It is in my humble opinion a matter of great distress that despite the numerous opportunities to properly utilize the full extent of the vocabulary and academic methods of expression acquired by us over the course of decades and the unfathomable potential of this medium in which we articulate our thoughts to properly engage in exhaustive discourse with full use of sentence length and complexity, the outcome of our combined attempts and joint efforts should most approprietly and what I deem most regretfully be labelled as a colossal and thus devastating failure to meet the pragmatic and noble goals established by proper etiquette. Is your position on the matter in accordance with mine or has a seed of incongruence been planted from which a schism could possibly arise?

Dude, he's just speaking English.

Spookymuffin said:

pretentious fauxiespeak =

Spookymuffin said:

From this inexplicably brief statement in which your position is not elaborated upon but merely summarized, I draw the conclusion that the latter part of the question of the original post is what is most consistent with your thoughts on this highly delicate matter?

Obviously erudite vernacular bores the shit out of me.

retina said:

The needlessly elaborate syntax and lexis you incorporate in your writing is indicative of your sexuality, you batty-boy.

evenstar3 said:

I fully agree that a certain portion of the implications of the chosen form of expression by the person referred to in your post are indeed sexual by nature.

CarrieMpls said:

Is the seemingly presumptuous emotional response expressed above indicative of your overall state of mind or is it a purposely crafted retort to the discussion at hand?

Imago said:

Imago said:

Is the excrement of which you speak a mere metaphor or a tangible byproduct of a previous intake of nourishment?

will you shut the fuck up?

Spookymuffin said:

The expletive to which you wish me to bring closure is better suited for personal and private enjoyment between two or more participants.

retina said:

No, it's not. It's better suited to shut up annoying people.

One might allow oneself to inquire as to the whereabouts of the titular orger. As preoccupied as this currently geographically challenged individual may be, one would assume that his participation would be as imminent as it is warranted, in light of the thread creation coinciding with his startling and abrupt reappearance.

I simply can not make it past the second word of the first sentence in everyone's posts in this thread.

JustErin said:

I simply get a headache

I'm completely lost.

This thread makes my brain hurt.

JustErin said:

The obstacle is constituted not by the prevalent abstractions nor by the overwrought wording but by the destructive and superfluous combination of the overextended series of morphological units and occasional convoluted syntax.

retina said:

The obstacle what?

the best were the times he did it on yahoo voice chat with insults aimed at Dan.

JustErin said:

The sentence-completing linguistic appendix that is omitted but suggested in your query has previously been fully elaborated in the previous addition to this ongoing discussion.

jerseykrs said:

A meticulous arrangement of language-units inferring a less than favourable conclusion about the receiver of the completed phrase can make the latter go largely undetected but simultaneously induce laughter through its comic dynamic between the overt and the implied.

I just wanted to share the latest picture of my dirty underwear. I most likely was thinking about Fauxie when I soiled it.

JustErin said:

I do understand Spookymuffin posts.....

Fauxie said:

come on, say something clever!