Serious said:

That was all part of my master plan to become friends with you.

sextonseven said:

Sure .





Well it worked I think .

eikonoklastes said:

I actually kind of agree with this (though many women might find that offensive). Not to say that women can't learn to parallel park, or to play sports, or to play poker, or fix a toilet, it's just that more men are better at so many of these kinds of tasks.

One way I'd say women are far superior relates to what you say about "better people." Women take much more quickly to things like caring for others--kids, old people, etc.

I know that's a huge generalization, but oh well.
[Edited 10/15/08 10:28am]

.... and

Helping a Fattie
Sometimes, I feel like the doors of a Hometown Buffet ten minutes before it opens. Every day, dozens of fat broads line up to bust me down.

Settle down you fucking cows, they serve that shitty lasagna all day.

Today, I’m going to be talking about one of these fatsos. One who has captured my attention like a humpback whale off the coast of Big Sur. Fellows and gentlemen, meet Donna Jackson.

[Picture removed. Explained below.]
Today, I’m giving Donna Jackson the chance to shut down MenAreBetterThanWomen.com.

This past week, Donna spent dozens of hours commenting on this website and sending me poorly spelled hatemail. She also set up a petition, complained to my webhost, and alerted the National Organization for Women. Her goal? To shut me the fuck down by screaming as loud as she possibly could.

That might work on the short and fat bus, Donna — which you obviously rode to elementary school — but it doesn’t work in the real world. In the real world, I have freedoms of speech not only as an American, but also as someone who realizes Daddy is not an omnipotent being who erases anything and everything you disagree with. So fuck you anyway. None of your two-ton tantrums will do shit and you will never have the power to shut me down.

Until now.

Edutainment

MenAreBetterThanWomen.com has always been focused on manly entertainment and education. That’s edutainment, and it serves to better all men. For example, a young man who realizes that women in the workplace are conniving little whores who do nothing at work all day but instant message each other and cause drama, will make more money than his uneducated peers. Studies have shown this.

Every man I convince to not get married saves like 300,000 dollars and God knows how much begging for pussy.

Today, I want to offer this same opportunity for self-improvement to one lucky young woman: Donna Jackson

Dick’s Fattie Outreach Program

Inside every great big blob, there’s a skinny little tramp just dying to get out and have a good time. That’s why fat chicks are so pissed off at “society”. To fat girls, everyone in society but them is thin as a rail and having a great time fucking each other without wanting to puke. I want to give Donna Jackson the chance to live that dream.

The following is an excerpt from a piece of hatemail penned by Donna Jackson.

“I AM NOT FAT. I AM AVERAGE IN WEIGHT AND EXERCISE AND EAT RIGHT. YOU HAVE NO SENSE OF HOW TO TREAT WOMEN OR EVEN COMMUNICATE IN A NORMAL WAY WITHOUT BEING RUDE. I SHOWED MY BOYFRIEND YOUR SITE TO GET HIS INPUT, AND HE ACTUALLY GIGGLED!”

Of course while Donna was saying such obviously false and hateful things, I heard what she was really saying.

“I’m fat, Dick, and I don’t know how to stop! Please help!”

Donna, I am going to help. I’m going to be your Dr. Phil. And just like Dr. Phil, I am also not having sex with his wife!

Shut Down MenAreBetterThanWomen.com!

In the name of laughs and ending youth obesity, I hereby offer a challenge to Miss Donna Jackson. Sweetheart, if you can lose 20 pounds, I will shut MenAreBetterThanWomen.com down for one month.

You heard that right, readers. If one lonely fat girl who is obsessed with shutting this site down can drop a mere 20 pounds, every feminists’ secondary wet dream will come true. MenAreBetterThanWomen.com will be gone.

Every feminists’ primary wet dream is to have a dick. Either in them or on them; it doesn’t matter to a feminist.

Donna Jackson is a size 18. For those of you who don’t give a fuck about sizes above 4, a size 18 tips the scales at a whopping 230+ pounds. That’s a lot of woman to love! Hell, if Donna’s picture is anything to go by, it’s two women! Donna has to shed a measly 8% of that gargantuan body mass to shut me down. She could take up walking for an hour every day. She could do a few situps while watching television. Fuck, she could switch from Party Size to Fun Size Doritos and have pounds to spare!

But the real question is, will she?

If she does take me up on this challenge, I won’t expect a “thank you”, for introducing Donna to a healthier lifestyle. I won’t expect a “you were right”, for proving that skinny girls are happier. This is something I will give her for free simply because I am a better person.

Manclusion

If Donna accepts this challenge, I will post the rules here, including the weigh-in procedure and any and all deadlines. Donna has freely posted her email address on this site for discussion. If you would like to urge her to participate in the Shut Down MenAreBetterThanWomen.com Challenge, you can find it here: geniusiq161@yahoo.com But keep it classy! This girl has enough problems already. Women don’t get fat because they’re happy about their life.

Youth obesity is one of the greatest threats to our nation’s health. It leads to heart failure, injury, and me being grossed out daily. There is no fucking reason a 21 year old girl should weigh 230 pounds. A 21 year old girl has two good years left. She shouldn’t waste them sitting on a toilet shitting out five meals a day.

Let’s set a good example for young girls out there, Donna. Skinnier is better. No matter how much skinnier that is. Besides, if you spent half as much time exercising as you do calling me dickless and hateful, you’d drop that third chin like it was a baby you didn’t even know you were giving birth to because you were too fucking fat to notice.

Facts

On September 30th, this comment was posted:

This is what I wrote to NOW: “There is a website called menarebetterthanwomen.com that is not some small fringe extremist site. It has gotten coverage on several episodes of Dr. Phil and other media outlets and promotes hate and violence against women. NOW needs to take action. Donna Jackson, geniusiq161@yahoo.com.”

Source

Picture Removal

In an email to me, Donna confessed taking a picture (previously shown above) from a random fat girl on MySpace and claiming it as her own. I verified this and removed the picture. Only God knows what Donna Jackson actually looks like — something I’m sure He isn’t happy about.

okay, now it's my turn

Space…the Male Frontier
If you’re anything like me, you have never asked yourself why a woman has never been to the moon because the answer is obvious.

Actually, the answer may surprise you.

The male instinct is a good one — it’s solid when the chips are down, and in this case it tells us men that women have never been to the moon because the moon is chalk full of science — like a robot, the natural enemy of womankind (both technology and robots). This is absolutely true, however, only true in the way that there are no unicorns underwater. Yes, unicorns cannot breathe water, but they also do not fucking exist. So what are we talking about here.

The real reason that women have never been to the moon has very little to do with their astounding ability to turn even the simplest of technologies into a catastrophic fucking unsolvable mystery on par with Stonehenge.

Remember the last time you were making some hot-hot jokes around a woman or womans, or the last time you were enjoying a cinematographic masterpiece like Die Hard 3, Payback, or The South Park Movie — or any other time that you were trying to mind your own fucking business?

Well what happened?

That’s right, said woman or womans ruined it with a torrent of shitty comments and/or nay saying. Perhaps something like, “Nicolas Cage thinks he’s so great” (in a sarcastic tone though. Nicholas Cage only thinks he’s so great because he’s fucking awesome), or maybe a “those are fake”, “you only think you’re funny”, or a “cigarettes cause cancer”.

Cigarettes cause cancer? No shit, I didn’t know that. Guess what talking any more during Face Off causes?

Can you imagine this manner of hijink aboard the USS Space Ship to the moon?

That’s why women will never go to the moon, because of their piss-poor, wet-blanket attitudes.

horatio said:

my female teachers knew to just get a student to clap the erasers together and clean out all the science

I'm not saying I agree with any of this talk, but please hear me out and help me ponder the science behind this...

Are there really any great female musicians? I mean great as in PRINCE great. Sure, you have your Madonnas, Sheryl Crows, and the slew of female guitarists who can just strum (whilst looking at their fretting fingers the entire time). But are there many female guitarists who can straight up SHRED. Like Prince-style... not just technique, but agressively creative. Sure, there are occasional females like Ani DiFranco, (and why do the creative females always have to be lesbian or bi??) But the ratio to inventive, creative, over-the-top virtuoso male musicians to female musicians is way high.

Again, I am not trying to diss creative females in any way, but what is the science behind this?

I can picture a guy in his teens sitting alone in a bedroom for 14 hours a day, forgoing his entire teenage years, practicing the guitar until his fingers bleed and then eating the blood for nutrition because he doesn't want to get up to go to the foodstore because it would take time away from his practicing.

On the other hand, I just can't see a girl having this kind of devotion. Maybe she'll pick the guitar up for 45 minutes a day, but then she'd be on her cell phone talking to Becky about how Sharon just dumped Brian.

Please don't take this the wrong way and hate me. It's just the way I perceive it. It's not necessarily bad. Maybe genetically male and female priorities are inheritanly different? I am just trying to understand. Surely, all the "female studies" in Universities across the country must tackle this issue somewhere in their curriculum.
[Edited 10/15/08 13:45pm]
[Edited 10/15/08 13:46pm]

Comparing the 2 is like apples and oranges, totally depends on your priorities.

The differences in many ways are totally superficial AND stereotypical - ie. can't read roadmaps / won't ask for help with directions. I guess it is hilarious when we fall into our stereotypes, to an extent. This site goes beyond humour and into territory though. The man who wrote this book, probably has spent limited time with actual women, he isn't seeing them as PEOPLE. It's sad.

berniejobs said:

Again, a matter of priorities

ZombieKitten said:

yes it's strange to devote so much time to actually write a book on something so mean spirited--and what is in the end untrue. To say that one sex's contributions to the world is greater than the other's assumes that we could possibly have done any of it without both sexes!

There are definitely differences, and yes they are mostly only stereotypical & superficial, and they are also fun and part of the mystery of love. Women don't have to love flowers, but I like that my girl does. Men don't have to know how to hang shelving, but my girl likes that I can do that.

I don't mind sexual roles. I really like the differences, and think we complement each other perfectly (though if a woman wants to go into plumbing that won't mean she's not sexy)

berniejobs said:

most guys I know never learned how to play their guitars, either. And for someone to forsake food for the guitar doesn't exactly scream superiority, only that they will know their scales better. So he plays guitar better. That woman you described will know her fellow human beings better. In the end it evens out, though the sexes are different, and indeed all people are different.

But I believe the reason for what you're describing is that women have such built in purpose to their lives because of the fact that they bring children into this world, they don't see as much purpose in learning magic tricks or playing the guitar.

Men have to do something impressive to have any meaning in their lives (which only really comes from female attention anyway)

So to say men are better because of some achievement like creating calculus, women can always say "who cares, I brought life into this world! I care for human beings and understand them!" In the end what does playing the guitar matter except as a way to express one's feelings--something that women tend to be able to do without playing the guitar or talking about baseball.
[Edited 10/15/08 17:01pm]

NDRU said:

Imagine if the guy, in bernie's post who practises all day, DIDN'T eat, he would die and never be a famous shredder. luckily somebody did care enough to care for him, and most likely, it was a woman. So yeah, probably complimentary priorities in the grander scheme of things

ZombieKitten said:

and the shredder really only shredded for a woman's attention, anyway

NDRU said:

and she thought, hurry up and finish this goddamn noise so we can

berniejobs said:

Sure there would be, if more of them got the chance.
I think its just about gender-roles, but thats just me.

Gimmesomehorns said:

Previuosly traditional roles prohibited it, or at least made things very difficult

NDRU said:

A huge generalization that I think is utter bullshit. I think we choose NOT to bother with many of those things because we don't find them enjoyable. I know plenty of women who are awesome at sports, can fix ANYthing, can play poker with the best of them, etc. You really are living in old sterotypes if you believe otherwise.

ZombieKitten said:

Exactly. Up until, oh, 15-20 years ago, what woman was encouraged let alone allowed to persue someting so whole-heartedly.

NDRU said:

I don't cause I believe it's true also.. e.g. cooking.. most of your Chefs are men and they can burn in the kitchen.. from the waist up, men are built stronger than women ..so naturally you would excel over women with alot of things.. and it doesn't bother me and I don't feel offended by that .. I'm content and happy with what I can do as a woman...

It's kind of a superfluous and pretentious generalization, though. I don't know. Women are complex creatures. I know that much. Not much to a man. There's a Freudian Disposition in ERR-BAWDY!!! We can't do it all as mortal human beings. But then again, that depends. Whoever may be the front-runners and conductors of New Age Technology can make a way to break down physical and psychological barriers. Hyperbolic enigmas are what make The World go round. Any woman can do what any man can. We are all only as human as the next, no? I don't know. It's all nothing short of elusive to my mind. Still trying to understand everything just being a mere mortal.
[Edited 10/15/08 19:45pm]

Mysterioso said:

not saying women can't do it, but men are better with certain things... there's women's boxing.. but uhm..no woman is going up against Mike Tyson or Holyfield in a ring ...or any other heavy weight dude.. men are not better human beings than women, but men are built stronger and can perform better in some aspects than women..

Flowers2 said:

You make a valid point. I guess I'm just complacent with ZEN! Holding a feeling that anything is possible is infinitely wondrous. It's just so chill. But I could see where you're coming from. I'd be scared for Leila Ali if she had boxed Mike Tyson in his prime. Some things are indeed set in stone, though.

NDRU said:

You are talking about statistic, not what the induvidual is capable of.
Just because more % of men/wimen is better at this and that dosent mean that there is imposible for the induvidual too manage thoose things.

NDRU said:

Women's plumber's crack

CarrieMpls said:

oh, definitely. As Gimmesomehorns mentioned, I'm talking just about "statistics," or what I tend to see in my life. There are women who know more about sports than me, fix cars better than me, are better at pool than me, play guitar better than me, are bigger than me, and on and on. But historically that is not the case, and still largely true today.

And as you & ZK said, it's about priorities, not innate abilities. Generally more men have done more "things" ie build bridges & be president, and generally more women have been better nurturers. But that doesn't exclude anyone from doing the opposite.

Just as an example, I'm a caring guy and haven't achieved a damn thing!

Gimmesomehorns said:

yes