Spats said:

Some of those things, yes, there is no deying that...but "bad boys" also usually have an incredible amount of sex appeal and are also typically amazing in bed and real dirty - just the way 99.9% of women want it. They absolutely do not give everything most women want, but they certainly deliver on some things.

That's what makes one type a "jerk" or "loser" and the other a "bad boy".

Thanks something.

There is an easy solution to dealing with Spats' posts that contain a direct insult. If you really take offense, report them and they will probably be snipped.

JustErin said:

Yes, exactly.

JustErin said:

good idea



why didn't i just do that before!?

gemini13 said:

And that description fits me. I am a bad boy.

"bad boys" also usually have an incredible amount of sex appeal and are also typically amazing in bed and real dirty

something said:

But i don't directly insult anyone...i do it indirectly. it's an art form, actually.

no, the description does not fit you

you've fallen from the "bad boy" category


to the "loser" category


which explains no sacktime for the past year!

no, the description does not fit you

you've fallen from the "bad boy" category


to the "loser" category


which explains no sacktime for the past year!

no, the description does not fit you

you've fallen from the "bad boy" category


to the "loser" category


which explains no sacktime for the past year!

something said:

sorry, you're wrong there. he can have sacktime anytime he wants if he plays sissy games.

something said:

I have explained why there has been no sacktime. I could have had sacktime with the plain jane coffee shop girl and The Babe.

purplerein said:

That's true.

The issue isn't even about if you are getting/might have sex. It's what you do and don't do in the sack that does not put you anywhere even remotely close to being the "bad boy" that you all of a sudden really long to be.

Sorry you are having such difficulty understanding what we are saying.

I think you need a good old fashioned motherly hug.

xplnyrslf said:

I don't need a motherly hug. I need a hug that will lead to sacktime with a mom look alike type woman.

Spats said:

no

you've speculated that you could have gotten sacktime


there is no definitive proof

never has been

never will be



simply because it does not exist

something said:

No i am pretty damn sure i would have got sacktime with the Plain Jane Coffee Shop Girl if i had played along. And the babe pretty much admitted it without admitting it in our long talk a few weeks back.

Spats said:

and yet, you had no sacktime.

Spats said:

and yet, you had no sacktime.

purplerein said:

It was my choice with the Plan Jane Coffee Shop Girl. The amount of attention she paid to me? Come on. And the fact that she barely said two words to me ever again after her i turned her down for a date. The evidence is all there.

And i wanted and want sacktime with the babe but it has not happened for a few reasons. Not really my fault though.

purplerein said:

It was my choice with the Plan Jane Coffee Shop Girl. The amount of attention she paid to me? Come on. And the fact that she barely said two words to me ever again after i turned her down for a date. The evidence is all there.

And i wanted and want sacktime with the babe but it has not happened for a few reasons. Not really my fault though.
[Edited 11/16/06 14:02pm]

Spats said:

[Edited 11/16/06 14:06pm]

luv4all7 said:

She should.

And yes, I can do that...but only for you.

mdiver said:

jone70 said:

See ya tommorrow.

Spats said:

Spats, I'm very disappointed in you. Did you venture into P:M&M today? I don't think you did...I don't see any posts in your profile that indicate you did.

All talk and no action...girls don't like that.