StillGotIt said:[quote]eaglebear4839 said:[quote]
..... thought I would share this here at the org, not only cuz there's at least several rainbow brothers/sisters (just like the sun, we rise) that have no doubt felt indignant at hearing these phrases, but also to shed a little light to the ones here that may use such slurs. Saying "fag", "homo", or "that's so gay", when you're not gay, is just as insulting to a gay person as other slurs about race, gender, religion, etc. You may have heard someone downplay anti-gay slurs as being "no big deal" or "that doesn't mean what you're saying it means..." - but they ARE as big a deal (Blanche!) Maybe even moreso, because you can't always see if someone is gay, like you can with a person of color (though it sure does come in handy to wear your sexual orientation on your sleeve, cuz if they can see it, they are much less likely to say things knowing you're around; but not everyone is obvious, I reiterate.) ***** It is interesting that you mention the whole thing as being hurtful when folks say stuff like "oh, that's so gay". Gay is not a bad word unless used a certain way. Let me offer you a parallel. Black is not a bad word unless used in a certain way. Dark skinned persons are referred to as black. And so is everything that is considered dirty or negative...black market, black listed, black face and black balled. All of the villians wear black. Black is the color predominantly used to denote evil and uncleanliness. The list is eternal and deeply engrained into our society. Someone outside of the "black" race will say its no big deal. (This is one of the reasons some have made the decision to refer to themselves as African Americans.) Do you find need to pause when somebody says that something is all black and dirty, or its not nice because it is too dark? Probably not, it likly never crossed your mind. Also, I will tell you that I dont care what race a person is, use of the "N" word or anything derrogatory should never be accepted. Its either acceptable or it isn't. And dont fool yourself, my non-white skin does not deter people from saying offensive stuff in my presence. As a matter of fact, it compels stupid people to reveal themselves. To my knowledge, skin color has failed to stop an entire country from enslaving persons and then following up with horribly oppresive, institutionalized racism. Wearing a rainbow shirt will offer you no protection, you are not special. If you feel threatened, you can just take off your shirt. Honestly, I dont think the comparison of your sexuality to persons of another race should have been offered in this context considering you can choose whether or not to reveal your sexuality depending upon the circumstances with which you are presented. [Edited 8/5/08 19:53pm] [Edited 8/5/08 19:53pm] I understand what you're saying but not all people of color feel the same. I have friends that are feminine and they are not putting on an act and overdoing it. That's just the way they are. They can't just act straight. They cannot just take off their femininity. You look at them and you know, they're gay or borderline transgendered. I'm only sayin. MyeternalgrattitudetoPhil&Val.Herman said "We want sweaty truckers at the truck stop! We want cigar puffing men that look like they wanna beat the living daylights out of us" Val"sporking is spooning with benefits" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I agree Miguel. I also agree with part of StillGotit's post. No one really cares unless it is something that matters to them. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Stymie said: I agree Miguel. I also agree with part of StillGotit's post. No one really cares unless it is something that matters to them.
Thanks love. Ivy, you know me. I'm not trying to say that one struggle is any less or more than the other one, just different. There are some commonalities. That is all I'm saying. MyeternalgrattitudetoPhil&Val.Herman said "We want sweaty truckers at the truck stop! We want cigar puffing men that look like they wanna beat the living daylights out of us" Val"sporking is spooning with benefits" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
MIGUELGOMEZ said: Stymie said: I agree Miguel. I also agree with part of StillGotit's post. No one really cares unless it is something that matters to them.
Thanks love. Ivy, you know me. I'm not trying to say that one struggle is any less or more than the other one, just different. There are some commonalities. That is all I'm saying. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Stymie said: I agree Miguel. I also agree with part of StillGotit's post. No one really cares unless it is something that matters to them.
Yup, totally. That's why nothing in this world ever really gets resolved. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Stymie said: I agree Miguel. I also agree with part of StillGotit's post. No one really cares unless it is something that matters to them.
i think that's true, and i think it's more human nature than it is a matter of finger-pointing criticism. we are all that way. it's easy for us to sympathize if someone we know is on the receiving end of some kind of oppression, but it doesn't become something that we actively rally against unless it happens to us. and when you think about it, it's unavoidable. i'm not just talking about racism, homophobia, sexism, etc. - i'm talking about anything that can happen to a person which can be fought against or advocated. any disease, any consequence which puts you in a situation where your experience can be given support or in which you can provide support because you've been there. it's hard for someone who hasn't dealt with, say, breast cancer, to be at the forefront of speaking out about it, whereas someone who's experienced it or who has lost (or almost lost) a loved one to it has tons of insight and emotion and feels an urgency that nobody else can understand. so in some ways, sure, i can get how my struggle isn't necessarily going to be someone else's, but chances are their struggle isn't mine either. the best thing that can be done is to find the commonalities that prevent us from being part of each other's problem, i guess. none of that made sense, did it? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Anxiety said: Stymie said: I agree Miguel. I also agree with part of StillGotit's post. No one really cares unless it is something that matters to them.
i think that's true, and i think it's more human nature than it is a matter of finger-pointing criticism. we are all that way. it's easy for us to sympathize if someone we know is on the receiving end of some kind of oppression, but it doesn't become something that we actively rally against unless it happens to us. and when you think about it, it's unavoidable. i'm not just talking about racism, homophobia, sexism, etc. - i'm talking about anything that can happen to a person which can be fought against or advocated. any disease, any consequence which puts you in a situation where your experience can be given support or in which you can provide support because you've been there. it's hard for someone who hasn't dealt with, say, breast cancer, to be at the forefront of speaking out about it, whereas someone who's experienced it or who has lost (or almost lost) a loved one to it has tons of insight and emotion and feels an urgency that nobody else can understand. so in some ways, sure, i can get how my struggle isn't necessarily going to be someone else's, but chances are their struggle isn't mine either. the best thing that can be done is to find the commonalities that prevent us from being part of each other's problem, i guess. none of that made sense, did it? You also know me and everybody's fight is my fight. I care way too much about stuff. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Anxiety said: Stymie said: I agree Miguel. I also agree with part of StillGotit's post. No one really cares unless it is something that matters to them.
i think that's true, and i think it's more human nature than it is a matter of finger-pointing criticism. we are all that way. it's easy for us to sympathize if someone we know is on the receiving end of some kind of oppression, but it doesn't become something that we actively rally against unless it happens to us. and when you think about it, it's unavoidable. i'm not just talking about racism, homophobia, sexism, etc. - i'm talking about anything that can happen to a person which can be fought against or advocated. any disease, any consequence which puts you in a situation where your experience can be given support or in which you can provide support because you've been there. it's hard for someone who hasn't dealt with, say, breast cancer, to be at the forefront of speaking out about it, whereas someone who's experienced it or who has lost (or almost lost) a loved one to it has tons of insight and emotion and feels an urgency that nobody else can understand. so in some ways, sure, i can get how my struggle isn't necessarily going to be someone else's, but chances are their struggle isn't mine either. the best thing that can be done is to find the commonalities that prevent us from being part of each other's problem, i guess. none of that made sense, did it? It made total sense. MyeternalgrattitudetoPhil&Val.Herman said "We want sweaty truckers at the truck stop! We want cigar puffing men that look like they wanna beat the living daylights out of us" Val"sporking is spooning with benefits" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Anxiety said: Stymie said: I agree Miguel. I also agree with part of StillGotit's post. No one really cares unless it is something that matters to them.
i think that's true, and i think it's more human nature than it is a matter of finger-pointing criticism. we are all that way. it's easy for us to sympathize if someone we know is on the receiving end of some kind of oppression, but it doesn't become something that we actively rally against unless it happens to us. and when you think about it, it's unavoidable. i'm not just talking about racism, homophobia, sexism, etc. - i'm talking about anything that can happen to a person which can be fought against or advocated. any disease, any consequence which puts you in a situation where your experience can be given support or in which you can provide support because you've been there. it's hard for someone who hasn't dealt with, say, breast cancer, to be at the forefront of speaking out about it, whereas someone who's experienced it or who has lost (or almost lost) a loved one to it has tons of insight and emotion and feels an urgency that nobody else can understand. so in some ways, sure, i can get how my struggle isn't necessarily going to be someone else's, but chances are their struggle isn't mine either. the best thing that can be done is to find the commonalities that prevent us from being part of each other's problem, i guess. none of that made sense, did it? It absolutely makes sense. What doesn't make sense, and never has to me, is why some people seem to go out of their way to be assholes. Even in the instances where I've been perceived to be one, if I thought I hurt someone or overstepped my bounds it's always been more important to me to apologize or mend fences than to stand my ground. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
violator said: Anxiety said: i think that's true, and i think it's more human nature than it is a matter of finger-pointing criticism. we are all that way. it's easy for us to sympathize if someone we know is on the receiving end of some kind of oppression, but it doesn't become something that we actively rally against unless it happens to us. and when you think about it, it's unavoidable. i'm not just talking about racism, homophobia, sexism, etc. - i'm talking about anything that can happen to a person which can be fought against or advocated. any disease, any consequence which puts you in a situation where your experience can be given support or in which you can provide support because you've been there. it's hard for someone who hasn't dealt with, say, breast cancer, to be at the forefront of speaking out about it, whereas someone who's experienced it or who has lost (or almost lost) a loved one to it has tons of insight and emotion and feels an urgency that nobody else can understand. so in some ways, sure, i can get how my struggle isn't necessarily going to be someone else's, but chances are their struggle isn't mine either. the best thing that can be done is to find the commonalities that prevent us from being part of each other's problem, i guess. none of that made sense, did it? It absolutely makes sense. What doesn't make sense, and never has to me, is why some people seem to go out of their way to be assholes. Even in the instances where I've been perceived to be one, if I thought I hurt someone or overstepped my bounds it's always been more important to me to apologize or mend fences than to stand my ground. Awww...lets make out. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
violator said: Anxiety said: i think that's true, and i think it's more human nature than it is a matter of finger-pointing criticism. we are all that way. it's easy for us to sympathize if someone we know is on the receiving end of some kind of oppression, but it doesn't become something that we actively rally against unless it happens to us. and when you think about it, it's unavoidable. i'm not just talking about racism, homophobia, sexism, etc. - i'm talking about anything that can happen to a person which can be fought against or advocated. any disease, any consequence which puts you in a situation where your experience can be given support or in which you can provide support because you've been there. it's hard for someone who hasn't dealt with, say, breast cancer, to be at the forefront of speaking out about it, whereas someone who's experienced it or who has lost (or almost lost) a loved one to it has tons of insight and emotion and feels an urgency that nobody else can understand. so in some ways, sure, i can get how my struggle isn't necessarily going to be someone else's, but chances are their struggle isn't mine either. the best thing that can be done is to find the commonalities that prevent us from being part of each other's problem, i guess. none of that made sense, did it? It absolutely makes sense. What doesn't make sense, and never has to me, is why some people seem to go out of their way to be assholes. Even in the instances where I've been perceived to be one, if I thought I hurt someone or overstepped my bounds it's always been more important to me to apologize or mend fences than to stand my ground. i think the whole world should come together to fight assholism. but then again, you know there's some weird fetish group out there who think assholes are beautiful (i'm talking about euphemistically, not literally/biologically - that's another thread) and would advocate for asshole rights. oh my god. ASSHOLE RIGHTS. that's a totally hot t-shirt phrase. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Anxiety said: violator said: It absolutely makes sense. What doesn't make sense, and never has to me, is why some people seem to go out of their way to be assholes. Even in the instances where I've been perceived to be one, if I thought I hurt someone or overstepped my bounds it's always been more important to me to apologize or mend fences than to stand my ground. i think the whole world should come together to fight assholism. but then again, you know there's some weird fetish group out there who think assholes are beautiful (i'm talking about euphemistically, not literally/biologically - that's another thread) and would advocate for asshole rights. oh my god. ASSHOLE RIGHTS. that's a totally hot t-shirt phrase. ![]() MyeternalgrattitudetoPhil&Val.Herman said "We want sweaty truckers at the truck stop! We want cigar puffing men that look like they wanna beat the living daylights out of us" Val"sporking is spooning with benefits" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
MIGUELGOMEZ said: Anxiety said: i think the whole world should come together to fight assholism. but then again, you know there's some weird fetish group out there who think assholes are beautiful (i'm talking about euphemistically, not literally/biologically - that's another thread) and would advocate for asshole rights. oh my god. ASSHOLE RIGHTS. that's a totally hot t-shirt phrase. ![]() "the first asshole or assholes to fuck with me will be IMMEDIATELY ELIMINATED!!!" i actually uttered that phrase a few times over the weekend. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Anxiety said: MIGUELGOMEZ said: ![]() "the first asshole or assholes to fuck with me will be IMMEDIATELY ELIMINATED!!!" i actually uttered that phrase a few times over the weekend. Doesn't she also say something like "You have been accused of asshole-ism. Prepare to die." [Edited 8/5/08 21:23pm] MyeternalgrattitudetoPhil&Val.Herman said "We want sweaty truckers at the truck stop! We want cigar puffing men that look like they wanna beat the living daylights out of us" Val"sporking is spooning with benefits" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JustErin said: violator said: It absolutely makes sense. What doesn't make sense, and never has to me, is why some people seem to go out of their way to be assholes. Even in the instances where I've been perceived to be one, if I thought I hurt someone or overstepped my bounds it's always been more important to me to apologize or mend fences than to stand my ground. Awww...lets make out. So, like, what are you really saying? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Anxiety said: violator said: It absolutely makes sense. What doesn't make sense, and never has to me, is why some people seem to go out of their way to be assholes. Even in the instances where I've been perceived to be one, if I thought I hurt someone or overstepped my bounds it's always been more important to me to apologize or mend fences than to stand my ground. i think the whole world should come together to fight assholism. but then again, you know there's some weird fetish group out there who think assholes are beautiful (i'm talking about euphemistically, not literally/biologically - that's another thread) and would advocate for asshole rights. oh my god. ASSHOLE RIGHTS. that's a totally hot t-shirt phrase. Going to church doesn’t make you a Christian, any more than standing in a garage makes you a car. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Glad to see some good discussion about the subject. Lemme clarify that I wasn't so much upset at seeing someone name-calling - I'm pushing 40, and have heard it all and seen it all, where references to other people are concerned. My main desire was to start a dialogue, and get people thinking about it (though the org is, again, a little ahead of the curve, as far as I'm concerned, with respect for others.) I am somewhat desensetized to the names, but seeing future generations come along and use the same slurs and phrases - even so, kids today are cooler than they were when I was one. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
this thread is so gay..... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
StillGotIt said:[quote]eaglebear4839 said:[quote]
..... thought I would share this here at the org, not only cuz there's at least several rainbow brothers/sisters (just like the sun, we rise) that have no doubt felt indignant at hearing these phrases, but also to shed a little light to the ones here that may use such slurs. Saying "fag", "homo", or "that's so gay", when you're not gay, is just as insulting to a gay person as other slurs about race, gender, religion, etc. You may have heard someone downplay anti-gay slurs as being "no big deal" or "that doesn't mean what you're saying it means..." - but they ARE as big a deal (Blanche!) Maybe even moreso, because you can't always see if someone is gay, like you can with a person of color (though it sure does come in handy to wear your sexual orientation on your sleeve, cuz if they can see it, they are much less likely to say things knowing you're around; but not everyone is obvious, I reiterate.) ***** It is interesting that you mention the whole thing as being hurtful when folks say stuff like "oh, that's so gay". Gay is not a bad word unless used a certain way. Let me offer you a parallel. Black is not a bad word unless used in a certain way. Dark skinned persons are referred to as black. And so is everything that is considered dirty or negative...black market, black listed, black face and black balled. All of the villians wear black. Black is the color predominantly used to denote evil and uncleanliness. The list is eternal and deeply engrained into our society. Someone outside of the "black" race will say its no big deal. (This is one of the reasons some have made the decision to refer to themselves as African Americans.) Do you find need to pause when somebody says that something is all black and dirty, or its not nice because it is too dark? Probably not, it likly never crossed your mind. Also, I will tell you that I dont care what race a person is, use of the "N" word or anything derrogatory should never be accepted. Its either acceptable or it isn't. And dont fool yourself, my non-white skin does not deter people from saying offensive stuff in my presence. As a matter of fact, it compels stupid people to reveal themselves. To my knowledge, skin color has failed to stop an entire country from enslaving persons and then following up with horribly oppresive, institutionalized racism. Wearing a rainbow shirt will offer you no protection, you are not special. If you feel threatened, you can just take off your shirt. Honestly, I dont think the comparison of your sexuality to persons of another race should have been offered in this context considering you can choose whether or not to reveal your sexuality depending upon the circumstances with which you are presented. [Edited 8/5/08 19:53pm] [Edited 8/5/08 19:53pm] as some who couldn't pass for straight if my life depended on it, and was made fun of my entire childhood for being a sissy or a fag i can tell you that life isn't as easy as you imagine it for every gay person, because believe it or not some of cannot hide the fact that we are gay. in finances it's better to be in the black than in the red. also if you look up the roots of words you'd realize alot of negative traits are signed to things that are uncommon for instance, sinister comes for the latin word for left handed. [Edited 8/5/08 22:28pm] You CANNOT use the name of God, or religion, to justify acts of violence, to hurt, to hate, to discriminate- Madonna
authentic power is service- Pope Francis | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I reiterate - some slurs have a much more obvious meaning than others, and just like we're not okay to use slurs on people because of race or religion, add sexual orientation to the list. And if you feel insensetive by saying it, yer probably on the mark. Where children are concerned, I avoid being their "trauma of origin" at all costs - ya just never know what's gonna do it, true, but why contribute to it?
Shorty said: ok...first of all this quote is all messed up.
now...I'm gonna sound like a real insensitive bitch here but...have a tissue! please! I mean really, "it's not fair" You have every right to be upset by some one's words, just as they have every right to upset you. eaglebear4839 said: I care, because in this case, there are a lot of people under 18 that use the sight, and kids can be cruel and thoughtless, just because they don't know or are not taught any better. I also care because people have the right to be called only what they want to be called. In other words, I don't have the right to call a person of color anything except what they choose to refer to themselves to - the old argument of "if it walks like a duck..." has never washed with me.
(Similarly, my father used to have this thing about wanting to call anyone that is of Spanish descent by one label - he couldn't grasp that just as people in Europe can be British, German, Italian, etc., people from south of the US Border can be Mexican, Guatemalan, Brazilian, etc. (boils down to an "you're different" argument.) The point is that it's not fair to call someone by a label, without consulting with them first. Just as a Mexican person would not consent to being called a "beaner", I do not consent to anyone calling me "homo" or "fag". Now do you see why I care? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
thanks! Stymie said: Volitan said: | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Volitan said: This thread is so gay.
jonylawson said: this thread is so gay.....
you're late. yes SIR! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
StillGotIt said: eaglebear4839 said
..... thought I would share this here at the org, not only cuz there's at least several rainbow brothers/sisters (just like the sun, we rise) that have no doubt felt indignant at hearing these phrases, but also to shed a little light to the ones here that may use such slurs. : Saying "fag", "homo", or "that's so gay", when you're not gay, is just as insulting to a gay person as other slurs about race, gender, religion, etc. You may have heard someone downplay anti-gay slurs as being "no big deal" or "that doesn't mean what you're saying it means..." - but they ARE as big a deal (Blanche!) Maybe even moreso, because you can't always see if someone is gay, like you can with a person of color (though it sure does come in handy to wear your sexual orientation on your sleeve, cuz if they can see it, they are much less likely to say things knowing you're around; but not everyone is obvious, I reiterate.)
***** It is interesting that you mention the whole thing as being hurtful when folks say stuff like "oh, that's so gay". Gay is not a bad word unless used a certain way. Let me offer you a parallel. Black is not a bad word unless used in a certain way. Dark skinned persons are referred to as black. And so is everything that is considered dirty or negative...black market, black listed, black face and black balled. All of the villians wear black. Black is the color predominantly used to denote evil and uncleanliness. The list is eternal and deeply engrained into our society.
Someone outside of the "black" race will say its no big deal. (This is one of the reasons some have made the decision to refer to themselves as African Americans.) Do you find need to pause when somebody says that something is all black and dirty, or its not nice because it is too dark? Probably not, it likly never crossed your mind. Also, I will tell you that I dont care what race a person is, use of the "N" word or anything derrogatory should never be accepted. Its either acceptable or it isn't. And dont fool yourself, my non-white skin does not deter people from saying offensive stuff in my presence. As a matter of fact, it compels stupid people to reveal themselves. To my knowledge, skin color has failed to stop an entire country from enslaving persons and then following up with horribly oppresive, institutionalized racism. Wearing a rainbow shirt will offer you no protection, you are not special. If you feel threatened, you can just take off your shirt. Honestly, I dont think the comparison of your sexuality to persons of another race should have been offered in this context considering you can choose whether or not to reveal your sexuality depending upon the circumstances with which you are presented. [Edited 8/5/08 19:53pm] [Edited 8/5/08 19:53pm] who are you [Edited 8/6/08 3:44am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
and had a bunch of queens waiting there to WHOOP YOUR IGNORANT ASS (AND THEN FUCK IT!)
TOTALLY wrong mentality to have. That right there is why straight men/boys have so much animosity towards gay men. They think they're all about sex and saying that would've proved their theory. If you're ever going to fight back to a straight idiot, for the love of god don't mention sex in any way. Prove to them that you're a complete human being not some 2D stereotype. [Edited 8/6/08 4:31am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
rolling said: eaglebear4839 said: The point is that it's not fair to call someone by a label, without consulting with them first. Just as a Mexican person would not consent to being called a "beaner", I do not consent to anyone calling me "homo" or "fag". Now do you see why I care? Please, if someone wants to be offensive they arent going to ask your permission first are they "excuse me sir do you mind if I call you a fag". The fact of the matter is that the majority of straight people dont like gay people whether its because of a pariticular religion they follow or the way their parents brought them up. Thats just a fact of life maybe it will change with time who knows. Im personally so Glad Im straight and dont have to go through any of that shit. [Edited 8/4/08 18:03pm] So that's just the way it is, (to quote Bruce Hornsby's song)? I guess you're straight and white. How privileged. But for those of us who aren't, living with it as a fact of life is intolerable. Every day, throughout the day, is not something anyone is trying to get used to. I think the intent of the original poster is that if people were aware of the harm they were doing, they might think twice. But it seems that's too much to ask of some. [Edited 8/6/08 15:15pm] I don't want you to think like me. I just want you to think. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Volitan said: Stymie said: A person who is a member of this community and the LBGT family just said he found those words to be hurtful. It almost makes sense that people HERE would turn around and use them in a purposely offensive manner.
oh. It's the internet. Big fuckin deal. So because we're online, no respect is to be expected? How soon before that attitude takes effect offline? Not very long. I'm not sure if that's a lame attempt at humor or you really mean it. I don't want you to think like me. I just want you to think. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CarrieLee said: I don't use the word 'homo' but I am guilty of saying "that's soo gay"...and quite often. I don't mean it to be hurtful but I guess I have to watch what I say. Just like the time I said "that's retarded" in front of my friend who has a retarded sister.
Is it still hurtful if we don't intend it to be that way? I mean, I think saying that's so gay isn't as bad as calling someone a fucking homo. But what do I know Yes it is still offensive even if you don't intend it that way. It's not your intent, it is the message received by those who receive it. saying that's so gay is just as bad as calling someone a fucking homo. I guess you aren't gay, and unable to empathize with others but either is hurtful whether you acknowledge it or not. IF I slap you but don't intend it to hurt, does that mean you don't feel it? I don't want you to think like me. I just want you to think. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
StillGotIt said:[quote]eaglebear4839 said:[quote]
..... thought I would share this here at the org, not only cuz there's at least several rainbow brothers/sisters (just like the sun, we rise) that have no doubt felt indignant at hearing these phrases, but also to shed a little light to the ones here that may use such slurs. Saying "fag", "homo", or "that's so gay", when you're not gay, is just as insulting to a gay person as other slurs about race, gender, religion, etc. You may have heard someone downplay anti-gay slurs as being "no big deal" or "that doesn't mean what you're saying it means..." - but they ARE as big a deal (Blanche!) Maybe even moreso, because you can't always see if someone is gay, like you can with a person of color (though it sure does come in handy to wear your sexual orientation on your sleeve, cuz if they can see it, they are much less likely to say things knowing you're around; but not everyone is obvious, I reiterate.) How ignorant is that? Someone who is effiminate or butch does not have that option. ***** It is interesting that you mention the whole thing as being hurtful when folks say stuff like "oh, that's so gay". Gay is not a bad word unless used a certain way. Let me offer you a parallel. Black is not a bad word unless used in a certain way. Dark skinned persons are referred to as black. And so is everything that is considered dirty or negative...black market, black listed, black face and black balled. All of the villians wear black. Black is the color predominantly used to denote evil and uncleanliness. The list is eternal and deeply engrained into our society. Someone outside of the "black" race will say its no big deal. (This is one of the reasons some have made the decision to refer to themselves as African Americans.) Do you find need to pause when somebody says that something is all black and dirty, or its not nice because it is too dark? Probably not, it likly never crossed your mind. Also, I will tell you that I dont care what race a person is, use of the "N" word or anything derrogatory should never be accepted. Its either acceptable or it isn't. And dont fool yourself, my non-white skin does not deter people from saying offensive stuff in my presence. As a matter of fact, it compels stupid people to reveal themselves. To my knowledge, skin color has failed to stop an entire country from enslaving persons and then following up with horribly oppresive, institutionalized racism. Wearing a rainbow shirt will offer you no protection, you are not special. If you feel threatened, you can just take off your shirt. Honestly, I dont think the comparison of your sexuality to persons of another race should have been offered in this context considering you can choose whether or not to reveal your sexuality depending upon the circumstances with which you are presented. [Edited 8/5/08 19:53pm] [Edited 8/5/08 19:53pm] I don't want you to think like me. I just want you to think. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Stymie said: Shorty said: or maybe people should stop being so damn sensitive. Ok..I admit..I try not to offend people too but dang if they are still offended..well there ain't nuttin' I can do to stop that. Yes Stymie, I think that's exactly what people should do...call that person out...I guess I feel that's different than just being "offended" I never said people should just "get over it" and I don't use it because it "pisses people off" Do you consider you disabled child "retarded"? "not a fan" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SUPRMAN said: CarrieLee said: I don't use the word 'homo' but I am guilty of saying "that's soo gay"...and quite often. I don't mean it to be hurtful but I guess I have to watch what I say. Just like the time I said "that's retarded" in front of my friend who has a retarded sister.
Is it still hurtful if we don't intend it to be that way? I mean, I think saying that's so gay isn't as bad as calling someone a fucking homo. But what do I know Yes it is still offensive even if you don't intend it that way. It's not your intent, it is the message received by those who receive it. saying that's so gay is just as bad as calling someone a fucking homo. I guess you aren't gay, and unable to empathize with others but either is hurtful whether you acknowledge it or not. IF I slap you but don't intend it to hurt, does that mean you don't feel it? I think you're exaggerating a bit. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |