NDRU said: What was so special about that place that it went back there a few days later to be photographed again?
2 differnet locations, but I do hear, Central California is nice this time of year. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
july said: NDRU said: What was so special about that place that it went back there a few days later to be photographed again?
2 differnet locations, but I do hear, Central California is nice this time of year. I'm not talking about the telephone wire pictures, I mean the guy's wife took pictures with her cell phone, and then his friend with his camera a couple days later. This thing moves incredibly fast when it wants to. Why would it come back to the same place a few days later? Something special about those trees & mountains? I'm not saying there's no reason, I just think it's odd. My Legacy
http://prince.org/msg/8/192731 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
there are other pics of this craft. the craft looks way too small for a ufo Christian Zombie Vampires | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
NDRU said: july said: 2 differnet locations, but I do hear, Central California is nice this time of year. I'm not talking about the telephone wire pictures, I mean the guy's wife took pictures with her cell phone, and then his friend with his camera a couple days later. This thing moves incredibly fast when it wants to. Why would it come back to the same place a few days later? Something special about those trees & mountains? I'm not saying there's no reason, I just think it's odd. That's easy. "Chad" his wife and his friend are all aliens. Or pedestrians. One of the two. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I think it's real.
Because of sunlight angles. And the observance of distance to the object and other objects. Like trees and electric poles, houses and street lights. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I think it's real. But, Don't believe me. I'm just a pedestrian. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
july said: NDRU said: I'm not talking about the telephone wire pictures, I mean the guy's wife took pictures with her cell phone, and then his friend with his camera a couple days later. This thing moves incredibly fast when it wants to. Why would it come back to the same place a few days later? Something special about those trees & mountains? I'm not saying there's no reason, I just think it's odd. That's easy. "Chad" his wife and his friend are all aliens. Or pedestrians. One of the two. ah My Legacy
http://prince.org/msg/8/192731 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
The writing on the bottom appears to be Japanese (katakana to be exact), The only thing that makes it "alien" is the fact that it is printed backwards. For example, the third picture from the bottom shows the writing. On the third long panel on left says "raroto". Doesn't mean anything but it is still clearly Japanese.
And for being April 2007, why do those slides look so dirty, almost everyone has a digital camera or a camera on thier phone. FAKE 'A pillow covered in all our tears' | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
monkey sandwich | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Way way too small Christian Zombie Vampires | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
actionthisday said: The writing on the bottom appears to be Japanese (katakana to be exact), The only thing that makes it "alien" is the fact that it is printed backwards. For example, the third picture from the bottom shows the writing. On the third long panel on left says "raroto". Doesn't mean anything but it is still clearly Japanese.
I disagree. Like I said in a previous post I agree that it looks like katakana, but it isn't. At least not most of it. One character sort of looks like a "fu" and another looks like a backwards "so" or possibly "n". I don't see any "ro" (the lines are not connected) or "to" though (it's way too diagonal to be "to"), and the majority of the characters are clearly not katakana (to name a few that don't match; one looks like a +, another like an X, and yet another like, erm, a tipi?). Still, I think katakana probably inspired the scribbling. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
retina said: actionthisday said: The writing on the bottom appears to be Japanese (katakana to be exact), The only thing that makes it "alien" is the fact that it is printed backwards. For example, the third picture from the bottom shows the writing. On the third long panel on left says "raroto". Doesn't mean anything but it is still clearly Japanese.
I disagree. Like I said in a previous post I agree that it looks like katakana, but it isn't. At least not most of it. One character sort of looks like a "fu" and another looks like a backwards "so" or possibly "n". I don't see any "ro" (the lines are not connected) or "to" though (it's way too diagonal to be "to"), and the majority of the characters are clearly not katakana (to name a few that don't match; one looks like a +, another like an X, and yet another like, erm, a tipi?). Still, I think katakana probably inspired the scribbling. Right. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
retina said: actionthisday said: The writing on the bottom appears to be Japanese (katakana to be exact), The only thing that makes it "alien" is the fact that it is printed backwards. For example, the third picture from the bottom shows the writing. On the third long panel on left says "raroto". Doesn't mean anything but it is still clearly Japanese.
I disagree. Like I said in a previous post I agree that it looks like katakana, but it isn't. At least not most of it. One character sort of looks like a "fu" and another looks like a backwards "so" or possibly "n". I don't see any "ro" (the lines are not connected) or "to" though (it's way too diagonal to be "to"), and the majority of the characters are clearly not katakana (to name a few that don't match; one looks like a +, another like an X, and yet another like, erm, a tipi?). Still, I think katakana probably inspired the scribbling. So aliens are bad at writing katakana? 'A pillow covered in all our tears' | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
actionthisday said: retina said: I disagree. Like I said in a previous post I agree that it looks like katakana, but it isn't. At least not most of it. One character sort of looks like a "fu" and another looks like a backwards "so" or possibly "n". I don't see any "ro" (the lines are not connected) or "to" though (it's way too diagonal to be "to"), and the majority of the characters are clearly not katakana (to name a few that don't match; one looks like a +, another like an X, and yet another like, erm, a tipi?). Still, I think katakana probably inspired the scribbling. So aliens are bad at writing katakana? Yeah, I hear the education system on Mars is poorly funded these days. The whole Milky Way is going down the drain. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
retina said: actionthisday said: So aliens are bad at writing katakana? Yeah, I hear the education system on Mars is poorly funded these days. The whole Milky Way is going down the drain. 'A pillow covered in all our tears' | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
NDRU said: What was so special about that place that it went back there a few days later to be photographed again?
the white castle in that area has clam strips | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
the first pic just looked like one of these was crawling across the lens...
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
wait, I just scanned this thread again and the telephone wire thing is a dead give away that this is fake...
Did I see that right?, no time, gotta run... My art book: http://www.lulu.com/spotl...ecomicskid
VIDEO WORK: http://sharadkantpatel.com MUSIC: https://soundcloud.com/ufoclub1977 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Some more photos. Chad is worried.
May 15, 2007 Lake Tahoe and Central California - Today I received the first photo below by email from a source simply identified as "Lake Tahoe-05-05-07 MUFON Submitter 7013" that was recently posted at UFO Casebook.com. Later, I was referenced to the second image and the wife's comments. Lake Tahoe, California, May 5, 2007 by MUFON Submitter 7013 "My husband and I were in Lake Tahoe over the weekend. We left on Friday afternoon and came back Monday morning. On Saturday at about 7 PM, I was walking out to my car to get a sweater when I saw this thing in the sky. It was pretty close I think, but still above the trees. It was moving and spinning slowly, heading towards my right. "I was startled and confused at first and wanted to take a picture, but our camera was still inside so I took two pictures with my camera phone before it passed behind the roof of the house." "I ran around to the other side and was yelling to my husband to come out. We came around the other side and saw it just as it was going down behind some trees. He didn't get a good look at it, but he saw enough to convince him that it was something really strange. "We decided to take a drive around the area to see if we could see it again, but we never did. We didn't see it the next day either. Since we were renting the cabin for the weekend we didn't know any nearby residents but I would bet at least a few other people saw it. It was very visible and very strange looking. I was definitely a little freaked out but my husband didn't seem very bothered by it. He was more interested in it than scared. "He wanted to drive around a lot longer trying to find it than I did! It didn't make any noise except for a very, very faint sound that is hard to describe but sounded like something vibrating. We both heard the sound although just barely. It moved in a very straight line when it went over the house but when we saw it on the other side of the house, when it was going down behind the trees, it made a very sharp turn. It didn't move like a helicopter or airplane, it was very "exact". "We did see one person on our drive who was a few blocks away taking a walk and asked him if he saw it, and he said no. Then we asked him if he heard any weird noise and tried to describe it as best we could, and he said he might have but he wasn't sure. By this time it was at least 20 minutes since we first saw the thing so who knows. MUFON Submitter 7013" I realized the Lake Tahoe aerial craft is similar, but not identical, to another posted a week ago at the Coast to Coast AM website. Coast webmaster, Lex, and I have talked about the email letter with attached images of a very odd aerial object from a Central California resident who calls himself "Chad." He says he took the images nine days ago on May 6, 2007. That would be the next day after the Lake Tahoe photos was dated. Chad is worried about his family's safety and health since he has now seen the bizarre aerial object at least eight times from his house windows and on hikes near his home. Neighbors, he said, have also seen the unidentified aerial object. www.earthfiles.com | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
It is not known why FuNkeNsteiN capitalizes his name as he does, though some speculate sunlight deficiency caused by the most pimpified white guy afro in Nordic history.
- Lammastide | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
"Chad", you mofo. You better straighten this thing out.
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
lilgish said: Well. I've heard about something similar, but from the description of the craft, I'm suprised those guys surivived if, it if that what this was. That's why you always carry aluminum or tin foil, you might have to put it over your crown chakra.
[Edited 5/21/07 19:41pm] At least he'll be ready. looking for you in the woods tonight Switch FC SW-2874-2863-4789 (Rum&Coke) | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
superspaceboy said: Way way too small maybe its a probe droid sent from the mothership on a reconnaissance mission. a psychotic is someone who just figured out what's going on | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ufoclub said: wait, I just scanned this thread again and the telephone wire thing is a dead give away that this is fake...
Did I see that right?, no time, gotta run... No...it's the lighter cable that twists around. See it? You can see it twist around again if you follow the cable to the far left. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
FruitToAttractBears said: ufoclub said: wait, I just scanned this thread again and the telephone wire thing is a dead give away that this is fake...
Did I see that right?, no time, gotta run... No...it's the lighter cable that twists around. See it? You can see it twist around again if you follow the cable to the far left. you're right, but the photos still seem fake to me, too clear, no motion blur... My art book: http://www.lulu.com/spotl...ecomicskid
VIDEO WORK: http://sharadkantpatel.com MUSIC: https://soundcloud.com/ufoclub1977 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
july said: Chad is worried about his family's safety and health since he has now seen the bizarre aerial object at least eight times from his house windows and on hikes near his home. Neighbors, he said, have also seen the unidentified aerial object.
www.earthfiles.com So... stop feeding it and it'll stop coming 'round. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SlamGlam said: i think it is Oprah's missing IUD
...now why you gotta be messin' with Oprah? By St. Boogar and all the saints at the backside door of Purgatory! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
PurpleJedi said: SlamGlam said: i think it is Oprah's missing IUD
...now why you gotta be messin' with Oprah? cuz she will not return my calls. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
a number of other ppl have spotted this. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |