independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > General Discussion > Hey, America-bashers.... that means you, crackpot!
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 2 of 2 <12
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #30 posted 11/05/02 2:51pm

soulpower

avatar

AaronForever said:

soulpower said:

AaronForever said:




war's ugly. peace is uglier. you can't make an omelette without breaking a few eggs. or world peace without nuking a few countries. just ask iraq, they'll tell you in a few months' time wink


lol lol lol Man, this is the most shilly shit I have read here in a long time. Your ignorance can only be topped by Oceana. To say it in your egg-realted terms: Your brain has been scrambled.
btw its funny that the worst warmongers, like yourself, are carefully watching America's humanitarian wars from a safe distance... why dont you sign up for uncle sam so you can spread the beauty of your country all over the world?



it's funnier when peaceniks are also so far away from wars and escalating situations saying that "everything's fine" and just sit back and want to do nothing.



Actually, I am not gonna wait for a situation escalating. Thats why I oppose a war in Iraq. Because shit's gonna go up in flames very soon, and your shit will be part of that. And then what are you gonna do? Run home to Momma and blames the peaceniks?
How twisted can you be my friend that you dis those who oppose war and violence? You been watching too much Starsky&Hutch?
"Peace and Benz -- The future, made in Germany" peace
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #31 posted 11/05/02 2:56pm

AaronForever

avatar

soulpower said:

AaronForever said:

soulpower said:

AaronForever said:




war's ugly. peace is uglier. you can't make an omelette without breaking a few eggs. or world peace without nuking a few countries. just ask iraq, they'll tell you in a few months' time wink


lol lol lol Man, this is the most shilly shit I have read here in a long time. Your ignorance can only be topped by Oceana. To say it in your egg-realted terms: Your brain has been scrambled.
btw its funny that the worst warmongers, like yourself, are carefully watching America's humanitarian wars from a safe distance... why dont you sign up for uncle sam so you can spread the beauty of your country all over the world?



it's funnier when peaceniks are also so far away from wars and escalating situations saying that "everything's fine" and just sit back and want to do nothing.



Actually, I am not gonna wait for a situation escalating. Thats why I oppose a war in Iraq. Because shit's gonna go up in flames very soon, and your shit will be part of that. And then what are you gonna do? Run home to Momma and blames the peaceniks?
How twisted can you be my friend that you dis those who oppose war and violence? You been watching too much Starsky&Hutch?



And if America just sits by and does nothing, as you would like it, will you come crying to us when your continent is suffering from nuclear winter? Because I'll tell you what, you're in much more danger than we are. And I don't want to hear you pussies come crying to us telling us we got involved too late, like you do about WWII.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #32 posted 11/05/02 3:03pm

AaronForever

avatar

why'd i start this thread? i'm so far behind the times. endless posts about America/Iraq, etc., are so 4 weeks ago. i should have started a thread about jesus or atheism.

soulpower, shall we catch up with the times?


off to find some religion (threads)!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #33 posted 11/05/02 3:04pm

soulpower

avatar

AaronForever said:



And if America just sits by and does nothing, as you would like it, will you come crying to us when your continent is suffering from nuclear winter? Because I'll tell you what, you're in much more danger than we are. And I don't want to hear you pussies come crying to us telling us we got involved too late, like you do about WWII.



I see nobody threatening us. Where did you get your reasoning? www.pentagon.gov? So far your country is the only one which has uses nuclear weapons. And its very obvious (at least according to UN inspectors, who dont seem to mean anything to your gov) that Saddam has no nuclear weapons, nor does Al Quaida. Pakistan does, and they have threatened to use them, but your gov decided to make a very doubtful friendship with them.
No Aaron, as long as Bush doesnt drop a nuclear bomb on Berlin, I feel quite safe here. We do not need a nuclear defense shield.
"Peace and Benz -- The future, made in Germany" peace
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #34 posted 11/05/02 9:17pm

AaronForever

avatar

soulpower said:

AaronForever said:



And if America just sits by and does nothing, as you would like it, will you come crying to us when your continent is suffering from nuclear winter? Because I'll tell you what, you're in much more danger than we are. And I don't want to hear you pussies come crying to us telling us we got involved too late, like you do about WWII.



I see nobody threatening us. Where did you get your reasoning? www.pentagon.gov? So far your country is the only one which has uses nuclear weapons. And its very obvious (at least according to UN inspectors, who dont seem to mean anything to your gov) that Saddam has no nuclear weapons, nor does Al Quaida.



that's funny... a Reuters story from about a month ago said that Saddam had given his generals the go-ahead to use nuclear and biological weapons in response to an attack from America.

now, the last time i checked, Reuters is a very Eurocentric news service and is not in the business of US-propoganda-making. if Saddam is ordering them (the weapons) to be used, is that not a pretty good indication that he has them?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #35 posted 11/05/02 9:49pm

SkletonKee

AaronForever said:


that's funny... a Reuters story from about a month ago said that Saddam had given his generals the go-ahead to use nuclear and biological weapons in response to an attack from America.

now, the last time i checked, Reuters is a very Eurocentric news service and is not in the business of US-propoganda-making. if Saddam is ordering them (the weapons) to be used, is that not a pretty good indication that he has them?



what reuters story? a CIA report issued three or four weeks ago specified that Iraq was a good 5 to 10 years away from creating any nuclear weapons...biological is a whole nother story but everyone is pretty much in agreement that Saddam and his people have no serious nuclear weapons..none that could reach US land...Isreal possibly...but the CIA report was inconclusive on that...this is one of the sticklers that forced Dubya to slow down his war mongering preaching...Notice how yesterday the Administration announced a change in their proposed UN resolution? this was done in an attempt to get agreement from the UN since the original Bush/US proposal was DOA...the only reason they would do this is because they understand that US and UN would not back an single nation attack against Iraq...which means, not too many people or countries believe this immediate threat by nuclear weapons thing...





from issues to issued!!
[This message was edited Tue Nov 5 21:49:40 PST 2002 by SkletonKee]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #36 posted 11/05/02 11:54pm

soulpower

avatar

AaronForever said:

soulpower said:

AaronForever said:



And if America just sits by and does nothing, as you would like it, will you come crying to us when your continent is suffering from nuclear winter? Because I'll tell you what, you're in much more danger than we are. And I don't want to hear you pussies come crying to us telling us we got involved too late, like you do about WWII.



I see nobody threatening us. Where did you get your reasoning? www.pentagon.gov? So far your country is the only one which has uses nuclear weapons. And its very obvious (at least according to UN inspectors, who dont seem to mean anything to your gov) that Saddam has no nuclear weapons, nor does Al Quaida.



that's funny... a Reuters story from about a month ago said that Saddam had given his generals the go-ahead to use nuclear and biological weapons in response to an attack from America.

now, the last time i checked, Reuters is a very Eurocentric news service and is not in the business of US-propoganda-making. if Saddam is ordering them (the weapons) to be used, is that not a pretty good indication that he has them?



So you question everything that I say (and I report for europe's largest newspaper) but everything that Reuters (not even the largest press agency in europe) is okay in your book? you are quite picky my friend. Like SkletonKee said above: no CIA reports and no UN inspectors can confim any of this. And actually Saddam cant either. If you are so scared of a nuclear attack on your country you should rather worry about Pakistan, China, North-korea, India and Israel. All those countries have plenty of motives as well.

But okay, lets switch to religion. Any suggestions
"Peace and Benz -- The future, made in Germany" peace
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #37 posted 11/05/02 11:56pm

MostBeautifulG
rlNTheWorld

soulpower just out of curiosity are the guy with or without the hat in your profile pic.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #38 posted 11/06/02 12:00am

soulpower

avatar

MostBeautifulGrlNTheWorld said:

soulpower just out of curiosity are the guy with or without the hat in your profile pic.


I font dig hats too much. They have something shady about them pimp2
"Peace and Benz -- The future, made in Germany" peace
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #39 posted 11/06/02 12:02am

MostBeautifulG
rlNTheWorld

soulpower said:

MostBeautifulGrlNTheWorld said:

soulpower just out of curiosity are the guy with or without the hat in your profile pic.


I font dig hats too much. They have something shady about them pimp2



so then you are the pimp without the hat I take it.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #40 posted 11/06/02 12:16am

soulpower

avatar

MostBeautifulGrlNTheWorld said:

soulpower said:

MostBeautifulGrlNTheWorld said:

soulpower just out of curiosity are the guy with or without the hat in your profile pic.


I font dig hats too much. They have something shady about them pimp2



so then you are the pimp without the hat I take it.



from now on I shall call you MostSmartestGrlNTheWorld wink
"Peace and Benz -- The future, made in Germany" peace
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #41 posted 11/06/02 12:43am

MostBeautifulG
rlNTheWorld

soulpower said:

MostBeautifulGrlNTheWorld said:

soulpower said:

MostBeautifulGrlNTheWorld said:

soulpower just out of curiosity are the guy with or without the hat in your profile pic.


I font dig hats too much. They have something shady about them pimp2



so then you are the pimp without the hat I take it.



from now on I shall call you MostSmartestGrlNTheWorld wink



lol that is sweet of you... wink
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #42 posted 11/06/02 3:39am

servantsofpuas

avatar

MostBeautifulFlirtNTheWorld and SoulProwler I think you two form a real cute couple
bar the ocean between you that is.. wink
I feel pretty, that's enough
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #43 posted 11/11/02 7:00pm

AaronForever

avatar

soulpower said:

AaronForever said:

soulpower said:

AaronForever said:



And if America just sits by and does nothing, as you would like it, will you come crying to us when your continent is suffering from nuclear winter? Because I'll tell you what, you're in much more danger than we are. And I don't want to hear you pussies come crying to us telling us we got involved too late, like you do about WWII.



I see nobody threatening us. Where did you get your reasoning? www.pentagon.gov? So far your country is the only one which has uses nuclear weapons. And its very obvious (at least according to UN inspectors, who dont seem to mean anything to your gov) that Saddam has no nuclear weapons, nor does Al Quaida.



that's funny... a Reuters story from about a month ago said that Saddam had given his generals the go-ahead to use nuclear and biological weapons in response to an attack from America.

now, the last time i checked, Reuters is a very Eurocentric news service and is not in the business of US-propoganda-making. if Saddam is ordering them (the weapons) to be used, is that not a pretty good indication that he has them?



So you question everything that I say (and I report for europe's largest newspaper)


correction: europe's largest CRACKPOST newspaper

but everything that Reuters (not even the largest press agency in europe) is okay in your book? you are quite picky my friend.



correct. i AM quite picky. i like to get my news from credible sources.

Like SkletonKee said above:


i don't read what skletonkee writes. too hard to wade through the typos and spelling errors (inluding the one in his name wink)

But okay, lets switch to religion. Any suggestions


ok... what crackpot religion do you belong to? jehovas witnesses? scientology? jews for jesus?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #44 posted 11/11/02 7:26pm

MostBeautifulG
rlNTheWorld

servantsofpuas said:

MostBeautifulFlirtNTheWorld and SoulProwler I think you two form a real cute couple
bar the ocean between you that is.. wink




Had my roots not left Leipzig I could of been there with no ocean to bar. big grin

Soulpower ist ein anziehender Mann wink
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 2 of 2 <12
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > General Discussion > Hey, America-bashers.... that means you, crackpot!