luv4all7 said:

Exactly. Britney is not skin and bones. She has a realistic body unlike Paris, etc,.She does not starve herself or anything. Everything Brit eats seems to settle in all the right places.

Spats said:

Yeah. Lucky bitch!

gemini13 said:

luv4all7 said:

I'm really not shaped like her at all. I'm more of a Beyonce shape, with broad shoulders and hips, the big old thighs and small waist...and luckily, when I gain weight I stay proportioned.

But I'll never look like Brit...and that's ok.

luv4all7 said:

Brit's not dumb. Just misunderstood.

She has godawful taste in men though. She has to work on that.

....
[Edited 11/15/06 19:17pm]

Spats said:

I agree.

Her mistakes are mistakes lotsa chics make. She's just in the spotlite.

And Erin please, most dudes would pick Beyonce over Brit anyday. You just keep that waist tiny and you'll be aight.
[Edited 11/15/06 19:17pm]

luv4all7 said:

"Her mistakes are mistakes lotsa chics make"

You can say that again. Women cannot seem to stay away from bad guys. From the time they are teenagers right into adult hood. What a phenomenon.

Spats said:

Well, thats not actually what I was talking about. I meant that, a lot of the stuff the media has a field day with are honest to goodness mistakes anyone could make. Well, driving with your baby in your lap is wrong, but the other stuff, coulda happened to anyone. She's a young girl, give her a break yanno?

As far as girls picking bad guys.....I mean obviously not ALL women do that, but a fair amount do.

I am one of them. I was engaged to a really nice guy at one time, but he was TOO nice. Like a pushover, yanno?

I can't speak for other chics, just for myself, but I tend to want to HELP people. So I get involved with an asshole, wanting to nurture and care for him. Not even just assholes, but any ole headcase, and I'm all over it. I do, what you said in another thread that you don't like, I wanna TAKE CARE of my man. I just always end up picking men that take it for granted and take advantage of it.

Spats said:

Every time someone talks about being romantic for their wife or girlfriend, you call them a "romantic sissy boy", or just refer to anyone that fits that characteristic the same way. I happen to love my wife and would do anything for her. I love the way we are together when she melts because of things I've done for her. I give her flowers from time to time. I give her heart-felt cards that express how I feel about her. This fits your description of the "romantic sissy boy", so every time you use that term is an insult to me and others who love their wives or girlfriends in the same manner. You offend me.

Come to think of it, you've also had the nerve to post on peoples' marriage and engagement threads with derogatory remarks about marriage in general. I mean, use some fucking common sense. If you don't like engagements or marriage, then don't post on the damn thread and take away the happiness that they're enjoying and should rightfully have. Either congratulate them or get the fuck out.

And you don't think you're offensive. The ignorance just astounds me.

TMPletz said:

I agree that it was probably not right to post my opinions and stuff on silly marriage threads and stuff like that. And i have not done that lately.

If you love doing that romantic BS then you should not be insulted by what i call guys like that. It should not bother you.

I don't love any girl and i would not do anything in the world for them. I can't stand it when girls get all mushy and melt and i don't give flowers. You and i are opposites. I don't spoil my girlfriends with stuff like that. I think i treat them good but i don't over do it. You don't want them taking you for granted or have them thinking you are too nice. I have taken them out to dinner and to movies and stuff like that though. That's pretty much as mushy as i get. And that's not mushy at all.

luv4all7 said:

A fair amount do? I would say that 95% of women out there have hooked up with a jerk/bad boy etc, etc at some point in their life. I think it's part of being a woman.

Spats said:

Since you are such an expert on sociology and psychology, please enlighten us on what "jerk/bad boy" behaviour is.

JustErin said:

Everyone knows what that is.

Spats said:

It's subjective...so no, it's not all the same for everyone.

I asked for your definition.

JustErin said:

Guys that treat women badly in one way or another. Not nice guys.

Spats said:

Holy shit, stop frigging tip toeing around the subject.

Give me specific examples of what constitutes "treating women badly".

JustErin said:

Yeah, I'm kinda waitin' too.

JustErin said:

Cheating on them, taking them for granted, not doing nice things for them, only treating them good when they want something, taking and not giving, arrogant, bullying them, ignoring them, etc, etc. Those things that would fit the the jerk/bad boy label.

Spats said:

!!!!!

K, thanks for answering.

TMPletz said:

spats made todd swear

oh

my

god

Spats said:

you DO realize that (perhaps except for the cheating thing though we don't know that for certain) you just described yourself to a tee??

"taking them for granted"

"not doing nice things for them"

"only treating them good when they want something"

"taking and not giving"

"arrogant"

"ignoring them"

something said:

He'll say that he doesn't do any of those things and then add something about not being not being a sissy, romantic boy while doing all the good things he thinks he does.

But what he fails to see is that it doesn't matter what his perception of himself is, it's how others perceive him that really determines whether he is looked at as a one of the jerks (but certainly not a bad boy).

something said:

I don't bully them either. I don't think i take them for granted. I take them out to dinner and the movies. Stuff like that. Those are nice things.

Only treating them good when they want I something? I have been guilty of that.

Taking and not giving? Depends on what you consider giving.

Arrogant. I don't act arrogant towards them.

I don't ignore them that i know of.

JustErin said:

Bad Boys do the same things.

Spats said:

Some of those things, yes, there is no deying that...but "bad boys" also usually have an incredible amount of sex appeal and are also typically amazing in bed and real dirty - just the way 99.9% of women want it. They absolutely do not give everything most women want, but they certainly deliver on some things.

That's what makes one type a "jerk" or "loser" and the other a "bad boy".

JustErin said:

I have sex appeal. I have had plenty of pretty girls. And they have never complained about sacktime. I don't give everything women want but i do deliver on a few things. Hey!! I am a bad boy!!!

Spats is Gotta Let it Go's alter ego!

Spats said:

A total dud in bed would never, ever be considered a bad boy. More like a prudish loser.

But whatever you say, Champ. Keep reaching for that gold star.

I know that you will eventually find a woman that is best suited for your wants and needs.

JustErin said:

Who is a total dud in bed??? The girls never complained about the actual sacktime. Just the cuddling crap.