New topic
PrintableMOVE ON.
He's not into you. http://www.facebook.com/p...111?ref=ts
y'all gone keep messin' around wit me and turn me back to the old me...... | |
- E-mail - orgNote -  Report post to moderator |
abierman said: dag said: And why wouldn´t you answer? because if I would not be interested in you, and hardly know you, I'd rather let this die quietly than react.... I would feel no responsibility for your feelings and therefore not the urge to answer..... just like women do as well!  I do not reply only when it comes to pple I don´t know at all. For instance if someone replies to my profile on the net and I have never met this person, never written to them, than I don´t bother answering too. But if it is someone that I´ve been in contact with, I think it is polite to answer. I would. See, I am hoping that he is interested because if he wasn´t he would have let it die in the beginning. Damn, I hope it was not a mistake because I wouldn´t like to ruin something that might have had slightest chance. "When Michael Jackson is just singing and dancing, you just think this is an astonishing talent. And he has had this astounding talent all his life, but we want him to be floored as well. We really don´t like the idea that he could have it all." | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
abierman said: dag said: And why wouldn´t you answer? because if I would not be interested in you, and hardly know you, I'd rather let this die quietly than react.... I would feel no responsibility for your feelings and therefore not the urge to answer..... just like women do as well! That's it exactly. If he's not interested he will not bother to take the time to try and give any explanation what so ever. Would you? I understand that you're looking for some kind of closure or definitive answer from him but I really do not think you will get it. So I would just try to look at it as you needing to get out how you felt about it and you were able to do that. Again, time to move on. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JustErin said: abierman said: because if I would not be interested in you, and hardly know you, I'd rather let this die quietly than react.... I would feel no responsibility for your feelings and therefore not the urge to answer..... just like women do as well! That's it exactly. If he's not interested he will not bother to take the time to try and give any explanation what so ever. Would you? I understand that you're looking for some kind of closure or definitive answer from him but I really do not think you will get it. So I would just try to look at it as you needing to get out how you felt about it and you were able to do that. Again, time to move on. I am not sure I understand this sentence correctly. So you think that sending the last message wasn´t a mistake? The way I see it is that I have nothing to lose, do I? If he is interested, he will answer, right? If he is not, he might answer, but probably not. If he does answer, it will help me to get over him. But if he is interested, how am I supposed to "get things moving". SHould I keep on waiting for weeks for another message from him? One of my friends was joking that this way, we´d have kids at 60. My only concern right now after sending it is: do you think he might get discoured by this message even if he was interested? [Edited 7/24/08 7:31am] "When Michael Jackson is just singing and dancing, you just think this is an astonishing talent. And he has had this astounding talent all his life, but we want him to be floored as well. We really don´t like the idea that he could have it all." | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
dag said: JustErin said: That's it exactly. If he's not interested he will not bother to take the time to try and give any explanation what so ever. Would you? I understand that you're looking for some kind of closure or definitive answer from him but I really do not think you will get it. So I would just try to look at it as you needing to get out how you felt about it and you were able to do that. Again, time to move on. I am not sure I understand this sentence correctly. So you think that sending the last message wasn´t a mistake? The way I see it is that I have nothing to lose, do I? If he is interested, he will answer, right? If he is not, he might answer, but probably not. If he does answer, it will help me to get over him. But if he is interested, how am I supposed to "get things moving". SHould I keep on waiting for weeks for another message from him? One of my friends was joking that this way, we´d have kids at 60. My only concern right now after sending it is: do you think he might get discoured by this message even if he was interested? [Edited 7/24/08 7:31am] No, I didn't say that I thought it was a mistake. I just said that you will probably not get the answers you are looking for. It's not a mistake because you obviously felt the need to do it...and maybe sending it and saying what you said will help you in some way. You keep saying, 'if he is interested, if he is interested...' all his behavior indicates that he is not. So when (or if rather) he doesn't reply will you just let it go? Or will you search for another excuse as to why he didn't respond? | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
dag said: The way I see it is that I have nothing to lose, do I?
If he is interested, he will answer, right? If he is not, he might answer, but probably not. If he does answer, it will help me to get over him. I am sorry but I can't help replying to this. Like I said he probably likes you but not enough to seriously make an effort right now. If that's not enough for you, FORGET ABOUT IT. But if that is enough for you, then make sure he replies IMMEDIATELY. - [Edited 7/24/08 7:49am] | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JustErin said: dag said: I am not sure I understand this sentence correctly. So you think that sending the last message wasn´t a mistake? The way I see it is that I have nothing to lose, do I? If he is interested, he will answer, right? If he is not, he might answer, but probably not. If he does answer, it will help me to get over him. But if he is interested, how am I supposed to "get things moving". SHould I keep on waiting for weeks for another message from him? One of my friends was joking that this way, we´d have kids at 60. My only concern right now after sending it is: do you think he might get discoured by this message even if he was interested? [Edited 7/24/08 7:31am] No, I didn't say that I thought it was a mistake. I just said that you will probably not get the answers you are looking for. It's not a mistake because you obviously felt the need to do it...and maybe sending it and saying what you said will help you in some way. You keep saying, 'if he is interested, if he is interested...' all his behavior indicates that he is not. So when (or if rather) he doesn't reply will you just let it go? Or will you search for another excuse as to why he didn't respond? I will let it go. What else could I do? i know his behaviour indicates that he is not interested, but his words indicate the opposite. I do realize that behaviour speaks louder than words. I am sorry but I can't help replying to this. Like I said he probably likes you but not enough to seriously make an effort right now. If that's not enough for you, FORGET ABOUT IT. But if that is enough for you, then make sure he replies IMMEDIATELY. Even if I wanted him to reply immediately, how am i supposed to do that? "When Michael Jackson is just singing and dancing, you just think this is an astonishing talent. And he has had this astounding talent all his life, but we want him to be floored as well. We really don´t like the idea that he could have it all." | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Blank post [Edited 7/24/08 23:45pm] "When Michael Jackson is just singing and dancing, you just think this is an astonishing talent. And he has had this astounding talent all his life, but we want him to be floored as well. We really don´t like the idea that he could have it all." | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
dag said: Even if I wanted him to reply immediately, how am i supposed to do that?
One word. SEX But like I said, if that's not good enough for you, then forget about him. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Tremolina said: dag said: Even if I wanted him to reply immediately, how am i supposed to do that?
One word. SEX But like I said, if that's not good enough for you, then forget about him. Wait a minute. So should I write him, do you wanna have sex with me? 
i don´t think he´s that type of guy. "When Michael Jackson is just singing and dancing, you just think this is an astonishing talent. And he has had this astounding talent all his life, but we want him to be floored as well. We really don´t like the idea that he could have it all." | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
dag said: Tremolina said: One word. SEX But like I said, if that's not good enough for you, then forget about him. Wait a minute. So should I write him, do you wanna have sex with me?
i don´t think he´s that type of guy.
Ehm no I wouldn't write THAT. If he is "not that type of guy" (which I doubt but you know him, not me) forget about it. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Tremolina said: dag said: Wait a minute. So should I write him, do you wanna have sex with me?
i don´t think he´s that type of guy.
Ehm no I wouldn't write THAT. If he is "not that type of guy" (which I doubt but you know him, not me) forget about it. Really, does he look like it to you? See, I can´t get him to bed in any other way as to write it straight. Cause, he doesn´t live in my town. I haven´t seen him for about a year, we keep in touch only through the net. But when I used to meet him at work, he did not seem to be that type of guy. He seemed to be very intelectual walking around reading books (see we worked at school, we both were teachers)and when you talked to him unbelievably polite. He´s just not that type of "playboy guy". [Edited 7/24/08 9:48am] "When Michael Jackson is just singing and dancing, you just think this is an astonishing talent. And he has had this astounding talent all his life, but we want him to be floored as well. We really don´t like the idea that he could have it all." | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
|
 |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
