most straight porn I've seen seems to have such gross guys in it, I wouldn't want to picture myself anywhere near them

Like U wouldn't want want 2 B pounded like a rump steak by Ron Jeremy!

I'd watch it, if there was nothing else. It's sex.

I like watching 2 women as well.

Oh you turn me on.

Not in the least. The excitement of watching porn (for me) is picturing myself in the situation the actors are in.

most straight porn I've seen seems to have such gross guys in it, I wouldn't want to picture myself anywhere near them

Thank you! I've seen drop dead gorgeous women in porn, but all the guys tend to look disgusting. Like bums that the studios pulled out of a dumpster.

with big hairy guts

Ive talked to straight men who hate girl on girl action.

One guy at my office can only get off to girl on girl.


I think that a lot of time girl and girl porn is shot
with men as intended audience, rather than lesbians.
The underlying message is that lesbian sex is less
"real" than gay sex, cuz there is no "real" agent of penetration,
hence the place can, or "is" taken over by the male viewer.
Also rarely are there butch girls in lesbian scenes.
a) not attractive to most straight men
b) too close to taking over their role


With gay porn, there is penetration, and there is plenty.
While some women might get turned on from the actual
act of ultimate domination - one male violating other male -
gay porn leaves no space for female agent.
The role is usually taken over by an effeminate bottom.
A bottom which happens not to be effeminate,
seems in a way even more submissive, hence not plausible
as as a potential object of female desire (again - to some females, methinks)
What about the top? I think that since gay sex
seems "realer" - the act of penetration is clearly visible -
and the fact that men are believed not to be able to
pretend erection (unlike women) - women have little space
to imagine that this guy who gets rock hard for a bearded
bear, will ever be able to feel truly attracted to females,
and hence will not manage to fulfill his sexual purpose.

Don't private message me.

Ive talked to straight men who hate girl on girl action.

One guy at my office can only get off to girl on girl.


I think that a lot of time girl and girl porn is shot
with men as intended audience, rather than lesbians.
The underlying message is that lesbian sex is less
"real" than gay sex, cuz there is no "real" agent of penetration,
hence the place can, or "is" taken over by the male viewer.
Also rarely are there butch girls in lesbian scenes.
a) not attractive to most straight men
b) too close to taking over their role


With gay porn, there is penetration, and there is plenty.
While some women might get turned on from the actual
act of ultimate domination - one male violating other male -
gay porn leaves no space for female agent.
The role is usually taken over by an effeminate bottom.
A bottom which happens not to be effeminate,
seems in a way even more submissive, hence not plausible
as as a potential object of female desire (again - to some females, methinks)
What about the top? I think that since gay sex
seems "realer" - the act of penetration is clearly visible -
and the fact that men are believed not to be able to
pretend erection (unlike women) - women have little space
to imagine that this guy who gets rock hard for a bearded
bear, will ever be able to feel truly attracted to females,
and hence will not manage to fulfill his sexual purpose.

Don't private message me.

The excitement of watching porn (for me) is picturing myself in the situation the actors are in.

Interesting point of view.

As long as the guys have good bodies & aren't too ugly, I'm into it. They just want it sooooo bad, which is way more interesting than anyone (of either gender) faking it...


.
[Edited 10/6/08 14:05pm]

There is nothing worse than a broad not even trying to fake her way in enjoying a cum shot