horatio said: chillichocaholic said: They sooooo screwed this up that sucks, they should just air the original on primetime television for the US that's what I said about The Office, but now I'm really glad they remade it My Legacy
http://prince.org/msg/8/192731 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
NDRU said: horatio said: that sucks, they should just air the original on primetime television for the US that's what I said about The Office, but now I'm really glad they remade it in what ways? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ZombieKitten said: NDRU said: So America's not alone in this phenomenon? well these are from South America, so maybe it is just the Americas hmm, well the important part is keeping pretty women on TV! Put glasses on them, marry them to fat men, but keep the pretty women on TV!! My Legacy
http://prince.org/msg/8/192731 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ZombieKitten said: NDRU said: that's what I said about The Office, but now I'm really glad they remade it in what ways? I initially thought it was silly, because the original was so good, and it's hard to re-create the chemistry of a great show (writing, cast, direction, etc). And they changed "Tim" to "Jim." What a stroke of trans-cultural marketing genius! I just thought it was an ode to the stupidity of America. But somehow they managed to make a great show that was different than the original. Much more American, but not in a bad way. And now it has been on much longer than the British version and the stories have moved completely beyond what happened in the original episodes. So I got more entertainment for my consumer dollar! My Legacy
http://prince.org/msg/8/192731 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
NDRU said: ZombieKitten said: in what ways? I initially thought it was silly, because the original was so good, and it's hard to re-create the chemistry of a great show (writing, cast, direction, etc). And they changed "Tim" to "Jim." What a stroke of trans-cultural marketing genius! I just thought it was an ode to the stupidity of America. But somehow they managed to make a great show that was different than the original. Much more American, but not in a bad way. And now it has been on much longer than the British version and the stories have moved completely beyond what happened in the original episodes. So I got more entertainment for my consumer dollar! does Kath & Kim have a chance? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ZombieKitten said: NDRU said: I initially thought it was silly, because the original was so good, and it's hard to re-create the chemistry of a great show (writing, cast, direction, etc). And they changed "Tim" to "Jim." What a stroke of trans-cultural marketing genius! I just thought it was an ode to the stupidity of America. But somehow they managed to make a great show that was different than the original. Much more American, but not in a bad way. And now it has been on much longer than the British version and the stories have moved completely beyond what happened in the original episodes. So I got more entertainment for my consumer dollar! does Kath & Kim have a chance? I don't know. I haven't seen either version. I don't hold out much hope for ANY sitcom. Very few are any good. But I like Molly Shannon okay, and she's worn some choice outfits in the commercials My Legacy
http://prince.org/msg/8/192731 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ZombieKitten said: NDRU said: I initially thought it was silly, because the original was so good, and it's hard to re-create the chemistry of a great show (writing, cast, direction, etc). And they changed "Tim" to "Jim." What a stroke of trans-cultural marketing genius! I just thought it was an ode to the stupidity of America. But somehow they managed to make a great show that was different than the original. Much more American, but not in a bad way. And now it has been on much longer than the British version and the stories have moved completely beyond what happened in the original episodes. So I got more entertainment for my consumer dollar! does Kath & Kim have a chance? Critics hated it: http://www.metacritic.com...kathandkim But ratings for the premiere were okay. People might have tuned in out of curiosity. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
sextonseven said: ZombieKitten said: does Kath & Kim have a chance? Critics hated it: http://www.metacritic.com...kathandkim But ratings for the premiere were okay. People might have tuned in out of curiosity. The core problem with K&K is that there's no character to root for. — Entertainment Weekly That is exactly the point! They are meant to be characters one loves to hate, and hate to love And they complain about Blair being bratty!! Kath & Kim writers, meanwhile, seem to have nothing but contempt for their heroines. Kim is willfully ignorant, rude and obnoxious in a fashion that has no redeeming qualities, and Kath is mainly an unhappy blank who lets her daughter walk all over her. — Newark Star-Ledger Again, EXACTLY!!! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CarrieMpls said: sextonseven said:
ehuffnsd said:
seriously have you seen movies or tv in the last 10-15 years? if you believed what you saw on tv you'd believe that ungly people anyone over a size 4 for women or doesn't have washboard abs in men do not exisit.
