New topic
Printablemeow85 said: Dance said: Well then why are you complaining? 
If you want certain things, you can find it. It's your own fault if you choose to watch the bad stuff. I don't watch the bad stuff. I've seen enough mainstream to know it's not worth watching. Why shouldn't I complain about it though? That's like saying you shouldn't complain about the shit quality of mainstream music just because you know where to hear tunes that don't suck. I know porn is largely a man's market, but I highly doubt the entirety of numbers of men who are active consumers are so completely devoid of desire to pleasure their partners as porn portrays. How is the scenario supposed to be sexy when half the participants are clearly not having fun?  Why don't you organize a march? | |
- E-mail - orgNote -  Report post to moderator |
JustErin said: I don't think it's that hard to understand why they do it...even if it is just an illusion. It's like those women who squirt 2 gallons of so called female ejaculate across a room - total fake shit and everyone knows that...but some people still just love to see that kinda thing. If you think that's fake, you should see some of these "monster black dick" videos. They show mostly white women holding some black dude's 16 inch dick which obviously looks like a prosthetic attachment, and their cum looks like a stream of milk being blasted out.   
 | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
meow85 said: JustErin said: Because as many people have said, men (and some women) are very visual, literal creatures. I don't think it's that hard to understand why they do it...even if it is just an illusion. It's like those women who squirt 2 gallons of so called female ejaculate across a room - total fake shit and everyone knows that...but some people still just love to see that kinda thing. Physical impossibility and activities that don't garner enjoyment are sexier than real genitalia and hot playtime?  Yes, that's exactly what I am saying.  | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
wHiTEgIRlCrAzY said: If a person is a willing party can it still be called exploitation? Pornography as eveything else is made to make money. The people that pose in the magazines or star in the movies are as well doing it for the money. Does this fact alone wipe away the exploitation label? It's not that simple for many people. How do you feel? I would like to hear all opinions.
To the thread stater..... Yes, pornography (the adult film industry in general) exploit women. This kind of entertainment gives people a very fault idea that ALL women are a bunch of lip-stick bisexuals. There, I said it. [Edited 3/20/08 17:12pm] | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
