CalhounSq said:

Some of us need more work than others, though. If I wanted to be "hot" it would be a full time job. I'd have to work out 5 hours a day and that's just the beginning.
I settle for "cute" and spend an hour getting ready each morning. Maybe an hour and a half getting ready when I go out at night.

CarrieMpls said:

i spend about an hour a week doing the essentials, i can't imagine the work that goes into some peoples look.
i prefer the natural look, not able for high-maintainence.

JustErin said:

shanti0608 said:

TonyVanDam said:

sarcasm is a wonderful thing.

angelcat said:

Well, people would probably classify me as high-maintenance and I spend all of 20 minutes a day to get ready - shower included and then I take maybe a hour all week to do other stuff like nails and other girlie stuff.

I think it's a bit of a fallacy that it takes a long time for people to look (what they think at least is) their best.

I know one thing..a man thats not so hot makes hell of a better man than ones that are.

paisleypark4 said:

Why?

CarrieMpls said:

Same here...it works for me!

TonyVanDam said:

You are single right?

JustErin said:

JustErin said:

Because from my experience they have been cocky arrogant and "know" they can always "do better".

paisleypark4 said:

mdiver said:

Very single!

Stymie said:

Hey, I just noticed your comment about what I said on other thread. Thanks for the encouragement. I will have to work through some self-esteem issues myself before I get REALLY serious about the dating game.
Of course I hope that those single moms find me attractive or at least "interesting"... obviously they don't know see or know anything about me except what I look like and some very basic info about my interests.
I will admit that I'm getting a bit desperate these days but I WILL NOT date a woman just for the sake of dating her.
After checking out the profiles of those girls I mentioned earlier in the other thread, I did notice that one of the two was like I mentioned, not exactly conventionally attractive, but still attractive in a "quirky" way. Maybe some consider those kind of women "ugly" but like many say, beauty is in the eye of the beholder.



Oh, and sorry for this brief de-tour of the thread.

TonyVanDam said:

Well i am sure some beautiful woman somewhere will be falling over herself to get a man who asks these kind of questions.

paisleypark4 said:

This sounds familiar(like in another thread) And what I was trying to say all along.

Thanks so much for seeing it the way I do

I have to add a small story to this reply maybe even some questions. I'm in a relationship with an awesome girl. I truely love her. but i do kind of love someone elese as well. My female friend and best friend in general. I've known my best friend for about 7 - 8 years now and am wildy attracted to her personallity and looks. She lives 4 hours away though so i only see here a few times a year aside from on cam. The girl i'm dating is wonderful personality wise but i don't find myself as wildly attracted to her physically. Don't get me wrong, i still find her attractive but in comparison i'm just not as wild about her. It's always had me a little worried but i believe in loyalty and i would never cheat. I've recently started thinking that my girl is better for me because i know she cares for me. Plus i know that if i were to get involved with my best friend things wouldn't be the same as they are, right now she can cheer me up from a hellish day with just a few words or a smile. I'm sure if we started more it wouldn't be as easy for me to cheer up with just a grin. Whereas my girlfriend although she doesn't have the grin cheer up shes got many tricks up her sleeves.

So in my opinion, not the ugly but the less infatuated love wins. Theres no room for change if you're infatuated witht he way someone looks. It could make a dream girl not a dream anymore. more or less a broken dream.

toots said:

But they can always get better!

TonyVanDam said:

Not true by any means.

JustErin said:

Be better at being assholes or better at showing how arrogant/cocky they are?
[Edited 7/31/08 16:01pm]

toots said:

No, get better, hotter people to be with.

JustErin said:

I disagree with you on this the woman my ex is NOW with has no teeth, ha 8 kids ( none live with her) and is more ugly themn me the last wife he has was HOT beleive me that dont mean NOTTA! it goes downhill from there

JustErin said:

maybe the hotter people aren't better?

i don't know, all i know is that i'd have a hard time marrying someone who i wasn't sexaully attracted to. if i have to close my eyes, avoid touching areas that i don't like, and imagine someone else during sex then the relationship is probably not going to last.

JasmineFire said:

I meant, better and hotter people.

TonyVanDam said:

There are a LOT more ULGLY MEN in the world then there are women...Some of them men make Threads just like thease ones .....Beauty it self has always been form what ones mind can produce...and many time More than not it the MEN that make their women look ULGY

RipPoPtheregoMYTOP said:

RipPoPtheregoMYTOP said:

Wanna explain that one?

JustErin said:

I think he meant talk bad about them and give them bad reps not to mention a few other things involved.

RipPoPtheregoMYTOP said:

That is a pretty stupid move on you part for negatively stereotyping people (especially me) because we're bold enough to start a thread like this than you.

Yes, I said it! This thread was going very well & educational until you wanted to pick a bad time throwing a flamebait. I hope you feel real good about yourself mate.

TonyVanDam said:

yes u do sterotype keep a rubber on the world don't need ur offspring