New topic
PrintableI suppose digital is more environmentally friendly. | |
- E-mail - orgNote -  Report post to moderator |
heartbeatocean said: I suppose digital is more environmentally friendly.
Now that makes sense.... The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who cannot read them. -- Mark Twain.
BOB JOHNSON IS PART OF THE PROBLEM!! | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
heybaby said: Byron said: I used to be exactly like you, in that I had no desire to use digital cameras and wanted to build my own darkroom. Then I bought one lol  ...
Actually, I first saw the photos of professional photographers using digital cameras ($3,500-$4,000 digital cameras, but still)...and the work was outstanding. Figured it would be easier and cheaper than building my own darkroom lol. Then, I read an article about how some camera companies are discontinuing making 35mm cameras--it was becoming a Walkman while everyone was buying Discmans and iPods lol...so when I had some money, I dipped into cheapest end of the high-end digitals and bought a Sony for $1,000. My next camera, I'm going all-out and spending the the money for a complete outfit. And I SO want to see your photo project!! That sounds excellent (and not just because I'm from Chicago heh)...Make a thread when you have it done.  i'm still dreaming of that nikon d80 tho digitial or analog? which one is cheaper? i've been told it doesnt matter. and of course i know that digital is in  btw when i'm done with the project i'll post it I was after the D80, but I'm going to give up and get the D40x with a couple of lenses instead because I'm impatient.
As for analog, I still have this awesome camera, my first 'proper' camera, that I bought second hand nearly 15 years ago. It's back in the UK though. Really good camera as a starter when I was just a wee boy, and still good now.  | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
heartbeatocean said: I suppose digital is more environmentally friendly.
Never thought of that but it's true! I guess I need to learn to develop my own stuff. That way at least I could limit myself to developing just the good negatives. My Legacy
http://prince.org/msg/8/192731 | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Fauxie said: heybaby said: i'm still dreaming of that nikon d80 tho digitial or analog? which one is cheaper? i've been told it doesnt matter. and of course i know that digital is in btw when i'm done with the project i'll post it I was after the D80, but I'm going to give up and get the D40x with a couple of lenses instead because I'm impatient.
As for analog, I still have this awesome camera, my first 'proper' camera, that I bought second hand nearly 15 years ago. It's back in the UK though. Really good camera as a starter when I was just a wee boy, and still good now. I just used one of these on vacation to take a pic of a couple that owned one. It seemed old & heavy, but probably in no worse condition than it was 20 years ago. My Legacy
http://prince.org/msg/8/192731 | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
NDRU said: heartbeatocean said: I suppose digital is more environmentally friendly.
Never thought of that but it's true! I guess I need to learn to develop my own stuff. That way at least I could limit myself to developing just the good negatives. but then you'd be breathing in all those fumes! | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
heartbeatocean said: NDRU said: Never thought of that but it's true! I guess I need to learn to develop my own stuff. That way at least I could limit myself to developing just the good negatives. but then you'd be breathing in all those fumes! But I don't do drugs anymore, I need something! My Legacy
http://prince.org/msg/8/192731 | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |