As quoted by the lovely Lothan on the sex toys thread.

Thank you Lothan.

This got me thinking:

In a perfect world would you RATHER come in 2 minutes flat or engage in a longer, more stretched and teasing on and off and tantilising full on unexpected orgasm?
[Edited 10/7/07 13:22pm]

I want foreplay to last atleast about 30 mins. So I aint coming no time soon

MissMe said:

depends really....depends on my mood and how much time I have.

shanti0608 said:

Right OK. You got me.

Rushing for work and squezzing in an orgasm in 2 mins flat, yes, of course. But you must have misread my words - "In a perfect world".
[Edited 10/7/07 13:31pm]

MissMe said:

In a perfect world variation is still the ideal

MissMe said:

In a perfect world I still have other things to do...not work necessarily...maybe I need to get off so I can take care of him for a while...

I guess that is more of a man's perfect world perspective.

mdiver said:

You got me there. I posted ideal, and remembered I didn't post ideal, so edited to perfect, only to misspell that too. I am giving up now. But a prefect world kind of works too.
[Edited 10/7/07 13:34pm]

shanti0608 said:

So I don't get an answer?
Maybe when the americans come online they are more open to question.

MissMe said:

I am an American but I was told last night that I am not a typical one.

I like change too much so if I was in a perfect world then I would need both and everything in between.

shanti0608 said:

Oh sorry, my bad. Usually at this time mostly Europeans post. I guess my perfect world I would prolong my orgasm and spend more qua lity time doing it.

MissMe said:

Good answer... I am American but I am living in the UK...

MissMe said:

I can say that 99.9% of the time I'd like to have long and relaxed foreplay that leads to orgasm. It is so nice why would I want to rush?

shanti0608 said:

Ah, best answer of them all. Sometimes it's all lust, other times it's love, innit?

HamsterHuey said:

Yep

Some times you just want a quickie...

I am one moody bitch I guess..

*sigh* If only it took just two minutes.ha.


In a perfect world I would prefer a long, passionate, moanie-groanie love-making session that ends in a thunderous orgasm.
If I could have that all the time that would be great.

MissMe said:

MissMe said:

Both
Consistantly
Daily

two minutes... flat that does absolutely nothing for me... thank you but NO thank you. that would not be a positive experience for me and neither would the shit I'd have to say about having said experience... I would be pissed.

2 minutes sex that is the end of a long nice foreplay.

a little bit of this and a little bit of that...
the longer the foreplay the more explosive the climax - that's what i dig.

I would like it both ways..why not have one fast..then have the next one slow..and then the next one fast..and so on and so on. I think you all get the idea!

you know what I wish? I wish it would happen satisfaction guaranteed when I want it to. Like if I wanted it to happen in 2 minutes that it would

I know I can make it take half an hour, but sometimes I wish I could speed things up*.

*I'm not talking DIY - that takes a minute if I need it.

first one and then the other, please.

MoniGram said:

Multiple orgasms, each one different, I like the way you think Moni




.
[Edited 10/7/07 22:42pm]

veronikka said:

ZombieKitten said:

most women take, on average, 10-20 minutes to reach climax. that's 10-20 minutes more foreplay, and touching. why cut that short?

XxAxX said:

I can orgasm in less than a minute, ok that's sometimes, but it takes experTEASE.

MissMe said:

would make watching countdown more fun

jami0mckay said:

I think if Des O'Connor was anything to go by, it would put me off my orgasms.

MissMe said:

but at least u could go do do do do diddo de dum at the end