Not true. Practically every sitcom wife is married to a fat slob. Men can absolutely be ugly and be on tv. Women, not so. Hey ZombieKitten, I don't know if you are aware of the average USA family sitcom, but basically any type of guy can be cast as the patriarch, whether he is buff or a fat slob, but the wives are always far too hot to be a typical mom. Think of what a Maxim, Playboy or Hawaiian Tropic model looks like and make them ten years older, and that's the casting of your typical USA TV sitcom wife and mother. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
728huey said: CarrieMpls said:
sextonseven said:
Men can absolutely be ugly and be on tv. Women, not so. Hey ZombieKitten, I don't know if you are aware of the average USA family sitcom, but basically any type of guy can be cast as the patriarch, whether he is buff or a fat slob, but the wives are always far too hot to be a typical mom. Think of what a Maxim, Playboy or Hawaiian Tropic model looks like and make them ten years older, and that's the casting of your typical USA TV sitcom wife and mother. Oh I'm sure you are right though, looking around at the mums at school, some of them are pretty hot | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
728huey said: CarrieMpls said:
sextonseven said:
Men can absolutely be ugly and be on tv. Women, not so. Hey ZombieKitten, I don't know if you are aware of the average USA family sitcom, but basically any type of guy can be cast as the patriarch, whether he is buff or a fat slob, but the wives are always far too hot to be a typical mom. Think of what a Maxim, Playboy or Hawaiian Tropic model looks like and make them ten years older, and that's the casting of your typical USA TV sitcom wife and mother. No way would any actress be allowed to appear on an American TV show now looking like the actress on the right: ![]() | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
NDRU said: ZombieKitten said: does Kath & Kim have a chance? I don't know. I haven't seen either version. I don't hold out much hope for ANY sitcom. Very few are any good. But I like Molly Shannon okay, and she's worn some choice outfits in the commercials thats the problem, its supposed to be in the free clinic waiting room wondering what VD it is this time but still trying to look sexy when im not hot. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I've never seen the non-US version but watching this US "Kath and Kim", I could tell it was off. I wasn't sure if they were supposed to be dumb or mean or what. It just never went for it. The US "The Office" started out pretty badly when they just recycled UK scripts but it found it's groove. Something tells me this one won't get the chance. I can't imagine it will be getting a lot of repeat viewers. Molly Shannon is great but she should honestly try to write (or work with someone that will write) her own show with her own character. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ZombieKitten said: NDRU said: You obviously don't understand America! Haven't you seen "Ugly Betty?"
![]() the original wasn't THAT ugly either though ![]() Yeah. She does not look like that on the show. They put her bad glasses, braces and they might even put a fat suit on her (her body isn't size zero in real life but it looks damn good). | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
NDRU said: ZombieKitten said: in what ways? I initially thought it was silly, because the original was so good, and it's hard to re-create the chemistry of a great show (writing, cast, direction, etc). And they changed "Tim" to "Jim." What a stroke of trans-cultural marketing genius! I just thought it was an ode to the stupidity of America. But somehow they managed to make a great show that was different than the original. Much more American, but not in a bad way. And now it has been on much longer than the British version and the stories have moved completely beyond what happened in the original episodes. So I got more entertainment for my consumer dollar! I hated "The Office" US when it debuted...now I think it's my favorite show! It is not just that they made it more American (which they had to do) but they realized they couldn't just follow the UK episodes for various reasons. I'm not sure why, but UK shows seems to have a different structure of shorter seasons (which they actually call series). And it seemed like at some point that Ricky Gervais, the co-creator and star of the original, figured he only wanted to do two seasons and than a closing special. Seems like the show was designed to have a beginning, a middle and an end. The US "The Office" probably will not think about it's end until they have to. So they had to change the formula. Michael is obnoxious but nothing like always cringe worthy David Brent. Brent was breaking down by season 2 and the show actualy got dark. Michael just watches through and stumbles and it's all fun because he is such a child. Also, frankly, "The Office" US could go on without Michael because the supporting characters (even beyond Jim, Pam and Dwight) are so strong. They made an online special called "The Accountants" that mostly only featured Oscar, Angela and Kevin and it was spectacular. I've been watching Season 2 and 3 lately. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ZombieKitten said: sextonseven said: Critics hated it: http://www.metacritic.com...kathandkim But ratings for the premiere were okay. People might have tuned in out of curiosity. The core problem with K&K is that there's no character to root for. — Entertainment Weekly That is exactly the point! They are meant to be characters one loves to hate, and hate to love And they complain about Blair being bratty!! Kath & Kim writers, meanwhile, seem to have nothing but contempt for their heroines. Kim is willfully ignorant, rude and obnoxious in a fashion that has no redeeming qualities, and Kath is mainly an unhappy blank who lets her daughter walk all over her. — Newark Star-Ledger Again, EXACTLY!!! Well the critics are idiots. I guess they want a show like the "The Office" where you cheer on Jim and Pam (I forgot what they were called in the UK version) and in a show like "Absolutely Fabulous", I guess you root for the daughter. I don't think the show has to be that. Again, if anything, they aren't awful enough! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
VinnyM27 said: ZombieKitten said: The core problem with K&K is that there's no character to root for. — Entertainment Weekly That is exactly the point! They are meant to be characters one loves to hate, and hate to love And they complain about Blair being bratty!! Kath & Kim writers, meanwhile, seem to have nothing but contempt for their heroines. Kim is willfully ignorant, rude and obnoxious in a fashion that has no redeeming qualities, and Kath is mainly an unhappy blank who lets her daughter walk all over her. — Newark Star-Ledger Again, EXACTLY!!! Well the critics are idiots. I guess they want a show like the "The Office" where you cheer on Jim and Pam (I forgot what they were called in the UK version) and in a show like "Absolutely Fabulous", I guess you root for the daughter. I don't think the show has to be that. Again, if anything, they aren't awful enough! no OMG if anyone you root for the son-in-law, who made such a terrible mistake marrying Kim Kim is supposed to be the worst of all, so bad you even feel sorry for Kath! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ZombieKitten said: VinnyM27 said: Well the critics are idiots. I guess they want a show like the "The Office" where you cheer on Jim and Pam (I forgot what they were called in the UK version) and in a show like "Absolutely Fabulous", I guess you root for the daughter. I don't think the show has to be that. Again, if anything, they aren't awful enough! no OMG if anyone you root for the son-in-law, who made such a terrible mistake marrying Kim Kim is supposed to be the worst of all, so bad you even feel sorry for Kath! Based on the one episode, that is true. I guess Molly's character is the one that is not developed at all! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
VinnyM27 said: ZombieKitten said: no OMG if anyone you root for the son-in-law, who made such a terrible mistake marrying Kim Kim is supposed to be the worst of all, so bad you even feel sorry for Kath! Based on the one episode, that is true. I guess Molly's character is the one that is not developed at all! She is meant to be a totally hapless airhead lady with terrible taste in everything. I'm not sure if I will keep watching, I feel like a traitor | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
So have any Americans (or non-Australians) seen the Australian one? Even just the clips that were posted in this thread? What do you's think? I just can't see Americans finding the Australian one funny but you never know.
Summer Heights High is another classic Australian tv show that I think should be given some attention overseas. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I think u should all take a look at the clips I posted and see what u think of the origional PRINCE IS WATCHING U U can't polish a turd.. but u can roll it in glitter In my Profile Pic | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
chillichocaholic said: I think u should all take a look at the clips I posted and see what u think of the origional
Same. But I don't think that first clip posted shows how funny the show can be. Well not untill the end anyway. But I did a search on youtube and there's surprisingly not many videos of the show up. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Arnotts said: chillichocaholic said: I think u should all take a look at the clips I posted and see what u think of the origional
Same. But I don't think that first clip posted shows how funny the show can be. Well not untill the end anyway. But I did a search on youtube and there's surprisingly not many videos of the show up. Yeah I noticed that as well. Maybe we should be looking on dailymotion? PRINCE IS WATCHING U U can't polish a turd.. but u can roll it in glitter In my Profile Pic | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
chillichocaholic said: I think u should all take a look at the clips I posted and see what u think of the origional
fyi anyone who cares has already watched this show long long ago. its been playing on the U.S. BBC station for a couple years now that i know of, so has the original office long before they made a u.s. version. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CarrieMpls said: sextonseven said: Not true. Practically every sitcom wife is married to a fat slob. Men can absolutely be ugly and be on tv. Women, not so. only on Sitcoms. dramas now feature mostly good looking men. You CANNOT use the name of God, or religion, to justify acts of violence, to hurt, to hate, to discriminate- Madonna
authentic power is service- Pope Francis | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
It'll be hard to judge after just a few episodes. Remakes usually flourish once they're given time to expand upon the original concept. You can call me Wex. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
We are ALWAYS fucking up something good over here - anybody remember the fiasco that was Coupling?? Needless to say I didn't make it to the end of the episode on the US version of Kath & Kim, it was horrible (but not worse than the attempt @ Coupling). I immediately killed the season pass off the Tivo... The Office is the only show (of late) that's managed to do it right. & I really can't stand what they've done to the US version of Ramsay's Kitchen Nightmares [Edited 10/14/08 12:24pm] I never met you, but I LOVE you & I will forever!! Thank you for being YOU - my little Princey, the best to EVER do it | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CalhounSq said: We are ALWAYS fucking up something good over here - anybody remember the fiasco that was Coupling??
Needless to say I didn't make it to the end of the episode on the US version of Kath & Kim, it was horrible (but not worse than the attempt @ Coupling). I immediately killed the season pass off the Tivo... The Office is the only show (of late) that's managed to do it right. & I really can't stand what they've done to the US version of Ramsay's Kitchen Nightmares [Edited 10/14/08 12:24pm] wasn't Friends based on Coupling? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ZombieKitten said: CalhounSq said: We are ALWAYS fucking up something good over here - anybody remember the fiasco that was Coupling??
Needless to say I didn't make it to the end of the episode on the US version of Kath & Kim, it was horrible (but not worse than the attempt @ Coupling). I immediately killed the season pass off the Tivo... The Office is the only show (of late) that's managed to do it right. & I really can't stand what they've done to the US version of Ramsay's Kitchen Nightmares [Edited 10/14/08 12:24pm] wasn't Friends based on Coupling? Coupling was based on Friends. The US version was a copy of a copy. You CANNOT use the name of God, or religion, to justify acts of violence, to hurt, to hate, to discriminate- Madonna
authentic power is service- Pope Francis | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ehuffnsd said: ZombieKitten said: wasn't Friends based on Coupling? Coupling was based on Friends. The US version was a copy of a copy. aaaaah | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |