AlienX2050 said: mdiver said: As well as being grammatically a total mess, this post shows an amazing lack of knowledge about human anatomy. I am also pretty sure that she won't particularly like you either. Grammatically a total mess? Why would you even respond to my post with this crap? A lot of these posts are in fun and humor. Your comment shows a lack of intuition with the inability to understand what goes from your mind to your keyboard. You have incorrectly quoted me and I will tell you that my educational level and understanding human anatomy is significantly high. As far as I'm concerned, I don't have an obligation to be morally or grammatically correct for individuals and clicks on this forum. I try to respect people here but it's hard when you're faced with transparent ignorance and insecurities. By no means am I in any position to disregard freedom of speech and the will to express on topics. This forum is a form of life for many. As far as I'm concerned, I've never judged anyone here based on race, sexuality or educational level. Still some will assume I have other alternatives for posting here. In the past years, it was a place where Orgers were real. We were friends and had fun. We never attacked anyone but there were some individuals who made it quite interesting. That's what it was...interesting and not offensive. It was fun. Orgers these days tend to become easily offended. And when is some Orger who is not a part of the "group" on the Org, excerpt some level of education and straightforwardness, it's a problem. From one Orger to the next, you don't know me and never will. I don't care to judge you on what you post or what some person might say about you. Feel free to be you. Although some may not think so, I live in peace. I could end this in vulgarity but I wanted to address you in a manner you should understand if your had any common sense. Still, what in the world is Linda gonna do with $40,000 a month? She didn't get her plastic ass out there and wrestle! . Took you a while after your first attempt to come back with that And FYI Crabs or "pubic lice" are exactly that...pubic not vaginal.So that and your anatomy knowledge are laid to rest. And i know exactly who you are ..... I just found your post exactly what you maintain you are not, judgemental. Kind of ironic huh. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
mdiver said: AlienX2050 said: Grammatically a total mess? Why would you even respond to my post with this crap? A lot of these posts are in fun and humor. Your comment shows a lack of intuition with the inability to understand what goes from your mind to your keyboard. You have incorrectly quoted me and I will tell you that my educational level and understanding human anatomy is significantly high. As far as I'm concerned, I don't have an obligation to be morally or grammatically correct for individuals and clicks on this forum. I try to respect people here but it's hard when you're faced with transparent ignorance and insecurities. By no means am I in any position to disregard freedom of speech and the will to express on topics. This forum is a form of life for many. As far as I'm concerned, I've never judged anyone here based on race, sexuality or educational level. Still some will assume I have other alternatives for posting here. In the past years, it was a place where Orgers were real. We were friends and had fun. We never attacked anyone but there were some individuals who made it quite interesting. That's what it was...interesting and not offensive. It was fun. Orgers these days tend to become easily offended. And when is some Orger who is not a part of the "group" on the Org, excerpt some level of education and straightforwardness, it's a problem. From one Orger to the next, you don't know me and never will. I don't care to judge you on what you post or what some person might say about you. Feel free to be you. Although some may not think so, I live in peace. I could end this in vulgarity but I wanted to address you in a manner you should understand if your had any common sense. Still, what in the world is Linda gonna do with $40,000 a month? She didn't get her plastic ass out there and wrestle! . Took you a while after your first attempt to come back with that And FYI Crabs or "pubic lice" are exactly that...pubic not vaginal.So that and your anatomy knowledge are laid to rest. And i know exactly who you are ..... I just found your post exactly what you maintain you are not, judgemental. Kind of ironic huh. . Keep your head up. Keep your head in mind and out of pants. . | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I read about this the other week and its quite a joke really. Neither have bothered to tone down the lifestyle. Linda is living in some ridiculously expensive condo and Terry (The Hulkster) is living in one of their huge houses. Now I think one if not both of them should tone it down as I can see in the near future of headlines saying "Hulk Hogan is now poor!"
That Vegas house had something around about a $1 - 2 million down payment on it which neither will get back and Terry has moved on from that but Linda being the money grabbing woman she is wants it all. Personally I think they both need to learn they aren't in the spot light anymore and nobody cares as much as we used to, especially with all the negative stories about them lately. Its time to move on for the Hulkster Receiving transmission from David Bowie's nipple antenna. Do you read me Lieutenant Bowie, I said do you read me...Lieutenant Bowie | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
kcwm said: I read about this the other week and its quite a joke really. Neither have bothered to tone down the lifestyle. Linda is living in some ridiculously expensive condo and Terry (The Hulkster) is living in one of their huge houses. Now I think one if not both of them should tone it down as I can see in the near future of headlines saying "Hulk Hogan is now poor!"
That Vegas house had something around about a $1 - 2 million down payment on it which neither will get back and Terry has moved on from that but Linda being the money grabbing woman she is wants it all. Personally I think they both need to learn they aren't in the spot light anymore and nobody cares as much as we used to, especially with all the negative stories about them lately. Its time to move on for the Hulkster Hulk has moved into an apartment...he is no longer allowed to reside on any of their properties, per Linda...supposedly she fears for her life... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
uPtoWnNY said: JasmineFire said: Linda Hogan held down the homefront for many a decade while Hulk Hogan was basically an absentee dad. He was touring and away from home constantly. Linda stayed home and raise the children and kept a comfortable home for the family. She is entitled to alimony to keep her in the lifestyle that she is accustomed to.
...and the Hulkster was out there busting his ass and making money for his family. Ever read about what pro wrestlers put their bodies through? It's not fun. Hogan did his job, and Linda did hers. Ok, he has to pay her alimony(which I don't get), but why rake the guy over the coals? Be fair. i have no idea if she's raking him over the coals or not. i do have a very clear idea of how ugly divorce is and from a financial standpoint i was being very fair. Much more fair than people who are wishing death on her. what pro wrestlers put their bodies through is not the point. the point is that he has accumulated all of the wealth in the marriage while she stayed home and took care of the house and family. There is no reason for her to get nothing financially. Just because a woman doesn't work a paying job does not mean that she is not working. Raising children is work, keeping a comfortable home is work, all of those things that are considered "woman's work" is hard work and should not be slighted. And on another note, I've become very sick of how misogynistic this site has become. It seems as though ever third so called man on this site believes that women are idiotic cock ornaments whose sole purpose in life is to look good. If they have children then they are evil and only doing so to trap a man and his money. if they get old or gain weight then they are utterly worthless and need to be replaced. if they get a divorce from their abusive celebrity husband and ask for alimony and the house they deserve a mafia hit and numerous other unspeakable acts committed against them. You guys are pathetic. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JasmineFire said: uPtoWnNY said: ...and the Hulkster was out there busting his ass and making money for his family. Ever read about what pro wrestlers put their bodies through? It's not fun. Hogan did his job, and Linda did hers. Ok, he has to pay her alimony(which I don't get), but why rake the guy over the coals? Be fair. i have no idea if she's raking him over the coals or not. i do have a very clear idea of how ugly divorce is and from a financial standpoint i was being very fair. Much more fair than people who are wishing death on her. what pro wrestlers put their bodies through is not the point. the point is that he has accumulated all of the wealth in the marriage while she stayed home and took care of the house and family. There is no reason for her to get nothing financially. Just because a woman doesn't work a paying job does not mean that she is not working. Raising children is work, keeping a comfortable home is work, all of those things that are considered "woman's work" is hard work and should not be slighted. And on another note, I've become very sick of how misogynistic this site has become. It seems as though ever third so called man on this site believes that women are idiotic cock ornaments whose sole purpose in life is to look good. If they have children then they are evil and only doing so to trap a man and his money. if they get old or gain weight then they are utterly worthless and need to be replaced. if they get a divorce from their abusive celebrity husband and ask for alimony and the house they deserve a mafia hit and numerous other unspeakable acts committed against them. You guys are pathetic. Awesome post. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JasmineFire said: uPtoWnNY said: ...and the Hulkster was out there busting his ass and making money for his family. Ever read about what pro wrestlers put their bodies through? It's not fun. Hogan did his job, and Linda did hers. Ok, he has to pay her alimony(which I don't get), but why rake the guy over the coals? Be fair. i have no idea if she's raking him over the coals or not. i do have a very clear idea of how ugly divorce is and from a financial standpoint i was being very fair. Much more fair than people who are wishing death on her. what pro wrestlers put their bodies through is not the point. the point is that he has accumulated all of the wealth in the marriage while she stayed home and took care of the house and family. There is no reason for her to get nothing financially. Just because a woman doesn't work a paying job does not mean that she is not working. Raising children is work, keeping a comfortable home is work, all of those things that are considered "woman's work" is hard work and should not be slighted. And on another note, I've become very sick of how misogynistic this site has become. It seems as though ever third so called man on this site believes that women are idiotic cock ornaments whose sole purpose in life is to look good. If they have children then they are evil and only doing so to trap a man and his money. if they get old or gain weight then they are utterly worthless and need to be replaced. if they get a divorce from their abusive celebrity husband and ask for alimony and the house they deserve a mafia hit and numerous other unspeakable acts committed against them. You guys are pathetic. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JasmineFire said: And on another note, I've become very sick of how misogynistic this site has become. It seems as though ever third so called man on this site believes that women are idiotic cock ornaments whose sole purpose in life is to look good. If they have children then they are evil and only doing so to trap a man and his money. if they get old or gain weight then they are utterly worthless and need to be replaced. if they get a divorce from their abusive celebrity husband and ask for alimony and the house they deserve a mafia hit and numerous other unspeakable acts committed against them.
You guys are pathetic. whateva... I think 'spousal support' is a bunch of crap to start with. Split up everything a couple has and go your own way. If one spouse was a stay-at-home(be it husband or wife), then something should be done. But stay-at-home doesn't mean you do that for the rest of your life, while the other spouse is still working for two. One shouldn't be responsible for the other's lifestyle, regardless who the primary earner is. When two people split, they both need to fend for themselves. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
can I just say that "cock ornament" is my new favorite term... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
uPtoWnNY said: JasmineFire said: And on another note, I've become very sick of how misogynistic this site has become. It seems as though ever third so called man on this site believes that women are idiotic cock ornaments whose sole purpose in life is to look good. If they have children then they are evil and only doing so to trap a man and his money. if they get old or gain weight then they are utterly worthless and need to be replaced. if they get a divorce from their abusive celebrity husband and ask for alimony and the house they deserve a mafia hit and numerous other unspeakable acts committed against them.
You guys are pathetic. whateva... I think 'spousal support' is a bunch of crap to start with. Split up everything a couple has and go your own way. If one spouse was a stay-at-home(be it husband or wife), then something should be done. But stay-at-home doesn't mean you do that for the rest of your life, while the other spouse is still working for two. One shouldn't be responsible for the other's lifestyle, regardless who the primary earner is. When two people split, they both need to fend for themselves. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
roodboi said: can I just say that "cock ornament" is my new favorite term... That was fuckin' awesome. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
roodboi said: can I just say that "cock ornament" is my new favorite term...
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
uPtoWnNY said: JasmineFire said: And on another note, I've become very sick of how misogynistic this site has become. It seems as though ever third so called man on this site believes that women are idiotic cock ornaments whose sole purpose in life is to look good. If they have children then they are evil and only doing so to trap a man and his money. if they get old or gain weight then they are utterly worthless and need to be replaced. if they get a divorce from their abusive celebrity husband and ask for alimony and the house they deserve a mafia hit and numerous other unspeakable acts committed against them.
You guys are pathetic. whateva... I think 'spousal support' is a bunch of crap to start with. Split up everything a couple has and go your own way. If one spouse was a stay-at-home(be it husband or wife), then something should be done. But stay-at-home doesn't mean you do that for the rest of your life, while the other spouse is still working for two. One shouldn't be responsible for the other's lifestyle, regardless who the primary earner is. When two people split, they both need to fend for themselves. Isn't spousal support temporary? Or can it also be permanent? I totally get it being temporary...but I really don't get why it should ever be permanent. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JustErin said: uPtoWnNY said: whateva... I think 'spousal support' is a bunch of crap to start with. Split up everything a couple has and go your own way. If one spouse was a stay-at-home(be it husband or wife), then something should be done. But stay-at-home doesn't mean you do that for the rest of your life, while the other spouse is still working for two. One shouldn't be responsible for the other's lifestyle, regardless who the primary earner is. When two people split, they both need to fend for themselves. Isn't spousal support temporary? Or can it also be permanent? I totally get it being temporary...but I really don't get why it should ever be permanent. I don't understand how somebody getting $40,000 per month doesn't have to pay their own damn light bill... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JustErin said: Isn't spousal support temporary? Or can it also be permanent?
I totally get it being temporary...but I really don't get why it should ever be permanent. I just hate this attitude of, "our marriage didn't work out, so f-ck you, pay up!" What is that shit? And I'd say the same thing if the woman's the primary earner, and the husband's looking for a phat payday. If you any assets, why bother getting married, if it's going to come to this? I know I'm not. I've seen too many hard-working friends/family members(male & female), who did the right thing, get f-cked over financially because of a bad marriage. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Um, so is it temporary or not?
Temporary makes COMPLETE sense when it's a stay at home parent that's been abandoned by their spouse. And didn't that dude cheat on his wife and that's why they are ending their marriage? I dunno, but I think I remember reading on here that he porked his daughter's best friend or something. He's fucking gross, btw. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JustErin said: Um, so is it temporary or not?
Aren't the kids grown though? I may be wrong.Temporary makes COMPLETE sense when it's a stay at home parent that's been abandoned by their spouse. And didn't that dude cheat on his wife and that's why they are ending their marriage? I dunno, but I think I remember reading on here that he porked his daughter's best friend or something. He's fucking gross, btw. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JustErin said: Um, so is it temporary or not?
Temporary makes COMPLETE sense when it's a stay at home parent that's been abandoned by their spouse. And didn't that dude cheat on his wife and that's why they are ending their marriage? I dunno, but I think I remember reading on here that he porked his daughter's best friend or something. He's fucking gross, btw. no he didnt cheat...they were having issues before their show even started... the "young" girl he's been seen with,that is rumored to be Brookes best friend, is 30-something and not a friend of Brookes at all... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Stymie said: JustErin said: Um, so is it temporary or not?
Aren't the kids grown though? I may be wrong.Temporary makes COMPLETE sense when it's a stay at home parent that's been abandoned by their spouse. And didn't that dude cheat on his wife and that's why they are ending their marriage? I dunno, but I think I remember reading on here that he porked his daughter's best friend or something. He's fucking gross, btw. unless you count the 19 year old that Linda has living with her, all the kids are out of the house... Nick is in jail and Brooke is on her own... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Stymie said: JustErin said: Um, so is it temporary or not?
Aren't the kids grown though? I may be wrong.Temporary makes COMPLETE sense when it's a stay at home parent that's been abandoned by their spouse. And didn't that dude cheat on his wife and that's why they are ending their marriage? I dunno, but I think I remember reading on here that he porked his daughter's best friend or something. He's fucking gross, btw. Yes, I think the have adult kids. But I thought it was about supporting the spouse until they get an education and /or a job and are in a position to support themselves. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
roodboi said: JustErin said: Um, so is it temporary or not?
Temporary makes COMPLETE sense when it's a stay at home parent that's been abandoned by their spouse. And didn't that dude cheat on his wife and that's why they are ending their marriage? I dunno, but I think I remember reading on here that he porked his daughter's best friend or something. He's fucking gross, btw. no he didnt cheat...they were having issues before their show even started... the "young" girl he's been seen with,that is rumored to be Brookes best friend, is 30-something and not a friend of Brookes at all... Interesting. That's not what I heard the daughter say. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JustErin said: roodboi said: no he didnt cheat...they were having issues before their show even started... the "young" girl he's been seen with,that is rumored to be Brookes best friend, is 30-something and not a friend of Brookes at all... Interesting. That's not what I heard the daughter say. Brooke alluded to it in her blogs but never came right out and accused him...I heard Hulk on a radio interview just a few days ago and Brooke was on there with him as well...so any bitter feeling she may have dont exist anymore... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Stymie said: uPtoWnNY said: whateva... I think 'spousal support' is a bunch of crap to start with. Split up everything a couple has and go your own way. If one spouse was a stay-at-home(be it husband or wife), then something should be done. But stay-at-home doesn't mean you do that for the rest of your life, while the other spouse is still working for two. One shouldn't be responsible for the other's lifestyle, regardless who the primary earner is. When two people split, they both need to fend for themselves. This is a juvenile statement you made. You know damn-well that was a figure of speech and not an intent to say she should fall off the face of the earth, actually catching a disease and die. C'mon now. Without explaining what I said, I do not think this alimony is justified. Yes, give her some money but be fair. You people kill me on these lethargic rebuttles of posts, acting dumb-founded as if life is that innocent. Please! Just because I say that bitch shouldn't get that much, I'm supposed to be crazy or something. Drop dead. Kiss my ass. Yes, Linda should catch a cold and fall off a bridge. Go suck a few nut fruits and eat fruit flies. Who cares, man? The bitch is getting over. . | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JustErin said: JasmineFire said: i have no idea if she's raking him over the coals or not. i do have a very clear idea of how ugly divorce is and from a financial standpoint i was being very fair. Much more fair than people who are wishing death on her. what pro wrestlers put their bodies through is not the point. the point is that he has accumulated all of the wealth in the marriage while she stayed home and took care of the house and family. There is no reason for her to get nothing financially. Just because a woman doesn't work a paying job does not mean that she is not working. Raising children is work, keeping a comfortable home is work, all of those things that are considered "woman's work" is hard work and should not be slighted. And on another note, I've become very sick of how misogynistic this site has become. It seems as though ever third so called man on this site believes that women are idiotic cock ornaments whose sole purpose in life is to look good. If they have children then they are evil and only doing so to trap a man and his money. if they get old or gain weight then they are utterly worthless and need to be replaced. if they get a divorce from their abusive celebrity husband and ask for alimony and the house they deserve a mafia hit and numerous other unspeakable acts committed against them. You guys are pathetic. Awesome post. Oh please... God ya'll suck a big fat rat ass. . | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
AlienX2050 said: Stymie said: While I do not think alimony is a good idea (I believe one should leave with one came with) I still do not understand the need to wish someone get killed or get a veneral disease.
This is a juvenile statement you made. You know damn-well that was a figure of speech and not an intent to say she should fall off the face of the earth, actually catching a disease and die. C'mon now. Without explaining what I said, I do not think this alimony is justified. Yes, give her some money but be fair. You people kill me on these lethargic rebuttles of posts, acting dumb-founded as if life is that innocent. Please! Just because I say that bitch shouldn't get that much, I'm supposed to be crazy or something. Drop dead. Kiss my ass. Yes, Linda should catch a cold and fall off a bridge. Go suck a few nut fruits and eat fruit flies. Who cares, man? The bitch is getting over. . | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Stymie said: AlienX2050 said: This is a juvenile statement you made. You know damn-well that was a figure of speech and not an intent to say she should fall off the face of the earth, actually catching a disease and die. C'mon now. Without explaining what I said, I do not think this alimony is justified. Yes, give her some money but be fair. You people kill me on these lethargic rebuttles of posts, acting dumb-founded as if life is that innocent. Please! Just because I say that bitch shouldn't get that much, I'm supposed to be crazy or something. Drop dead. Kiss my ass. Yes, Linda should catch a cold and fall off a bridge. Go suck a few nut fruits and eat fruit flies. Who cares, man? The bitch is getting over. . Hell, I was thinking the same thing about you. I wanted to know what was your problem with me. Outside of that...I think Kim Porter's claim for $100 million was justified because she and P Diddy have 2 young kids. Yes, I think you have a problem with me but I don't know what it is. . | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
AlienX2050 said: Stymie said: I have zero idea what your problem is with me but how the hell was I to know if you were being serious or not? And damn I wasn't even talking to you.
Hell, I was thinking the same thing about you. I wanted to know what was your problem with me. Outside of that...I think Kim Porter's claim for $100 million was justified because she and P Diddy have 2 young kids. Yes, I think you have a problem with me but I don't know what it is. . | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
AlienX2050 said: JustErin said: Awesome post. Oh please... God ya'll suck a big fat rat ass. . Eat a dick, dude. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JustErin said: AlienX2050 said: Oh please... God ya'll suck a big fat rat ass. . Eat a dick, dude. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Stymie said: AlienX2050 said: Hell, I was thinking the same thing about you. I wanted to know what was your problem with me. Outside of that...I think Kim Porter's claim for $100 million was justified because she and P Diddy have 2 young kids. Yes, I think you have a problem with me but I don't know what it is. . If this is what you think then I need to rethink my posts. By no means do I bait. I was guilty of that years ago but I don't try that now. I may make a statement that's off the wall but by no means do I try to hurt anyone. If I have, I apologize. And I apologize to you. However, I still don't think $40,000 a month is justified for this woman. And I can't say that I don't like her. I don't know her. I think she has taken advantage of the system and pushed her family into a hole. She should have stayed. . | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |