Author | Message |
What Might We Have Missed? I was inspired to post this by seeing a piece of bread fall out of a bread bag and then onto my kitchen floor. I thought to myself, "Bread is cool. I don't know what I'd do without it."
I wonder how many great things like bread that never existed could have. They say wheat was made by a cross of two grass varieties. This new grass grew in a little spot. Eventually, people found it and started cultivating it. Let's say instead of people finding it, a herd of hungry goats found it and ate the whole damn spot, roots and all, and then wheat was never domesticated. Makes me think about how big of an impact that would've made on history. Then, I wonder what other wild cross of grass was in fact eaten by goats, or otherwise eliminated. I wonder if we could have had a food source superior to wheat, but by random chance, just missed out on it. The same thing could be true to any invention, discovery, or innovation. And I still think Christianity prevented an industrial revolution in the 1200s. I could be exercising on a holodeck right now...Bastards. -------
A census taker once tried to test me. I ate his liver with some fava beans and a nice chianti... "I've just had an apostrophe!" "I think you mean an epiphany..." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
BattierBeMyDaddy said: I was inspired to post this by seeing a piece of bread fall out of a bread bag and then onto my kitchen floor. I thought to myself, "Bread is cool. I don't know what I'd do without it."
Actually, most things arrive in their own time. Calculus, for example, was discovered by Newton and some other chap on the other side of the globe at about the same time. It was just "time" for Calculus. Knowledge had simply gotten to that point in general, and if you killed Newton, another would have taken his place. Likewise, Hitler wasn't so much the cause of all evil as was Germany simply ready for such a person. And so it is with wheat--the details might have been altered, but the fundamentals remain pretty constant.
I wonder how many great things like bread that never existed could have. They say wheat was made by a cross of two grass varieties. This new grass grew in a little spot. Eventually, people found it and started cultivating it. Let's say instead of people finding it, a herd of hungry goats found it and ate the whole damn spot, roots and all, and then wheat was never domesticated. Makes me think about how big of an impact that would've made on history. Then, I wonder what other wild cross of grass was in fact eaten by goats, or otherwise eliminated. I wonder if we could have had a food source superior to wheat, but by random chance, just missed out on it. The same thing could be true to any invention, discovery, or innovation. And I still think Christianity prevented an industrial revolution in the 1200s. I could be exercising on a holodeck right now...Bastards. Enjoy. Fear is the mind-killer. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
teller said: BattierBeMyDaddy said: I was inspired to post this by seeing a piece of bread fall out of a bread bag and then onto my kitchen floor. I thought to myself, "Bread is cool. I don't know what I'd do without it."
Actually, most things arrive in their own time. Calculus, for example, was discovered by Newton and some other chap on the other side of the globe at about the same time. It was just "time" for Calculus. Knowledge had simply gotten to that point in general, and if you killed Newton, another would have taken his place. Likewise, Hitler wasn't so much the cause of all evil as was Germany simply ready for such a person. And so it is with wheat--the details might have been altered, but the fundamentals remain pretty constant.
I wonder how many great things like bread that never existed could have. They say wheat was made by a cross of two grass varieties. This new grass grew in a little spot. Eventually, people found it and started cultivating it. Let's say instead of people finding it, a herd of hungry goats found it and ate the whole damn spot, roots and all, and then wheat was never domesticated. Makes me think about how big of an impact that would've made on history. Then, I wonder what other wild cross of grass was in fact eaten by goats, or otherwise eliminated. I wonder if we could have had a food source superior to wheat, but by random chance, just missed out on it. The same thing could be true to any invention, discovery, or innovation. And I still think Christianity prevented an industrial revolution in the 1200s. I could be exercising on a holodeck right now...Bastards. Enjoy. Wonderful answer. -------
A census taker once tried to test me. I ate his liver with some fava beans and a nice chianti... "I've just had an apostrophe!" "I think you mean an epiphany..." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
My pleasure...and I didn't even beat you over the head! LOL...sorry...these posts will go down in recent history as "teller's drunken hubris." Edit: Well, not these posts.
. [This message was edited Sun Nov 10 6:25:16 PST 2002 by teller] Fear is the mind-killer. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
teller said: My pleasure...and I didn't even beat you over the head! LOL...sorry...these posts will go down in recent history as "teller's drunken hubris."
You have to have certain conditions present before advancement can take place. But I wonder how many time you've had all those conditions present, but for some reason, the new advancement was delayed. -------
A census taker once tried to test me. I ate his liver with some fava beans and a nice chianti... "I've just had an apostrophe!" "I think you mean an epiphany..." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
BattierBeMyDaddy said: teller said: My pleasure...and I didn't even beat you over the head! LOL...sorry...these posts will go down in recent history as "teller's drunken hubris."
You have to have certain conditions present before advancement can take place. But I wonder how many time you've had all those conditions present, but for some reason, the new advancement was delayed. Fear is the mind-killer. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
teller said: Likewise, Hitler wasn't so much the cause of all evil as was Germany simply ready for such a person.
Enjoy. You're point is fairly sound in that any invention is simply a matter of "standing on the shoulder of giants". In that an invention of any nature is mostly taking one idea and expanding it. However, I think the illustration of Hitler is wrong. Germany at the time was reeling from the Depression and needed stronger politicians than it had. But to go further than that is just wrong. Hitler was evil and managed to manipulate the state around his madness as a direct result of the populations very understandable insecurities. That doesn't shift the blame from him, and nor should it. Ever. ----------------------------------------- | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
teller said: Indeed! It could happen...Calculus could have been delayed for decades. But when you zoom out you'll find that the industrial revolution didn't depend on any one single individual.
Wasn't it more based on social conditions which promoted factory labor? An overabundance of population? -------
A census taker once tried to test me. I ate his liver with some fava beans and a nice chianti... "I've just had an apostrophe!" "I think you mean an epiphany..." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
BattierBeMyDaddy said: teller said: Indeed! It could happen...Calculus could have been delayed for decades. But when you zoom out you'll find that the industrial revolution didn't depend on any one single individual.
Wasn't it more based on social conditions which promoted factory labor? An overabundance of population? Fear is the mind-killer. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
teller said: BattierBeMyDaddy said: teller said: Indeed! It could happen...Calculus could have been delayed for decades. But when you zoom out you'll find that the industrial revolution didn't depend on any one single individual.
Wasn't it more based on social conditions which promoted factory labor? An overabundance of population? True, but didn't those property rights begin in England? I was thinking that's why the industrial revolution began there like 100 years before it started in the U.S. I assumed it had to do with higher population densities, but I'm sure property rights had a lot to do with it as well... -------
A census taker once tried to test me. I ate his liver with some fava beans and a nice chianti... "I've just had an apostrophe!" "I think you mean an epiphany..." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Great I have to be drunk to finally start catching up with the people with brains on this site LOL
But I do beleave that things do happen when they are "needed" or something akin to that at least when they will benifit the "enviorment" or force some sort of development around them ... God I am too drunk to explain that one but perhaps someone with more than one workin brain cell will understand that ... lol | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
dewmass said: teller said: Likewise, Hitler wasn't so much the cause of all evil as was Germany simply ready for such a person.
Enjoy. You're point is fairly sound in that any invention is simply a matter of "standing on the shoulder of giants". In that an invention of any nature is mostly taking one idea and expanding it. However, I think the illustration of Hitler is wrong. Germany at the time was reeling from the Depression and needed stronger politicians than it had. But to go further than that is just wrong. Hitler was evil and managed to manipulate the state around his madness as a direct result of the populations very understandable insecurities. That doesn't shift the blame from him, and nor should it. Ever. Fear is the mind-killer. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
BattierBeMyDaddy said: True, but didn't those property rights begin in England? I was thinking that's why the industrial revolution began there like 100 years before it started in the U.S. I assumed it had to do with higher population densities, but I'm sure property rights had a lot to do with it as well... England did turn decidedly capitalistic as the period of the Enlightenment cast a fine glow across the world for a time. Libertarian ideas about freedom were taking hold, and England had a head-start on the United States. But the U.S. was more free as it didn't have the baggage of the past, and it quickly outpaced Europe.
But it didn't stick...the 20th century will be remembered as a wrong turn. Money is a big reason...governments STILL don't understand how to create stable money, and inflation leads to war. Deflation is just as bad, as the Great Depression shows, as well as the current deflation and it's accompanying economic down-turn. Fear is the mind-killer. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |