Who uses Flickr?

I've just got on it, it's amazing! It's SO much better than photobucket! I love it! Plus it's so easy to mass-upload photos, I've just been adding and adding and adding all day.

Who's on it? Let's add each other!

http://www.flickr.com/peo...okymuffin/

Igot it!

Flickr rules. I have begged everybody I know to use it instead of the other crappy photo sites.

not yet

But now I need to pay for an account. I hate that.

i just got all up in the photobucket and i like it just fine. i guess i'll have to check this flickr deal out.

Spookymuffin said:

why? mine is free

Anx said:

Flickr is sooooo ooo o o oooo much better, honestly.

HereToRockYourWorld said:

dammit. now i have to transfer all my photos to this new thingie. that, or just wait till after my next major photo op and just start using it from then on. bleh. hulk hate picture machines.

Thanks Spooky, it will be handy for my travels.

Anx said:

I know, it sucks.

I really, really want to get all of the invasion photos collected on one Flickr account. . . Flickr is SO PERFECT for that sort of thing, with the organization and tagging and stuff being so good. . . but OMG, getting them all uploaded is such a lot of work.

HereToRockYourWorld said:

i just organized all my iceland pics into (pretty much) one album, then had a photo book made of them via photobucket. it was pretty cheap and very easy. i'd LOVE to put a book together of all our invasion photos. that would be HOTT.

mdiver said:

I've added loads of photos, and it has a 200 photo limit. Add me!

Anx said:

Get the Flickr Uploadr program - you add all the photos into the app, tag them, resize them, organise them - then upload all at once!

Spookymuffin said:

How much?

REDFEATHERS said:

£12 a year. I'll buy it in 2 weeks when I've been paid for my job, but right now I really can't afford it!

Spookymuffin said:

I checked on mine and it onl has a monthly upload limit

Anx said:

Yah, it's nice to have the book option. Though I never look at paper photos anymore, I realize that some people do ().

It would just be really cool because if each pic were properly tagged, you could click on a person's name and see all of the photos that include them across all invasions, or look at pics by invasion, or by city, or by year. . .
[Edited 4/9/07 15:34pm]

HereToRockYourWorld said:

mdiver said:

I know.

HereToRockYourWorld said:

yeah, the whole electronic thing is better, but it's nice when people visit or when i'm visiting my mom, to have something on paper instead of crowding around a monitor. plus if my computer crashes in some fatally evil way, i would be sad. yeah, i know: BACK UP. but i'm busy. i have candy to eat, DVDs to watch.

i like the whole arrange by: function idea though. that sounds pretty awesome.

mdiver said:

How many photos you got on it?

Anx said:

Yeah, I understand.

It would also be cool 'cause the way that Flickr displays a group of tags for an account is to put them in a paragraph alphabetically and then vary the size of the font by the number of times that tag shows up. So, there would be this paragraph with all of our names (and whatever other tags) in various sizes, and then you'd get to "Karen" and her name would take up half the screen.

HereToRockYourWorld said:

i'm not sure if that kind of encouragement is altogether necessary.

Spookymuffin said:

You look ridiculous, which is why I enjoy you so much.

live4lust said: