lambskin... [Edited 3/8/08 2:49am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
LittleSmedley said lambskin...
Yes. Sort of. There are condoms that are made from lamb skin and others which are made of intestinal matter which has been cleaned and chemically treated to be stored in condom packets and not decompose. They most resemble actual skin and give the most sensation, but because they are from organic material which is porous, they don't protect people from potential STD's like regular condoms. I didn't realize that so many people thought that condoms were such a pain in the ass. I thought that the alternative, like getting syphilis, gonorrhea, chlamydia, herpes, HIV, or that unexpected visitor which will consume the next 18 to 20 years of your life was worse than the momentary inconvenience of wearing a condom. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
728huey said: LittleSmedley said
lambskin...
Yes. Sort of. There are condoms that are made from lamb skin and others which are made of intestinal matter which has been cleaned and chemically treated to be stored in condom packets and not decompose. They most resemble actual skin and give the most sensation, but because they are from organic material which is porous, they don't protect people from potential STD's like regular condoms. I didn't realize that so many people thought that condoms were such a pain in the ass. I thought that the alternative, like getting syphilis, gonorrhea, chlamydia, herpes, HIV, or that unexpected visitor which will consume the next 18 to 20 years of your life was worse than the momentary inconvenience of wearing a condom. me, too. i'm amazed at how many women just assume that any man they're with is going to be "clean" and therefore they don't need to wear a condom. So many sexually transmitted diseases show very little or no symptoms in men, especially if they are recently infected, but they can still pass on the disease. Sexual ignorance is a frightening thing. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Condoms make alot of money for corrupt individuals
sex with a condom is shit unfortunately. However getting someone pregnant is far worse. [Edited 3/8/08 8:45am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
fcukthepolice said: Condoms make alot of money for corrupt individuals
sex with a condom is shit unfortunately. However getting someone pregnant is far worse. [Edited 3/8/08 8:45am] Dying is REALLY inconvenient too. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
728huey said: LittleSmedley said Just because folks think condoms are a pain in the ass doesn't mean they don't use them, particularly for all the reasons you listed. But, let's be real, too. Condoms, while effective, are not 100%. I'd much rather trust the person I am sleeping with, meaning we've both gotten tested before, so I don't have the least bit of worry in the back of my mind. If it came down to having sex with a condom than not having sex, I rather not have sex.lambskin...
Yes. Sort of. There are condoms that are made from lamb skin and others which are made of intestinal matter which has been cleaned and chemically treated to be stored in condom packets and not decompose. They most resemble actual skin and give the most sensation, but because they are from organic material which is porous, they don't protect people from potential STD's like regular condoms. I didn't realize that so many people thought that condoms were such a pain in the ass. I thought that the alternative, like getting syphilis, gonorrhea, chlamydia, herpes, HIV, or that unexpected visitor which will consume the next 18 to 20 years of your life was worse than the momentary inconvenience of wearing a condom. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JasmineFire said: me, too. i'm amazed at how many women just assume that any man they're with is going to be "clean" and therefore they don't need to wear a condom. So many sexually transmitted diseases show very little or no symptoms in men, especially if they are recently infected, but they can still pass on the disease. Sexual ignorance is a frightening thing. And as someone else mentioned earlier, there is NO test available for men with HPV, human papillomovirus, which is probably the most common sexually transmitted disease. And most people don't even know they're infected. http://www.webmd.com/sexu...toms-tests Genital HPV infection is very common. At least half of people who have had sex will contract the HPV virus (human papillomovirus) at some point in their lives. Yet many will not know it because they will not have any HPVsymptoms. Whether HPV symptoms occur or not can depend on the HPV type involved in the infection. There are more than 100 types of HPV. Some HPV types are associated with genital warts, although the warts are not always visible. Some types of HPV are associated with cervical and other cancers, and no warts occur, and no other symptoms may be noticed. Some HPV types also cause common warts that you can find on other areas of the body such as your hands or feet. In men, as in women, genital warts reflect HPV infection. But no specific test for the strains of HPV that cause cancer is available at this time for men. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SCNDLS said: fcukthepolice said: Condoms make alot of money for corrupt individuals
sex with a condom is shit unfortunately. However getting someone pregnant is far worse. [Edited 3/8/08 8:45am] Dying is REALLY inconvenient too. Dying? from what? sex? You mean hiv; that is not a death sentence but of course you have nothing without your health so try to be safe. [Edited 3/8/08 9:29am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
fcukthepolice said: SCNDLS said: Dying is REALLY inconvenient too. Dying? from what? sex? Yeah, IMO, pregnancy isn't the WORST thing that could happen from unprotected sex. Dying is. . . | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
fcukthepolice said: SCNDLS said: Dying is REALLY inconvenient too. Dying? from what? sex? You mean hiv; that is not a death sentence but of course you have nothing without your health so try to be safe. [Edited 3/8/08 9:29am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SCNDLS said: fcukthepolice said:
SCNDLS said:
Dying is REALLY inconvenient too. Dying? from what? sex? You mean hiv; that is not a death sentence but of course you have nothing without your health so try to be safe. [Edited 3/8/08 9:29am] AIDS isn't necessarily a death sentence if you have money or decent health insurance. However, if you don't have the insurance or funds to pay for the anti-AIDS cocktail drugs, you are really screwed. Plus those drugs don't work forever; they only slow the progression of the disease, and at some point they lose their effectiveness. As for HPV, it can be contracted through non-sexual means, though it usually is contracted sexually. However, the biggest risk for women is that their male partner may have contracted the virus years ago, and while they may carry the virus without any ill effects whatsoever, they spread it to their partner, who then gets cervical cancer from it. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Stymie said: 728huey said: LittleSmedley said
Just because folks think condoms are a pain in the ass doesn't mean they don't use them, particularly for all the reasons you listed. But, let's be real, too. Condoms, while effective, are not 100%. I'd much rather trust the person I am sleeping with, meaning we've both gotten tested before, so I don't have the least bit of worry in the back of my mind. If it came down to having sex with a condom than not having sex, I rather not have sex.Yes. Sort of. There are condoms that are made from lamb skin and others which are made of intestinal matter which has been cleaned and chemically treated to be stored in condom packets and not decompose. They most resemble actual skin and give the most sensation, but because they are from organic material which is porous, they don't protect people from potential STD's like regular condoms. I didn't realize that so many people thought that condoms were such a pain in the ass. I thought that the alternative, like getting syphilis, gonorrhea, chlamydia, herpes, HIV, or that unexpected visitor which will consume the next 18 to 20 years of your life was worse than the momentary inconvenience of wearing a condom. I find it interesting that people seem to think that the only two options are use condoms or not use them and get some sort of std or get pregnant. And once again, condoms do not fully protect you from stds like herpes, so why anyone would even risk sleeping with someone they didn't fully trust or knew for a fact that they were clean - condom or no condom is beyond anything I'll understand. And especially if they are not trusting someone so they use condoms for intercourse but freely engage in oral sex with no protection. That, right there to me is very stupid. [Edited 3/8/08 10:33am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Stymie said: 728huey said: LittleSmedley said
Just because folks think condoms are a pain in the ass doesn't mean they don't use them, particularly for all the reasons you listed.Yes. Sort of. There are condoms that are made from lamb skin and others which are made of intestinal matter which has been cleaned and chemically treated to be stored in condom packets and not decompose. They most resemble actual skin and give the most sensation, but because they are from organic material which is porous, they don't protect people from potential STD's like regular condoms. I didn't realize that so many people thought that condoms were such a pain in the ass. I thought that the alternative, like getting syphilis, gonorrhea, chlamydia, herpes, HIV, or that unexpected visitor which will consume the next 18 to 20 years of your life was worse than the momentary inconvenience of wearing a condom. Yes! I will certainly use one, but I just wish there was a better way. It's not just "a momentary inconvenience." It takes away a huge part of sex. My Legacy
http://prince.org/msg/8/192731 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
NDRU said: Yes! I will certainly use one, but I just wish there was a better way. It's not just "a momentary inconvenience." It takes away a huge part of sex.
I admit that genital penetration is a big part of sex, but what about foreplay? I thought that the whole kissing, cuddling, petting, mutual masturbation, oral sex, etc. contributed a huge part to the whole sexual enjoyment experience. JustErin said: I find it interesting that people seem to think that the only two options are use condoms or not use them and get some sort of std or get pregnant.
And once again, condoms do not fully protect you from stds like herpes, so why anyone would even risk sleeping with someone they didn't fully trust or knew for a fact that they were clean - condom or no condom is beyond anything I'll understand. And especially if they are not trusting someone so they use condoms for intercourse but freely engage in oral sex with no protection. That, right there to me is very stupid. [Edited 3/8/08 10:33am] Well, the other option is abstinence, but I won't even go down that road. As for condom usage, they don't entirely eliminate the risk of getting an STD or getting someone pregnant because they can break during sex. But if you are just beginning a sexual relationship with someone that you aren't absolutely sure that you'll be spending the rest of your life with, then you need that protection to save yourself and your partner. If you've been in a long term sexual relationship with someone and you know that he/she has been monogamous, then you probably are more familiar with that person's (or your) menstrual cycles, so there's a little more latitude about when to wear a condom or not (depending on how anxious you are to start a family). As for oral sex, there's been a lot of dispute about this, but while most health experts agree that oral sex isn't entirely safe with regard to STD's, some health experts say that saliva has chemicals and enzymes which potentially break up any harmful bacteria or viruses, so the chances of contracting an STD are less than by genital intercourse. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
728huey said: NDRU said:
Yes! I will certainly use one, but I just wish there was a better way. It's not just "a momentary inconvenience." It takes away a huge part of sex.
I admit that genital penetration is a big part of sex, but what about foreplay? I thought that the whole kissing, cuddling, petting, mutual masturbation, oral sex, etc. contributed a huge part to the whole sexual enjoyment experience. agreed, but intercourse is like the main course to me (and I definitely love soup, salad & dessert I am all for condoms, but I'll be happy when an alternative comes around. [Edited 3/8/08 11:39am] My Legacy
http://prince.org/msg/8/192731 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Stymie said: 728huey said: LittleSmedley said
Just because folks think condoms are a pain in the ass doesn't mean they don't use them, particularly for all the reasons you listed. But, let's be real, too. Condoms, while effective, are not 100%. I'd much rather trust the person I am sleeping with, meaning we've both gotten tested before, so I don't have the least bit of worry in the back of my mind. If it came down to having sex with a condom than not having sex, I rather not have sex.Yes. Sort of. There are condoms that are made from lamb skin and others which are made of intestinal matter which has been cleaned and chemically treated to be stored in condom packets and not decompose. They most resemble actual skin and give the most sensation, but because they are from organic material which is porous, they don't protect people from potential STD's like regular condoms. I didn't realize that so many people thought that condoms were such a pain in the ass. I thought that the alternative, like getting syphilis, gonorrhea, chlamydia, herpes, HIV, or that unexpected visitor which will consume the next 18 to 20 years of your life was worse than the momentary inconvenience of wearing a condom. Okay, some questions for all the "no condom" folks: Do ALL of you insist that your partners get tested When does the "test so we can fuck" convo happen (how far into knowing them) How often are you & your partner getting re-tested & I'm not trying to come off judgemental here, I'm genuinely curious as I've never been bold enough to roll w/o one even in long relationships WITH testing I never met you, but I LOVE you & I will forever!! Thank you for being YOU - my little Princey, the best to EVER do it | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CalhounSq said: Stymie said: Just because folks think condoms are a pain in the ass doesn't mean they don't use them, particularly for all the reasons you listed. But, let's be real, too. Condoms, while effective, are not 100%. I'd much rather trust the person I am sleeping with, meaning we've both gotten tested before, so I don't have the least bit of worry in the back of my mind. If it came down to having sex with a condom than not having sex, I rather not have sex.
Okay, some questions for all the "no condom" folks: Do ALL of you insist that your partners get tested When does the "test so we can fuck" convo happen (how far into knowing them) How often are you & your partner getting re-tested & I'm not trying to come off judgemental here, I'm genuinely curious as I've never been bold enough to roll w/o one even in long relationships WITH testing and remember CS, lots of people get married and stop using condoms, too. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
728huey said: NDRU said:
Yes! I will certainly use one, but I just wish there was a better way. It's not just "a momentary inconvenience." It takes away a huge part of sex.
I admit that genital penetration is a big part of sex, but what about foreplay? I thought that the whole kissing, cuddling, petting, mutual masturbation, oral sex, etc. contributed a huge part to the whole sexual enjoyment experience. JustErin said: I find it interesting that people seem to think that the only two options are use condoms or not use them and get some sort of std or get pregnant.
And once again, condoms do not fully protect you from stds like herpes, so why anyone would even risk sleeping with someone they didn't fully trust or knew for a fact that they were clean - condom or no condom is beyond anything I'll understand. And especially if they are not trusting someone so they use condoms for intercourse but freely engage in oral sex with no protection. That, right there to me is very stupid. [Edited 3/8/08 10:33am] Well, the other option is abstinence, but I won't even go down that road. As for condom usage, they don't entirely eliminate the risk of getting an STD or getting someone pregnant because they can break during sex. But if you are just beginning a sexual relationship with someone that you aren't absolutely sure that you'll be spending the rest of your life with, then you need that protection to save yourself and your partner. If you've been in a long term sexual relationship with someone and you know that he/she has been monogamous, then you probably are more familiar with that person's (or your) menstrual cycles, so there's a little more latitude about when to wear a condom or not (depending on how anxious you are to start a family). As for oral sex, there's been a lot of dispute about this, but while most health experts agree that oral sex isn't entirely safe with regard to STD's, some health experts say that saliva has chemicals and enzymes which potentially break up any harmful bacteria or viruses, so the chances of contracting an STD are less than by genital intercourse. The only time I'll use them is at the beginning of a new-ish relationship (which would only be new in the sense that we haven't slept together yet)....but really even then, I'm usually not gonna sleep with someone I am not entirely sure about - and that's my point. I just don't have sex with randoms. I usually end up hooking up with people I already know quite well. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JustErin said: 728huey said: NDRU said:
Well, the other option is abstinence, but I won't even go down that road. As for condom usage, they don't entirely eliminate the risk of getting an STD or getting someone pregnant because they can break during sex. But if you are just beginning a sexual relationship with someone that you aren't absolutely sure that you'll be spending the rest of your life with, then you need that protection to save yourself and your partner. If you've been in a long term sexual relationship with someone and you know that he/she has been monogamous, then you probably are more familiar with that person's (or your) menstrual cycles, so there's a little more latitude about when to wear a condom or not (depending on how anxious you are to start a family). As for oral sex, there's been a lot of dispute about this, but while most health experts agree that oral sex isn't entirely safe with regard to STD's, some health experts say that saliva has chemicals and enzymes which potentially break up any harmful bacteria or viruses, so the chances of contracting an STD are less than by genital intercourse. The only time I'll use them is at the beginning of a new-ish relationship (which would only be new in the sense that we haven't slept together yet)....but really even then, I'm usually not gonna sleep with someone I am not entirely sure about - and that's my point. I just don't have sex with randoms. I usually end up hooking up with people I already know quite well. Yes, a relationship takes a certain leap of faith, emotionally & physically. And you try not to be stupid about your trust. Of course it's different for a new relationship or a one night stand. Then you're an idiot to not use one, right? But life is risky, and sometimes you take chances. You evaluate the risk & the trust you have in your partner, at least that's how I've lived my life. My Legacy
http://prince.org/msg/8/192731 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
NDRU said: JustErin said: The only time I'll use them is at the beginning of a new-ish relationship (which would only be new in the sense that we haven't slept together yet)....but really even then, I'm usually not gonna sleep with someone I am not entirely sure about - and that's my point. I just don't have sex with randoms. I usually end up hooking up with people I already know quite well. Yes, a relationship takes a certain leap of faith, emotionally & physically. And you try not to be stupid about your trust. Of course it's different for a new relationship or a one night stand. Then you're an idiot to not use one, right? But life is risky, and sometimes you take chances. You evaluate the risk & the trust you have in your partner, at least that's how I've lived my life. I simply do not have one night stands. I personally think they are yucky. But yes, absolutely...if you don't fully trust someone of course you should try to protect yourself. I just don't know why people would bother fucking someone they don't fully trust. I love sex but I don't need it so bad that I will risk getting something from someone just to get some. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Stymie said: CalhounSq said: Okay, some questions for all the "no condom" folks: Do ALL of you insist that your partners get tested When does the "test so we can fuck" convo happen (how far into knowing them) How often are you & your partner getting re-tested & I'm not trying to come off judgemental here, I'm genuinely curious as I've never been bold enough to roll w/o one even in long relationships WITH testing and remember CS, lots of people get married and stop using condoms, too. Well hell, I expect to stop using them once I get married too! I never met you, but I LOVE you & I will forever!! Thank you for being YOU - my little Princey, the best to EVER do it | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JustErin said: NDRU said: Yes, a relationship takes a certain leap of faith, emotionally & physically. And you try not to be stupid about your trust. Of course it's different for a new relationship or a one night stand. Then you're an idiot to not use one, right? But life is risky, and sometimes you take chances. You evaluate the risk & the trust you have in your partner, at least that's how I've lived my life. I simply do not have one night stands. I personally think they are yucky. But yes, absolutely...if you don't fully trust someone of course you should try to protect yourself. I just don't know why people would bother fucking someone they don't fully trust. I love sex but I don't need it so bad that I will risk getting something from someone just to get some. It's good someone finally raised the issue, because some people are in relationships and some are just sexually active singles. Totally different perspectives. In my life, I'm lucky I have someone I trust, and they're more about birth control. And they're definitely my least favorite form. But out in the dating world, they're great because it's one less worry when you're hooking up w/strangers My Legacy
http://prince.org/msg/8/192731 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
NDRU said: JustErin said: I simply do not have one night stands. I personally think they are yucky. But yes, absolutely...if you don't fully trust someone of course you should try to protect yourself. I just don't know why people would bother fucking someone they don't fully trust. I love sex but I don't need it so bad that I will risk getting something from someone just to get some. It's good someone finally raised the issue, because some people are in relationships and some are just sexually active singles. Totally different perspectives. In my life, I'm lucky I have someone I trust, and they're more about birth control. And they're definitely my least favorite form. But out in the dating world, they're great because it's one less worry when you're hooking up w/strangers Ya, but I am in that singles group. I am not in a relationship - I am in something casual. It's just with someone I know very, very well. You can date without making random hook ups. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JustErin said: NDRU said: It's good someone finally raised the issue, because some people are in relationships and some are just sexually active singles. Totally different perspectives. In my life, I'm lucky I have someone I trust, and they're more about birth control. And they're definitely my least favorite form. But out in the dating world, they're great because it's one less worry when you're hooking up w/strangers Ya, but I am in that singles group. I am not in a relationship - I am in something casual. It's just with someone I know very, very well. You can date without making random hook ups. I might argue that you are in a relationship, but... My Legacy
http://prince.org/msg/8/192731 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
NDRU said: JustErin said: Ya, but I am in that singles group. I am not in a relationship - I am in something casual. It's just with someone I know very, very well. You can date without making random hook ups. I might argue that you are in a relationship, but... Yes, you're right. It is kind of a relationship, a non-conventional, one I suppose. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I prefer to use them.
I use them during dating scenarios, as well as during LTRs. In my long term committed relationships I generally use them to prevent pregnancy. In dating scenarios, I'm pretty picky about who I sleep with, but I can't account for who a person may have slept with in the past and that other partner's habits, so I want to be proactive in protecting my Kimcheechee. You know, recently I had a childhood friend reveal to me some sorrid detils of her sexual history. She's a very glamourous, beautiful funny woman, whom one would never suspect has no many physical/sexual issues. But the reality is that she has had every STD out there short of AIDS. Herpes, Gonorrhea, ALL of it. She has freely admitted to me that every time a man sleeps with her, it's the proverbial equivilent to putting his dick on a crap table. She takes care to protect men that she falls in love with, but is also very capable of subjecting them to infectious sex if they piss her off simply out of anger or revenge. I'm sure some of the men she's dated are probably nice fellows...but I would hate to be the person sleeping with them years later, either of us not knowing that they had been subjected to some twisted revenge fuck from a black widow in their past that exposed them to all manner of things Nah...I stick with condoms even in dating situations... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
DexMSR said:
42 years old....NO KIDS. BITCHES!! And GOOOOOD timing!! [Edited 3/5/08 15:45pm] No sense in beating around the bush as long you keep it safe & protected. Keep banging. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Necessary componet in this day and age if one is not involved in an commited/exclusive relationship . No sense in playing Russian Roullette. [Edited 3/8/08 20:08pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
blackguitaristz said: JustErin said: Condoms, including the flavoured ones, taste like shit! And once again, someone not using condoms for oral but insists on it for sex. Tsk, tsk. Unless you're my woman and we're living together or we are really really close to the point that I'm not sleeping with anyone else, then yeah, I'm pulling out the unicorn. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CalhounSq said: Do ALL of you insist that your partners get tested
When does the "test so we can fuck" convo happen (how far into knowing them) How often are you & your partner getting re-tested & I'm not trying to come off judgemental here, I'm genuinely curious as I've never been bold enough to roll w/o one even in long relationships WITH testing I KNOW that's right. I have that conversation very early, especially if it's someone I think there's relationship potential. And I do expect to see a test if we're going to be having sex on the regular. In the last long term relationship I was in, we got tested annually but we RARELY did it without a condom cuz I'm not on the pill and was/am not trynta get pregnant. It would be really nice (naive) to believe that just because someone says you are in a committed relationship or EVEN married that would mean both parties are being monogamous. I personally know THREE women who contracted AIDS from their husbands of more than ten years. And this is becoming more and more common, especially in the black community. I'm not saying that I would expect a husband and wife to use a condom but this is just an example that just cuz you think you can trust your partner does not mean they are not fucking around and exposing you, as a woman, to diseases. Also, again there's NO male test for HPV which is the primary cause of cervical cancer. I wonder how many men who ARE being faithful unwittingly gave HPV to their partner or wife and she ended up with cancer as a result???? In a nutshell, I guess I'll have to say "Fuck trusting someone else where my own health and safety is at risk." As long as the following statement is true, sex without a condom ain't even up for discussion. http://www.blackaids.org/...0women.pdf Despite a growing belief that AIDS is no longer a lethal disease, African Americans are still dying from AIDS-related illnesses every year. Blacks who test HIV positive are seven times more likely to die from it than whites. And as of 2002, AIDS remained the leading cause of death for Black women between the ages of 25 and 34—and ranked among the leading causes of death for all Black women. [Edited 3/9/08 9:10am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |