New topic
Printableherbthe4 said: SummerRain said: Once again, Bush will commit mass murder against innoncent victims if we attack Iraq. Attacking Iraq will be the worst mistake in the history of the United States since slavery. There is no evidence agaisnt Suddam that states he is responsible or assisted in the "alleged" attack of the WTC on September 11, 2001. There is no evidence against Suddam that supports Bush's theory that he is supplying Al Queda with chemical weapons.
Bush needs to be impeached! He has stolen retirement funds, he supported the inflation of worthless stock prices and dumped mass of amounts of those stocks back into the stock market to get rich, and he lied to American people about cutting taxes. He gave a tax refund and demanded it back when Americans filed their taxes. He inflated oil prices and promoted policies that only protect the rich. He exploited congress and the "alleged" September 11 attack when congress gave him a blank check because he spent billions of tax dollars that congress can't trace. He promoted the practice of disregarding affirmitive action when he stole the election and stated that he was against it. He has shown a lack of interest for future social security recipients by not focusing and creating policies that secure the existence of the fund for the working class of today. Now he wants to start a war, why? Bush wants the attention of his scandulous adminstrations to be camoflaged by introducing the concept of war and creating fear and worry in the American people. Every action taken by Bush has been self beneficial. HE is a racist and attacking muslims won't cover of up the fact that he can't find Bin ladin. There are 7 million muslims in this country, and over a billion muslims world wide. One muslim state has weapons of mass destruction. Attacking an innocent man, in this case, will only put muslims on a alert for racial voilence against them. Bush is a racist, and his ideas shouldn't be acknowledged because they are meant to suppress the weak, promote world governmnent, and separate the country. No, the United States should not attack Iraq!!! Ever think about the field day all of these Conservative, Right wing martyrs would be having with Clinton if even HALF of this shit had occured under his watch? Or if this war was his idea? I cn hear it now: " He's just tryting to get his approval ratings up and deflect attention from his sex life." Where does this end?  Why do people refer to Clinton when Bush's dirty laundry is hung out for people to see? | |
- E-mail - orgNote -  Report post to moderator |
TheMax said: Anyone, whatever their politics or nationality, who says, "alleged" attack when referring to September 11 needs to have their head examined.
"Allegedly" 4 commercial jetliners where hijacked by a gang of murderous, hate-filled, drooling, maniacal religous fanatics who "allegedly" crashed the planes, "allegedly", into towers 1 and 2 of the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, which is "allegedly" in Washington D.C., and a piece of farmland in Pennsylvania after an "alleged" route to the White House or the Capitol Building, both of which are "allegedly" also in Washington D.C. "Allegedly" almost 3,000 people died in what is "alleged" to be a terrorist attack, of a most cowardly and diabolical nature, on the "alleged" country of the United States of America. "Allegedly", it sucked by any definition, and "allegedly", it's all true. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SummerRain said: ["Don't be lazy, scroll up and read it yo damn self!"-NPS] Dayyum grl, you GO! [This message was edited Tue Sep 3 14:07:02 PDT 2002 by NuPwrSoul] "That...magic, the start of something revolutionary-the Minneapolis Sound, we should cherish it and not punish prince for not being able to replicate it."-Dreamshaman32 | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
TheMax said: Anyone, whatever their politics or nationality, who says, "alleged" attack when referring to September 11 needs to have their head examined.
You can't call urself a man of justice if u convict a incident simply from an opinion rather than by fact. How can u deteremine that an isolated incident is an attack if there is no evidence against the attacker? Noone has testified that Bin ladin is the intelligence behind what happen in NYC September 11, 2001. Tim McVeigh blew up the federal building in Okolahoma city and that incident was not considered an attack on America, yet thousands of Americans were killed in that incident as well. It is not a coincidence that Americans are quick to catergorize indiviidual acts of violence against PEOPLE in this country based soley on their race. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
No... free ur mind | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
herbthe4 said: bonojr said: Yes. We kick Saddam and his minions out of power. Terrorism shouldn't be supported by this madman, this psychopath, which is exactly what he is. The Bush administration will fully explain and show evidence of Iraqi bio/chem/possibly nucleaur weapons development, probably after Sept 11th. Very soon now, watch the magic. Let's bring the virtues of freedom to these suffering folks under a tyrannical dictator.
Pass the M-4 auto rifle... Democracy: Love it OR DIE! So why does China enjoy such a cozy relationship with our Govt.? I recall watching protesting, unarmed students being tramples by tanks a few years back under the rule of the last generation's "evil empire' - the Red Commie menace. you don't suppose they're less evil because they they have no oil...? Lots of nations have nuclear weapons. In fact, WE have more than anyone, and so far, we're the only one's that have dropped any, so don't hand me that bullshit. How can we look the rest of the world in the eye with a straight face and talk about the eveils of "weapons of mass destruction" when the whole fucking world knows what happened in Japan? We sound like the cheating husband that wants to beat his wife because she made eyes at some dude in a restaraunt. We can't invade a Nation based on what they MIGHT do. By that logic, I could shoot my neighbor in the face with a sawed off shotgun because he MIGHT rob me or he MIGHT rape my girlfriend. I can make a list as long as my arm of things we can address RIGHT HERE AT HOME rather than worry about what the "Madman of the Week" might do wiht all of thise weapons that WE GAVE HIM. So the U.S. has nuclear weapons so it's even. Are you serious? Ahh once again the relativists speak. Keep following that pathology and you'll ultimately reject reason. The U.S. isn't Iraq. If you don't know the difference, the common sense of difference in history, well, there's another for the therapists. This isn't about what might happen, it's about what already did and will. This isn't big news and it's not to hard to figure out. Every terrorism expert will tell you the same thing --that believe it or not, we actually have terrorists out there (oh my!) who want to destroy this country, many of whom are already here, and will most probably succeed in another attack. As laid out in the Bush Doctrine, we're going after countries that support them. Read some stuff on terrorism, the intelligence community. Syria, the Bekaa Valley, camps in Sudan, Iraq. There are groups being trained and abetted by States. China isn't actively going out to recruit terrorists with supplied w.m.d to pummel the U.S. Iraq should have been dealt with long ago, but Clinton didn't want to deal with much of anything, did he? I need to quit wasting my time here, honestly. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
No! good point CarrieLee. ^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^
Being happy doesn't mean that everything is perfect, it means you've decided to look beyond the imperfections... unknown | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SummerRain said: Once again, Bush will commit mass murder against innoncent victims if we attack Iraq. Attacking Iraq will be the worst mistake in the history of the United States since slavery. There is no evidence agaisnt Suddam that states he is responsible or assisted in the "alleged" attack of the WTC on September 11, 2001. There is no evidence against Suddam that supports Bush's theory that he is supplying Al Queda with chemical weapons.
Bush needs to be impeached! He has stolen retirement funds, he supported the inflation of worthless stock prices and dumped mass of amounts of those stocks back into the stock market to get rich, and he lied to American people about cutting taxes. He gave a tax refund and demanded it back when Americans filed their taxes. He inflated oil prices and promoted policies that only protect the rich. He exploited congress and the "alleged" September 11 attack when congress gave him a blank check because he spent billions of tax dollars that congress can't trace. He promoted the practice of disregarding affirmitive action when he stole the election and stated that he was against it. He has shown a lack of interest for future social security recipients by not focusing and creating policies that secure the existence of the fund for the working class of today. Now he wants to start a war, why? Bush wants the attention of his scandulous adminstrations to be camoflaged by introducing the concept of war and creating fear and worry in the American people. Every action taken by Bush has been self beneficial. HE is a racist and attacking muslims won't cover of up the fact that he can't find Bin ladin. There are 7 million muslims in this country, and over a billion muslims world wide. One muslim state has weapons of mass destruction. Attacking an innocent man, in this case, will only put muslims on a alert for racial voilence against them. Bush is a racist, and his ideas shouldn't be acknowledged because they are meant to suppress the weak, promote world governmnent, and separate the country. No, the United States should not attack Iraq!!! Uh...what? We're attacking a regime that supports terrorism and many suffering Iraqi people will support it. It's always after that fact we get the big conspiracy stories of how all this terrorist stuff was a ruse to rise to power. No. The largest group of muslims is in Indonesia by the way, ah but he's racist against Asians as well, right? | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
herbthe4 said: Does ANYONE think we should do this? I've been listening to this bullshit for weeks now.
I vote "NO." I haven't yet heard in the media the real reason we were attacked on 9/11, and IRAQ is not a threat to us. And there's no evidence that they gassed the kurds.NO Fear is the mind-killer. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Yes. -------
A census taker once tried to test me. I ate his liver with some fava beans and a nice chianti... "I've just had an apostrophe!" "I think you mean an epiphany..." | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
herbthe4 said: TheMax said: Anyone, whatever their politics or nationality, who says, "alleged" attack when referring to September 11 needs to have their head examined.
"Allegedly" 4 commercial jetliners where hijacked by a gang of murderous, hate-filled, drooling, maniacal religous fanatics who "allegedly" crashed the planes, "allegedly", into towers 1 and 2 of the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, which is "allegedly" in Washington D.C., and a piece of farmland in Pennsylvania after an "alleged" route to the White House or the Capitol Building, both of which are "allegedly" also in Washington D.C. "Allegedly" almost 3,000 people died in what is "alleged" to be a terrorist attack, of a most cowardly and diabolical nature, on the "alleged" country of the United States of America. "Allegedly", it sucked by any definition, and "allegedly", it's all true. Don't forget the "alleged" passport perfectly preserved (In at times 2000oC heat) of one of the "alleged" suicide bombers. That was just hilarious piece of planted proof/propaganda at the time. If Mr Bush wants to take Saddam out in the name of democracy then he should be consistent at least and do it in every country worldwide with slightly corrupt regimes. Will he? Thought not... [This message was edited Wed Sep 4 19:58:51 PDT 2002 by Essence] | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
NO! | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
YES, INVADE IRAQ AND MAKE SURE THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE DIE.
IF NOT, ITS NOT REALLY WORTH IT, IS IT? | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |