Anxiety said: Mach said: you feel that for the majority of folks love is fleeting ? i think that lots of people expect the honeymoon phase to last forever, rather than accepting the changing nature of a relationship and preparing to make the future stages just as fun but in different ways. i think true love in and of itself is extraordinarily strong, but not unshapable or indestructible. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Anxiety said: Mach said: you feel that for the majority of folks love is fleeting ? i think that lots of people expect the honeymoon phase to last forever, rather than accepting the changing nature of a relationship and preparing to make the future stages just as fun but in different ways. i think true love in and of itself is extraordinarily strong, but not unshapable or indestructible. I agree | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
shanti0608 said: Anxiety said: i think that lots of people expect the honeymoon phase to last forever, rather than accepting the changing nature of a relationship and preparing to make the future stages just as fun but in different ways. i think true love in and of itself is extraordinarily strong, but not unshapable or indestructible. What he said.... He was like a cock who thought the sun had risen to hear him crow.
(George Eliot) the video for the above... http://www.youtube.com/wa...re=related | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Ex-Moderator | DaniDaniBoBani said: Mach said: I just found it funny perhaps because once again I do not agree with you, though I understand we live in different area's and are different ages so do you feel then if you remain married for 20 yrs you will be unhappy or divorce then yourself ? No. I don't think I'll end in divorce or unhappy. I think the recent events in my life only prove that I am MUCH happier with my husband than without. Even in the moments where were arguing and can't stand each other, I'm happier than I was without him. Maybe it is due to the location difference....but most of the folks that I DO know who are older and happy with their marriages, they are on their second or third marriages. Which tells me that they were young and niave and in 'love' in their first marriages. Which tells me that most 'love' is fleeting. I know thats not the case with you.....but I think it is with a lot of marriages. Unfortunately, I know very, very few people who have been able to make long-term relationships work, both in my family and in my friends. Well, particularly my friends. And I'd say they were all in love at some point. But I don't know that I agree that "love is fleeting". Just that most people I know don't know how to transfer that into a long-term partnership. It's very disheartening. |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CarrieMpls said: DaniDaniBoBani said: No. I don't think I'll end in divorce or unhappy. I think the recent events in my life only prove that I am MUCH happier with my husband than without. Even in the moments where were arguing and can't stand each other, I'm happier than I was without him. Maybe it is due to the location difference....but most of the folks that I DO know who are older and happy with their marriages, they are on their second or third marriages. Which tells me that they were young and niave and in 'love' in their first marriages. Which tells me that most 'love' is fleeting. I know thats not the case with you.....but I think it is with a lot of marriages. Unfortunately, I know very, very few people who have been able to make long-term relationships work, both in my family and in my friends. Well, particularly my friends. And I'd say they were all in love at some point. But I don't know that I agree that "love is fleeting". Just that most people I know don't know how to transfer that into a long-term partnership. It's very disheartening. I find it disheartening as well.... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CarrieMpls said: DaniDaniBoBani said: No. I don't think I'll end in divorce or unhappy. I think the recent events in my life only prove that I am MUCH happier with my husband than without. Even in the moments where were arguing and can't stand each other, I'm happier than I was without him. Maybe it is due to the location difference....but most of the folks that I DO know who are older and happy with their marriages, they are on their second or third marriages. Which tells me that they were young and niave and in 'love' in their first marriages. Which tells me that most 'love' is fleeting. I know thats not the case with you.....but I think it is with a lot of marriages. Unfortunately, I know very, very few people who have been able to make long-term relationships work, both in my family and in my friends. Well, particularly my friends. And I'd say they were all in love at some point. But I don't know that I agree that "love is fleeting". Just that most people I know don't know how to transfer that into a long-term partnership. It's very disheartening. It is disheartening. I think Anx is right that a lot of it ends up being about expectations, and truly wanting the sort of love and stability that comes with a long-term partnership and doing the work to keep that fun and vital, vs. the butterflies and obsession of new love. Most people kinda live for the butterflies. I certainly don't think that a person should settle for a marriage without affection that they are "tolerating". If that's inevitable, then why get married? Ew. You were dead on about not accepting anything for yourself that you wouldn't accept for your kids. Doesn't mean that they shouldn't try to fix it, but raising kids with the idea that a partnership should look like that goes a long way towards condemning them to a similarly unhappy situation, IMHO. oh noes, prince is gonna soo me!!1! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Don't you find though that when people get married its all lovey dovey but they settle into routine and wonder where that feeling went. Well it hasn't gone away its just matured and you know that person now inside and out and theres nothing new but its up to both of you to keep the love alive and not take each other for granted. People are always graving the first love feelings but when reality checks in like paying the bills and raising a family, well the rest is history. "I may not agree with what you say but I'll fight for your right to say it"
Be proud of who you are not what they want you to be... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Sounds like he needs to do some soul searching and reflecting. She is another human being too. He doesn't just live in an isolated bubble. If he's just tolerating the marriage doesn't he think that affects her and her state of happiness. Marriage is a very lovely and divine thing. I don't think it was appropriate for him to tell her he only tolerates it. First you're never going to find wholeness or completeness in a marriage. If you're half empty when you went into it and you carry that attitude the whole way through you're going to be half empty at the end of it. Marriage allows you to share your fullness with another person. And if he's not sharing his fullness with her then he's half the problem. Sure, maybe she's not peaches all the time but it's not completely her fault. He shares some of the blame. I don't believe it's out of anyones control to change the status of their marriage and their feelings towards each other. Even if the marriage has been stale for years it can still come back to life. He needs to change his attitude and mind. He needs a revelation and in the mean time he should fake it till he makes it and not tell her that's what he's doing. But he has some responsibilty to not only tolerate the marriage. Also there is a good reason for them to stay together, the 2 kids. So they should definitely go out of their way to make it work. It won't work if they change nothing but if they work on it their marriage will come back to life for sure. After all like you said: Marriage is a commitment that endures through good and bad. America's political system used to be about the "pursuit of happiness." Now more and more of us want to stop chasing it and have it delivered.
"Our Constitution is designed only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate for any other."- | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
greenpixies said: Sounds like he needs to do some soul searching and reflecting. She is another human being too. He doesn't just live in an isolated bubble. If he's just tolerating the marriage doesn't he think that affects her and her state of happiness. Marriage is a very lovely and divine thing. I don't think it was appropriate for him to tell her he only tolerates it. First you're never going to find wholeness or completeness in a marriage. If you're half empty when you went into it and you carry that attitude the whole way through you're going to be half empty at the end of it. Marriage allows you to share your fullness with another person. And if he's not sharing his fullness with her then he's half the problem. Sure, maybe she's not peaches all the time but it's not completely her fault. He shares some of the blame. I don't believe it's out of anyones control to change the status of their marriage and their feelings towards each other. Even if the marriage has been stale for years it can still come back to life. He needs to change his attitude and mind. He needs a revelation and in the mean time he should fake it till he makes it and not tell her that's what he's doing. But he has some responsibilty to not only tolerate the marriage. Also there is a good reason for them to stay together, the 2 kids. So they should definitely go out of their way to make it work. It won't work if they change nothing but if they work on it their marriage will come back to life for sure. After all like you said: Marriage is a commitment that endures through good and bad.
This is good counsel. Many thanks "I may not agree with what you say but I'll fight for your right to say it"
Be proud of who you are not what they want you to be... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
blueblossom said: People are always graving the first love feelings but when reality checks in like paying the bills and raising a family, well the rest is history.
Exactly - marriage is f-n hard work, 24-7, 365 days a year for the rest of your life. You have be totally honest with yourself, do some serious soul-searching and ask yourself, "Can I make this lifetime committment?" I realized at a young age that lifestyle wasn't for me. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Yeah, having kids is what really tests a marriage.
It gets crazy hard after that. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
DaniDaniBoBani said: Yeah, having kids is what really tests a marriage.
and yet children can as well be the fule to strengthen a marriage and make it even more joyful
It gets crazy hard after that. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Mach said: DaniDaniBoBani said: Yeah, having kids is what really tests a marriage.
and yet children can as well be the fule to strengthen a marriage and make it even more joyful
It gets crazy hard after that. Psst. You spelled fuel wrong. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
DaniDaniBoBani said: Mach said: and yet children can as well be the fule to strengthen a marriage and make it even more joyful
Psst. You spelled fuel wrong. I transpose numbers and letters all day long never claimed to be perfect | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Mach said: DaniDaniBoBani said: Psst. You spelled fuel wrong. I transpose numbers and letters all day long never claimed to be perfect I know. I just LOVE when I catch the people who usually don't make mistakes making typos. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
DaniDaniBoBani said: Mach said: I transpose numbers and letters all day long never claimed to be perfect I know. I just LOVE when I catch the people who usually don't make mistakes making typos. you have issues I make mistakes on here everyday... now I know how much attention you really pay to my posts | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
blueblossom said: My good friend has been told by her husband that he only tolerates the marriage. They have been married for 10 years. Is this a good reason to stay together - I don't think so. He seems to be quite happy plodding along but there is no affection and they argue quite a bit. I say that she is settling for second best but she is finding it hard to get the courage to leave him and take the two children.
What do you think she should do? You can't force someone to do something can you? they have to realise it themselves. The ball is in her court... that’s correct you cannot and they do have to realize it for themselves... I think sometimes people get comfortable in there situations, good or bad. Change is a hard and scary thing for some, especially a change of that magnitude so it maybe easier for her (and him) to stay in it or tolerate it. I do agree that she should tell him what her position...feelings and any other issues or dislikes are. but more importantly based on what he's already said to her, she needs to decide if this is something she wants to continue to be apart of because forcefully...strongly or not, the bottom line is he has already stated his position and view of the marriage to her. He’s already said that this is what it is you can stay or you can go basically and from what you've stated she's decided to stay. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
DaniDaniBoBani said: Mach said: I transpose numbers and letters all day long never claimed to be perfect I know. I just LOVE when I catch the people who usually don't make mistakes making typos. Girl, just use a browser that has auto-spellcheck. Nobody knows how to spell these days. We have help. oh noes, prince is gonna soo me!!1! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I don't agree with the belief that two people should stay together because they have kids or for the sake of the kid’s, simply because they’re "kids" only for a time. Kids grow up and go their own way, start or live their own lives. A marriage has to be about the person, the two people in the actual relationship. IMO, you have to want to be married to or with that person whether there are kids involved or no, that's a more realistic and honest view of things to me. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
FiveFootNine said: mdiver said: Isn't that an oxymoron? Yeah..I don't get that either... [Edited 6/11/07 5:14am] Aren't you engaged? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
blueblossom said: My good friend has been told by her husband that he only tolerates the marriage. They have been married for 10 years. Is this a good reason to stay together - I don't think so. He seems to be quite happy plodding along but there is no affection and they argue quite a bit. I say that she is settling for second best but she is finding it hard to get the courage to leave him and take the two children.
What do you think she should do? You can't force someone to do something can you? they have to realise it themselves. I think that's a rather cruel statement to make to one's spouse. Is he seeing someone else?? Family counseling may help, providing everyone is open and honest. Maybe he feels that way because of something she's doing?? It's worth it to give it a try. We've had ups and downs in our marriage, but the whole picture needs consideration. Not to mention I'd have to break some one else in to my high maintenance ways and over indulgences..... No one should suffer in a miserable relationship.....but the grass isn't always greener. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
eikonoklastes said: FiveFootNine said: Yeah..I don't get that either... [Edited 6/11/07 5:14am] Aren't you engaged? who? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
mdiver said: eikonoklastes said: Aren't you engaged? who? FFN | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
eikonoklastes said: mdiver said: who? FFN TIOKTITYMM | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
statuesqque said: The ball is in her court... that’s correct you cannot and they do have to realize it for themselves... I think sometimes people get comfortable in there situations, good or bad. Change is a hard and scary thing for some, especially a change of that magnitude so it maybe easier for her (and him) to stay in it or tolerate it. I do agree that she should tell him what her position...feelings and any other issues or dislikes are. but more importantly based on what he's already said to her, she needs to decide if this is something she wants to continue to be apart of because forcefully...strongly or not, the bottom line is he has already stated his position and view of the marriage to her. He’s already said that this is what it is you can stay or you can go basically and from what you've stated she's decided to stay. So under this logic the fate of the marriage is in his, not her, hands....which runs counter to the whole concept of TWO people being affected by his feelings....if she doesn't confront him and let him know that his "toleration" isn't working for her, then it'll end up being the great unknown if she does decide to leave....better to at least give it the old college try than to just walk away from it...because, as my situation has proven out to me (personal emphasis), all that may end up being required on his part is a change in perspective..... marriage is a partnership...not two individuals flying in the same pattern.... He was like a cock who thought the sun had risen to hear him crow.
(George Eliot) the video for the above... http://www.youtube.com/wa...re=related | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
reneGade20 said: statuesqque said: The ball is in her court... that’s correct you cannot and they do have to realize it for themselves... I think sometimes people get comfortable in there situations, good or bad. Change is a hard and scary thing for some, especially a change of that magnitude so it maybe easier for her (and him) to stay in it or tolerate it. I do agree that she should tell him what her position...feelings and any other issues or dislikes are. but more importantly based on what he's already said to her, she needs to decide if this is something she wants to continue to be apart of because forcefully...strongly or not, the bottom line is he has already stated his position and view of the marriage to her. He’s already said that this is what it is you can stay or you can go basically and from what you've stated she's decided to stay. So under this logic the fate of the marriage is in his, not her, hands....which runs counter to the whole concept of TWO people being affected by his feelings....if she doesn't confront him and let him know that his "toleration" isn't working for her, then it'll end up being the great unknown if she does decide to leave....better to at least give it the old college try than to just walk away from it...because, as my situation has proven out to me (personal emphasis), all that may end up being required on his part is a change in perspective..... marriage is a partnership...not two individuals flying in the same pattern.... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
reneGade20 said: statuesqque said: The ball is in her court... that’s correct you cannot and they do have to realize it for themselves... I think sometimes people get comfortable in there situations, good or bad. Change is a hard and scary thing for some, especially a change of that magnitude so it maybe easier for her (and him) to stay in it or tolerate it. I do agree that she should tell him what her position...feelings and any other issues or dislikes are. but more importantly based on what he's already said to her, she needs to decide if this is something she wants to continue to be apart of because forcefully...strongly or not, the bottom line is he has already stated his position and view of the marriage to her. He’s already said that this is what it is you can stay or you can go basically and from what you've stated she's decided to stay. So under this logic the fate of the marriage is in his, not her, hands....which runs counter to the whole concept of TWO people being affected by his feelings....if she doesn't confront him and let him know that his "toleration" isn't working for her, then it'll end up being the great unknown if she does decide to leave....better to at least give it the old college try than to just walk away from it...because, as my situation has proven out to me (personal emphasis), all that may end up being required on his part is a change in perspective..... marriage is a partnership...not two individuals flying in the same pattern.... I know that marriage is a partnership and not two individuals flying in the same pattern AND I said she should make her feelings and position known to him. I also said the ball is in her court he has said this is where I am with this...now it's her turn to say, okay that's not going to work for me or not good enough or however she phrases it. It it dialog...it is a conversation...it is productive yelling sometimes... BUT even with all of that the bottom-line is as it has been said it's up to him to change or do whatever... no one can make another person change... you can't ignore the possibility that he may actually feel the way that he does and doesn't want to change. I'm not saying that it may not be the case but looking at all sides everyone is going on the premise that he said this to her (as fucked up as it is) as a sign of lets fix this. I'm acknowledging or at least looking at the possibility that this is exactly what it is for him. It's like my best friend ALWAYS says to me, sometimes there isn't a hidden message...it is exactly what was said...they don't always have happy endings. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |