Slave2daGroove said:

Way out comment, wasn't it?

ScarletScandal said:

Macaulay Culkin's sister.

ArielB said:

Exactly....I was thinking the exact same thing...my first reaction was ...I've never been all in Macauley Culkin's business to know that he even had a sister, so why should I feel anything more than a fleeting "AWWWW" moment.....

ArielB said:

I don't think people are showing compassion BECAUSE it's his sis, but just because there was loss of life. If it had been an 8-year-old or an 81-year-old, most of those that posted for his sis would post for those 2 as well.

MuthaFunka said:

That's fine. So are we supposed to post a thread of every person who dies now?

ArielB said:

perhaps refraining from denigrating the deceased would suffice

ArielB said:

No...and I didn't even know he had a sis. Never liked him either. But..damn...luv4u posted it or I might not have known, but since I DO know now, I'm not going to make fun. Karma is a bitch.

ArielB said:

You could, if you felt the need to. Do you have that much time on your hands?

MuthaFunka said:

I got the day off from work. So yes

noimageatall said:

Most def. People are funny.

ArielB said:

Knock yaself out then.

MuthaFunka said:

Why did I know that was coming?
Most women? My experiences driving in L.A. I guess. I really haven't been counting . . , sorry for the generalization.

horatio said:

I don't know anyone killed that way. That doesn't even bother me anymore.
But I've seen girls step off the curb without even looking and are talking to other girls who aren't looking either (I'm approaching them and watching) they all just step out on faith I guess. Or they are on the phone and again not bothering to look left or right just walking and talking . . .

Slave2daGroove said:

Get in line and bring a book. I suggest 'War and Peace'.

SUPRMAN said:

Cuz you KNEW it was completely foul and completely wrong, THAT'S why!

MuthaFunka said:

No, if I were thinking that, I could have said that. Why is my experience wrong?
How is an experience in and of itself right or wrong? Isn't that perception?

ASUPRMAN said:

Although I get your exagerated point, I also get your ability to see its just that.

SUPRMAN said:

Your experience is your experience, but you're "wrong" in how you presented your experience because you don't know "MOST of the WOMEN in L.A." to which you based your response on. Plain and simple. What you SHOULD'VE said was "Most of the women that I know in L.A...." and then it would've made somewhat more sense. But even beyond that, to sit there and act as if you know EXACTLY WHY she did it is still ridiculous.

MuthaFunka said:

where did I give a why? I don't know why women in L.A. choose not to look left and right when crossing the street.
I don't care about why, I care that they understand the hazard. They themselves appear to be making a very conscious decision to cross the street. That's all I know. Why looking left and right isn't the sensible way to do that for them, I couldn't begin to explain . . .,

SUPRMAN said:

Dude, you can't even prove that MOST L.A. women do this. Give me the numbers on this. Show me that an OVERWHELMING AMOUNT (MOST) of L.A. actually do this. You can't. You have zero proof. None. This is ALL based on your extremely small sample from your individual experience. So, this was NEVER about "Why" women do it, this was about you falsely claiming that MOST L.A. WOMEN DO IT, to which you have absolutely no facts to back up your ridiculous claim.

But you DID actually give a "why" and even THAT was ridiculous!:



C'mon. That's even MORE ridiculous than your whole "MOST L.A. women".

BlackAdder7 said:

I did comment about the driver. All I can say is that driver must be going through sheer emotional/mental hell having to live with what happened. I hope the driver gets some counselling to deal with the trauma they are going through

MuthaFunka said:[quote]

SUPRMAN said:

But we can both agree that women in L.A. do it right? Whatever the actual percentage is.

My why is going to be as good as anyone else's since we can't ask her 'why?'

SUPRMAN said:

No, we can agree that PEOPLE do it in the U.S., not just "L.A. Women". And no, your why isn't as good as anyone else's. To me, it has to be reasonable, and I dont deem "Because pretty women expect cars to stop for them" as a viable "why".

MuthaFunka said:

Why limit it to just people in the U.S.? People throughout the known universe probably do it as well right?

What one deems reasonable or not depends on a lot of factors . . .

But I'm glad to know I've found the arbiter of reasonableness. That will come in handy in P& R certainly.

SUPRMAN said:

considering this threads title . . .
I think we should discontinue.
I don't want it to stay up at the top of the page ., . .

SUPRMAN said:

TRANSLATION: "Yeah, you got me, Mutha. I should stop altogether right now because my reaction was a knee-jerk one and I should've realized that. But let me keep posting JUST BECAUSE." -

May she rest in peace.