Do you sometimes ask a friend to read something, even though they never read the Org?

IceNine said:

Catherine Deneuve doesn't think she's hot either.

If you could pick a film director who best defines the spirit of your posting activity, who would it be?

Aerogram said:

Posting, like most things in life, is a black cloud that must be overcome in order to bring meaning to anything. In the absence of a god to judge the worth of my posts, I am left with the responsibility of accepting the glory or the shame of my posts.

It's all so meaningless, isn't it?

Your screen name is Orwellian. Do you feel alienated? Is it worse in real life than on the Org?

wendy or lisa?

Aerogram said:

She is wrong...

She was just too damned hot in Belle De Jour.

Aerogram said:

I have never tried to impose my stupidity on anyone who was not willingly looking at it on the org of their own volition.

Aerogram said:

That would be Edward Wood, Jr. He was the shittiest director of all-time.

IceNine said:

Some say nothing can ever be meaningless as long as there are imperatives like survival and reproduction... that the act of survival creates its own genuine meaning... Like if there's a fire in a house, it's not meaningless that you can escape horrible pain and death. Don't you agree?

IceNine said:

You can't pick him because I already did.

Aerogram said:

There is no real connection between human beings... in the absence of god, we form bonds by communication and I do not communicate with others very well.

This quote pretty much sums it up:

"The last philosopher I call myself, for I am the last human being. No one converses with me beside myself and my voice reaches me as the voice of one dying. With thee, beloved voice, with thee, the last remembered breath of all human happiness, let me discourse, even if it is only for another hour. Because of thee, I delude myself as to my solitude and lie my way back to multiplicity and love, for my heart shies away from believing that love is dead. It cannot bear the icy shivers of loneliest solitude. It compels me to speaks as though I were two." - Friedrich Nietzsche

SkletonKee said:

Wendy... but they are great together... let's not separate them...

Aerogram said:

It is meaningful to you, as being burned up would really suck, but there is no real meaning to other people other than an empathetic feeling and the hopes and superstitions that make them wish you well. Knock on wood and such...

I don't know though... maybe you should ask Kierkegaard.

Vocation vs. Evocation? And how does this relate to the downfall of Prince's recent music...

Aerogram said:

Okay... I will go with Orson Wells because he was a big fat-ass too!

SkletonKee said:

I think that music is now simply a vocation to Prince and that he has lost much of his imagination.

That poor fucker needs to pull his head out of his ass and listen to Wendy and Lisa's work... "Girl Bros" is a million times better than anything he has done in the last 10 years or so.

IceNine said:

According to an article I read today, it could be that when it comes to communication, you are more visual than auditory. In this case, it means getting more out of words when they are read or written than when they are heard or spoken.

I had to review a translation that said "You don't understand jokes when you listen to them, only when you read them." That was the mark of a visual person..

IceNine said:

So you are really saying that if a tree falls in the forest and nobody's there, it doesn't make a sound?

Ladies and gentlemen, there will be a twenty minute intermission while Tony goes out to get some very nutritious food. He asked me to let you know that he would be back soon.

Aerogram said:

Whoever said that oughta b shot!


Allow me.

Aerogram said:

Sound is simply energy and that energy is released in the absence of observation, therefore it does the same thing whether we observe it or not. The difference is in the reception of the stimulus... if nothing can percieve the sound, there is no sound, only the energetic waveform.

Excuse me, I have a question 4 ice9!!!

*sticks microphone in ice9's face*

Umm..sir? *knocks another reporter out of the way*

The people were wondering...if u were asked 2 take over prince.org, thereby replacing Mr. Ben Margolin, would u do it?

If so, what would u change about the org? Would it be overran by bureaucrats? Would u lobby 4 better funding if the org started looking real shabby? Would u put partisanship behind u and work 4 the good of the common people here at the org?

..and what do u think about lockboxes?

Nep2nes said:

theC
To the reporter(Neps)...Why is it each time you post the star rating goes down???Do you know why this is happening???

Nep2nes said:

A fine question.

I would not be capable of the great feats that Ben has repeatedly done and the org would not be in capable hands if I took it over.

However, if I did take over, I would certainly campaign for volunteer work on org overhauls and I would certainly avoid all partisanship and I would allow true democracy and brotherhood!

Nep2nes said:

I think that they should be locked.

Next question.

Gene Rodenberry vs. Ray Bradbury?

SkletonKee said:

I think that Ray Bradbury would take him in the middle rounds... he has the superior jab and a great left hook.

IceNine said:

Wait...sir...SIR??? *gets swept away in the paparazzi*

U know, if u dont tell me the real story, I can always make it up on my own...


So y dont u tell me the truth...(the truth)...(the truth)...Y DONT U TELL ME THE TRUTH!