NegaTIVity said:

Good thing everybody don't think this way. Sweet and kind/genuine are noncomparable. When people refer to something as being "sweet" they feel intense feelings for this or that. Kind and genuine just don't have the same effect.

My choices are as follows:

My son
Heather

IceNine said:

Now that's priceless

4LOVE said:

And predictable...and pointless...

NegaTIVity said:

You know what?

My son is not predictable or pointless and he is the most important person in the world to me... so fuck you.

The only way to actually piss me off is to say something against my son... I know that your screen name is "negativity," but don't be a fucking dickhead about my son.

...
[This message was edited Tue Nov 12 20:17:45 PST 2002 by IceNine]

IceNine said:

Jesus, Nine, go read my replies again--you might see that I purposely excluded children from my negative definition of "sweet". And I never, ever said anything "against" your son--all I "said" was that a person listing his son and significant other as "the sweetest person(s)" was predictable and pointless. Meaning that of course that's what a person's going to say!

Back the fuck off and don't put words in my mouth!

NegaTIVity said:

The point is that he IS the sweetest person that I know... I didn't see your earlier post excluding kids though...

My son is by far the most important person in the world to me and he is all that I really care about.

So, all-in-all, I don't think that is is pointless to say that my son is the sweetest person in the world, although most people with kids will say that.

IceNine said:

Then say that, don't accuse me of saying shitty things about kids. You sound like Oceana when you jump to those conclusions...

ME, eye'm an angel!

Again (and for the last time): I did not call your son, or any person, "pointless".

SweeTea said:

Your grammar is atrocious--good thing everybody "don't" write/talk this way! Also: you don't have the exclusive definition of the word "sweet"...'kind' and 'genuine' are my version of "sweet". And what most people would refer to as sweet, I would call fake and syrupy (small children excluded).

CarrieMpls said:

He's pretty hot too!

NegaTIVity said:

This is not The University of Prince.org. Pipe down, we all just here to have fun. And just because you ain't never experienced "sweet" before is your problem. Who the hell would call a night (or day for that matter) of high grade lovemaking "kind" and "geniune". Don't get me wrong, there's absolutly nothing wrong with being kind or genuine, but sweet is something one has to experience. And being the negative person that you are, I can understand why you have no inkling as to how it's used in this thread.


And I just love my Funk & Wagnalls (just to hip you up on how the term sweetest is used here):

kind: Having gentleness, tenderness, or goodness of heart,

genuine: Of the original or true stock 2. Authentic: of the authorship claimed. 3 Not spurious, adulterated, or counterfeit.

sweet: Agreeable or delightful to the mind, arousing pleasant emotions. Gently pleasing to the senses.


You see negativity, sweet stimulates and affects one's senses and is an EMOTIONAL term. I didn't author these definitions. Be a little open minded, you may find that it's "S..W..E..E..T"

ME, eye'm an angel!

SweeTea said:

Feeling a little defensive, since you obviously use the term as your cutesy little name here?

No. I know I'm sweet, you do not offend me.


First of all, the origin of this thread was not about sweet "lovemaking", remember? It asked about sweet "persons".

We could talk about "persons" all day long until kingdom comes, it's the "type" of person ("sweetest") that is the distinguishing factor here. I was using lovemaking as an example of how one NORMALLY views the term "sweet". You are however entitled to your opinion. Sorry

And originally, ...

Hey mister grammatically correct, you never use a conjunction at the beginning of a sentence!


...I merely stated that my definition was different than the typical one. I didn't insult you or say that you were wrong. Yet you decided to tell me my perception of "sweet", and what I prefer in a person instead of "sweet", was wrong and that you were glad others didn't feel that way.

I'm sorry, I was wrong. Please accept my apologies.


Secondly, you erroneously state I've never experienced sweetness, and that I don't understand how it's used in this thread. Major--and incorrect--assumptions that were obviously intended to attempt to belittle me.

I was not trying to belittle you, although I've noticed you do so to people here all the time, but that's your thang. Again, forgive me for the error of my ways.


Thirdly, "kindness" by the definition you give from Wagnall's, is definitely a postive emotional term, so you don't make any real point there.

Look again. The difference between "sweet" and "kind" is the emotional aspect. No where in the definition of "kind" is the word emotional or senses.

Your 43 yr. old ass needs to be elsewhere...SWEETea

My choices are as follows:

My son
Heather

00769BAD said:

JESUS CHRIST heheheheheheh



can I B 1 on yo vise women pls...

and U can B 1 of my vise man...








1+1+1=3



PS - Ur SOUL is born 24th of sept.- right???

IceNine said:

Your son Heather?

That's an odd name for a boy...lol!

Cloudbuster said:

Clever... clever... but it was a list...

My Son

then

Heather

He's my secret