JustErin said: Ok, so there was another time - fairly recently actually.
I invited a FWB over one night when I bumped into him downtown. I invited him over and he pulled the "I'm really tired tonight". Then at 7am I get the "Are you still up?" text. LAME! The same dude just told me that we can no longer hang out at all (not even platonically) because he's dating someone and he has a hard time resisting temptation. Hence, your desire for him to spontaneously combust. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Imago said: Dave1992 said: What would YOU expect a 16 year old to do all day long, apart from listening to Prince? What did YOU do back then? Dude, I was trying to get laid from the time I was 12. I would have had sex with afire hydrant if I could. But at 16, I didn't have a "history" like it appears you have The end times are near my friends You ready for the ultimate breakdown? I was actually going to tell you when I had had sex for the first time, but I think you would go crazy and probably hate me afterwards, thinking I was lying I have to admit that the idea of fucking a fire hydrant is not THAT bad, though | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
violator said: JustErin said: Ok, so there was another time - fairly recently actually.
I invited a FWB over one night when I bumped into him downtown. I invited him over and he pulled the "I'm really tired tonight". Then at 7am I get the "Are you still up?" text. LAME! The same dude just told me that we can no longer hang out at all (not even platonically) because he's dating someone and he has a hard time resisting temptation. Hence, your desire for him to spontaneously combust. No, not him. I really, really like this dude and it appears that he can do no wrong to me. I want a certain woman to combust. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Dave1992 said: Imago said: Dude, I was trying to get laid from the time I was 12. I would have had sex with afire hydrant if I could. But at 16, I didn't have a "history" like it appears you have The end times are near my friends You ready for the ultimate breakdown? I was actually going to tell you when I had had sex for the first time, but I think you would go crazy and probably hate me afterwards, thinking I was lying I have to admit that the idea of fucking a fire hydrant is not THAT bad, though As you get older , like me, the idea becomes more attractive again | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Yes, by someone I was already seeing and by this other guy.... I still want him. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Imago said: Dave1992 said: You ready for the ultimate breakdown? I was actually going to tell you when I had had sex for the first time, but I think you would go crazy and probably hate me afterwards, thinking I was lying I have to admit that the idea of fucking a fire hydrant is not THAT bad, though As you get older , like me, the idea becomes more attractive again Nah don't be so harsh, I bet you're just being overmodest! I mean, I have a look at your avatar and think to myself "This dude must be a sex-maniac" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JustErin said: violator said: Hence, your desire for him to spontaneously combust. No, not him. I really, really like this dude and it appears that he can do no wrong to me. I want a certain woman to combust. I'm afraid to ask... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JustErin said: Dave1992 said: Btw Erin: If this is really you on these pics.. how come you have been refused?
No. it's not me. It's my mom. I think your mum looks good | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Ex-Moderator | Imago said: JustErin said: Truth is, most people don't even have that discussion and if they do it's often after they've banged. So, it's totally silly to suddenly think someone that you think is attactive is suddenly not attractive because you found out how many people they slept with. Most of the time I don't. So this double standard is very poorly enforced, even though it's there. Guys like to think that we can just 'sense' that in women. Or that by her manner we can tell. Which of course, is one of the reasons men fail so miserably at keeping women happy I guess. Unless i've heard it through the grapevine or she says it (alot of girls are pretty open and uninhibitted), it's something you find out after you've slept together a few times. But yes, depending on the situation leading up to sleeping together, it has come up in conversation. Girls aren't ashamed of it--and I don't think they should be. Not every guy is going to think like me or Ken in that regard. I don't think Carrie's issue is as much with the standard itself or caring how many partners they slept with so much as it's that I made a clear distinction that I only hold that standard towards women. Bingo! And it has absolutely everything to do with feminism. You are holding women to a different standard. Period. |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CarrieMpls said: Imago said: Most of the time I don't. So this double standard is very poorly enforced, even though it's there. Guys like to think that we can just 'sense' that in women. Or that by her manner we can tell. Which of course, is one of the reasons men fail so miserably at keeping women happy I guess. Unless i've heard it through the grapevine or she says it (alot of girls are pretty open and uninhibitted), it's something you find out after you've slept together a few times. But yes, depending on the situation leading up to sleeping together, it has come up in conversation. Girls aren't ashamed of it--and I don't think they should be. Not every guy is going to think like me or Ken in that regard. I don't think Carrie's issue is as much with the standard itself or caring how many partners they slept with so much as it's that I made a clear distinction that I only hold that standard towards women. Bingo! And it has absolutely everything to do with feminism. You are holding women to a different standard. Period. no it doesn't. You're making it something it'snot. Again this is about sex right? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Ex-Moderator | Imago said: CarrieMpls said: Bingo! And it has absolutely everything to do with feminism. You are holding women to a different standard. Period. no it doesn't. You're making it something it'snot. Again this is about sex right? Yup. It's about sex. |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CarrieMpls said: Imago said: no it doesn't. You're making it something it'snot. Again this is about sex right? Yup. It's about sex. You're trying to get the last word in aren't you? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Ex-Moderator | Imago said: CarrieMpls said: Yup. It's about sex. You're trying to get the last word in aren't you? Clearly you are. |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Ex-Moderator | OK, Dan, explain to me WHY you hold that preference for women but not for men. |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CarrieMpls said: Imago said: You're trying to get the last word in aren't you? Clearly you are. Look, feminism is more than just shutting a guy up if he has an opinion that offends you I mean, all I've done since you attacked me is defend myself. If that's the last word, than fine. You can have it. I'll even pretend this was about sex the entire time. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
violator said: JustErin said: No, not him. I really, really like this dude and it appears that he can do no wrong to me. I want a certain woman to combust. I'm afraid to ask... Yeah, yeah...it's him. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Dave1992 said: JustErin said: No. it's not me. It's my mom. I think your mum looks good She looks amazing for turning 60 this year!! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Ex-Moderator | Imago said: CarrieMpls said: Clearly you are. Look, feminism is more than just shutting a guy up if he has an opinion that offends you I mean, all I've done since you attacked me is defend myself. If that's the last word, than fine. You can have it. I'll even pretend this was about sex the entire time. It has nothing to do with shutting you up. I even asked you to explain your preference. I just don't see what sex has to do with saying a double standard is OK. It's still a double standard. |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CarrieMpls said: OK, Dan, explain to me WHY you hold that preference for women but not for men.
Because men and women are different. Duh. I mean, if a man is emotional or cries alot, most girls I know would get pretty tired of him quickly. is it fair? Hell I don't know. It's just the way it is. I doubt these women are anti-male because of it. It's just sexual preferences. I'm not the one painting labels here or upset at them . It's sex. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CarrieMpls said: OK, Dan, explain to me WHY you hold that preference for women but not for men.
And doens't he bone both? Weird. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JustErin said: Oh, I certainly have.
Someone said 'No thanks' to you? You want us to believe this? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CarrieMpls said: Imago said: Look, feminism is more than just shutting a guy up if he has an opinion that offends you I mean, all I've done since you attacked me is defend myself. If that's the last word, than fine. You can have it. I'll even pretend this was about sex the entire time. It has nothing to do with shutting you up. I even asked you to explain your preference. I just don't see what sex has to do with saying a double standard is OK. It's still a double standard. Wait. Where did I say the double standard was ok? Are you sure you're even reading what I say, or just pushing your own agenda here and using me as the scapegoat? I never said anything about the inherent unfairness of double standards. What I said was that my own double standard for that doesn't mean I don't support a woman to be as promiscuous as she wants. I absolutely think women should be free to express themselves sexually in every bit the same way a man does. Find text anywhere that I typed here that disputes that. you won't. What I said was, "not in my bed". A double standard? Sure. But I never said it wasn't or that having double standards are ok. That's not even an argument I bother to engage in. You're the one who tried to pull this into my overall (though implied) feelings towards women. As afore mentioned, I think women should express themselves as they want. That doesn't mean I have to be attracted to each of their expressions. Again, where did I even bother engaging in the "it's ok or not ok to have double standards argument"? Are we talking about sex here? I'd really like to know! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Ex-Moderator | Imago said: CarrieMpls said: OK, Dan, explain to me WHY you hold that preference for women but not for men.
Because men and women are different. Duh. I mean, if a man is emotional or cries alot, most girls I know would get pretty tired of him quickly. is it fair? Hell I don't know. It's just the way it is. I doubt these women are anti-male because of it. It's just sexual preferences. I'm not the one painting labels here or upset at them . It's sex. I'm not painting labels either. I'm just trying to understand your double standard and why you think it is justified. So it's somehow un-womanly to you for a woman to have many sexual partners? I'm not sure what a crying man has to do with a woman who has had sex with more than a certain number of partners. |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I've never offered sex unless I was in a relationship with that person, so I have never been refused an offer. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Ex-Moderator | Imago said: CarrieMpls said: It has nothing to do with shutting you up. I even asked you to explain your preference. I just don't see what sex has to do with saying a double standard is OK. It's still a double standard. Wait. Where did I say the double standard was ok? Are you sure you're even reading what I say, or just pushing your own agenda here and using me as the scapegoat? I never said anything about the inherent unfairness of double standards. What I said was that my own double standard for that doesn't mean I don't support a woman to be as promiscuous as she wants. I absolutely think women should be free to express themselves sexually in every bit the same way a man does. Find text anywhere that I typed here that disputes that. you won't. What I said was, "not in my bed". A double standard? Sure. But I never said it wasn't or that having double standards are ok. That's not even an argument I bother to engage in. You're the one who tried to pull this into my overall (though implied) feelings towards women. As afore mentioned, I think women should express themselves as they want. That doesn't mean I have to be attracted to each of their expressions. Again, where did I even bother engaging in the "it's ok or not ok to have double standards argument"? Are we talking about sex here? I'd really like to know! We are absoutely talking about sex. But saying you find something unattractive in a woman says something. It's saying you don't approve. Your personal opinion says something about you. |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CarrieMpls said: Imago said: Because men and women are different. Duh. I mean, if a man is emotional or cries alot, most girls I know would get pretty tired of him quickly. is it fair? Hell I don't know. It's just the way it is. I doubt these women are anti-male because of it. It's just sexual preferences. I'm not the one painting labels here or upset at them . It's sex. I'm not painting labels either. I'm just trying to understand your double standard and why you think it is justified. So it's somehow un-womanly to you for a woman to have many sexual partners? I'm not sure what a crying man has to do with a woman who has had sex with more than a certain number of partners. You're doing it again. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Ex-Moderator | Imago said: CarrieMpls said: I'm not painting labels either. I'm just trying to understand your double standard and why you think it is justified. So it's somehow un-womanly to you for a woman to have many sexual partners? I'm not sure what a crying man has to do with a woman who has had sex with more than a certain number of partners. You're doing it again. Doing what? If you can't explain your preference, then I guess, so be it. We'll have to agree to disagree that your preferences say anything about you. |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CarrieMpls said: Imago said: Wait. Where did I say the double standard was ok? Are you sure you're even reading what I say, or just pushing your own agenda here and using me as the scapegoat? I never said anything about the inherent unfairness of double standards. What I said was that my own double standard for that doesn't mean I don't support a woman to be as promiscuous as she wants. I absolutely think women should be free to express themselves sexually in every bit the same way a man does. Find text anywhere that I typed here that disputes that. you won't. What I said was, "not in my bed". A double standard? Sure. But I never said it wasn't or that having double standards are ok. That's not even an argument I bother to engage in. You're the one who tried to pull this into my overall (though implied) feelings towards women. As afore mentioned, I think women should express themselves as they want. That doesn't mean I have to be attracted to each of their expressions. Again, where did I even bother engaging in the "it's ok or not ok to have double standards argument"? Are we talking about sex here? I'd really like to know! We are absoutely talking about sex. But saying you find something unattractive in a woman says something. It's saying you don't approve. Your personal opinion says something about you. holy thread jackage And what does that say about me, Carrie? I mean, obviously you think I'm don't have feminist "cred". I'm dying to know. That I don't think women have all the same rights as men? That I don't think they should be free to express themselves like men? What do you think it says? Perhaps your overreaction to my 'double standard' says more about you than it does about me. I think what you're getting at is why does promiscuity have to be a 'masculine' trait--ultimately, my personal opion on the matter boils down to that, doesn't it? Should I have to have the same sexual requirements for men as I do women? And if I don't why does that need to be sexist? Like I said before, what if one of my preferences for a sexual partner was for them to be latino (which I prefer actually). This says something about me also doesn't it? But does that make me racist that I have this preference? I see no reason why I should be attracted to the same features in both sexes. And no reason why this translates to my overall views of what they have a right to do in their own lives. If that makes me feminist strictly for my vote and not my strict adherence to your own moral code, than fine. Or if that strips me of your coveted title, fine too. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CarrieMpls said: Imago said: You're doing it again. Doing what? If you can't explain your preference, then I guess, so be it. We'll have to agree to disagree that your preferences say anything about you. You wouldn't have to ask me this if you actually read my posts. It's in reference to your stating that I said it was ok to have double standards. That somehow I was engaging in that argument, when I never refuted nor supported your statement from the start. [Edited 12/12/08 13:03pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Imago said: pardonme4livin said: If I was going to be with a girl and she told me there was over 20 others before me, I'd probably not be too interested...just not for me....I don't think I have ever been with anyone with over 3 or 4 previous partners... For a female I wouldn't either. But it depends on how hot she is. It's a double standard, but meh--I have to put up with double standards too. It's quite bold to expect your female sex partners to not have had sex with more than 3 or 4 partners when you have had sex with about 100. Just saying. Apart from that whole double standard discussion. With a very special thank you to Tina: Is hammer already absolute, how much some people verändern...ICH hope is never so I will be! And if, then I hope that I would then have wen in my environment who joins me in the A.... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |