peb319 said:

Hmmmm I do see the face you speak of, but still working on the other one. What year were these pics taken?

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:

Which visitor ?

rnljs said:

feel like been there done that...when the blond one (branden)was about 5 months old, an older lady saw him and told me he was a fairy changling!!!we were at the mall in the food court and she was walking by, stopped looked at him
and said...this one here,beautiful he is...yes he is and he's a changling..for sure, a fairy changling...
and she knew he was a boy, even though he wasn't really dressed obviously as a boy..i looked that one up...

perhaps forest fairies or a mandrake?

peb319 said:

I see it

Mach said:

oh hush! Don't tell me you forgot about the person in the car!

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:

Oh no I have not forgotton - was just wondering which visitor- I have had many

that was a friends visitor ( the car ) not mine

mine are sometimes like that though too

MoniGram said:

94 or 95..but most likely 94...they are old but there's nothing on the pics themselves that would do this..just a photo of what's there...

baroque said:

one of my first thoughts...
the little people were my next one...but it seemed to be full of
'people'....and i seemed to have 'captured' them..willingly...

They are amazing pics.

MoniGram said:

unsettlingly amazing...
did you see the crowd in the trees?? the jester and everybody showed up for
the 'group photo'
'posers'..


they weren't the only ones i found like that..alot of the pics of my younger
son,have a white light kinda glow in them, especially around him...no i'm not explaining it right...extra light?? not even reflective, just glowing..

peb319 said:

I do understand about the light you are explaining...my question to you would be, does your son ever mention seeing things?

peb319 said:

He may be an Indigo child.

MoniGram said:

both of them...
i was explaining to my older son of something i was seeing in the kitchen one night,while it was there, and there was an element that i didn't mention to him...it was he who turned to me after looking a second time and said, there's one by the table...my cat was sitting in the middle of the floor and it looked like someone was squatting next to her, petting her,and she was leaning to one side like she was getting her ears scratched..and there was indeed another by the table,which was closer to the doorway...then they both stood up and walked to the other side of the room where the fridge was and went into the wall there...i found out later that there was a door there,and they had walled it in...there was alot of activity in that house..

MIGUELGOMEZ said:

an indigo child..

peb319 said:

You probably know this already but here's the definition and some info on Indigo Children.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w...o_children

I kinda think one of my little cousins is one. She's super sensitive, super smart and I think she's an old soul.

peb319 said:

Now that is very interesting.....

MIGUELGOMEZ said:

maybe they would say they are few and far between..but i did look and my younger son shows nearly all those traits..he hated school,homework, behaving
would rather be doing things with his hands and hated when people fight(hence my ex..)i have felt and thought alot of those things and my teachers always wrote that i 'was a daydreamer' on every report card.they made it seem like it wasn't a good thing,but inwardly i was pleased to be called that..i never tried to change that..i also never turned in homework,yet passed every test..neither of my sons like tests..can't sit still for them.and Branden's(younger)dad took him to a doc as soon as the school said ADHD...i was pissed that he put him on meds,blindly in my opinion...my older son reflects most of those traits listed... http://www.namastecafe.co...canyoutell
even i do...and i've been told many times that 'you are an old soul'

This is better than most horror films.

johnart said:

Y??
some people may say you see what you wanna see...
but it did take me awhile to notice this..the first pic with the man, was what i saw...even though these are a day apart, the crew was still hanging around...did they know we were returning?? i didn't even know...we decided we liked it so much that we went back out there the next day...the next day is the photo of both of them standing there...and there was more of them...in the background..non-chalantly hanging out...
so is it better because, ...there they are??
and no plot even...i showed the pic to my nephew and asked him what he saw...
he picked up on the green man right away..what the heck is that??!!
i told him that's what i've been trying to figure out...

peb319 said:

Better because whether there is, there isn't there are or aren't...it's all actually kinda creepin me out.

Hahahaha!!

The green man is so awesome but you're clearly nuts.

on a side note..
this is my first thread on fire!!!

peb319 said:

okay okay i see the jester head now, its not like its physically there amongst the plants, its like. i dont want to even think about it, it creeps me out too.
ive seen shit like this before. its like looking through a bubble or a glass but the glass or bubble is in a shape and reflecting its surrounding making it blend in with its surroundings.

johnart said:

i had the pic in my hand, when i noticed it...

hair standing on end...

horatio said:

and yet nothing was there when i took the picture..if was taken and examined, they wouldn't find it altered in any way..unless it was done during processing
which i didn't do...

it could be that when the image got processed that another image somehow go slightly process on the same film or paper
but id have to see the picture in real life to be sure.

Is the jester head cocked sideways? I'm creeped but still don't think I see it.

horatio said:

I can't see it can someone circle it or trace the outline to where I should be looking?

DesertEskimo said:

its like the head is smack in the middle of the image and the shoulders and arms are crossed...its a larger image behind the child..it fills the whole clip of the image. It doesnt appear to be in relation to the scale size of the things in the actual image. thats why i wondered if maybe another image got slightly burned into the actual image.
Its like watching a tv thats not tuned totally to one station and there is a ghost image from another station in the background.

or it looks like what ever the hell it is is right up in the camera persons face peering into the lens. okay its creeping me out again...
and the camera took a picture right through whatever the hell that is.