New topic
Printable| Author | Message |
Dont Flame People I have no intentions of setting anyone on fire.  | |
- E-mail - orgNote -  Report post to moderator |
PurplePassion65 said: I have no intentions of setting anyone on fire.
Well, you know what they say...best laid plans and all that.  | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Teacher said: PurplePassion65 said: I have no intentions of setting anyone on fire.
Well, you know what they say...best laid plans and all that. I'm a lover not a flamer.  | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
PurplePassion65 said: Teacher said: Well, you know what they say...best laid plans and all that. I'm a lover not a flamer. It's ok  The Org has plenty of flamers without you, unfortunately. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
What does flame mean? | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
wlcm2thdwn said: What does flame mean?
Flaming (internet) From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search Flaming is the hostile and insulting interaction between Internet users. Flaming usually occurs in the social context of a discussion board on the Internet. An Internet user typically generates a flame response to other posts or users posting on a site, and is usually not constructive, does not clarify a discussion, and does not persuade others. Sometimes, flamers attempt to assert their authority, or establish a position of superiority over other users. Other times, a flamer is simply an individual who believes he or she carries the only valid opinion. This leads him or her to personally attack those who disagree. Occasionally, flamers wish to upset and offend other members of the forum, in which case they are trolls. Most often however, flames are angry or insulting messages transmitted by people who have strong feelings about a subject. Some equate flaming with simply letting off steam, though the receiving party may be less than pleased. Similarly, a normal, non-flame message may have elements of a flame -- it may be hostile, for example -- but it is not a flame if its author seriously intends to advance the discussion. The word flaming is also sometimes used for long, intensive and heated discussions, even though insults do not occur. Although the trading of insults is as old as human speech, flaming on the Internet, like many other online 'actions,' started in the Usenet hierarchies (although it was known to occur in the WWIVnet and FidoNet computer networks as well). | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
mdiver said: wlcm2thdwn said: What does flame mean?
Flaming (internet) From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search Flaming is the hostile and insulting interaction between Internet users. Flaming usually occurs in the social context of a discussion board on the Internet. An Internet user typically generates a flame response to other posts or users posting on a site, and is usually not constructive, does not clarify a discussion, and does not persuade others. Sometimes, flamers attempt to assert their authority, or establish a position of superiority over other users. Other times, a flamer is simply an individual who believes he or she carries the only valid opinion. This leads him or her to personally attack those who disagree. Occasionally, flamers wish to upset and offend other members of the forum, in which case they are trolls. Most often however, flames are angry or insulting messages transmitted by people who have strong feelings about a subject. Some equate flaming with simply letting off steam, though the receiving party may be less than pleased. Similarly, a normal, non-flame message may have elements of a flame -- it may be hostile, for example -- but it is not a flame if its author seriously intends to advance the discussion. The word flaming is also sometimes used for long, intensive and heated discussions, even though insults do not occur. Although the trading of insults is as old as human speech, flaming on the Internet, like many other online 'actions,' started in the Usenet hierarchies (although it was known to occur in the WWIVnet and FidoNet computer networks as well). an expert!  | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
evenstar3 said: mdiver said: Flaming (internet) From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search Flaming is the hostile and insulting interaction between Internet users. Flaming usually occurs in the social context of a discussion board on the Internet. An Internet user typically generates a flame response to other posts or users posting on a site, and is usually not constructive, does not clarify a discussion, and does not persuade others. Sometimes, flamers attempt to assert their authority, or establish a position of superiority over other users. Other times, a flamer is simply an individual who believes he or she carries the only valid opinion. This leads him or her to personally attack those who disagree. Occasionally, flamers wish to upset and offend other members of the forum, in which case they are trolls. Most often however, flames are angry or insulting messages transmitted by people who have strong feelings about a subject. Some equate flaming with simply letting off steam, though the receiving party may be less than pleased. Similarly, a normal, non-flame message may have elements of a flame -- it may be hostile, for example -- but it is not a flame if its author seriously intends to advance the discussion. The word flaming is also sometimes used for long, intensive and heated discussions, even though insults do not occur. Although the trading of insults is as old as human speech, flaming on the Internet, like many other online 'actions,' started in the Usenet hierarchies (although it was known to occur in the WWIVnet and FidoNet computer networks as well). an expert! Exactly.....  | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
evenstar3 said: mdiver said: Flaming (internet) From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search Flaming is the hostile and insulting interaction between Internet users. Flaming usually occurs in the social context of a discussion board on the Internet. An Internet user typically generates a flame response to other posts or users posting on a site, and is usually not constructive, does not clarify a discussion, and does not persuade others. Sometimes, flamers attempt to assert their authority, or establish a position of superiority over other users. Other times, a flamer is simply an individual who believes he or she carries the only valid opinion. This leads him or her to personally attack those who disagree. Occasionally, flamers wish to upset and offend other members of the forum, in which case they are trolls. Most often however, flames are angry or insulting messages transmitted by people who have strong feelings about a subject. Some equate flaming with simply letting off steam, though the receiving party may be less than pleased. Similarly, a normal, non-flame message may have elements of a flame -- it may be hostile, for example -- but it is not a flame if its author seriously intends to advance the discussion. The word flaming is also sometimes used for long, intensive and heated discussions, even though insults do not occur. Although the trading of insults is as old as human speech, flaming on the Internet, like many other online 'actions,' started in the Usenet hierarchies (although it was known to occur in the WWIVnet and FidoNet computer networks as well). an expert!  | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
shanti0608 said: evenstar3 said: an expert! Exactly..... And too | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
mdiver said: shanti0608 said: Exactly..... And toook. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
shanti0608 said: mdiver said: And toook.  | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
mdiver said: evenstar3 said: an expert!  | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
mdiver said: evenstar3 said: an expert! OI!  NO FLAMING! | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
evenstar3 said: mdiver said:  | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
mdiver said: evenstar3 said: your puny fish is nothing compared to my weaponry. GIVE UP, MDIVER!  | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
evenstar3 said: mdiver said: your puny fish is nothing compared to my weaponry. GIVE UP, MDIVER! RAPE HER, MDIVER! | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Spookymuffin said: evenstar3 said: your puny fish is nothing compared to my weaponry. GIVE UP, MDIVER! RAPE HER, MDIVER! 
i mean, OH MY GOD I AM SO OFFENDED. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
evenstar3 said: Spookymuffin said: RAPE HER, MDIVER!
i mean, OH MY GOD I AM SO OFFENDED.  That's the spirit! | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Spookymuffin said: evenstar3 said: your puny fish is nothing compared to my weaponry. GIVE UP, MDIVER! RAPE HER, MDIVER! Dude she is hot and all but now you have been there.....ain't gonna happen  | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Spookymuffin said: evenstar3 said:
i mean, OH MY GOD I AM SO OFFENDED. That's the spirit!you're horrid! post a semi-clothed picture and i might forgive you. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
mdiver said: Spookymuffin said: RAPE HER, MDIVER! Dude she is hot and all but now you have been there.....ain't gonna happen 
touché. as i read that, the words "sloppy seconds" popped into my head too. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Spookymuffin said: mdiver said: Dude she is hot and all but now you have been there.....ain't gonna happen
touché. as i read that, the words "sloppy seconds" popped into my head too. Poor Laurel | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
evenstar3 said: Spookymuffin said: That's the spirit!you're horrid! post a semi-clothed picture and i might forgive you. as if you don't have enough.
 | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Spookymuffin said: evenstar3 said: you're horrid! post a semi-clothed picture and i might forgive you. as if you don't have enough.
lip biting | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
mdiver said: Spookymuffin said:
touché. as i read that, the words "sloppy seconds" popped into my head too. Poor Laurelhe should really be nicer to me, considering the things i've got in my photobucket.  | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
evenstar3 said: mdiver said: Poor Laurelhe should really be nicer to me, considering the things i've got in my photobucket. Out the peasy motherfucker | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
mdiver said: evenstar3 said: he should really be nicer to me, considering the things i've got in my photobucket. Out the peasy motherfucker 
Even I don't get that english phrase.  | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Spookymuffin said: mdiver said: Out the peasy motherfucker
Even I don't get that english phrase. i'm guessing it means 'post them for fuck's sake already'. in a second!  | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
evenstar3 said: Spookymuffin said:
Even I don't get that english phrase. i'm guessing it means 'post them for fuck's sake already'. in a second!
this is funny: http://uk.youtube.com/wat...BFwde9FRIE | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |