WillyWonka said: Controversial changes are brewing in the world of candy, specifically in the area of mass market chocolate in the USA.
There is currently a petition to the FDA, being supported by the US Chocolate Industry and other groups, requesting the FDA allow for certain changes in the standard of identity for chocolate. This change in standard would mean it would be legal and allowable for chocolate manufacturers to use vegetable fat substitutes in place of cocoa butter (cocoa butter costs three times as much as cheap, low-quality vegetable fat), but yet still label the resulting inferior 'mockolate' product as chocolate. More about the petition here: http://dontmesswithourcho...ittard.com certainly u can do something about it, Mr. Wonka!!! noituloveryxesevolasildnaydnew
is the water warm enough? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
WillyWonka said: Controversial changes are brewing in the world of candy, specifically in the area of mass market chocolate in the USA.
There is currently a petition to the FDA, being supported by the US Chocolate Industry and other groups, requesting the FDA allow for certain changes in the standard of identity for chocolate. This change in standard would mean it would be legal and allowable for chocolate manufacturers to use vegetable fat substitutes in place of cocoa butter (cocoa butter costs three times as much as cheap, low-quality vegetable fat), but yet still label the resulting inferior 'mockolate' product as chocolate. More about the petition here: http://dontmesswithourcho...ittard.com I'm going to sign this. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
weepingwall said: WillyWonka said: BUT NOT WILLY WONKA"S SWEETS HE MAKES THE BEST KIND!!..plus i have this bad cavity in my tooth so i like avoid candy. Sorry about your cavity-ravaged tooth. I hope it is taken care of soon. (Let me know when it's fixed -- I'll send you something delicious.) | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
applekisses said: WillyWonka said: Controversial changes are brewing in the world of candy, specifically in the area of mass market chocolate in the USA.
There is currently a petition to the FDA, being supported by the US Chocolate Industry and other groups, requesting the FDA allow for certain changes in the standard of identity for chocolate. This change in standard would mean it would be legal and allowable for chocolate manufacturers to use vegetable fat substitutes in place of cocoa butter (cocoa butter costs three times as much as cheap, low-quality vegetable fat), but yet still label the resulting inferior 'mockolate' product as chocolate. More about the petition here: http://dontmesswithourcho...ittard.com I'm going to sign this. me too - i'm not paying for any bootleg chocolate! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
LisasBrush said: WillyWonka said: Controversial changes are brewing in the world of candy, specifically in the area of mass market chocolate in the USA.
There is currently a petition to the FDA, being supported by the US Chocolate Industry and other groups, requesting the FDA allow for certain changes in the standard of identity for chocolate. This change in standard would mean it would be legal and allowable for chocolate manufacturers to use vegetable fat substitutes in place of cocoa butter (cocoa butter costs three times as much as cheap, low-quality vegetable fat), but yet still label the resulting inferior 'mockolate' product as chocolate. More about the petition here: http://dontmesswithourcho...ittard.com certainly u can do something about it, Mr. Wonka!!! Oh I'm telling them how bad an idea it is, but I'm often not taken seriously. Many of my peers in the confectionery industry consider me bonkers - I can't understand it! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
WillyWonka said: Oh I'm telling them how bad an idea it is, but I'm often not taken seriously. Many of my peers in the confectionery industry consider me bonkers - I can't understand it!
that's ridiculous! u have a frickin chocolate river! how can they not respect that shit?!?!?!?!???? noituloveryxesevolasildnaydnew
is the water warm enough? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
applekisses said: WillyWonka said: Controversial changes are brewing in the world of candy, specifically in the area of mass market chocolate in the USA.
There is currently a petition to the FDA, being supported by the US Chocolate Industry and other groups, requesting the FDA allow for certain changes in the standard of identity for chocolate. This change in standard would mean it would be legal and allowable for chocolate manufacturers to use vegetable fat substitutes in place of cocoa butter (cocoa butter costs three times as much as cheap, low-quality vegetable fat), but yet still label the resulting inferior 'mockolate' product as chocolate. More about the petition here: http://dontmesswithourcho...ittard.com I'm going to sign this. Thank you, dearest lady. Every name helps! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Anxiety said: applekisses said: I'm going to sign this. me too - i'm not paying for any bootleg chocolate! You need to become a moderator for the chocolate industry! (And thank you for voicing your opinion against the petition.) | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
LisasBrush said: WillyWonka said: Oh I'm telling them how bad an idea it is, but I'm often not taken seriously. Many of my peers in the confectionery industry consider me bonkers - I can't understand it!
that's ridiculous! u have a frickin chocolate river! how can they not respect that shit?!?!?!?!???? These young business-suited upstarts nowadays don't understand such things as chocolate rivers, chocolate-mixing waterfalls and Oompa Loompas. That's why people like yourself are so very special. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
WillyWonka said: These young business-suited upstarts nowadays don't understand such things as chocolate rivers, chocolate-mixing waterfalls and Oompa Loompas.
That's why people like yourself are so very special. awww, shucks! i guess it's not surprising that upstart lunkheads who want to use vegetable fat substitutes in place of cocoa butter wouldn't understand your magical world. it's only mountains and a chocolate sea -- life's a parade! noituloveryxesevolasildnaydnew
is the water warm enough? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
NDRU said: Illustrator said: That's okay.
From what I heard, The Vegans can't stand the Martians & vise-a-versa. It's practically an intergalactic Hatfields & McCoys between these two species. That made me Snicker | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ZombieKitten said: NDRU said: That made me Snicker Cute! I will love you forever and you will never be forgotten - L.A.F. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
katt said: Teacher said: No more crap chocolates for y'all
hush ur mouth | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Mars U-turn on animal rennet plan
Press Association Sunday May 20 Link:http://www.guardian.co.uk...19,00.html Mars has abandoned its plan to use animal products in chocolate, apologising to vegetarians who organised a campaign against the change. The company announced last week it was changing the whey used in some chocolate and ice cream from a vegetarian source to one with traces of rennet, an animal enzyme. The Vegetarian Society protested on behalf of three million vegetarians in the UK and asked people to "express their concern" to Masterfoods, which produces the Mars, Snickers, Maltesers and Galaxy brands affected by the change. Within a week of the decision being announced, more than 6,000 people had called and emailed the Mars UK switchboard, which usually receives 500 comments per week. Forty MPs also signed a petition "to voice their disquiet", said Mars UK. Fiona Dawson, managing director of the Mars snack business in the UK, said: "The consumer is our boss and we had lots of feedback from consumers who were unhappy about the change. It became very clear, very quickly that we had made a mistake, for which I am sorry. "There are three million vegetarians in the UK and not only did we disappoint them but we upset a lot of the consumers. We have listened to their views and have decided to reverse our decision." The company, which had said admitting that it could not guarantee all products as suitable for vegetarians was a "principled decision", said it will begin changing its recipe back immediately for the best-selling four brands and at a later date for Minstrels. Ms Dawson added: "We made the original decision in order to broaden our supply base to ensure the availability of our supply, but we underestimated the impact this would have. "I personally commit to make sure that the products we changed will be suitable for vegetarians again in the near future." Dr Annette Pinner, chief executive of the Vegetarian Society, said: "We cannot endorse any planned actions by the company until we receive detailed assurances about the ingredients and processes involved in production but we are delighted that Mars UK has been honest enough to mark the beginning of National Vegetarian Week by admitting that it made a mistake." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
good news , cheers | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Teacher said: katt said: hush ur mouth we now can still eat rubbish chocolate | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |