papaaisaway said:

that's why I stopped posting!

papaaisaway said:

The sad part is, you actually thought this was a "debate". Wrong. It's a discussion based on opinions. If you don't like the opinions, that's your choice, but don't sit here and try and fake the funk and say I was speaking for ALL people. If you had read things more carefully, you would have read that I said there are no absolutes.

MuthaFunka said:

dude, if you can't stand the heat, stay out of the kitchen!

abierman said:

Kitchen? What kitchen? You call THIS little pissy discussion a kitchen? This shit ain't even a microwave. You must not EVER visit P&R then. THAT'S a muthafuckin' kitchen ! Nice try, though!

abierman said:

You stopped posting because you couldn't handle the "microwave".

MuthaFunka said:

[Name calling snip - luv4u], but we already knew that and that's the reason why you've been in trouble before.....go back to your beloved P&R, no-one needs you here!
[Edited 9/19/08 15:54pm]

DEBATE, DISCUSSION, DONKEY DOO DOO...

Call it what you want. All I know is that you lost your way. Btw, it's not a matter of me or anyone else not liking your opinions. You're entitled to state your opinion and I'm entitled to pick holes in it. Simply telling me its a "discussion based on opinions" actually means very little.

Btw part 2: Fair enough. I many not have followed this thread closely but your quotes listed below (which haven't been taken out of context) suggest you have been speaking in absolutes..

MuthaFunka said:

abierman said:

Ah yes! Reduced to petty insults as a last resort! Good luck with that!

papaaisaway said:

[/quote]

So YOU'RE now determining what "my way" was? And what exactly was my way? Explain "my way". You have no clue as to what "my way" was, so don't even try and act as if you did. And again, if you don't know the difference between a "debate" and a "discussion" then that's on you and only you.

And no, you haven't followed this discussion and it's obvious or else you would have read this comment by me:



That's why I say, it's best to actually follow the thread before you decide to try and "get into it" with someone.

But it's still hilarious at how some people just can't accept other people's opinions to the point to where they get upset, hurl insults, and try and rule that other person's opinion "invalid" simply because they don't like their opinion or agree with it. And all over some silly shit such as "sex"? Then again, if people see no problem is paying for it, then maybe they have good reason to be this worked-up over it.

MuthaFunka said:

not really, I only just now I realized who I was dealing with and that is no use to discussing/debating with you because of your obnoxious & arrogant attitude, mr. knowitall!.And, it is late where I'm at and you should probably be working right now instead of igniting flame-wars on this site!

Thank you, go on!

abierman said:

That's funny, other people on this thread have voiced the exact same opinion as myself and yet you only have this "so-called" issue with me. Agenda ? I'd say yes.

MuthaFunka said:

maybe it's the approach, [Name calling snip - luv4u]! I was talking about your attitude, don't give a shit about your agenda!

MUTHAFUNKA

This is really more trouble than its worth. I don't know what "your way" is, I don't know why you've brought that up or what that even means let alone try to explain it. As I said, debate, discussion, tea party, call it what you want but you've come up on the wrong side of it after tarring folks with the same brush and then back tracking afterwards.

That's all.
[Edited 9/19/08 16:39pm]

abierman said:

Ah, and yet more petty insults. Speaks volumes.

Now, my approach? Oh! You mean since I didn't sugar-coat it for you. Ah! Got it. So I'm supposed to deliver it the way YOU want me to deliver it so you'll feel ok. Got it. My bad. . No, this is an obvious agenda-based tirade you're on, plain and simple.

papaaisaway said:

Then if you didn't know what "my way" was, why did you front and claim that I "lost it" . Makes no sense. But, again, even as you've already admitted, you didn't have the full facts to wage a true battle against my stance from jump.

MuthaFunka said:

Please explain, why the hell would I be on a agenda-based tirade against you? I do not even know you! And what agenda? You need to tap that monkey off of your shoulder, my friend! This is really starting to get pathetic!

abierman said:

OK you two that's enough fun
One won't pay... the other was just curious

OK! OK!!

paintedlady said:

Yes. If one would stop responding to posts and the other one would discontinue the egging on it would look more pleasant like this:

luv4u said:

Aw dayum!

I'd pay to see Aiberman and Muthafunka have sex...

paintedlady said:

But I'd most definitely pay for you, sexy-sexy .

roodboi said:

Ok, we're all done here.

MuthaFunka said:

...and thats why I'm here folks...theres no issue I cant resolve with a lil' uncomfortable idiocy...

MuthaFunka said:

I'd know exactly what to do with that mouth of yours too.

MuthaFunka said:

I love Roodboi

roodboi said:

paintedlady said:

paintedlady said:

He a complete "foow" wit' his, ain't he?

roodboi said:

I'd pay to see muthafunka...._____ (fill in blank)

noimageatall said:

yes, I'm sure "blanks" would get "filled"....