Author | Message |
BUFFY'S GONE GAY!!!! http://abcnews.go.com/Ent...156&page=1
Buffy Summers has now done it all. After spending nearly a decade slaying vampires and demons and carefully juggling her schoolwork with her budding teen romances, Buffy of "Buffy the Vampire Slayer" now also knows what it's like to have a one-night stand -- with a woman. The Most Important Thing In Life Is Sincerity....Once You Can Fake That, You Can Fake Anything. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Moderator | I Buffy!
Good for her! In spite of the cost of living, it's still popular. |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Oops. This issue came out this week and I haven't bought it yet.
I clicked on the link hoping it was about Sarah Michelle Gellar. It will still be a good read tonight I'm sure. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I thought you were talking about Sarah Michelle Gellar.
My mistake, I should have known that her and Freddie would NEVER... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
The issue was HILARIOUS.
Classic Buffy. I only wish they'd been able to have another season on TV, cuz seeing this would be amazing. http://www.facebook.com/p...111?ref=ts
y'all gone keep messin' around wit me and turn me back to the old me...... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
What?
I can't wait to catch up on these in the trades. Wow. "Half of what I say is meaningless; but I say it so that the other half may reach you." - Kahlil Gibran | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I read the issue this weekend. The following pages after the revelation were too funny! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Loved It.
Classic Xander. The Most Important Thing In Life Is Sincerity....Once You Can Fake That, You Can Fake Anything. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Moderator | I'm currently about half way through season 7.... are the comics in an anthology book or do you have to hunt all the single issues down? In spite of the cost of living, it's still popular. |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
lazycrockett said: http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/Story?id=4396156&page=1
Buffy Summers has now done it all. After spending nearly a decade slaying vampires and demons and carefully juggling her schoolwork with her budding teen romances, Buffy of "Buffy the Vampire Slayer" now also knows what it's like to have a one-night stand -- with a woman. My cynical side wants to dismiss it as a marketing ploy. BUT The Buffy-verse has always been one of the most gay-friendly ones out there. Plenty of characters, main and side, have been variations of queer. There've been queer-centric themes in certain plot lines and episodes from the get-go. Not to mention Joss' fan-friendly habit of insinuating everyone of both genders either has sexed it up with Spike or is hoping to. "A Watcher scoffs at gravity!" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
lazycrockett said: Loved It.
'
Classic Xander. It was Classic Joss. The way EVERYONE found out about it was freaking hilarious. I can't remember ever laughing out loud at a comic before. http://www.facebook.com/p...111?ref=ts
y'all gone keep messin' around wit me and turn me back to the old me...... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Sweeny79 said: I'm currently about half way through season 7.... are the comics in an anthology book or do you have to hunt all the single issues down?
No anthology yet, but any decent comic shop should have most of the issues in stock if not all. http://www.facebook.com/p...111?ref=ts
y'all gone keep messin' around wit me and turn me back to the old me...... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
meow85 said: lazycrockett said: http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/Story?id=4396156&page=1
Buffy Summers has now done it all. After spending nearly a decade slaying vampires and demons and carefully juggling her schoolwork with her budding teen romances, Buffy of "Buffy the Vampire Slayer" now also knows what it's like to have a one-night stand -- with a woman. My cynical side wants to dismiss it as a marketing ploy. BUT The Buffy-verse has always been one of the most gay-friendly ones out there. Plenty of characters, main and side, have been variations of queer. There've been queer-centric themes in certain plot lines and episodes from the get-go. Not to mention Joss' fan-friendly habit of insinuating everyone of both genders either has sexed it up with Spike or is hoping to. the buffy-spike hookup pretty much did me in. that was all my fan loyalty could take.. .. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Sweeny79 said: I'm currently about half way through season 7.... are the comics in an anthology book or do you have to hunt all the single issues down?
The first five issues are currently collected in tpb: Issues 6-10 will be collected in a tpb in June: | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
XxAxX said: meow85 said: My cynical side wants to dismiss it as a marketing ploy. BUT The Buffy-verse has always been one of the most gay-friendly ones out there. Plenty of characters, main and side, have been variations of queer. There've been queer-centric themes in certain plot lines and episodes from the get-go. Not to mention Joss' fan-friendly habit of insinuating everyone of both genders either has sexed it up with Spike or is hoping to. the buffy-spike hookup pretty much did me in. that was all my fan loyalty could take.. .. Yeah, I wasn't a big fan of that. Mostly because the viewer was supposed to feel sorry for her and her alone in the situation. I know she's the show's hero and all, but I would've happier with a more balanced portrayal of the relationship. Both Buffy and Spike were causing damage to themselves and each other; both taking advantage of the other's needs. But instead of highlighting that, the focus every other episode was on Buffy having some big, melodramatic "Why me?" self-pity fest. It jsut rubbed me the wrong way. But what I was really referring to was the fact that Joss figured out pretty quick Spike was a fan favourite, and the obvious reasons why. So, in a nod to fic writers both het and slash, he started throwing bits out here and there. Wink-and-nudge moments where a viewer could, if she or he so pleased, imagine Spike knocking boots with their other fave character/s with a minimum of canon-stretching. Some would argue Angel(us)/Spike is canon.... "A Watcher scoffs at gravity!" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
My only real problem with the Buffy/Spike thing was that she had just returned from being dead and somehow needed to be around other "dead" characters. I kinda think that Josh dropped the ball on the rebirth of Buffy.
The musical brought up the idea of being brought back from heaven by your witchy friend but I just never felt that they really addressed the issue. It was always well Buffy is just different now. I just thought there could have been a better arc of rediscovery of life that was lacking. The Most Important Thing In Life Is Sincerity....Once You Can Fake That, You Can Fake Anything. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I'm not a fan of the Buffy/Spike relationship. Mostly because it pandered to all of the Spuffy shippers (shit, I'm such a fanboygirl, I guess) who were extremely annoying. But hell there were so many of them, I guess they had to at some point. "Half of what I say is meaningless; but I say it so that the other half may reach you." - Kahlil Gibran | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I think the fumbling rape scene just turned all fans off. The Most Important Thing In Life Is Sincerity....Once You Can Fake That, You Can Fake Anything. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
lazycrockett said: My only real problem with the Buffy/Spike thing was that she had just returned from being dead and somehow needed to be around other "dead" characters. I kinda think that Josh dropped the ball on the rebirth of Buffy.
The musical brought up the idea of being brought back from heaven by your witchy friend but I just never felt that they really addressed the issue. It was always well Buffy is just different now. I just thought there could have been a better arc of rediscovery of life that was lacking. I didn't have a problem with the dead thing, but it did bother me that after the big heaven revelation in the musical, it wasn't really touched on again. Something like finding out the Slayer'd been forcibly ripped out of heaven should've been a big deal, not just a "Huh. So that's where she was" moment. "A Watcher scoffs at gravity!" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Raze said: I'm not a fan of the Buffy/Spike relationship. Mostly because it pandered to all of the Spuffy shippers (shit, I'm such a fanboygirl, I guess) who were extremely annoying. But hell there were so many of them, I guess they had to at some point.
Personally, I would've preferred any 'ship to that one. Had it been played out differently, Spuffy could've worked for me. But no. No cookie for Joss this time. The rampant inequality in how it was portrayed bugged the shit out of me. Personally, I wouldn't have complained about Spiles, but maybe I'm wrong for that. "A Watcher scoffs at gravity!" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
meow85 said: Raze said: I'm not a fan of the Buffy/Spike relationship. Mostly because it pandered to all of the Spuffy shippers (shit, I'm such a fanboygirl, I guess) who were extremely annoying. But hell there were so many of them, I guess they had to at some point.
Personally, I would've preferred any 'ship to that one. Had it been played out differently, Spuffy could've worked for me. But no. No cookie for Joss this time. The rampant inequality in how it was portrayed bugged the shit out of me. Yeah, I kind of lost a lot of respect for the character (Buffy) the way she handled Spike. There's a difference between revealing flaws for some great characterization and just completely trashing her personality. Sure, she had a lot going on in her head, but still, this is fiction.... the heroes don't have to be COMPLETELY realistic human beings. A lot of the magic of the character and the show were lost for me during S6. And it wasn't just Buffy's character. "Half of what I say is meaningless; but I say it so that the other half may reach you." - Kahlil Gibran | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
lazycrockett said: I think the fumbling rape scene just turned all fans off.
I actually had an interesting conversation with my Communications Professor about this one, she also being an avid watcher (heh) of all things Joss, and hey, a Comm. Prof. Though the more obvious error was making a character who the majority of fans had come to love attempt a horrific act (most people are more put off by sexual violence than plain ol' violence -a thing Spike's portrayed with gleefully over the story arcs) the real misstep was again, (and I agree with her) the inequality in the portrayal in context of the entire Spuffy storyline. Yes. Spike attempted to rape Buffy. Not cool on any level. Not cool at all. Not even vamps get a pass on this one. That was just all kinds of wrong. But. Um. Remember some of those sex scenes throughout the Spuffy-scope? Remember, on more than one occasion, Spike saying no and even physically resisting Buffy? Dude, that's rape. And if the genders of the characters had been reversed and they were, say, Brad the Vampire Slayer and Spikette the chipped vampire, it wouldn't even be a question. Throw in the added factors of "Brad" being stronger, higher up than "Spikette" on the demon food chain by way of being the thing that kills vampires, and Spikette's electronic handicap, and there you have it. But because the coerced party in the earlier scenes was male and the aggressor female, it's mostly played for laughs. I'm not in any way trying to play down the seriousness of Spike's actions, just questioning why Joss et al. would play down the seriousness of Buffy's. [Edited 3/11/08 1:57am] "A Watcher scoffs at gravity!" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Raze said: meow85 said: Personally, I would've preferred any 'ship to that one. Had it been played out differently, Spuffy could've worked for me. But no. No cookie for Joss this time. The rampant inequality in how it was portrayed bugged the shit out of me. Yeah, I kind of lost a lot of respect for the character (Buffy) the way she handled Spike. There's a difference between revealing flaws for some great characterization and just completely trashing her personality. Sure, she had a lot going on in her head, but still, this is fiction.... the heroes don't have to be COMPLETELY realistic human beings. A lot of the magic of the character and the show were lost for me during S6. And it wasn't just Buffy's character. I'll admit, Buffy herself was never why I tuned into the show in the first place. I was more of a fan of the rest of the characters and the overal storyline. But I could respect Buffy. Through S6 and S7 I hung on for the show, but I couldn't handle seeing Buffy after that point. I still loved the rest, but I didn't even like seeing her onscreen anymore. "A Watcher scoffs at gravity!" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
meow85 said: lazycrockett said: I think the fumbling rape scene just turned all fans off.
I actually had an interesting conversation with my Communications Professor about this one, she also being an avid watcher (heh) of all things Joss, and hey, a Comm. Prof. Though the more obvious error was making a character who the majority of fans had come to love attempt a horrific act (most people are more put off by sexual violence than plain ol' violence -a thing Spike's portrayed with gleefully over the story arcs) the real misstep was again, (and I agree with her) the inequality in the portrayal in context of the entire Spuffy storyline. Yes. Spike attempted to rape Buffy. Not cool on any level. Not cool at all. Not even vamps get a pass on this one. That was just all kinds of wrong. But. Um. Remember some of those sex scenes throughout the Spuffy-scope? Remember, on more than one occasion, Spike saying no and even physically resisting Buffy? Dude, that's rape. And if the genders of the characters had been reversed and they were, say, Brad the Vampire Slayer and Spikette the chipped vampire, it wouldn't even be a question. Throw in the added factors of "Brad" being stronger, higher up than "Spikette" on the demon food chain by way of being the thing that kills vampires, and Spikette's electronic handicap, and there you have it. But because the coerced party in the earlier scenes was male and the aggressor female, it's mostly played for laughs. I'm not in any way trying to play down the seriousness of Spike's actions, just questioning why Joss et al. would play down the seriousness of Buffy's. [Edited 3/11/08 1:57am] But the whole buffy/spike was s/m or thats how i saw it. two damaged souls trying to figure it all out. Thats why the "rape" thing felt false. Both Spike and Buffy had been playing each other for the thrill, then suddenly Buffy goes all weak and cant beat the shit out of Spike? And for the record Im in no way condoning none equal sex games, im all for a good rape fantasy, but this to me just didn't make sense. The Most Important Thing In Life Is Sincerity....Once You Can Fake That, You Can Fake Anything. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
lazycrockett said: meow85 said: I actually had an interesting conversation with my Communications Professor about this one, she also being an avid watcher (heh) of all things Joss, and hey, a Comm. Prof. Though the more obvious error was making a character who the majority of fans had come to love attempt a horrific act (most people are more put off by sexual violence than plain ol' violence -a thing Spike's portrayed with gleefully over the story arcs) the real misstep was again, (and I agree with her) the inequality in the portrayal in context of the entire Spuffy storyline. Yes. Spike attempted to rape Buffy. Not cool on any level. Not cool at all. Not even vamps get a pass on this one. That was just all kinds of wrong. But. Um. Remember some of those sex scenes throughout the Spuffy-scope? Remember, on more than one occasion, Spike saying no and even physically resisting Buffy? Dude, that's rape. And if the genders of the characters had been reversed and they were, say, Brad the Vampire Slayer and Spikette the chipped vampire, it wouldn't even be a question. Throw in the added factors of "Brad" being stronger, higher up than "Spikette" on the demon food chain by way of being the thing that kills vampires, and Spikette's electronic handicap, and there you have it. But because the coerced party in the earlier scenes was male and the aggressor female, it's mostly played for laughs. I'm not in any way trying to play down the seriousness of Spike's actions, just questioning why Joss et al. would play down the seriousness of Buffy's. [Edited 3/11/08 1:57am] But the whole buffy/spike was s/m or thats how i saw it. two damaged souls trying to figure it all out. Thats why the "rape" thing felt false. Both Spike and Buffy had been playing each other for the thrill, then suddenly Buffy goes all weak and cant beat the shit out of Spike? And for the record Im in no way condoning none equal sex games, im all for a good rape fantasy, but this to me just didn't make sense. The relationship definitely had an s/m bent, for sure. But there were specific instances where I felt it crossed the line. For example, the ep. where Buffy was invisible. She goes to visit Spike, and he wants just to talk to her. He says no, phsyically resists, and she goes down on him anyway. Now I know most guys aren't going to turn down a blowjob. But again, imagine the genders reversed in that situation. Would Joss have been able to get away with playing up the chuckle factor if it was the female who'd said no? I agree, it didn't make sense that Buffy was unable to fight back. She's equally matched in strength with Spike if not stronger, and she wasn't caught off guard or in a weakened state. "A Watcher scoffs at gravity!" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Moderator | meow85 said: Raze said: Yeah, I kind of lost a lot of respect for the character (Buffy) the way she handled Spike. There's a difference between revealing flaws for some great characterization and just completely trashing her personality. Sure, she had a lot going on in her head, but still, this is fiction.... the heroes don't have to be COMPLETELY realistic human beings. A lot of the magic of the character and the show were lost for me during S6. And it wasn't just Buffy's character. I'll admit, Buffy herself was never why I tuned into the show in the first place. I was more of a fan of the rest of the characters and the overal storyline. But I could respect Buffy. Through S6 and S7 I hung on for the show, but I couldn't handle seeing Buffy after that point. I still loved the rest, but I didn't even like seeing her onscreen anymore. This being my first go around via DVD, I feel the same way....it's as if for the characters to "grow up" they had to loose big parts of their soul and their integrity... and this might be true in real life, but on a TV show... come on..I would much rather it if our heros could just be heroes. In spite of the cost of living, it's still popular. |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Moderator | Raze said: meow85 said: Personally, I would've preferred any 'ship to that one. Had it been played out differently, Spuffy could've worked for me. But no. No cookie for Joss this time. The rampant inequality in how it was portrayed bugged the shit out of me. Yeah, I kind of lost a lot of respect for the character (Buffy) the way she handled Spike. There's a difference between revealing flaws for some great characterization and just completely trashing her personality. Sure, she had a lot going on in her head, but still, this is fiction.... the heroes don't have to be COMPLETELY realistic human beings. A lot of the magic of the character and the show were lost for me during S6. And it wasn't just Buffy's character. Extactly... it was everybody. In spite of the cost of living, it's still popular. |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Sweeny79 said: Raze said: Yeah, I kind of lost a lot of respect for the character (Buffy) the way she handled Spike. There's a difference between revealing flaws for some great characterization and just completely trashing her personality. Sure, she had a lot going on in her head, but still, this is fiction.... the heroes don't have to be COMPLETELY realistic human beings. A lot of the magic of the character and the show were lost for me during S6. And it wasn't just Buffy's character. Extactly... it was everybody. Season six was aimless for the most part. I couldn't believe that halfway through the season, the big bad was the super-villian trio of Jonathan, Andrew and Warren. It didn't really kick into high gear until the last few episodes. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
sextonseven said: Sweeny79 said: Extactly... it was everybody. Season six was aimless for the most part. I couldn't believe that halfway through the season, the big bad was the super-villian trio of Jonathan, Andrew and Warren. It didn't really kick into high gear until the last few episodes. Yeah, that was a little iffy. I think Joss wanted to take time to focus more on the interpersonal drama than dealing with supervillians, which I understand. But honestly -high school nerds as evildoers? Only Warren was arguably evil, and he was just a smart guy with a huge chip on his shoulder. Jonathan and Andrew were just kids sitting in a basement. For me, S7 had a much better villain (THE evil!) but the presentation was weak. It just dragged on and on. "A Watcher scoffs at gravity!" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
meow85 said: sextonseven said: Season six was aimless for the most part. I couldn't believe that halfway through the season, the big bad was the super-villian trio of Jonathan, Andrew and Warren. It didn't really kick into high gear until the last few episodes. Yeah, that was a little iffy. I think Joss wanted to take time to focus more on the interpersonal drama than dealing with supervillians, which I understand. But honestly -high school nerds as evildoers? Only Warren was arguably evil, and he was just a smart guy with a huge chip on his shoulder. Jonathan and Andrew were just kids sitting in a basement. For me, S7 had a much better villain (THE evil!) but the presentation was weak. It just dragged on and on. Spike going crazy coping with having a soul got a little tired for me. I do love Spike with a soul on Angel though. Is anyone reading Angel: After The Fall? Shocking to see what happened after season five. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |