NDRU said: CarrieMpls said: In any case...
My point being, one person alone is everything. Though companionship and love are great to have, you should need no more than yourself alone. Not just that, but it really doesn't matter how close you get to someone, in the end we're all alone. so true ... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
One4All4Ever said: NDRU said: Not just that, but it really doesn't matter how close you get to someone, in the end we're all alone. so true ... thank god I'm not the only one who feels that way!! My Legacy
http://prince.org/msg/8/192731 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Ex-Moderator | NDRU said: CarrieMpls said: In any case...
My point being, one person alone is everything. Though companionship and love are great to have, you should need no more than yourself alone. Not just that, but it really doesn't matter how close you get to someone, in the end we're all alone. Not even in "the end"... This is something I've been thinking about for a while now. If we want to be really real, we can never be sure about anything, count on anyone but ourselves. Ultimately we (as in ourselves, alone) are all we have. |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CarrieMpls said: NDRU said: Not just that, but it really doesn't matter how close you get to someone, in the end we're all alone. Not even in "the end"... This is something I've been thinking about for a while now. If we want to be really real, we can never be sure about anything, count on anyone but ourselves. Ultimately we (as in ourselves, alone) are all we have. total truth. You're full of baloney Phil 2010: Healing the Wounds of the Past.... http://prince.org/msg/8/325740 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CarrieMpls said: NDRU said: Not just that, but it really doesn't matter how close you get to someone, in the end we're all alone. Not even in "the end"... This is something I've been thinking about for a while now. If we want to be really real, we can never be sure about anything, count on anyone but ourselves. Ultimately we (as in ourselves, alone) are all we have. Right, that's what I meant--ultimately, or when it comes down to it, we're all alone. The stability in our lives (home, family, job, love) is pretty much an illusion, albeit a powerful one. My Legacy
http://prince.org/msg/8/192731 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said: ZombieKitten said: bloody mexicans I'm not bloody! Besides, I would marry him, but he doesn't want me What do you mean I don't want you? I already slept with you, didn't I? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ArielB said: CarrieMpls said: "One man by himself is nothing. Two people who belong together make a world."
discuss. I agree. Two nothings are still nothing. I think Phil forgot how to do math. But I also agree with him about two people who belong together, making a world. The strength you get from each other, the love, the devotion, can make those two the strongest, toughest thing on earth. I'll have to agree with that. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Ex-Moderator | NDRU said: CarrieMpls said: Not even in "the end"... This is something I've been thinking about for a while now. If we want to be really real, we can never be sure about anything, count on anyone but ourselves. Ultimately we (as in ourselves, alone) are all we have. Right, that's what I meant--ultimately, or when it comes down to it, we're all alone. The stability in our lives (home, family, job, love) is pretty much an illusion, albeit a powerful one. Yup. |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CarrieMpls said: NDRU said: Right, that's what I meant--ultimately, or when it comes down to it, we're all alone. The stability in our lives (home, family, job, love) is pretty much an illusion, albeit a powerful one. Yup. the org is basically the only rock in our world! My Legacy
http://prince.org/msg/8/192731 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Ex-Moderator | NDRU said: CarrieMpls said: Yup. the org is basically the only rock in our world! |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CarrieMpls said: In any case...
My point being, one person alone is everything. Though companionship and love are great to have, you should need no more than yourself alone. And a whole bunch of cats. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
NDRU said: CarrieMpls said: Yup. the org is basically the only rock in our world! except when it crashes | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Ex-Moderator | teaspoon said: CarrieMpls said: In any case...
My point being, one person alone is everything. Though companionship and love are great to have, you should need no more than yourself alone. And a whole bunch of cats. Well, that's just the icing on the cake. But way more reliable than another person, most definitely. |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CarrieMpls said: teaspoon said: And a whole bunch of cats. Well, that's just the icing on the cake. But way more reliable than another person, most definitely. and much more honest. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Ex-Moderator | whoops. |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Somebody needs a man. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Ex-Moderator | Fauxie said: Somebody needs a man.
shut UP! |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CarrieMpls said: Fauxie said: Somebody needs a man.
shut UP! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CarrieMpls said: Fauxie said: Somebody needs a man.
shut UP! And hey, maybe a person by themselves should be all that and a bag of chips, and the relationship should only be the meeting of two similarly secure, well-rounded individuals who, therefore don't 'need' each other as much as they just compliment each other and take the couple higher than the individuals could go alone. BUT, is that grounded in reality whatsover? I seem to find myself not being a perfect person without flaws who in fact does appreciate having someone who can help me be a better person and fill in where I'm lacking. I think it's nice that two people who love each other can get together and take different responsibilities and roles based on their skills and each make the other better. Would I be nothing without my wife? Certainly not nothing, but I wouldn't be able to do some of the things I can now. Besides, it's just a turn of phrase so exaggeration is acceptable and common place to make the point. Make a world? Well, making a world for Mon and I would be to have a family. I think I'd certainly struggle to do that without my wife. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
as a quote it's waaaay too sappy for me.
i agree with what jasminefire said, though. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
evenstar said: as a quote it's waaaay too sappy for me.
i agree with what jasminefire said, though. I just murdered Ben in cold blood. Still, you're a tough cookie who depends on nobody! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Fauxie said: evenstar said: as a quote it's waaaay too sappy for me.
i agree with what jasminefire said, though. I just murdered Ben in cold blood. Still, you're a tough cookie who depends on nobody! no, it's definitely true that the little world two people make with each other can be amazing, but total codependency (going along with saying that you're nothing without the other person) isn't desirable, i don't think. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
evenstar said: Fauxie said: I just murdered Ben in cold blood. Still, you're a tough cookie who depends on nobody! no, it's definitely true that the little world two people make with each other can be amazing, but total codependency (going along with saying that you're nothing without the other person) isn't desirable, i don't think. Just so you understand, though. Ben's dead. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Ex-Moderator | Fauxie said: CarrieMpls said: shut UP! And hey, maybe a person by themselves should be all that and a bag of chips, and the relationship should only be the meeting of two similarly secure, well-rounded individuals who, therefore don't 'need' each other as much as they just compliment each other and take the couple higher than the individuals could go alone. BUT, is that grounded in reality whatsover? I seem to find myself not being a perfect person without flaws who in fact does appreciate having someone who can help me be a better person and fill in where I'm lacking. I think it's nice that two people who love each other can get together and take different responsibilities and roles based on their skills and each make the other better. Would I be nothing without my wife? Certainly not nothing, but I wouldn't be able to do some of the things I can now. Besides, it's just a turn of phrase so exaggeration is acceptable and common place to make the point. Make a world? Well, making a world for Mon and I would be to have a family. I think I'd certainly struggle to do that without my wife. I'm not belittling what is undoubtedly the amazing connections people have. But saying there are things you can do with a partner that you can't without? I don't know. I don't get that. Does it make some things easier? Surely. But are they things you couldn't already do? Unless you're talking about combined income and resources, I don't get it. |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Fauxie said: evenstar said: no, it's definitely true that the little world two people make with each other can be amazing, but total codependency (going along with saying that you're nothing without the other person) isn't desirable, i don't think. Just so you understand, though. Ben's dead. i'm neurotic that something will happen before i fly there next week. stoppit. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CarrieMpls said: Fauxie said: And hey, maybe a person by themselves should be all that and a bag of chips, and the relationship should only be the meeting of two similarly secure, well-rounded individuals who, therefore don't 'need' each other as much as they just compliment each other and take the couple higher than the individuals could go alone. BUT, is that grounded in reality whatsover? I seem to find myself not being a perfect person without flaws who in fact does appreciate having someone who can help me be a better person and fill in where I'm lacking. I think it's nice that two people who love each other can get together and take different responsibilities and roles based on their skills and each make the other better. Would I be nothing without my wife? Certainly not nothing, but I wouldn't be able to do some of the things I can now. Besides, it's just a turn of phrase so exaggeration is acceptable and common place to make the point. Make a world? Well, making a world for Mon and I would be to have a family. I think I'd certainly struggle to do that without my wife. I'm not belittling what is undoubtedly the amazing connections people have. But saying there are things you can do with a partner that you can't without? I don't know. I don't get that. Does it make some things easier? Surely. But are they things you couldn't already do? Unless you're talking about combined income and resources, I don't get it. Someone can give you the strength, courage, determination etc. to do something, or help you realise your responsibilities to do something or be somebody, be better, that you might not by yourself. Could you? Ok, perhaps. But in reality 'would you?' is the only pertinent question. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Fauxie said: CarrieMpls said: I'm not belittling what is undoubtedly the amazing connections people have. But saying there are things you can do with a partner that you can't without? I don't know. I don't get that. Does it make some things easier? Surely. But are they things you couldn't already do? Unless you're talking about combined income and resources, I don't get it. Someone can give you the strength, courage, determination etc. to do something, or help you realise your responsibilities to do something or be somebody, be better, that you might not by yourself. Could you? Ok, perhaps. But in reality 'would you?' is the only pertinent question. very true. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Ex-Moderator | Fauxie said: CarrieMpls said: I'm not belittling what is undoubtedly the amazing connections people have. But saying there are things you can do with a partner that you can't without? I don't know. I don't get that. Does it make some things easier? Surely. But are they things you couldn't already do? Unless you're talking about combined income and resources, I don't get it. Someone can give you the strength, courage, determination etc. to do something, or help you realise your responsibilities to do something or be somebody, be better, that you might not by yourself. Could you? Ok, perhaps. But in reality 'would you?' is the only pertinent question. Might not a friend, a family member, etc. do the same things? I don't imagine my strength, determination or courage changing because I have a personal cheering section of one. I can certainly see that having a lasting relationship changes things, oh yes. But not in who I am or who I am to become. That is mine alone. That's all ours alone. |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Im to fuzzy too actually make since but I like this thread! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |