Harlepolis said: horatio said: is she a billionaire or something? she can afford to pay the entire staff of a hospital to neglect other patients needs in order to to care for her newborn's needs for the next 2 months? she wont get any assistance from religious organizations, charities,tax payer monies ect. that would be better used somewhere else than taking care of her selfish need to pop out a bunch of children. what about the children themselves, is it fair? Is it fair for the older children? is it good for the environment all those diapers toys tanks of gas shuttling them to dr.s and chuckie cheese? But again, you guys are jumping ship. Who says that she doesn't have ALL of this figured out and calculated? I know many people from the south with big families who are doing fine,,,,no negligence from the parents, and no trouble from the older kids. We're just jaded 2010: Healing the Wounds of the Past.... http://prince.org/msg/8/325740 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said: Harlepolis said: But again, you guys are jumping ship. Who says that she doesn't have ALL of this figured out and calculated? I know many people from the south with big families who are doing fine,,,,no negligence from the parents, and no trouble from the older kids. We're just jaded And you're deranged as ALL hell thats why I didn't mess with you earlier | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Harlepolis said: SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said: We're just jaded And you're deranged as ALL hell thats why I didn't mess with you earlier See, I'm ready to cut folks and sick the government on them 2010: Healing the Wounds of the Past.... http://prince.org/msg/8/325740 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
horatio said: Harlepolis said: I agree! But untill then, folks need to keep their OWN judgments to themselves. is she a billionaire or something? she can afford to pay the entire staff of a hospital to neglect other patients needs in order to to care for her newborn's needs for the next 2 months? she wont get any assistance from religious organizations, charities,tax payer monies ect. that would be better used somewhere else than taking care of her selfish need to pop out a bunch of children. what about the children themselves, is it fair? Is it fair for the older children? is it good for the environment all those diapers toys tanks of gas shuttling them to dr.s and chuckie cheese? I strongly believe that the more kids in a family (like 5-6+) the more each kid suffers in terms of having their individual needs met. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
MrsGoodnight said: Teacher said: IMO, if you were that easy to get going that you get 8 foetuses on a little dose of whatever fertility drug, then it's doubtful you needed any in the first place. The family nor their doctor will say what they used of course, for that particular reason - it most likely isn't regular treatment that's behind it, and the biggest hint is that it's only ever happened once before. Also, I still think it's greedy for all the reasons several of us stated further up in this thread, and irresponsible too if they really aimed for multiples like that. With respect, I don't think it's as black & white as that, Teacher. The patients don't get to self prescribe, the fertility dr would set the dosage, based on the woman's hormone levels and her response to previous treatments, so the fault would be in the hands of the Fertility Practitioner. All fertility clinics have to report their live birth rates (amongst other statistics) to the governing body (at least they do here in the UK). People who are seeking a fertility clinic can then use this information to help them choose the right one. It sounds to me like they were 'hedging their bets' in order to give them the chance of a birth rate. Of course it also depends on what their fertility issues were and the treatment that they received - If it were IVF or ICSI treatments then the clinic should be hauled up in front of the governing body for endangering this woman's life. If it were a Chlomid/IUI treatment, then that's a little different as the clinic doesn't really have much control over the amount of embryos created (though scans would have shown how many follicles she had before the ovaries released the eggs - As she had a minimum of 8 they should probably have abandoned the cycle as she would have been close to hyper-stimulation, which in itself is dangerous. Either way, to me, the clinic were in the wrong here Sorry, this is just my educated opinion, but I respect what you're saying What's wrong with 14 kids? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JustErin said: horatio said: is she a billionaire or something? she can afford to pay the entire staff of a hospital to neglect other patients needs in order to to care for her newborn's needs for the next 2 months? she wont get any assistance from religious organizations, charities,tax payer monies ect. that would be better used somewhere else than taking care of her selfish need to pop out a bunch of children. what about the children themselves, is it fair? Is it fair for the older children? is it good for the environment all those diapers toys tanks of gas shuttling them to dr.s and chuckie cheese? I strongly believe that the more kids in a family (like 5-6+) the more each kid suffers in terms of having their individual needs met. i can see how elsewhere in the world and in different times than these that large families are beneficial. But certainly not here in America at this time. And certainly not in an artificial manner. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Harlepolis said: Teacher said: Allowed, sure. Should she be a burden on society because she chose to have that many? No. What makes them a burden on society? If they could be taken care of financially & medically, then I don't see what the problem is. You guys act like the earth is a one room shack If... IF... and what's the likelihood of them being able to completely independently care for these children? Slim to none. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
horatio said: JustErin said: I strongly believe that the more kids in a family (like 5-6+) the more each kid suffers in terms of having their individual needs met. i can see how elsewhere in the world and in different times than these that large families are beneficial. But certainly not here in America at this time. And certainly not in an artificial manner. I agree with you. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Teacher said: Harlepolis said: What makes them a burden on society? If they could be taken care of financially & medically, then I don't see what the problem is. You guys act like the earth is a one room shack If... IF... and what's the likelihood of them being able to completely independently care for these children? Slim to none. And how exactly did you come up with this conclusion IF I may ask? Do you guys know this person or how they support themselves? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Harlepolis said: Teacher said: If... IF... and what's the likelihood of them being able to completely independently care for these children? Slim to none. And how exactly did you come up with this conclusion IF I may ask? Do you guys know this person or how they support themselves? she wanted all this kept secret. So you know she's ashamed doin some wrong shit 2010: Healing the Wounds of the Past.... http://prince.org/msg/8/325740 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said: Harlepolis said: And how exactly did you come up with this conclusion IF I may ask? Do you guys know this person or how they support themselves? she wanted all this kept secret. So you know she's ashamed doin some wrong shit Boy, saaaaat your ass down | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Harlepolis said: SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said: she wanted all this kept secret. So you know she's ashamed doin some wrong shit Boy, saaaaat your ass down 2010: Healing the Wounds of the Past.... http://prince.org/msg/8/325740 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said: Harlepolis said: And how exactly did you come up with this conclusion IF I may ask? Do you guys know this person or how they support themselves? she wanted all this kept secret. So you know she's ashamed doin some wrong shit I love you | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
14 kids is fuckin gross and irresponsible for a number of reasons.
I don't care if they shit gold and have all the money in the world to take care of those kids. I would say to them: This is not the 1700-1800's (or even early 1900's) when folk needed a brood to plow their farm and shit. If you got 6 kids and still need more, ADOPT careless fuckers. The world is ALREADY overcrowded. Thanks shittards! ...shit. [Edited 1/29/09 12:58pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
johnart said: 14 kids is fuckin gross and irresponsible for a number of reasons.
I don't care if they shit gold and have all the money in the world to take care of those kids. I would say to them: This is not the 1700-1800's (or even early 1900's) when folk needed a brood to plow their farm and shit. If you got 6 kids and still need more, ADOPT careless fuckers. The world is ALREADY overcrowded. Thanks shittards! ...shit. [Edited 1/29/09 12:58pm] 2010: Healing the Wounds of the Past.... http://prince.org/msg/8/325740 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said: johnart said: 14 kids is fuckin gross and irresponsible for a number of reasons.
I don't care if they shit gold and have all the money in the world to take care of those kids. I would say to them: This is not the 1700-1800's (or even early 1900's) when folk needed a brood to plow their farm and shit. If you got 6 kids and still need more, ADOPT careless fuckers. The world is ALREADY overcrowded. Thanks shittards! ...shit. [Edited 1/29/09 12:58pm] And I resent them shamelessly pushing their reproductive "lifestyle" on me. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ocean said: The last part was a joke. But just the last part. Unless you're @ the 8 baby thing. [Edited 1/29/09 15:29pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Harlepolis said: Teacher said: If... IF... and what's the likelihood of them being able to completely independently care for these children? Slim to none. And how exactly did you come up with this conclusion IF I may ask? Do you guys know this person or how they support themselves? ABC news reported that in addition to having six other children, she is a single mother and lives with her parents. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
DevotedPuppy said: Harlepolis said: And how exactly did you come up with this conclusion IF I may ask? Do you guys know this person or how they support themselves? ABC news reported that in addition to having six other children, she is a single mother and lives with her parents. NO! This can't be true! 2010: Healing the Wounds of the Past.... http://prince.org/msg/8/325740 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said: DevotedPuppy said: ABC news reported that in addition to having six other children, she is a single mother and lives with her parents. NO! This can't be true! Are you fuckin kidding me??? Seriously, someone tell me that's not true. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
johnart said: SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said: NO! This can't be true! Are you fuckin kidding me??? Seriously, someone tell me that's not true. I'll clutch you for non sexual purposes if you clutch me back. I think I might faint 2010: Healing the Wounds of the Past.... http://prince.org/msg/8/325740 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Teacher said: I think it's abusing artificial insemination and fertility drugs - there are so many people who want children and can't even have ONE and these people do it just cause they can. It's next to impossible to give birth to that many without artificial assistance.
the problem is, people who use artificial assitance aren't trying to have 5, 6, 7, 8 kids. they're just trying to have 1, usually. it's the nature of fertility assistance that causes multiple births. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
johnart said: SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said: NO! This can't be true! Are you fuckin kidding me??? Seriously, someone tell me that's not true. I swear that's what Charlie Gibson said. I just tried to look for more info on the ABC website and Google but don't see anything. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
DevotedPuppy said: Harlepolis said: And how exactly did you come up with this conclusion IF I may ask? Do you guys know this person or how they support themselves? ABC news reported that in addition to having six other children, she is a single mother and lives with her parents. Oh ya? So how does she pay for this? It's extremely expensive. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
DevotedPuppy said: johnart said: Are you fuckin kidding me??? Seriously, someone tell me that's not true. I swear that's what Charlie Gibson said. I just tried to look for more info on the ABC website and Google but don't see anything. I found it! http://abcnews.go.com/Hea...873&page=1 In reporting on "The Early Show" that the mother already has six other children, a CBS reporter who visited the woman's Los Angeles-area home cited two unnamed acquaintances.
One of those acquaintances said that the mother lived with her parents and that two of her other children were twins. (It's third paragraph after the "Related" picture break.) I guess they are inferring she is single because she lives with her parents. They didn't say, "The mother and father live with her parents." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said: johnart said: Are you fuckin kidding me??? Seriously, someone tell me that's not true. I'll clutch you for non sexual purposes if you clutch me back. I think I might faint If you're clutching you might as well cop a feel. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Gave birth? Those kids practically walked out "We may deify or demonize them but not ignore them. And we call them genius, because they are the people who change the world." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
errant said: Teacher said: I think it's abusing artificial insemination and fertility drugs - there are so many people who want children and can't even have ONE and these people do it just cause they can. It's next to impossible to give birth to that many without artificial assistance.
the problem is, people who use artificial assitance aren't trying to have 5, 6, 7, 8 kids. they're just trying to have 1, usually. it's the nature of fertility assistance that causes multiple births. Why did she need artificial assistance if she had 6 already? Eh? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
johnart said: 14 kids is fuckin gross and irresponsible for a number of reasons.
I don't care if they shit gold and have all the money in the world to take care of those kids. I would say to them: This is not the 1700-1800's (or even early 1900's) when folk needed a brood to plow their farm and shit. If you got 6 kids and still need more, ADOPT careless fuckers. The world is ALREADY overcrowded. Thanks shittards! ...shit. [Edited 1/29/09 12:58pm] They're starting a family business - a sweatshop | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |