Ocean said:

Hey! I was being generous with 75%! it's probably more like 95%!

Amaxx said:

who have a nice young boyfriend behind their old man's back if they have any brains

ZombieKitten said:

Yep!

Amaxx said:

those kinds of people deserve each other

ZombieKitten said:

Not to sound repetative but Yep!
Prime example! Hugh Heffner!

this thread, damn

i haven't been yet, but i'm sure it'll happen eventually.

I realise I've not even answered the question yet
A few times, in fact I'm sure WAAAAY more times than I can count. Apart from this housemate I had who could keep up with me and liked to do it 3 times each day, all the rest have had significantly lower libidos than me. Oh the excuses "things are really tough at work" which have nothing to do with NOW etc etc.

ZombieKitten said:

How high is it exactly?
[Edited 12/14/08 22:51pm]

I've always been too chicken to offer

Ottensen said:

even with your longterm partners?

Ocean said:

the twice a day kind

ZombieKitten said:

OH! Well long term? Yes! But we just always managed to just sort of topple over each other into the bed and get right down to business , so in that respect I've never been refused.

But I never offered to someone I was dating casually or just getting to know. Then I would be too chicken. I always wait for the boy to make the first move. You can kinda tell in the kiss where it's going to lead, so I just wait until they get all agitated and worked up and let them initiate it. I guess I'm kinda antiquated and 'tease-y'

veronikka said:

Totally .

Ocean said:

It's disgusting .

Serious said:

I find it kinda sad...sad that they buy love..sad for the guy that ends up alone as the girl eventually ends up leaving him...and sad that the girl would give up real love for money

Ocean said:

Yeah it's sad.

obsessed said:

that's fine. i am immune to your laughter. pretty much

ZombieKitten said:

To quote Marcia Hines! "That's what I'm talkin 'bout!

woah this thread is long...

Serious said:

What do you think of sugar mummies? I was watching a documentary about them on the BBC channel the other day: Sugar Mummies

ufoclub said:

I like it long.

JustErin said:

I was waiting for you to say that!

JustErin said:

I thought girth was more important to you.

I meant the session, not the uh....instrument.

sextonseven said:

As long as somebody man or woman feels attracted to somebody much older or younger but not because of the status or money it's okay. Although this couple is odd IMO. But as long as they are happy . And I hope you are not asking me this question because I prefer younger men .

Serious said:

how much younger?

Serious said:

I just look at those situations as arrangements. I mean, both parties know what they are getting into and why.

I see nothing wrong with it myself. It's just not something I could see myself doing.

thekidsgirl said:

It depends on the man. I'd say 5-10 years younger is cool.

JustErin said:

I don't know if all of them are arrangements. But some (probably the majority) sure are.

Serious said:

Not at all, just that, even though the couples in the doc seemed to genuinely have feelings for each other, the term "sugar mummies"--which is the female equivalent of "sugar daddies"--suggests that the woman is financially supporting the younger man.