Dada
then Hipsters then Beatniks birthed the idea of Hippies [Edited 1/10/09 12:35pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Teacher said: meow85 said: What's "normal life", as you define it? And why should someone who's made the decision to be part of a subculture live one? And shouldn't society include everyone who abides by the law, not just those who fit in? That last sentence of yours is exactly what I'm getting at. You don't dig drugs -that's fair. But that "rather get stoned than wash" idea is pure nonsense, and that you even brought it up makes me wonder how much exposure to real hippie culture you've had. And what's so pathetic about preferring long hair to short? I mean like not wanting to work cos it's contributing to capitalism and then bitching when they don't get welfare, as an example. That IS the law, at least here - work or apply for work, or else you're not eligible for welfare. No it's not nonsense - perhaps you don't know that drug use corrupts the rest of your life? The drug comes first, everything else after - like personal hygiene for example. For some long hair and beard is a fashion statement, but there are no rules they have to be dirty and unkempt to be so. Personal appearance and hygiene are two things that go unnoticed by stoners pretty quickly, and I think potheads are pathetic anyways. All of them. Like I said, I don't know what sort of people you've been encountering, but I have never known a hippie that didn't work in some way. Those that don't wish to contribute to capitalism find some creative, off-the-books way to do it, but they do all work. As for that bolded sentence? I just have to laugh. Other, harder drugs can have that effect, for sure. But things like pot and shrooms? Sure. What else did you learn from Reefer Madness? I bet you think potheads are all crazy, jazz-dancing murderers too. "A Watcher scoffs at gravity!" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
meow85 said: Teacher said: I mean like not wanting to work cos it's contributing to capitalism and then bitching when they don't get welfare, as an example. That IS the law, at least here - work or apply for work, or else you're not eligible for welfare. No it's not nonsense - perhaps you don't know that drug use corrupts the rest of your life? The drug comes first, everything else after - like personal hygiene for example. For some long hair and beard is a fashion statement, but there are no rules they have to be dirty and unkempt to be so. Personal appearance and hygiene are two things that go unnoticed by stoners pretty quickly, and I think potheads are pathetic anyways. All of them. Like I said, I don't know what sort of people you've been encountering, but I have never known a hippie that didn't work in some way. Those that don't wish to contribute to capitalism find some creative, off-the-books way to do it, but they do all work. As for that bolded sentence? I just have to laugh. Other, harder drugs can have that effect, for sure. But things like pot and shrooms? Sure. What else did you learn from Reefer Madness? I bet you think potheads are all crazy, jazz-dancing murderers too. No. I just think they're idiots. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Teacher said: perhaps you don't know that drug use corrupts the rest of your life? The drug comes first, everything else after -
That sounds more like drug abuse/addiction than drug use Le prego di non toccare la macchina per favore! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ThirdandFinal said: Teacher said: perhaps you don't know that drug use corrupts the rest of your life? The drug comes first, everything else after -
That sounds more like drug abuse/addiction than drug use There is no such thing to me. Drugs ARE bad, for yourself and for those around you. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
meow85 said: Harlepolis said: Some left-wing folks represent the epitome of conservatism. But yeah, it ain't just that. Although its a BIG factor why they just like many other so-called subcultures don't get excepted in USA. Among the many famous reasons why they get looked down on is because they were bunch of "whiney middle class kids" who got all the advantages and so they supposedly don't have credibility in their struggle Of course, I think its much deeper than that..... There is definitely that factor. But to me, that's telling of that strange victim-elite attitude that pops up from time to time. The notion that being poor and downtrodden is somehow nobler or more authentic than being not. I say, if someone wants to help out with a cause and their intentions are honest, who cares what their background is? Besides, someone who's background is middle or even upper class may have access to better resources in their fight for whatever their chosen cause is anyway. Some rich kid who wants to work as an anti-poverty activist, say, might have legal training that his homeless buddy chances are doesn't. Well, you're an exception, Meow most people don't look at it like you do,,,,,just take a look @ this thread Personally, I have NEVER encountered with a hippie. I mean once I met somebody who doesn't shave and who has a somewhat of a peculiar odor(with an occasional taste for "the chief") but he was filthy rich,,,,and as he(or the folks around him) put it, he doesn't give a flying fuck so I don't think the thought of him not looking acceptable bothered him,,,,,he can afford it, as far as I'm concern. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CarrieMpls said: I have no problem with hippies who smell clean and aren't stoned all the time.
agreed! If you will, so will I | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Teacher said: ThirdandFinal said: That sounds more like drug abuse/addiction than drug use There is no such thing to me. Drugs ARE bad, for yourself and for those around you. What counts as "drugs"? Heroin? Meth? Acid? Ecstasy? Weed? Prozac? Penicillin? Aspirin? St. John's Wort? Tea tree oil? Chamomile? I don't think it's black-and-white at all. "What's 'non-sequitur' mean? Do I look it up in a Fag-to-English dictionary?" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
tackam said: Teacher said: There is no such thing to me. Drugs ARE bad, for yourself and for those around you. What counts as "drugs"? Heroin? Meth? Acid? Ecstasy? Weed? Prozac? Penicillin? Aspirin? St. John's Wort? Tea tree oil? Chamomile? I don't think it's black-and-white at all. I know you don't, and you are one of the few people I respect despite of it. I'll clarify it by saying "addictive substances" then. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
'Never trust a hippie!' - Johnny Rotten, 1979 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Teacher said: meow85 said: Like I said, I don't know what sort of people you've been encountering, but I have never known a hippie that didn't work in some way. Those that don't wish to contribute to capitalism find some creative, off-the-books way to do it, but they do all work. As for that bolded sentence? I just have to laugh. Other, harder drugs can have that effect, for sure. But things like pot and shrooms? Sure. What else did you learn from Reefer Madness? I bet you think potheads are all crazy, jazz-dancing murderers too. No. I just think they're idiots. And you're free to think that. But don't bring falsehoods up to support your argument. "A Watcher scoffs at gravity!" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
meow85 said: Teacher said: No. I just think they're idiots. And you're free to think that. But don't bring falsehoods up to support your argument. These aren't falsehoods. Drugs ARE bad, there is no contending that. If they weren't people wouldn't die from using/abusing them, it's as easy as that. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Teacher said: tackam said: What counts as "drugs"? Heroin? Meth? Acid? Ecstasy? Weed? Prozac? Penicillin? Aspirin? St. John's Wort? Tea tree oil? Chamomile? I don't think it's black-and-white at all. I know you don't, and you are one of the few people I respect despite of it. I'll clarify it by saying "addictive substances" then. Do you drink coffee, tea, or carbonated beverages? Smoke cigarettes? Indulge in foods like chocolate or turkey, which have proven addictive chemicals? What about addictive behaviours, even sociall acceptable ones, like exercise? "A Watcher scoffs at gravity!" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
KatSkrizzle said: ZombieKitten said: the only thing I have against all my hippie friends is them calling me a yuppie which is SOOOOO not the case - I shop at savers just like they do, and with the money I saved, I bought a plasma tv so up yours
awesome! I love this retort! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
meow85 said: Teacher said: I know you don't, and you are one of the few people I respect despite of it. I'll clarify it by saying "addictive substances" then. Do you drink coffee, tea, or carbonated beverages? Smoke cigarettes? Indulge in foods like chocolate or turkey, which have proven addictive chemicals? What about addictive behaviours, even sociall acceptable ones, like exercise? Out of those, only smoking kills. And no, I don't smoke. Never have. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
They are ok, but if they are too radical they get get on my nerves | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Teacher said: meow85 said: Do you drink coffee, tea, or carbonated beverages? Smoke cigarettes? Indulge in foods like chocolate or turkey, which have proven addictive chemicals? What about addictive behaviours, even sociall acceptable ones, like exercise? Out of those, only smoking kills. And no, I don't smoke. Never have. speshul | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Teacher said: meow85 said: And you're free to think that. But don't bring falsehoods up to support your argument. These aren't falsehoods. Drugs ARE bad, there is no contending that. If they weren't people wouldn't die from using/abusing them, it's as easy as that. You said that one of the first things stoners (assuming you mean people who smoke marijuana) disregard is personal hygiene. Sorry, but that's a load of bull. People also die from using and abusing perfectly legal things, like golf ball washers (check the Darwin awards!) and motor vehicles, not to mention legal addictive substances like alcohol and nicotine -both of which are immeasurably more harmful than THC. When it comes to the soft drugs, just like alcohol, the harm done depends on the individual. Most people handle them just fine, and it neither interferes with their person nor their livelihood. It's true there are some who can't handle themselves and overdo their intake, or allow their use to become a problem, but just like with alcohol those people are not the majority. "A Watcher scoffs at gravity!" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JasmineFire said: most of the hippies I've known have been over privledged kids who like to put others down for being a part of mainstream society but don't think twice about using their parents money for a new car or to get them out of whatever legal situation they've happened to fall in. they seem pretty insensitive to the financial constraits of others or to anyone else's point of view. i don't know about how the original hippies behaved, but the ones that i've encountered in college (which has been the only place i've ever seen a hippie be able to exist) were pretty much dirty, rich brats. I call those "trustafarians." They try to front like they're all down for peace and love, don't work at all, or work at bizarre pseudo-jobs, smoke pot, etc. but are bankrolled by a trust fund so they can travel around and play "hippie" in different places. I'm not a big fan of patchouli, not bathing regularly, or communal living so I tend to not have any 'hippie' friends. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
meow85 said: Teacher said: These aren't falsehoods. Drugs ARE bad, there is no contending that. If they weren't people wouldn't die from using/abusing them, it's as easy as that. You said that one of the first things stoners (assuming you mean people who smoke marijuana) disregard is personal hygiene. Sorry, but that's a load of bull. People also die from using and abusing perfectly legal things, like golf ball washers (check the Darwin awards!) and motor vehicles, not to mention legal addictive substances like alcohol and nicotine -both of which are immeasurably more harmful than THC. When it comes to the soft drugs, just like alcohol, the harm done depends on the individual. Most people handle them just fine, and it neither interferes with their person nor their livelihood. It's true there are some who can't handle themselves and overdo their intake, or allow their use to become a problem, but just like with alcohol those people are not the majority. Assuming...yes you are. This is not an argument really, you really seem to think that the people that suffer from THC-induced psychosis don't exist whereas I've met some. Unfortunately, my good friend took his life while in a paranoid state. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Teacher said: meow85 said: You said that one of the first things stoners (assuming you mean people who smoke marijuana) disregard is personal hygiene. Sorry, but that's a load of bull. People also die from using and abusing perfectly legal things, like golf ball washers (check the Darwin awards!) and motor vehicles, not to mention legal addictive substances like alcohol and nicotine -both of which are immeasurably more harmful than THC. When it comes to the soft drugs, just like alcohol, the harm done depends on the individual. Most people handle them just fine, and it neither interferes with their person nor their livelihood. It's true there are some who can't handle themselves and overdo their intake, or allow their use to become a problem, but just like with alcohol those people are not the majority. Assuming...yes you are. This is not an argument really, you really seem to think that the people that suffer from THC-induced psychosis don't exist whereas I've met some. Unfortunately, my good friend took his life while in a paranoid state. some people are allergic to shellfish. There should be a law banning all people from consuming shellfish. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Teacher said: meow85 said: Do you drink coffee, tea, or carbonated beverages? Smoke cigarettes? Indulge in foods like chocolate or turkey, which have proven addictive chemicals? What about addictive behaviours, even sociall acceptable ones, like exercise? Out of those, only smoking kills. And no, I don't smoke. Never have. Alcohol abuse kills people and destroys lives every day. Do you ever drink? Caffeine abuse impairs mental functioning, motor skills, and causes high blood pressure and heart palpitations. Do you drink coffee, tea, or soda/pop? Chocolate produces a euphoria-like high, and foods like turkey cause drowsiness making driving, among other activities, dangerous after a point. Do you abstain from all of these? If so, kudos to you for standing by your principles. If not, take a look at what you've just said about "addictive substances" and see if you don't want to revise your position a little. It's not as black and white as you seem to want to believe. The point is, overuse or abuse of just about any substance can be dangerous, not just those substances Nancy Reagan and a horde of cartoon characters commanded us all to Just Say No to. But just like not everyone who drinks is a gin-soaked lush, the majority of people who smoke pot are not perma-fried brain damaged druggies. "A Watcher scoffs at gravity!" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Teacher said: meow85 said: You said that one of the first things stoners (assuming you mean people who smoke marijuana) disregard is personal hygiene. Sorry, but that's a load of bull. People also die from using and abusing perfectly legal things, like golf ball washers (check the Darwin awards!) and motor vehicles, not to mention legal addictive substances like alcohol and nicotine -both of which are immeasurably more harmful than THC. When it comes to the soft drugs, just like alcohol, the harm done depends on the individual. Most people handle them just fine, and it neither interferes with their person nor their livelihood. It's true there are some who can't handle themselves and overdo their intake, or allow their use to become a problem, but just like with alcohol those people are not the majority. Assuming...yes you are. This is not an argument really, you really seem to think that the people that suffer from THC-induced psychosis don't exist whereas I've met some. Unfortunately, my good friend took his life while in a paranoid state. Did I say it didn't exist? Believe me, I know all too well what can happen to a person who abuses pot. But you're ignoring the fact that, just like how most people who drink are not alcoholics nor will they be, most people who smoke pot will not fry themselves. "A Watcher scoffs at gravity!" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
horatio said: Teacher said: Assuming...yes you are. This is not an argument really, you really seem to think that the people that suffer from THC-induced psychosis don't exist whereas I've met some. Unfortunately, my good friend took his life while in a paranoid state. some people are allergic to shellfish. There should be a law banning all people from consuming shellfish. Same logic, really. Some people abuse alcohol. We should just ban it. Oh wait, that didn't work... "A Watcher scoffs at gravity!" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
meow85 said: JuliePurplehead said: Most that I have encountered have smelled really bad, especially the females. If somebody doesn't want to bathe on a regular basis they should at least have the decency to clean their snatch.
Most of the hippies that I've encountered are IMO posers. They lived the "normal" lifestyle for 20 something years and then woke up one day and said "I'm a hippie". Then they proceed to get all self righteous and tell people how their life sucks because they consume too much. They quit their job, stop bathing, start making their own soap that doesn't work and start getting mad at "the man". Of course, these are the cases of the so called hippies that I've known. It's probably not fair to base my opinion on hippies after these fucktards. Let's not forget that the Manson family considered themselves hippies... So you have to be born a hippie not to be a poser? Barring being raised by hippies because the majority of people aren't, how would you propose that work? I have never known a hippie who didn't bathe, or work. Plenty who doen't wear deodorant, or have office jobs, but that's not the same thing. What's the Manson family got to do with it? He was a nutbag, and his followers were stupid sheep. End of story. Isn't that a bit like inferring all punks are violent heroin addicts because Sid Vicious may or may not have killed his girlfriend, or that everyone into hip-hop is a thug because Tupac and Biggie got shot? I was being sarcastic, hence my "...". I think a majority of the Manson family were wannabe hippies. And the hippies that I know are posers, not because they were not raised as hippies, but because I personally know they adopted a lifestyle just so they can call themselves something. I think they get self righteous because deep down they know this is not who they really are. I think the whole idea of peace, love and understanding is great but the message got skewed somewhere along the way when it all became about appearances. Some people would rather look the part than play the part. Shake it til ya make it | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
meow85 said: JayJai said: MY QUESTION IS: Wat is the definition of a hippie?
I can only judge from movies (cause we don't have "hippies" here), that they're people that live in trailer home "villages", away from cities, doesn't shave or keep themselves clean, (most) have rottenin teeth, fight and argue with anybody at any given time, have no self-respect or respectable behaviour. Am I right or wrong? You'd be wrong. Sounds like you're describing stereotypical trailer trash, to me. you didn't exactly answer her question either.. she did ask .. this is what webster has as a definition.. Main Entry: hip·pie Variant(s): or hip·py \ˈhi-pē\ Function: noun Inflected Form(s): plural hippies Etymology: 4hip + -ie Date: 1965 : a usually young person who rejects the mores of established society (as by dressing unconventionally or favoring communal living) and advocates a nonviolent ethic ; broadly : a long-haired unconventionally dressed young person [Edited 1/10/09 14:30pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JuliePurplehead said: meow85 said: So you have to be born a hippie not to be a poser? Barring being raised by hippies because the majority of people aren't, how would you propose that work? I have never known a hippie who didn't bathe, or work. Plenty who doen't wear deodorant, or have office jobs, but that's not the same thing. What's the Manson family got to do with it? He was a nutbag, and his followers were stupid sheep. End of story. Isn't that a bit like inferring all punks are violent heroin addicts because Sid Vicious may or may not have killed his girlfriend, or that everyone into hip-hop is a thug because Tupac and Biggie got shot? I was being sarcastic, hence my "...". I think a majority of the Manson family were wannabe hippies. And the hippies that I know are posers, not because they were not raised as hippies, but because I personally know they adopted a lifestyle just so they can call themselves something. I think they get self righteous because deep down they know this is not who they really are. I think the whole idea of peace, love and understanding is great but the message got skewed somewhere along the way when it all became about appearances. Some people would rather look the part than play the part. I think that's probably true with every segment of society. It's easier to talk the talk than it is to walk the walk. After all, if you can tell people what a good person you are, you don't need to put in the effort of actually being one. "A Watcher scoffs at gravity!" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
meow85 said: Teacher said: Out of those, only smoking kills. And no, I don't smoke. Never have. Alcohol abuse kills people and destroys lives every day. Do you ever drink? Caffeine abuse impairs mental functioning, motor skills, and causes high blood pressure and heart palpitations. Do you drink coffee, tea, or soda/pop? Chocolate produces a euphoria-like high, and foods like turkey cause drowsiness making driving, among other activities, dangerous after a point. Do you abstain from all of these? If so, kudos to you for standing by your principles. If not, take a look at what you've just said about "addictive substances" and see if you don't want to revise your position a little. It's not as black and white as you seem to want to believe. The point is, overuse or abuse of just about any substance can be dangerous, not just those substances Nancy Reagan and a horde of cartoon characters commanded us all to Just Say No to. But just like not everyone who drinks is a gin-soaked lush, the majority of people who smoke pot are not perma-fried brain damaged druggies. Caffeine actually enhances motor skills and mental functioning, especially in mathematics. It does also contribute to heart palpitations and the like. It's also been proven that the tryptophan in turkey doesn't cause significant drowsiness...it's usually the heavy Thanksgiving meal that's the true culprit. I've never heard of anyone being pulled over for driving under the influence of turkey. Chocolate does enhance mood but I wouldn't go as far as calling it an euphoria-like high. I think that would take a very very large amount of chocolate. I understand what you're trying to say but your examples are a bit off. I also understand what Teacher is trying to say. I've read many of Teacher's past threads about her life and I feel like I understand where she's coming from as well. She has a good point. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JasmineFire said: meow85 said: Alcohol abuse kills people and destroys lives every day. Do you ever drink? Caffeine abuse impairs mental functioning, motor skills, and causes high blood pressure and heart palpitations. Do you drink coffee, tea, or soda/pop? Chocolate produces a euphoria-like high, and foods like turkey cause drowsiness making driving, among other activities, dangerous after a point. Do you abstain from all of these? If so, kudos to you for standing by your principles. If not, take a look at what you've just said about "addictive substances" and see if you don't want to revise your position a little. It's not as black and white as you seem to want to believe. The point is, overuse or abuse of just about any substance can be dangerous, not just those substances Nancy Reagan and a horde of cartoon characters commanded us all to Just Say No to. But just like not everyone who drinks is a gin-soaked lush, the majority of people who smoke pot are not perma-fried brain damaged druggies. Caffeine actually enhances motor skills and mental functioning, especially in mathematics. It does also contribute to heart palpitations and the like. It's also been proven that the tryptophan in turkey doesn't cause significant drowsiness...it's usually the heavy Thanksgiving meal that's the true culprit. I've never heard of anyone being pulled over for driving under the influence of turkey. Chocolate does enhance mood but I wouldn't go as far as calling it an euphoria-like high. I think that would take a very very large amount of chocolate. I understand what you're trying to say but your examples are a bit off. I also understand what Teacher is trying to say. I've read many of Teacher's past threads about her life and I feel like I understand where she's coming from as well. She has a good point. that doesnt mean one persons experience should chastise everyone else from having their own. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
horatio said: JasmineFire said: Caffeine actually enhances motor skills and mental functioning, especially in mathematics. It does also contribute to heart palpitations and the like. It's also been proven that the tryptophan in turkey doesn't cause significant drowsiness...it's usually the heavy Thanksgiving meal that's the true culprit. I've never heard of anyone being pulled over for driving under the influence of turkey. Chocolate does enhance mood but I wouldn't go as far as calling it an euphoria-like high. I think that would take a very very large amount of chocolate. I understand what you're trying to say but your examples are a bit off. I also understand what Teacher is trying to say. I've read many of Teacher's past threads about her life and I feel like I understand where she's coming from as well. She has a good point. that doesnt mean one persons experience should chastise everyone else from having their own. You presume I give a fuck what others do - I don't, if they want to drug themselves they can do it, but I won't help - neither to approve, enable or treat. People don't need my approval, meow asked what people have against hippies and I said. Easy. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |