Author | Message |
Would You TRy A Swing Club or menage Affair? If your partner wanted to?. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
What the fuck is a menage Affair?
Whatever it is, I've probably done it, and I'm probably bored with it. "What's 'non-sequitur' mean? Do I look it up in a Fag-to-English dictionary?" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
So you got some dick in you and you liked it? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
or.... do you secretly want some dick and afraid to tell your lady? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Shouldn't we, ultimately, want our partners to do what they want to do?
Shouldn't we expect that our partners want us to do what we want to do? Shouldn't we want them to be with us by choice every day, and not just because they promised to pretend like there's nobody else? Shouldn't we be happy if they are so hot for us that they fuck other people and still want to come home to us? Shouldn't we be excited if there's an adventure we can share? Isn't life too short to NOT try a menage Affair (whatever the fuck that is)? I'm just sayin'. "What's 'non-sequitur' mean? Do I look it up in a Fag-to-English dictionary?" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Ex-Moderator | tackam said: Shouldn't we be happy if they are so hot for us that they fuck other people and still want to come home to us? Isn't life too short to NOT try a menage Affair (whatever the fuck that is)? While I appreciate what you're sayin'... I can say for myself without a doubt a resounding no. I don't need to try a menage affair to know it's not for me. And there's no way in hell I'd be happy if my partner fucked other people and then came home to me. If he wants to fuck other people then that's what he should do. But then he doesn't get to fuck me anymore. That's just the way I work. |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
why, autosexuality is so much greater [Edited 12/26/08 22:00pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
MRGee said: If your partner wanted to?.
Been there done that, with and without partners. Interesting with a partner but we just ended up having sex in the club with each other . . . With an audience. I don't want you to think like me. I just want you to think. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SUPRMAN said: MRGee said: If your partner wanted to?.
Been there done that, with and without partners. Interesting with a partner but we just ended up having sex in the club with each other . . . With an audience. Is there video footage of said event? If so can you please provide a link? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CarrieMpls said: tackam said: Shouldn't we be happy if they are so hot for us that they fuck other people and still want to come home to us? Isn't life too short to NOT try a menage Affair (whatever the fuck that is)? While I appreciate what you're sayin'... I can say for myself without a doubt a resounding no. I don't need to try a menage affair to know it's not for me. And there's no way in hell I'd be happy if my partner fucked other people and then came home to me. If he wants to fuck other people then that's what he should do. But then he doesn't get to fuck me anymore. That's just the way I work. You're obviously in the majority on that one. I just don't really . . . get it. Philosophically. "What's 'non-sequitur' mean? Do I look it up in a Fag-to-English dictionary?" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
paintedlady said: SUPRMAN said: Been there done that, with and without partners. Interesting with a partner but we just ended up having sex in the club with each other . . . With an audience. Is there video footage of said event? If so can you please provide a link? LMAO As far as I can recall, there was no footage of the encounter, but I'd want a copy if there were. It was hot. I was so turned on I didn't care who was around, just don't touch . . . I don't want you to think like me. I just want you to think. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
probably. the rumor around my job is that a supervisor & his wife swing, and i can't stop imagining it. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SUPRMAN said: paintedlady said: Is there video footage of said event? If so can you please provide a link? LMAO As far as I can recall, there was no footage of the encounter, but I'd want a copy if there were. It was hot. I was so turned on I didn't care who was around, just don't touch . . . It made you feel whole in some way? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Muse2NOPharaoh said: SUPRMAN said: LMAO As far as I can recall, there was no footage of the encounter, but I'd want a copy if there were. It was hot. I was so turned on I didn't care who was around, just don't touch . . . It made you feel whole in some way? Whole? No How would sex make me feel whole? Horny? Very! I don't want you to think like me. I just want you to think. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
No.
...and by the way, at first glance of the thread title I was browsing through the forum so fast I thought this was going to be about those clubs where they have swing dancing to jazz music | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
tackam said: Shouldn't we, ultimately, want our partners to do what they want to do?
Isn't life too short to NOT try a menage Affair (whatever the fuck that is)? I'm just sayin'. They mean a menage a trois (three way) that developes into ongoing encounters/or relationship instead of just being a one night stand. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Ottensen said: tackam said: Shouldn't we, ultimately, want our partners to do what they want to do?
Isn't life too short to NOT try a menage Affair (whatever the fuck that is)? I'm just sayin'. They mean a menage a trois (three way) that developes into ongoing encounters/or relationship instead of just being a one night stand. Is this common knowledge? Ok, so, yeah. I guess I have done that. Would I again? Yeah, sure. "What's 'non-sequitur' mean? Do I look it up in a Fag-to-English dictionary?" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Ex-Moderator | tackam said: CarrieMpls said: While I appreciate what you're sayin'... I can say for myself without a doubt a resounding no. I don't need to try a menage affair to know it's not for me. And there's no way in hell I'd be happy if my partner fucked other people and then came home to me. If he wants to fuck other people then that's what he should do. But then he doesn't get to fuck me anymore. That's just the way I work. You're obviously in the majority on that one. I just don't really . . . get it. Philosophically. Well, if it's any comfort, from what I can tell it's simply not possible for a man to remain faithful ( ), so I'm destined to be partnerless for having too high of expectations. |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Ex-Moderator | tackam said: Ottensen said: They mean a menage a trois (three way) that developes into ongoing encounters/or relationship instead of just being a one night stand. Is this common knowledge? Ok, so, yeah. I guess I have done that. Would I again? Yeah, sure. I've never heard the expression before. I was just going with it. |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
tackam said: Ottensen said: They mean a menage a trois (three way) that developes into ongoing encounters/or relationship instead of just being a one night stand. Is this common knowledge? Ok, so, yeah. I guess I have done that. Would I again? Yeah, sure. Menage a trois is a standard term in regards to human sexuality whether it is in practice or theory. I would assert (just in my own opinion) that three way "relationships" or affairs may have only come into "pop" or "common" consciousness in the last 30+ years. See books by Erica Jong or Mave Binchy to understand more about this in a non-self-help- non-medical-semi-fictional-semi-autobiographical context. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CarrieMpls said: tackam said: You're obviously in the majority on that one. I just don't really . . . get it. Philosophically. Well, if it's any comfort, from what I can tell it's simply not possible for a man to remain faithful ( ), so I'm destined to be partnerless for having too high of expectations. cough*****bullshit*****cough They just have to think more of the one they love than themselves. Selfishness is a fucker | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
MRGee said: If your partner wanted to?.
Are you asking about a swingers club? and a 3-some? Proud Memaw to Seyhan Olivia Christine ,Zoey Cirilo Jaylee & Ellie Abigail Lillian | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
mdiver said: CarrieMpls said: Well, if it's any comfort, from what I can tell it's simply not possible for a man to remain faithful ( ), so I'm destined to be partnerless for having too high of expectations. cough*****bullshit*****cough Le prego di non toccare la macchina per favore! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Ottensen said: tackam said: Is this common knowledge? Ok, so, yeah. I guess I have done that. Would I again? Yeah, sure. Menage a trois is a standard term in regards to human sexuality whether it is in practice or theory. I would assert (just in my own opinion) that three way "relationships" or affairs may have only come into "pop" or "common" consciousness in the last 30+ years. See books by Erica Jong or Mave Binchy to understand more about this in a non-self-help- non-medical-semi-fictional-semi-autobiographical context. Yes, those are two different terms. I've never heard them smooshed together. Never mind. "What's 'non-sequitur' mean? Do I look it up in a Fag-to-English dictionary?" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CarrieMpls said: tackam said: You're obviously in the majority on that one. I just don't really . . . get it. Philosophically. Well, if it's any comfort, from what I can tell it's simply not possible for a man to remain faithful ( ), so I'm destined to be partnerless for having too high of expectations. I don't believe that it's impossible, but I do believe that very, very few very-long-term relationships escape infidelity. And not just because of men. I know women who are repeat offenders, and the only person to ever cheat on me is a woman. So: "What's 'non-sequitur' mean? Do I look it up in a Fag-to-English dictionary?" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Ex-Moderator | tackam said: CarrieMpls said: Well, if it's any comfort, from what I can tell it's simply not possible for a man to remain faithful ( ), so I'm destined to be partnerless for having too high of expectations. I don't believe that it's impossible, but I do believe that very, very few very-long-term relationships escape infidelity. And not just because of men. I know women who are repeat offenders, and the only person to ever cheat on me is a woman. So: I don't care about women as I'm not dating them. And the odds are overwhelmingly against it, agreed. I don't want to take that bet. |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CarrieMpls said: tackam said: You're obviously in the majority on that one. I just don't really . . . get it. Philosophically. Well, if it's any comfort, from what I can tell it's simply not possible for a man to remain faithful ( ), so I'm destined to be partnerless for having too high of expectations. You are not alone . . . I don't want you to think like me. I just want you to think. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Never. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
No. Ὅσον ζῇς φαίνου
μηδὲν ὅλως σὺ λυποῦ πρὸς ὀλίγον ἐστὶ τὸ ζῆν τὸ τέλος ὁ χρόνος ἀπαιτεῖ.” | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
tackam said: CarrieMpls said: Well, if it's any comfort, from what I can tell it's simply not possible for a man to remain faithful ( ), so I'm destined to be partnerless for having too high of expectations. I don't believe that it's impossible, but I do believe that very, very few very-long-term relationships escape infidelity. And not just because of men. I know women who are repeat offenders, and the only person to ever cheat on me is a woman. So: I was in a 17 year long relationship and we never cheated on each other. With a very special thank you to Tina: Is hammer already absolute, how much some people verändern...ICH hope is never so I will be! And if, then I hope that I would then have wen in my environment who joins me in the A.... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |