mdiver said:

Me too! I mean, mine - not yours, erm, forget it...

roodboi said:

Not me.

onenitealone said:

Feel free to love mine mate!

onenitealone said:

Imago said:

Oh God.

roodboi said:

Oh God imagine how fast THAT would get taken down

shanti0608 said:

totally agree. i'd never have it done to a kid.

evenstar said:

as someone that has many experiences with both cut and uncut.

the noticable difference is those who are uncut seem to be a bit more sensitve on the head.

i haven't really noticed either group experiencing differnces when it comes to sex.

ehuffnsd said:

Kind of what I was getting at without being too graphic... in my experience with both as well.

shanti0608 said:

but i don't think either party enjoys sex more or less.

I've never even been with a dude that wasn't circumcised. It appears that almost every boy born in the 70s and early 80s were cut.

In Canada, this is.
[Edited 2/28/08 12:11pm]

I don't see any reason, not even religious, to circumsize a kid.

THAT SAID


I've run into way too many guys who are otherwise fastidious about personal hygiene that didn't take care of themselves below decks to think of it as attractive. Trust me, being clean all over is not a guarantee of being clean all over

JustErin said:

almost all men born in Canada and the US were cut

Well, you're asking to cancel a very significant religious ceramony. Although I'm not religious and I'm not sure what I would do in this case, if I had a child, this is going against their beliefs, and I hope you realize it's not going to be anytime soon that it would vanish from the world. These religious people strongly believe in this ritual.

ehuffnsd said:

You are right... though the first man I slept with in the states was not circumcised. It did not seem strange to me since it was the first one I had seen up close irl.
After that they were snipped.

reason numbers 1 through 12:

OUCH!

[Edited 2/28/08 21:09pm]

I'm factory stock

I've seen it as mutilization as soon as I found out what it was. And a lot of my friends seem to think it's hilarious, me being uncut. But I'm just like I don't get it. They seem to think it causes cancer or something which is untrue. Sometimes I worry if women will care about it (cuz you guys are shallow like that ), but then I figure, thay're just missing out, and I'll move on to a chick that digs it

Volitan said:

Just shows you how ignorant people are of their own bodies.

mdiver said:

That's something none of us needed to know

Ocean said:

The self penis love on this thread is rampant !

You are less likely to get aids with circumcision, it is cleaner, and let's be honest, more attractive.

Xavier Hollander, the legendary columnist, ex prostitute, once said she would never have sex with any man who wasn't, you know.

It's my body.

Ever heard that before?

2freaky4church1 said:

If you fuck someone with aids, not having a certain piece of skin isn't gonna protect you.

Thanks a lot. As if I didn't already have a feeling of lacking!

JustErin said:

Too true. I was like "You do realize they strap your son down and cut off part of his dick right?". And they were like "It's worth it though because they won't get diseases or give girls yeast infections" And I was like "So this kid is never gonna bathe??"

And then I pointed out that all the nerve endings are in the foreskin and sex feels better with it, and they all shut up,

It makes me more sexually aerodynamic.
It helps to shave off minutes in my fornicatin' time.

2freaky4church1 said:

Uh-huh. So UK men are huge AIDS risks compared to we Americans?

Circumsized peens aren't cleaner.

And the aesthetics of either are personal preferences, are they not?


Well, in that case...

Well that's not fair...

violator said:

It helps wonders for the g-spot, my man.