. Because your complaints are something I would have readily agreed with back in the 90s, but I think the exaggerations are more toned down now. Or maybe I'm reading the wrong books. Depictions of women currently are not as bad as they used to be in my opinion.
I don't know which ones she's referring to specifically, but I'd guess Power Girl would be one of them. Artists have long been completely ridiculous when drawing her. i think the whole point of that character is to give artists an opportunity to do ridiculous things with a character's boobage. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |