independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > General Discussion > High Fructose Corn Syrup in Non US countries?
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 1 of 2 12>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Author

Tweet     Share

Message
Thread started 06/06/08 5:46pm

jaimestarr79

High Fructose Corn Syrup in Non US countries?

I was wondering is High Fructose Corn Syrup used in all your foods in Non US countries as well?I seen an story on the news and they said they think this is a huge contributing factor in Kids gaining weight and adults developing Diabetes and an alarming rate.

I noticed that a lot of restaurants and foods in america are trying to eliminate Trans fats from the diet which is a good thing. If they can do this with trans fats why can't they elimate High Fructose Corn Syrup and go back to regular sugar. I even see that trans fat has been elimated from McDonalds french fries. If McDonalds changed their fry receipe it must be bad.

Also I think we also need to elimate all of this imitation sugars as well such as Sorbitol, etc. People fail to realize that Sorbitol in high doses is used as a laxative. It almost seems like this Sorbitol is in everything as well.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1 posted 06/06/08 5:52pm

XxAxX

avatar

interesting. sand, we eat a LOT of foods with questionable additives. it's hard to find food that is 100% natural out there
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #2 posted 06/06/08 5:53pm

Genesia

avatar

They don't need to use HFCS in other countries - unless there, as in the US, their law-making bodies are a friggin' bunch of boneheads using agricultural subsidies and tariffs to prop up a domestic sugar industry. rolleyes

Sugar alcohols (sorbitol, maltitol, etc.) shouldn't be banned for the simple reason that, if they are, you would have to kiss sugarless gum, no-sugar-added ice cream, and a lot of diabetic-aimed products good-bye. Sugar alcohols have chemical properties that facilitate their use in these types of products.

Besides, sugar alcohols wouldn't really be a problem if people actually took the time to read labels. It states very clearly on the labels of products that have enough sugar alcohol to matter that the products may cause digestive problems.
We don’t mourn artists because we knew them. We mourn them because they helped us know ourselves.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #3 posted 06/06/08 5:54pm

Genesia

avatar

XxAxX said:

interesting. sand, we eat a LOT of foods with questionable additives. it's hard to find food that is 100% natural out there


Define "100% natural." HFCS could be considered "100% natural" - since it's made from corn.
We don’t mourn artists because we knew them. We mourn them because they helped us know ourselves.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #4 posted 06/06/08 5:54pm

XxAxX

avatar

Genesia said:

XxAxX said:

interesting. sand, we eat a LOT of foods with questionable additives. it's hard to find food that is 100% natural out there


Define "100% natural." HFCS could be considered "100% natural" - since it's made from corn.



good point. i guess i meant unprocessed, and with no preservatives or additives.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #5 posted 06/06/08 5:59pm

jaimestarr79

Genesia said:

They don't need to use HFCS in other countries - unless there, as in the US, their law-making bodies are a friggin' bunch of boneheads using agricultural subsidies and tariffs to prop up a domestic sugar industry. rolleyes

Sugar alcohols (sorbitol, maltitol, etc.) shouldn't be banned for the simple reason that, if they are, you would have to kiss sugarless gum, no-sugar-added ice cream, and a lot of diabetic-aimed products good-bye. Sugar alcohols have chemical properties that facilitate their use in these types of products.

Besides, sugar alcohols wouldn't really be a problem if people actually took the time to read labels. It states very clearly on the labels of products that have enough sugar alcohol to matter that the products may cause digestive problems.



I think they should ban these fake sugars. I also don't think we should be ingesting Aspartime-like stuff.

Are these sugars really safe for Diabetics? So Diabetics don't have to restrict these fake sugars? Can they have as much as they want? Do any Diabetics on the org know?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #6 posted 06/06/08 6:01pm

jaimestarr79

I was always told that the body doesn't metabolize HFCS properly?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #7 posted 06/06/08 6:06pm

horatio

Genesia said:

XxAxX said:

interesting. sand, we eat a LOT of foods with questionable additives. it's hard to find food that is 100% natural out there


Define "100% natural." HFCS could be considered "100% natural" - since it's made from corn.



yeah alot of crap get thrown in with the 'natural' label. Hell even products derived from petroleum can be labeled under 'natural'. And dont think for a sec your not eating petroleum derived products.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #8 posted 06/06/08 6:08pm

Mach

horatio said:




yeah alot of crap get thrown in with the 'natural' label. Hell even products derived from petroleum can be labeled under 'natural'. And dont think for a sec your not eating petroleum derived products.



I would venture a guess that many people are not aware of what they are really eating
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #9 posted 06/06/08 6:08pm

Genesia

avatar

jaimestarr79 said:

Genesia said:

They don't need to use HFCS in other countries - unless there, as in the US, their law-making bodies are a friggin' bunch of boneheads using agricultural subsidies and tariffs to prop up a domestic sugar industry. rolleyes

Sugar alcohols (sorbitol, maltitol, etc.) shouldn't be banned for the simple reason that, if they are, you would have to kiss sugarless gum, no-sugar-added ice cream, and a lot of diabetic-aimed products good-bye. Sugar alcohols have chemical properties that facilitate their use in these types of products.

Besides, sugar alcohols wouldn't really be a problem if people actually took the time to read labels. It states very clearly on the labels of products that have enough sugar alcohol to matter that the products may cause digestive problems.


I think they should ban these fake sugars. I also don't think we should be ingesting Aspartime-like stuff.

Are these sugars really safe for Diabetics? So Diabetics don't have to restrict these fake sugars? Can they have as much as they want? Do any Diabetics on the org know?


Good lord. Ban fake sugars? Why? Because people are too stupid to educate themselves about what's good for them and what isn't?

Fake sugars aren't any worse for you than the real thing. Should we ban real sugar, too?

This is what is known as "smiley-face fascism." Who gets to decide what's good for us and what isn't? Ya know...a couple decades ago...most food processors quit using tropical and animal fats in favor of transfats because they swallowed a big load of bullshit from the CSPI about the "dangers" of saturated fats. Now, people have come to realize that the "cure" in that instance was far worse than the disease - that transfats have way more health consequences than the coconut oil or beef tallow they replaced.

Banning specific ingredients is a terrible idea.
We don’t mourn artists because we knew them. We mourn them because they helped us know ourselves.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #10 posted 06/06/08 6:28pm

XxAxX

avatar

Genesia said:

jaimestarr79 said:



I think they should ban these fake sugars. I also don't think we should be ingesting Aspartime-like stuff.

Are these sugars really safe for Diabetics? So Diabetics don't have to restrict these fake sugars? Can they have as much as they want? Do any Diabetics on the org know?


Good lord. Ban fake sugars? Why? Because people are too stupid to educate themselves about what's good for them and what isn't?

Fake sugars aren't any worse for you than the real thing. Should we ban real sugar, too?

This is what is known as "smiley-face fascism." Who gets to decide what's good for us and what isn't? Ya know...a couple decades ago...most food processors quit using tropical and animal fats in favor of transfats because they swallowed a big load of bullshit from the CSPI about the "dangers" of saturated fats. Now, people have come to realize that the "cure" in that instance was far worse than the disease - that transfats have way more health consequences than the coconut oil or beef tallow they replaced.

Banning specific ingredients is a terrible idea.



wow. your passion for this topic is... outstanding lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #11 posted 06/06/08 6:39pm

horatio

Genesia said:

jaimestarr79 said:



I think they should ban these fake sugars. I also don't think we should be ingesting Aspartime-like stuff.

Are these sugars really safe for Diabetics? So Diabetics don't have to restrict these fake sugars? Can they have as much as they want? Do any Diabetics on the org know?


Good lord. Ban fake sugars? Why? Because people are too stupid to educate themselves about what's good for them and what isn't?

Fake sugars aren't any worse for you than the real thing. Should we ban real sugar, too?

This is what is known as "smiley-face fascism." Who gets to decide what's good for us and what isn't? Ya know...a couple decades ago...most food processors quit using tropical and animal fats in favor of transfats because they swallowed a big load of bullshit from the CSPI about the "dangers" of saturated fats. Now, people have come to realize that the "cure" in that instance was far worse than the disease - that transfats have way more health consequences than the coconut oil or beef tallow they replaced.

Banning specific ingredients is a terrible idea.


confuse they banned coconut oil? I thought that was extremely good for you?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #12 posted 06/06/08 6:42pm

minneapolisgen
ius

avatar

Well they put in in bran flakes in the States and they ALSO put it in them here and in France as well. pissed
"I saw a woman with major Hammer pants on the subway a few weeks ago and totally thought of you." - sextonseven
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #13 posted 06/06/08 6:45pm

minneapolisgen
ius

avatar

horatio said:

Genesia said:



Good lord. Ban fake sugars? Why? Because people are too stupid to educate themselves about what's good for them and what isn't?

Fake sugars aren't any worse for you than the real thing. Should we ban real sugar, too?

This is what is known as "smiley-face fascism." Who gets to decide what's good for us and what isn't? Ya know...a couple decades ago...most food processors quit using tropical and animal fats in favor of transfats because they swallowed a big load of bullshit from the CSPI about the "dangers" of saturated fats. Now, people have come to realize that the "cure" in that instance was far worse than the disease - that transfats have way more health consequences than the coconut oil or beef tallow they replaced.

Banning specific ingredients is a terrible idea.


confuse they banned coconut oil? I thought that was extremely good for you?

oh hell no. shake It's one of hte worst fats you can eat. It clogs your arteries because it's a palm oil and is really high in saturated fat.

That said, I just had some yesterday because no one can take away my Thai food. mad It uses a lot of coconut milk.
"I saw a woman with major Hammer pants on the subway a few weeks ago and totally thought of you." - sextonseven
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #14 posted 06/06/08 6:54pm

Genesia

avatar

minneapolisgenius said:

horatio said:



confuse they banned coconut oil? I thought that was extremely good for you?

oh hell no. shake It's one of hte worst fats you can eat. It clogs your arteries because it's a palm oil and is really high in saturated fat.

That said, I just had some yesterday because no one can take away my Thai food. mad It uses a lot of coconut milk.


Wrong, wrong, wrong. Coconut oil is one of the best fats you can eat. It's high in lauric acid, which has antimicrobial properties and is also rich in medium-chain triglycerides, which help the body to maintain healthy weight.

There is absolutely nothing wrong with coconut oil.
We don’t mourn artists because we knew them. We mourn them because they helped us know ourselves.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #15 posted 06/06/08 7:05pm

minneapolisgen
ius

avatar

Genesia said:

minneapolisgenius said:


oh hell no. shake It's one of hte worst fats you can eat. It clogs your arteries because it's a palm oil and is really high in saturated fat.

That said, I just had some yesterday because no one can take away my Thai food. mad It uses a lot of coconut milk.


Wrong, wrong, wrong. Coconut oil is one of the best fats you can eat. It's high in lauric acid, which has antimicrobial properties and is also rich in medium-chain triglycerides, which help the body to maintain healthy weight.

There is absolutely nothing wrong with coconut oil.

It's still high in saturated fat though.
"I saw a woman with major Hammer pants on the subway a few weeks ago and totally thought of you." - sextonseven
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #16 posted 06/06/08 7:12pm

ThirdandFinal

avatar

I tried to stop drinking soda last year and found it close to impossible to find anything without hfcs in it. "natural" juice products, and bottles labled healthy still had it
Le prego di non toccare la macchina per favore!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #17 posted 06/06/08 7:15pm

Genesia

avatar

minneapolisgenius said:

Genesia said:



Wrong, wrong, wrong. Coconut oil is one of the best fats you can eat. It's high in lauric acid, which has antimicrobial properties and is also rich in medium-chain triglycerides, which help the body to maintain healthy weight.

There is absolutely nothing wrong with coconut oil.

It's still high in saturated fat though.


Saturated fat is not the dietary bogeyman it's made out to be. In fact, saturated fats contain compounds (like palmitic acid, myristic acid, lauric acid, and stearic acid) that are necessary for maintaining proper immune system and other functions.

That's why coconut oil, butter and lard (as long as it isn't partially hydrogenated) are actually good for you.
[Edited 6/6/08 12:16pm]
We don’t mourn artists because we knew them. We mourn them because they helped us know ourselves.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #18 posted 06/06/08 7:16pm

Xcalibre

avatar

I say the more corn and soy derivatives the better. I like being employed woot!
I don't want this to end
I'm missing my best friend
Yes it was Incredible
There's no reason to pretend
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #19 posted 06/06/08 7:17pm

Genesia

avatar

Xcalibre said:

I say the more corn and soy derivatives the better. I like being employed woot!


Make all you want. I'm sure some fool will eat them. (It won't be me, though.) lol
We don’t mourn artists because we knew them. We mourn them because they helped us know ourselves.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #20 posted 06/06/08 7:21pm

minneapolisgen
ius

avatar

Genesia said:

minneapolisgenius said:


It's still high in saturated fat though.


Saturated fat is not the dietary bogeyman it's made out to be. In fact, saturated fats contain compounds (like palmitic acid, myristic acid, lauric acid, and stearic acid) that are necessary for maintaining proper immune system and other functions.

That's why coconut oil, butter and lard (as long as it isn't partially hydrogenated) are actually good for you.
[Edited 6/6/08 12:16pm]

I'm talking about the coconut and palm oil that they put in crackers, cookies, and everything else they use it in so those things have a long shelf-life.

I seriously can't imagine that lard could ever be good for you though. Unless of course you absolutely need it in your diet to survive in the cold, wild tundra or something. confused
"I saw a woman with major Hammer pants on the subway a few weeks ago and totally thought of you." - sextonseven
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #21 posted 06/06/08 7:23pm

INSATIABLE

avatar

Genesia said:

butter and lard are good for you.

Jesus, I just came.

smile
Oh shit, my hat done fell off
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #22 posted 06/06/08 7:24pm

Genesia

avatar

minneapolisgenius said:

Genesia said:



Saturated fat is not the dietary bogeyman it's made out to be. In fact, saturated fats contain compounds (like palmitic acid, myristic acid, lauric acid, and stearic acid) that are necessary for maintaining proper immune system and other functions.

That's why coconut oil, butter and lard (as long as it isn't partially hydrogenated) are actually good for you.
[Edited 6/6/08 12:16pm]

I'm talking about the coconut and palm oil that they put in crackers, cookies, and everything else they use it in so those things have a long shelf-life.

I seriously can't imagine that lard could ever be good for you though. Unless of course you absolutely need it in your diet to survive in the cold, wild tundra or something. confused


It doesn't matter which specific fat you're talking about. Saturated fat is saturated fat. Coconut oil, palm oil, lard, beef tallow, butter - they're all beneficial.

And, yes - lard is good for you. Even more so if it's rendered from the fat of pastured pigs - because it'll be an even better source of vitamin D.
We don’t mourn artists because we knew them. We mourn them because they helped us know ourselves.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #23 posted 06/06/08 7:26pm

Genesia

avatar

INSATIABLE said:

Genesia said:

butter and lard are good for you.

Jesus, I just came.

smile


Happy I could help.

I'm sure Jesus is glad to know about it, too. lol
We don’t mourn artists because we knew them. We mourn them because they helped us know ourselves.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #24 posted 06/06/08 7:29pm

Genesia

avatar

Another good thing about saturated fats - they're more stable. Which means they don't go rancid as quickly as polyunsaturated fats.
We don’t mourn artists because we knew them. We mourn them because they helped us know ourselves.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #25 posted 06/06/08 7:33pm

minneapolisgen
ius

avatar

Genesia said:

minneapolisgenius said:


I'm talking about the coconut and palm oil that they put in crackers, cookies, and everything else they use it in so those things have a long shelf-life.

I seriously can't imagine that lard could ever be good for you though. Unless of course you absolutely need it in your diet to survive in the cold, wild tundra or something. confused


It doesn't matter which specific fat you're talking about. Saturated fat is saturated fat. Coconut oil, palm oil, lard, beef tallow, butter - they're all beneficial.

And, yes - lard is good for you. Even more so if it's rendered from the fat of pastured pigs - because it'll be an even better source of vitamin D.

falloff I'll stick to getting my vitamin D elsewhere thank you very much.

You work for the palm oil industry in Malaysia or the pig farmers of America don't you? hmm

In the end, all we can really believe is what "they" tell us and what we read. And what "they" tell us changes all the time. Just look at eggs. Unless you are somehow personally involved in the ongoing studies that they are doing on this subject or something. hmmm
"I saw a woman with major Hammer pants on the subway a few weeks ago and totally thought of you." - sextonseven
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #26 posted 06/06/08 7:36pm

XxAxX

avatar

good fats turn bad when they are heated. so, palm oil can be both good and bad. if it is unheated it's good. in cookies, which are baked, it's bad.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #27 posted 06/06/08 7:37pm

Genesia

avatar

minneapolisgenius said:

Genesia said:



It doesn't matter which specific fat you're talking about. Saturated fat is saturated fat. Coconut oil, palm oil, lard, beef tallow, butter - they're all beneficial.

And, yes - lard is good for you. Even more so if it's rendered from the fat of pastured pigs - because it'll be an even better source of vitamin D.

falloff I'll stick to getting my vitamin D elsewhere thank you very much.

You work for the palm oil industry in Malaysia or the pig farmers of America don't you? hmm

In the end, all we can really believe is what "they" tell us and what we read. And what "they" tell us changes all the time. Just look at eggs. Unless you are somehow personally involved in the ongoing studies that they are doing on this subject or something. hmmm


Where is your vitamin D coming from? A vitamin bottle? rolleyes

I don't work for any food producer or agricultural interest. I just don't buy into the anti-saturated fat hysteria that has gripped this country for two decades.

Not sure what you're getting at with the egg thing - but they're good for you, too.
We don’t mourn artists because we knew them. We mourn them because they helped us know ourselves.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #28 posted 06/06/08 7:38pm

Xcalibre

avatar

XxAxX said:

good fats turn bad when they are heated.



i swear to god i read that as "good farts turn bad when they are heated."

falloff
I don't want this to end
I'm missing my best friend
Yes it was Incredible
There's no reason to pretend
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #29 posted 06/06/08 7:38pm

Genesia

avatar

XxAxX said:

good fats turn bad when they are heated. so, palm oil can be both good and bad. if it is unheated it's good. in cookies, which are baked, it's bad.


Where did you get that from? It's not true.
We don’t mourn artists because we knew them. We mourn them because they helped us know ourselves.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 1 of 2 12>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > General Discussion > High Fructose Corn Syrup in Non US countries?