mdiver said: Lothan said: I agree with your post Phil but it does not answer the question. Killing animals is cruel, regardless if it is to eat them or for sport.
BTW Jana, I have never never seen any of those types of films. I can't do it. I really don't see it as cruel. Cruel implies some sort of pleasure or pre determined desire to inflict pain and suffering on someone or something. I don't see it as that. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
INSATIABLE said: Imago said: oh fuck you people! I post something serious and I still can't be part of this cliquey conversation!
Okay, okay. Christ, you sound like Dani. I don't know, man. My cat loves her uber-expensive adult formula food and I'd feel cruel forcing her to eat soy. It's something I'll have to investigate. Is it healthy for animals to go meatless? Sure, buying pet food that contains meat ALSO contributes to factory farming. Then again, she's my furry lovebug and I don't want her to eat something that tastes like poop. Fucking fuckity fuckass. Well, it would be cruel to do so. Animals can get mopy and lethargic eating soy based feed. But it doesn't mean you live a cruel free life if ya know what I'm sayin' Owning a pet at all contributes to this factory farming culture. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Anxiety said: Rhondab said: I'm looking at a statement from a man that made a judgement call about killing animals for food and yet didn't value his own life in the same manner. We all fall victim to hypocrisy myself included but I just found it very interesting coming from River. It was an observation that reminded me of why I take issue with pro-lifers. wouldn't you say that river's substance abuse issues were somehow indicative of some kind of mental illness - depression, addictive behavior, whatEVERtheheck...? if someone with self-destructive issues such as river were still able to find the wherewithal to have passionate beliefs that he did his best to follow through and be passionate about, i see that as a minor victory in his life - not so much as hypocrisy. at least he found his way around his own self-destructive behavior to attempt SOME kind of positive change in his world while he was alive. I really wish you would stop shooting my theories out of the water...its really becoming annoying.... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Imago said: But it doesn't mean you live a cruel free life if ya know what I'm sayin'
Owning a pet at all contributes to this factory farming culture. That's it, bottom line. There's no way to completely avoid it, but that's NO reason to not shoot for the top. It's like anything else. Complete innocence doesn't exist in this situation, but using that as an argument as to why we should all contribute to such a hopeless mindset is not my cup of tea. Oh shit, my hat done fell off | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
INSATIABLE said: Imago said: But it doesn't mean you live a cruel free life if ya know what I'm sayin'
Owning a pet at all contributes to this factory farming culture. That's it, bottom line. There's no way to completely avoid it, but that's NO reason to not shoot for the top. It's like anything else. Complete innocence doesn't exist in this situation, but using that as an argument as to why we should all contribute to such a hopeless mindset is not my cup of tea. So do you take the stance that Anx eluded to , that whatever our moral or tolerance threashold in supporting the end of unethical practices (if we can agree this means factory farming and overtly cruel practices), that it would be enough? Or is there a distinct line that needs to be drawn? Personally, as I struggle with my meat consumption I'm leaning towards a distinct line needing to be drawn--I just dislike the "moral high ground" argument, when in this game, we are all sinners--some more than others. OMG, thank you so much for acknowledging me on this elitist thread | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Anxiety said: mdiver said: I really don't see it as cruel. Cruel implies some sort of pleasure or pre determined desire to inflict pain and suffering on someone or something. I don't see it as that. you don't or you won't? Tofu killer | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Imago said: INSATIABLE said: That's it, bottom line. There's no way to completely avoid it, but that's NO reason to not shoot for the top. It's like anything else. Complete innocence doesn't exist in this situation, but using that as an argument as to why we should all contribute to such a hopeless mindset is not my cup of tea. So do you take the stance that Anx eluded to , that whatever our moral or tolerance threashold in supporting the end of unethical practices (if we can agree this means factory farming and overtly cruel practices), that it would be enough? Or is there a distinct line that needs to be drawn? Personally, as I struggle with my meat consumption I'm leaning towards a distinct line needing to be drawn--I just dislike the "moral high ground" argument, when in this game, we are all sinners--some more than others. OMG, thank you so much for acknowledging me on this elitist thread | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Imago said: INSATIABLE said: That's it, bottom line. There's no way to completely avoid it, but that's NO reason to not shoot for the top. It's like anything else. Complete innocence doesn't exist in this situation, but using that as an argument as to why we should all contribute to such a hopeless mindset is not my cup of tea. So do you take the stance that Anx eluded to , that whatever our moral or tolerance threashold in supporting the end of unethical practices (if we can agree this means factory farming and overtly cruel practices), that it would be enough? Or is there a distinct line that needs to be drawn? Personally, as I struggle with my meat consumption I'm leaning towards a distinct line needing to be drawn--I just dislike the "moral high ground" argument, when in this game, we are all sinners--some more than others. OMG, thank you so much for acknowledging me on this elitist thread i'm not saying that it would be "enough", but you would at least have your moral/ethical comfort levels defined and in a place where you can look at your "higher" ideals and figure out how you want to live within those ideals, or if it's worth it, and if it's not worth it, how you're able to reconcile that with yourself (first) and others. i don't think any living thing lives a 100% airtight cruelty-free existence. that's not an excuse for not caring, but it is a reminder that absolutes are a little pointless. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Imago said: So do you take the stance that Anx eluded to , that whatever our moral or tolerance threashold in supporting the end of unethical practices (if we can agree this means factory farming and overtly cruel practices), that it would be enough?
Or is there a distinct line that needs to be drawn? Personally, as I struggle with my meat consumption I'm leaning towards a distinct line needing to be drawn--I just dislike the "moral high ground" argument, when in this game, we are all sinners--some more than others. OMG, thank you so much for acknowledging me on this elitist thread Well, I hate to agree with Chris on anything, but we're all wired differently and can't agree on anything other than it's nice when someone tilts your head back and sprays whipped cream in your mouth and that sunlight feels good on your face after a long rain. Agreeing on a "distinct line"? Impossible! Do what you can, if you're so inclined, and that's as much as anyone can realistically ask. We've all created such vastly different realities in our heads, and most people live their lives as victims to stone-cold truths that exist OUTSIDE of themselves, when in fact, it's quite the opposite. Because of this, people will have different "levels" on which their "distinct line" can be drawn. Oh shit, my hat done fell off | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Imago said: Personally, as I struggle with my meat consumption This thread is about animals not you coming out of the closet | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
mdiver said: Imago said: Personally, as I struggle with my meat consumption This thread is about animals not you coming out of the closet | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
INSATIABLE said: Well, I hate to agree with Chris on anything | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Anxiety said: Imago said: So do you take the stance that Anx eluded to , that whatever our moral or tolerance threashold in supporting the end of unethical practices (if we can agree this means factory farming and overtly cruel practices), that it would be enough? Or is there a distinct line that needs to be drawn? Personally, as I struggle with my meat consumption I'm leaning towards a distinct line needing to be drawn--I just dislike the "moral high ground" argument, when in this game, we are all sinners--some more than others. OMG, thank you so much for acknowledging me on this elitist thread i'm not saying that it would be "enough", but you would at least have your moral/ethical comfort levels defined and in a place where you can look at your "higher" ideals and figure out how you want to live within those ideals, or if it's worth it, and if it's not worth it, how you're able to reconcile that with yourself (first) and others. i don't think any living thing lives a 100% airtight cruelty-free existence. that's not an excuse for not caring, but it is a reminder that absolutes are a little pointless. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
. [Edited 8/28/07 11:22am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Anxiety said: INSATIABLE said: Well, I hate to agree with Chris on anything Oh shit, my hat done fell off | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
VEGETARIANS OF THE WORLD UNITE!!!
---Carrot Marx. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Imago said: mdiver said: This thread is about animals not you coming out of the closet | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
evenstar3 said: Imago said: I have had to use that phrase a lot lately | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
surely I am going to hell...I took Phil to get steak last night. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Save the Plants they are defenceless | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Steadwood said: Save the Plants they are defenceless someone better save your spelling first, shit | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Anxiety said: Steadwood said: Save the Plants they are defenceless someone better save your spelling first, shit That's a mute point | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Steadwood said: Anxiety said: someone better save your spelling first, shit That's a mute point errrrr its moot point mate | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
mdiver said: Steadwood said: That's a mute point errrrr its moot point mate He might not notice | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Anxiety said: Steadwood said: Save the Plants they are defenceless someone better save your spelling first, shit move over Lisa Lampanelli, ANXY is the new queen of mean!! go! go! go! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
weepingwall said: Anxiety said: someone better save your spelling first, shit move over Lisa Lampanelli, ANXY is the new queen of mean!! go! go! go! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Anxiety said: Steadwood said: Save the Plants they are defenceless someone better save your spelling first, shit Hang on!.... what's up with the spelling | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Imago said: INSATIABLE said: Okay, okay. Christ, you sound like Dani. I don't know, man. My cat loves her uber-expensive adult formula food and I'd feel cruel forcing her to eat soy. It's something I'll have to investigate. Is it healthy for animals to go meatless? Sure, buying pet food that contains meat ALSO contributes to factory farming. Then again, she's my furry lovebug and I don't want her to eat something that tastes like poop. Fucking fuckity fuckass. Well, it would be cruel to do so. Animals can get mopy and lethargic eating soy based feed. But it doesn't mean you live a cruel free life if ya know what I'm sayin' Owning a pet at all contributes to this factory farming culture. Cats are obligate carnivores and as such need to be fed a meat based diet. To try to force a cat to adapt to a soy based diet would in its own way be animal cruelty. Can't win for losing, huh? If it is a big enough concern, one could feed a fresh diet with meat obtained from non-commercial farming sources. There is a lot of information available regarding feeding fresh home-prepared diets for cats and dogs. Another vegetarian on board. I woke up one morning two years ago and just decided I didn't want meat anymore. I hadn't thought of it beforehand, no preparation, no planning, no commitment at the time. Heck, we had just purchased and processed half a cow and put it in the freezer the same weekend I decided I didn't want meat. I haven't eaten it since. I did spend a brief period since as a vegan, but cheese and eggs are a lot harder to give up than meat. Oh well, I do buy organic and free range, for what that's worth. I don't think it would take much for me to guilt myself into going vegan again. Murica: at least it's not Sudan. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |